Kris Deugau <kdeu...@vianet.ca> writes: > micah anderson wrote: >> Allen Coates <znab...@cidercounty.org.uk> writes: >>> The web page https://www.abuseat.org/faq.html (about half-way down the >>> page) >>> has an honest - and fairly recent - appraisal of a number of DNSBLs. >> >> Its a little outdated... >> >> For example: >> >> Invaluement DNSBL >> [Note: Commercial] ivmURI and ivmSIP are good solid and >> professionally operated lists. ivmURI is a URI (domain) DNSBL like >> SURBL or URIBL or DBL, with high effectiveness (comparable with >> DBL/URIBL/SURBL), extremely low false positives, and quick to >> list. ivmSIP is a IP-based DNSBL which is particularly good at >> catching "new" emitters. Its FP rate is quite low. Neither of which >> should be considered substitutes for Spamhaus Zen/Spamcop, but do >> complement them well. >> >> They no longer exist. > > Not sure where you're looking, but we have an active subscription for > Invaluement and the datafeed files all have timestamps within the last > ~10 minutes or so. > > https://www.invaluement.com/
ah, the link on https://www.abuseat.org/faq.html goes to: https://dnsbl.invaluement.com/ which is not a valid site. -- micah
