[pfx] Re: Chaining XFORWARD

2023-10-12 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Wietse: > Postfix does not XFORWARD the information that it has received > with XFORWARD. It XFORWARDs the information that it has used for > its own smtpd_mumble_restrictions. Pedro David Marco: > Thanks Wietse, sometimes we want to stretch Postifx like gum beyond limits... > Thanks again, Mr!

[pfx] Re: Chaining XFORWARD

2023-10-12 Thread Pedro David Marco via Postfix-users
Thanks Wietse, sometimes we want to stretch Postifx like gum beyond limits... Thanks again, Mr! Pete. On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 02:32:11 PM GMT+2, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: Pedro David Marco via Postfix-users: > Hi, > Postfix documentation states clearly that

[pfx] Re: No Permissions To TLS Certificates

2023-10-12 Thread Bill Cole via Postfix-users
On 2023-10-12 at 08:26:40 UTC-0400 (Thu, 12 Oct 2023 23:26:40 +1100) Matthew J Black via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: On 12/10/2023 23:19, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: If the 'find' command cannot enumerate mode 755 directories, then this is no longer a problem that

[pfx] Re: No Permissions To TLS Certificates

2023-10-12 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Matthew J Black via Postfix-users: > On 12/10/2023 23:19, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: > > If the 'find' command cannot enumerate mode 755 directories, then > > this is no longer a problem that receives Postfix support. > > > > Turning off SeLinux is easy. > > Thanks for getting back to

[pfx] Re: Chaining XFORWARD

2023-10-12 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Pedro David Marco via Postfix-users: > Hi, > Postfix documentation states clearly that XFORDWARD is intended for scenarios > like this: > Client -> MTA1-> Content_filter -> MTA2 > And then Content_filter is able to get the IP of Client. Works great! Only if the filter understands XFORWARD

[pfx] Re: No Permissions To TLS Certificates

2023-10-12 Thread Matthew J Black via Postfix-users
On 12/10/2023 23:19, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: If the 'find' command cannot enumerate mode 755 directories, then this is no longer a problem that receives Postfix support. Turning off SeLinux is easy. Wietse Thanks for getting back to me. Yes, turning off SELinux is

[pfx] Re: No Permissions To TLS Certificates

2023-10-12 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
duluxoz via Postfix-users: > (Sorry, can't remember if I should be top-posting or bottom-posting :-)? ) > > The answer for both queries: > > * The root folder is 555 root:root > * All other folders are 755 root:root > * The certs themselves are 600 root:root (I think I mentioned this one >

[pfx] Re: *.mail.protection.outlook.com reporting "452 4.5.3 Too many recipients (AS780090)" for many domains

2023-10-12 Thread Pedro David Marco via Postfix-users
Microsoft incident EX680695 (sorry if i recall wrongly). Solved now! Pete. On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 03:24:03 PM GMT+2, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote: On 11.10.23 15:06, Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users wrote: >Since this morning, various MX hosts in

[pfx] Re: user based transport

2023-10-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
On 12.10.23 00:56, wesley--- via Postfix-users wrote: How can I setup username based transport? for incoming messages, such as use...@foo.com will be delivered to host a. use...@foo.com will be delivered to host b. transport_maps support username@domain notation:

[pfx] Chaining XFORWARD

2023-10-12 Thread Pedro David Marco via Postfix-users
Hi, Postfix documentation states clearly that XFORDWARD is intended for scenarios like this: Client -> MTA1->  Content_filter -> MTA2 And then Content_filter is able to get  the IP of Client. Works great! But i was wondering... what i chain more MTAs? Client -> MTA1 - > MTA2 -> Content_filter ->