Re: Max connection error message

Thank you Noel, just need a nudge in the right direction =) On 15.01.20 21:18, Noel Jones wrote: > On 1/15/2020 2:08 PM, Esteban L wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I suspect this is equal parts a problem from Thunderbird, as it is >> anything else. But, I am getting an err

Max connection error message

Hello, I suspect this is equal parts a problem from Thunderbird, as it is anything else. But, I am getting an error message: Unable to connect to your IMAP server. You may have exceeded the maximum number of connections to this server. If so, use the Advanced IMAP server Settings dialogue to

Re: dkim updating keys

m updating keys Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 15:20:42 +0200 * Esteban L.: > Trying to figure this out with as little disruption as possible. I sugest you do the following, in order: * Generate new key. * Add new key's data, using a new DKIM selector, to your DNS. * Wait for your domain z

dkim updating keys

Friendly Greetings, I am going to update my email server's Dkim keys for the first time. I can go to the original install instructions, and figure out how to update them. What I can't find in that original tutorial is the following: 1. Do I delete/remove old key and references thereto? Namely,

smtputf8

Hello, >From what I have read, smtputf8 is enabled by default to 'yes' in postfix version greater than 3. I also read through the Postfix documentation, that just because it's supported by Postfix, there are many subsystems (like Dovecot) that do not. I wouldn't have even given it much though,

Re: sieve commands

Thanks for the info Mr. Cole. I will find another the answer through an other avenue. -Original Message- From: Bill Cole Reply-to: "Postfix users" To: Postfix users Subject: Re: sieve commands Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 19:00:56 -0400 On 24 Apr 2019, at 18:27, Esteban L wr

Re: sieve commands

Just some follow up. fileinto: "INBOX.admin.postfix"; stop; not sure if the 'INBOX' part is required? -Original Message----- From: Esteban L Reply-to: este...@little-beak.com To: Postfix users Subject: sieve commands Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 00:27:03 +0200 Hi,

sieve commands

Hi, Am trying to setup some server side rules using sieve. It seems to work for junk/spamassassin. My question is, using the fileinto command...and I want to send it into a subdirectory, would I use a . or a /? fileinto: "admin.postfix"; or fileinto: "admin/postfix";

Re: Authentication attempts for x...@com.au addresses

to using fail2ban, and it seems to do the job, but if there is something better, I would like to check it out :-) On April 4, 2019 8:07:09 PM GMT+01:00, Andrey Repin wrote: >Greetings, Esteban L! > >> You will need to install fail2ban to ip block failed attempts. > >> As you h

Re: Authentication attempts for x...@com.au addresses

attempts. > >James. > > >> On 2 Apr 2019, at 7:43 pm, Esteban L <mailto:este...@little-beak.com>> wrote: >> >> You will need to install fail2ban to ip block failed attempts. >> >> As you have correctly assumed, a malicious person is trying to hack >into

Re: Authentication attempts for x...@com.au addresses

You will need to install fail2ban to ip block failed attempts. As you have correctly assumed, a malicious person is trying to hack into you mail server. Fail2ban is a required application now and days. On April 2, 2019 8:57:06 AM GMT+02:00, James Brown wrote: >Not sure if this is a Dovecot or

Re: SPF Temperrors - minor thing

. Everything else postfix/policyd-spf side all seems in order, and it was driving me crazy. I will either remove the program or re-configure it in a meaningful way. Thanks for the patience and help. -Original Message- From: Esteban L Reply-to: este...@little-beak.com To: Scott Kitterman , postfix

Re: SPF Temperrors - minor thing

d, 27 Mar 2019 04:22:10 + On March 27, 2019 12:57:12 AM UTC, Esteban L wrote: > Thank you Scott K. > > I just read the RFC7208, very well written. > > My favorite line was at the end in the second to last paragraph, > talking about TempError local policy considerati

Re: SPF Temperrors - minor thing

Tue, 26 Mar 2019 20:32:51 -0400 On Tuesday, March 26, 2019 01:49:08 PM Esteban L wrote: > Hello, > > My SPF record appears to be in order, using the SPF query tool at > kitterman dot com. > > Also, I do not appear to have any problems receiving or sending > emails,

SPF Temperrors - minor thing

Hello, My SPF record appears to be in order, using the SPF query tool at kitterman dot com. Also, I do not appear to have any problems receiving or sending emails, outside of this minor temperror message. However, the header kind of irks me, since it always returns the following header.

SPF setup Temperror

Hello, Dovecot 2.2.27 Postfix 3.1.9 I had SPF setup proper, originally. Then, it stopped working properly after some other configuration changes, as I tried to go through and eliminate errors. Here is my header information. Received-SPF: Temperror (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom;