nical rant.
Delete me for that and I will delete postfix.
Devolopment of the capability to delete individuals with whom you
disagree is where the speech policing is heading anyway,
John
On 2/25/21 5:47 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
John Dale:
"American concept that racism starts and ends at a
Kudos to you Mauricio (great name, btw :)
If we are changing variable names to fight racism, since racism is not
clearly defined and may not exist, we may be making code changes to
fight something that doesn't exist.
"Race" - doesn't exist. You can't point to it?
I love software, though -
"American concept that racism starts and ends at affecting blacks"
This is an untrue generalization. It's not racist, but is it bigoted?
If anything, Americans are presently too sensitive to this issue and are
being pressed into making bad short sighted reactive policies.
On 2/24/21 8:36
e bathroom .. would you rather work
for someone who is the word gestapo, or someone like me?
Sincerely,
John Dale, lover of people of all colors if they are good people.
On 2/25/21 3:20 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
however, the "allow" and "deny" clearly say something, while fo
this skill
or that skill. If it's biased examples of malfeasance you feel
compelled to point to, I can show you plenty emanating from every skin
color.
Try me.
Word policing has the opposite of the intended effect.
Stop now before you destroy us all. :)
Sincerely,
John Dale, MS MIS
Spearfish
"the right of devs to use whatever nomenclature they desire"
That's it. That's the thing. I suppose if it was my code and I wanted
to make that change other folks could go take a hike.
So, whose code is it?
If it were my code and I were dead (interesting prospect), I would try
to lay
If we were to change the nomenclature to something like "disallowed" and
"allowed", should we not consider the class of disallowed out there to
be inherently persecuted? Are we looking at choosing variable names
with no corresponding representation in the dictionary (just in case)?
var
The link is in your mind (not mine) and certainly not in non-sentient
software code. Scrubbing language only serves to define and sharpen the
distinction in your mind (not mine) and confuse historical development
of code (this language policing will be committed to some source repo
somewhere
What are we going to do about actual light and actual dark?
On 2/24/21 10:37 AM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
I totally agree with this and I am going to work to scrub the prior terminology
from my system.
Thank you, Wietse
—Curtis
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 24, 2021, at 12:12 PM, Wietse Venema
Why does this agitate people? Because if the time spend on this change
had been used to fix an actual deficiency, people of color who use the
software would have been served with value, not just platitudes.
On 6/8/20 6:49 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 2020-06-07 21:27, Ruben Safir wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to get rid of the actual master databases and
slave databases? Regardless of what they're called, there is still
subservience represented inherently.
In all seriousness, racial tensions can be manufactured when no racism
actually exists. There is no racism inherent in
"That is 100% correct technological description"
In Object Oriented Programming nomenclature, Blacklist and Master/Slave
are both "cohesive"!
On 6/7/20 7:27 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
That is 100% correct technological description
"It is a small group of international fanatics"
Somebody's tuned-in. ;)
John
On 6/7/20 7:29 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
It is a small group of international fanatics
The practice of systematic erasure of language regresses to human
ideas. Language policing has inertia and a kind of gravity that starts
removing tangential-but-uncontroversial ideas as a byproduct; dangerous
and anti-human! Appropriate usage of the term "Black" is not racist.
Not hiring
Ugh .. still having trouble getting apple's mail client to work with
postfix SMTP settings.
I'm not seeing anything in the logs that I can make sense of:
Sep 22 04:12:50 mx postfix/smtpd[30354]: connect from
unknown[the.ip.address.ofmynetwork]
Sep 22 04:12:51 mx postfix/smtpd[30354]:
I get this for several accounts/servers (note I've masked the host and ip):
host host.com[ip.ip.ip.ip] said: 550
Access denied - Invalid HELO name (See RFC2821 4.1.1.1) (in reply to MAIL
FROM command)
Help?
I do not have nearly your footprint or users, but I do setup
DKIM/SPF/DMARC by default. Also, google has an escalation process for
emails. You submit the request along with the complete email (with
headers). Work through the process at this URL and you might have some
luck.
:14 AM, John Dale
wrote:
Greetings;
Thanks for the info.
I have Dovecot talking well (popping in).
SMTP via postfix is giving me some issues. I'll double check my ports and
typing. :)
I'm wondering if I need to change authentication settings on postfix to make
things more straightforward
a spot in Mail.app to accept the postfix tls cert.
John
On 8/6/19 8:02 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
On Aug 6, 2019, at 8:32 AM, John Dale wrote:
Greetings;
I have Thunderbird working with PostFix/Dovecot for sending and receiving.
STARTTLS
Normal Password
I don't see these options in Mail.app
Greetings;
I have Thunderbird working with PostFix/Dovecot for sending and receiving.
STARTTLS
Normal Password
I don't see these options in Mail.app for OSX.
I've tried updating ports and different combinations of available
authentication in Mail.app, but no luck. It either times-out or
20 matches
Mail list logo
