On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:49:46PM +0530, tejas sarade wrote:
> warning: subject: =?utf-8?B?QVBMIE..
...
> Is there any way the the logged warning subject in Postfix logs can be
> displayed the way mail client does.
I suggest you run the log through a script that decodes the encoded UTF. A per
Wietse Venema wrote:
> To prevent Postfix sendmail from looking up this information you
> must supply the sender name or address with the -f command-line
> option.
Maksim,
One way to make the PHP mail() function do this is to configure
Apache with this:
# maybe lots of other opt
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:16:20PM +0200, Jamie wrote:
> I unblocked the IP and the problem came back.
In another mail you said you'd used tcpdump. Why don't you set
tcpdump to record everything from that IP address, unblock the
IP address, wait faor a few spams to go through, block the
IP address
The exact same question was sent by someone calling himself
"Ron White" to the exim mailing list at almost exactly the same
time. Peddling one's services by soliciting comparisons with
competitors is so passé . . .
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 11:42:37AM +1100, Greg Wilson wrote:
> I use this
> technique, DNS round robin to evenly spread rdp connections to our
> terminal servers. My understanding is that a device does a DNS lookup and
> the server hands out each different IP address sequentially. Each device
> use
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 08:37:48PM +, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
> One of my Postfix installs runs behind a NAT box. The host
> name for the local private IP is in the .local domain, not
> suitable for public use in SMTP sessions but suitable for
> trace fields. However, on IPv6, the host is
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 06:00:46PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> I have a 'border' postfix MTA that doesn't host any mailboxes, indeed it
> doesn't even know what the valid usernames are for the domain.
>
> It merely serves to check messages for viruses, and block DoS attacks.
>
> As such,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:51:27PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> These are rejected and not useful to our discussion. Please show
> ALL the postfix logging of a suspect transaction that makes it to
> your queue. In particular, we want to see if there is a
> sasl_username= line logged for a suspiciou
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 09:24:01PM +0100, Michael Maymann wrote:
> thanks for your kind reply...:-) !
> yes this is exactly the case... and my internal local-mailers consist on
> standard RHEL5+6 servers and NetApp's.
> Our ISP is restricting mail from only 1 of our sites, so we need to relay
> all
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 06:12:12PM +0100, Michael Maymann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks Peter, for you kind reply - some setup you have there... sounds very
> nice indeed...:-) !
> - If i have a lower budget, can this then be achieved without the
> loadbalancers and still have same redundancy/flexib
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:49:35AM -0800, Gonzo Fernandez wrote:
> /var/log/maillog:Dec 14 04:03:07 batch-ca4-02 postfix/sendmail[12280]: fatal:
> root(0): queue file write error
> /var/log/maillog:Dec 15 12:03:07 batch-ca4-02 postfix/postdrop[21744]:
> warning: uid=0: Illegal seek
In addition t
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 05:43:58PM -0800, Gonzo Fernandez wrote:
> I'm not sure I'm understanding the log file info you would like. I tried
> doing grep search for 8A2993E3003B on all log files under /var/log/* and only
> found the following line to show up:
>
> Dec 11 05:31:27 batch-ca4-02 post
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 06:09:43PM +0100, Nahliel Steinberg wrote:
> May 30 19:00:25 osiris postfix/qmgr[3168]: 2CEF7281D9F:
> from=, size=476, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> May 30 19:00:26 osiris postfix/smtp[3199]: 2CEF7281D9F:
> to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:11125, delay=1.2,
> delays=0.12/0.01/
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:50:50PM +0100, Ronald MacDonald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just been having a look through my config. I've an obscure
> case, where I've added a domain to the alias/lookup tables but
> the customer has not yet changed her DNS settings.
>
> In this case, when I'm waiting for a cl
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:48:05AM +0200, mouss wrote:
> Bounces go the envelope sender of the message. your best option is to
> get the web developpers to set the right envelope sender.
Amen. A lot of otherwise competent and knowledgeable people
simply don't even begin to think about error checki
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:23:13PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> as long as you starting threads with single liners like
>
> * How can I send 10 mails using postfix in 5 minutes
> * How can I increase mail sending speed in postfix
He's been asking the same question since April 5th. Each time
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:38:24PM +0100, Steve wrote:
> The spamming problem is not something that you can fix by
> replacing SMTP with something new.
An appropriate illustration is the initiative taken recently by
Germany's government to create a secure e-mail environment. It
does not replace SM
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:34:38AM +0530, ramesh srinivas wrote:
> Sorry Noel, I will figure out the DNS issue.
That's good, but you also said
> when i send mail to x...@example.com from yahoo maillog in
> mailhub shows 554 5.7.1 (Relay access denied)
You have to take care of that problem first
18 matches
Mail list logo
