Hello Henry,
I am running my own email-server as well and can connect to t-online. I assume
Viktor is right that they somehow check the imprint of a parallel web site. My
website does not indicate I am offering email service commercially, which in
fact I do only to organizations I know
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 02:08:57AM +, Henry R wrote:
> But t-online.de keep blocking me. I have contacted them twice and got the
> same answer:
>
>We only allow evidently commercial or similar operators to connect
>to our mailservers. So, as a private user please use an SMTP relay
>
I'm going to toy w/ that one tomorrow, I don't recall seeing in your original
post though the plumbing to config postfix to use the postgress db. I was going
to send a mail on that tomorrow, but while you are here
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org on
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 06:37:00AM +, Sean Hennessey wrote:
> smtpd_restriction_classes = class-gmail, class-yahoo
> class-gmail = check_recipient_access randmap:{filter smtp1:, filter
> smtp2:send.smtp.com:25}
> class-yahoo = check_recipient_access randmap:{filter smtp1:, filter smtp2:
Another one that bounced.
From: Sean Hennessey
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 1:14 AM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Is there an easy way to "warm up" a new sending IP w/ Postfix
So final update for the night.
It's got to be the way it's parsing the
I tried sending this earlier, but it bounced back because it was too long. let
me trim it and try again.
From: Sean Hennessey
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 12:49 AM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Is there an easy way to "warm up" a new sending IP w/
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 05:10:26AM +, Sean Hennessey wrote:
> I've been poking at this a bit tonight. I am by no means a postfix expert. In
> the hopes that someone can see an obvious configuration issue, I'm going to
> post what I'm seeing:
>
> In my main.cf;
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions
sigh
Nov 30 01:15:53 OptiPlex-9010 postfix/smtpd[505479]: >>> START Recipient
address RESTRICTIONS <<<
Nov 30 01:15:53 OptiPlex-9010 postfix/smtpd[505479]: generic_checks:
name=check_recipient_access
Nov 30 01:15:53 OptiPlex-9010 postfix/smtpd[505479]: check_mail_access:
x...@gmail.com
Nov 30
I've been poking at this a bit tonight. I am by no means a postfix expert. In
the hopes that someone can see an obvious configuration issue, I'm going to
post what I'm seeing:
In my main.cf;
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
inline:{
{ gmail.com = class-gmail }
post...@ptld.com skrev den 2022-11-30 04:07:
My mailserver once had some issues on sending messages to different
providers.
We only allow evidently commercial or similar operators to connect to
our mailservers.
That's so strange policy to permit only commercial company to send
messages to
My mailserver once had some issues on sending messages to different providers.
We only allow evidently commercial or similar operators to connect to our
mailservers.
That's so strange policy to permit only commercial company to send messages to
them.
Did you host your mail server in a data
Hello,
My mailserver once had some issues on sending messages to different providers.
I have contacted the provders and most of them were kind enough to resolve the
blocking issue. Thanks for them (ATT, GMX, 1and1 etc).
But t-online.de keep blocking me. I have contacted them twice and got the
Benny Pedersen:
> Sean Hennessey skrev den 2022-11-28 21:57:
>
> > I'd really like a way to send X% of gmail.com traffic to one relay and
> > the rest to another relay. Ditto for a couple of other major ESP's
> > like Yahoo, MS, etc?
>
> why not https://www.dnswl.org ?, its imho not hard to be
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 09:59:47AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > In /etc/postfix/master.cf:
> > ==
> >
> > smtp1 unix - - n - - smtp
> > -o { smtp_bind_address = 1.2.3.1 }
> > -o { smtp_helo_name =
Sean Hennessey skrev den 2022-11-28 21:57:
I'd really like a way to send X% of gmail.com traffic to one relay and
the rest to another relay. Ditto for a couple of other major ESP's
like Yahoo, MS, etc…
why not https://www.dnswl.org ?, its imho not hard to be there, and
remember
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 09:59:47AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> In /etc/postfix/master.cf:
> ==
>
> smtp1 unix - - n - - smtp
> -o { smtp_bind_address = 1.2.3.1 }
> -o { smtp_helo_name = helo-for-1.2.3.1 }
>
> smtp2 unix -
Wietse,
Thanks a bunch for this. I'm going to try to play w/ this on a test box to see
if I can get it working. It looks detailed enough here.
Sean
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On
Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2022 10:00 AM
To:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022, raf wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 11:40:01PM -0500, Jonathan Capra
wrote:
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache
Not relevant, but the above line isn't needed (since Postfix 2.11).
I commented this out.
mydestination =
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2022-11-29 10:32:
I've noticed some using port 2525. Any point?
From what I remember, only because people didn't know about 465/587
this ports are global abused, so there is a point to use another port :)
lets say 25
when i had backup mx i used port 26 just
>Sean Hennessey:
> All,
>
> I'm bringing a new sending IP online and need to know if there is
> an easy way to warm it up w/ Postfix.
>
> For those that don't know, warming up is a process where you start
> to send small amounts of mail of the new IP till it's built up a
> good enough reputation.
Viktor Dukhovni:
> It is not obvious to me, just at the moment, how to do this with the
> built-in Postfix randmap, pipemap, uniomap, ...
I have an example that I cam update and post later today.
Wietse
Op 29-11-2022 om 10:32 schreef Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 29.11.22 22:26, DL Neil wrote:
Postfix on VPS is lightly-loaded, currently running happily with SPF,
DKIM, DMARC, etc; and delivering inbound messages to Dovecot. MUAs
submit outbound messages using STARTTLS and port 25.
while using
On 29.11.22 22:26, DL Neil wrote:
Postfix on VPS is lightly-loaded, currently running happily with SPF,
DKIM, DMARC, etc; and delivering inbound messages to Dovecot. MUAs
submit outbound messages using STARTTLS and port 25.
while using starttls and authentication on port 25 is possible, I
Postfix on VPS is lightly-loaded, currently running happily with SPF,
DKIM, DMARC, etc; and delivering inbound messages to Dovecot. MUAs
submit outbound messages using STARTTLS and port 25.
To suit certain ISPs, plan to expand to (also) enable port 465
(described as "implicit TLS") and/or
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 08:57:37PM +, Sean Hennessey wrote:
> I searched the list archives and saw the thread of gradual shift of
> traffic from back in February of this year. That gives me some ideas,
> but that seems to be for all traffic, not a subset.
>
> I'd really like a way to send X%
25 matches
Mail list logo
