Am 09.03.2012 12:44, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
On 9/3/2012 1:33 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
# ls -la /etc/postfix/ldap-*
-rw-r- 1 root root 774 Oct 26 2010 /etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf
-rw-r- 1 root root 358 Aug 24 2010 /etc/postfix/ldap-alias-vacation.cf
-rwxr-x--- 1 root root 495
Am 09.03.2012 12:49, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
For reference:
# postconf -n
snip
why are you not doing simply what the error-message suggests?
add it to proxy_read_maps, see me mail before
Mar 8 20:12:01 vmail postfix/proxymap[32599]: warning: to approve this table
for read-only access,
Am 09.03.2012 12:53, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
On 9/3/2012 1:49 μμ, Reindl Harald wrote:
644 is a very bad idea - chown root:postfix, chmod 640
You are totally right Reindl,
I only did it momentarily, just to check the hypothesis that it was a
permissions problem
even than it is still
Am 09.03.2012 12:53, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Nikolaos Milas:
Mar 8 20:12:01 vmail postfix/proxymap[32599]: warning: request for
unapproved table: ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-alias-vacation.cf
That is because you screwed up the proxy_read_maps parameter setting.
COMMENT it OUT and THIS ERROR
Am 09.03.2012 15:55, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
Hi,
Today somebody (user1, see below) sent a message from outside to our org. Our
gateway server (Cisco Ironport C-160:
mailgw.admin.noa.gr) received the message which had 9 recipients, of which
one in an outside domain, one in the
Am 09.03.2012 16:01, schrieb Nick Edwards:
Hi,
I gave a secondary mx with 2 ipv4 and 2 ipv6 ip's.
I have dns'd one of each protocol for mx and ns
Trying to get postfix to play nice with mx on outbound. hostname,
mynetworks etc all setup right.
I have tried smtp_bind_address(6) but for
Am 09.03.2012 17:23, schrieb Nick Edwards:
On 3/10/12, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 09.03.2012 16:01, schrieb Nick Edwards:
Hi,
I gave a secondary mx with 2 ipv4 and 2 ipv6 ip's.
I have dns'd one of each protocol for mx and ns
Trying to get postfix to play nice with mx
Am 09.03.2012 17:35, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
On 9/3/2012 5:16 μμ, Reindl Harald wrote:
i doubt this is not a postfix-message
It can't be from anywhere else (as far as I can tell). We are not running any
filters,
anti-spam or anti-virus on this Postfix server.
Mar 9 04:21:36 vmail
Am 09.03.2012 20:28, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
On 9/3/2012 2:07 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
I've:
chown -R root:postfix /etc/postfix/
and chmod 640 to files and 750 to directories
Since I did this, I get the error:
Mar 9 21:23:53 vmail postfix/sendmail[1752]: fatal: open
Am 09.03.2012 21:01, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
On 9/3/2012 9:28 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Since I did this, I get the error:
Mar 9 21:23:53 vmail postfix/sendmail[1752]: fatal: open
/etc/postfix/main.cf: Permission denied
...
What do I have to do to get sendmail (i.e.
Am 09.03.2012 21:18, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
On 9/3/2012 9:59 μμ, Reindl Harald wrote:
/etc/postfix - 755
Thank you! You saved me from a very bad headache.
no problem
Obviously this was the main cause. I found that /etc/postfix was 750.
Thanks also for the absolutely valuable details
i recently upgraded my test-vm to Fedora 16
the following messages appear in the syslog (with Fedora 15 they was not there)
why they are unused and why they are not in /var/log/maillog?
Mar 10 02:16:45 testserver postfix[1935]: /usr/sbin/postconf: warning:
Am 10.03.2012 02:35, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Because they are not used. For example, smtpd_tls_cipherlist
does not exist
ok, got an old documentation i assume
and barracuda_smtpd_recipient_restrictions
also does not exist.
was mentioned by you because permit_mynetworks, reject
does not
Am 08.03.2012 16:44, schrieb Marcelo Vieira:
I have a question related with Postfix and SPF.
I have a server configured to check SPF MTA. Two domains uses that MTA.
When I receive an e-mail from outside (gmail / hotmail etc ...) the
verification of
SPF is ok. When sending an e-mail from a
Am 08.03.2012 20:58, schrieb Leslie León Sinclair:
2) Show one maillog example of a bad session.
Mar 8 14:52:59 apolo postfix/smtpd[24202]: Read 52 chars: MAIL
FROM:les...@mail.mydomain.cu
Mar 8 14:52:59 apolo postfix/smtpd[24202]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[10.8.xxx.yyy]: 550
Am 08.03.2012 00:46, schrieb Scott Brown scottwb...@yahoo.com:
Hello,
I am trying to install Postfix with mysql on CentOS 6.0.
I am trying to follow the instructions at
http://www.postfix.org/MYSQL_README.html
I downloaded the mysql libraries and source code.
why?
yum install mysql-devel
with mysql
Datum: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:04:50 +0100
Von: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
Organisation: the lounge interactive design
An: Scott Brown scottwb...@yahoo.com
TOP-POSTING FIXED
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Cc:
Sent
Am 08.03.2012 01:21, schrieb Mailinglist mailingl...@theflux.net:
I don't know what you use but on my iPad / iPhone if I hit reply it only
sends to you not the list. I do reply all. Please stop the whine and be
constructive. Kthx
if your client is broken and does not support reply to list
hi
i am not sure if my validation is up-to-date in
rejecting frankkröt...@example.com
AFAIK üöä are only allowed in DOMAIN name (IDN)
this moment got a notify that a address with this
localpart was removed from a newsletter table where
validation at input-time seems to be missing
Am 06.03.2012 02:41, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Reindl Harald:
i am not sure if my validation is up-to-date in
rejecting frankkr?t...@example.com
AFAIK ??? are only allowed in DOMAIN name (IDN)
RFC5321/22 do not allow non-ASCII in the localpart or domain, or
in any message header. All
Am 02.03.2012 13:19, schrieb Al:
I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail.
If so, what is the performance, could it be ran on
the same system as posfix while receiving thousands of emails a day?
we are running dbmail since summer 2009 on all mailservers
with postfix and
Am 02.03.2012 16:08, schrieb mail...@securitylabs.it:
Il 02/03/2012 15:54, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
Am 02.03.2012 13:19, schrieb Al:
I'm curious if anyone uses DBMail with postfix to store mail.
If so, what is the performance, could it be ran on
the same system as posfix while receiving
Am 02.03.2012 17:08, schrieb mail...@securitylabs.it:
how do you do your backups?
Bacula with Accurate backup
another software needed
i stop the slave per cron, make the backup with rsync
and start the slave again having a 100% consistent
copy
You need two server or at least two MySQL
Am 02.03.2012 17:29, schrieb Mailinglist:
I won't be storing for long term and won't require backing up either.
It's more for custom php to query the emails that I receive.
The influx of email will only grow over time. Writing perl scripts to
look at flat txt files I feel will be too
Am 02.03.2012 18:19, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2012-03-02 10:32 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
and you can make a 100% constistent backup pf this
many small files while the service is running?
you can not!
While all of this is totally OT for postfix, I just had to ask
Am 02.03.2012 22:19, schrieb Noel Jones:
On 3/2/2012 3:08 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
Hi,
Am 02.03.2012 22:02, schrieb Charles Marcus:
What is your concern?
to get flagged as spam without no other reason ;)?
Best regards,
Karol Babioch
Any anti-spam system that flags mail only because
Am 01.03.2012 11:36, schrieb Willy Janssen:
In the new setup, our networking department wants to get rid of the three
different ip-adresses per server. Instead
they want to 'stack' all the traffic comming from the load-balancer on one
ip-address, but on different ports, say
1025, 2025 and
Am 01.03.2012 19:06, schrieb Marián Černý:
Take a step back. Please describe the problem (why extra copies
of mail) instead of the solution (alias feature that excludes the
sender).
I don't know how to better describe the problem. Maybe the following:
John is a new junior employee in a
Am 01.03.2012 23:59, schrieb Mr fix:
reason is we custom patched the Postfix source code and it is an inherited one
in which way?
usually a unmodified postfix setup is the easiest upgrade
and i am user since 2.4 with partly real complex setups
never seen any postfix update hurting me like
Am 23.02.2012 20:06, schrieb rg86...@airpost.net:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/23/2012 12:11 PM, rg86...@airpost.net wrote:
sendmail -i -t
From: ro...@deskmail.rogermail.lan
To: ro...@mail.rogermail.lan,s...@mail.rogermail.lan
Am 23.02.2012 22:28, schrieb rg86...@airpost.net:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012, at 04:13 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
You are not listening.
Actually, I am. And I'm hearing contradcitions, incorrect advice, and
downright snyde comments.
Your presumption that message sent == message received,
Am 20.02.2012 00:45, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Peter:
On 20/02/12 11:14, Wietse Venema wrote:
Peter:
Note that if you put the old config in dovecot will give a warning on
startup and `doveconf -n' will show the new config that you should
replace it with.
Am 18.02.2012 10:55, schrieb Jean Bruenn:
A better approach _might_ be to reject all mails to postmaster@ with a
message pointing to a contact-form. That way you could also make sure
that users with problems will provide useful information (as you can
configure the fields of the contact-form
Am 17.02.2012 17:00, schrieb Simon Hintermann:
Hello all,
here is my problem:
I have several hosting servers, sending mails from authenticated users, web
scripts, web pages, and so on... I
cannot monitor everything, and our greatest problem is outgoing unauthorized
mails. we
Am 17.02.2012 18:31, schrieb Simon Hintermann:
Okay... perhaps I explained it poorly, or did I actually not understood a
word of your explaination...
The case I cannot detect is:
SENDER (a...@toto.com) sends an email to b...@domain.com
||
v
WEBSERVER (b...@domain.com forwards
Am 17.02.2012 18:41, schrieb Toni Mueller:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:35:11PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.02.2012 18:31, schrieb Simon Hintermann:
SENDER (a...@toto.com) sends an email to b...@domain.com
||
v
WEBSERVER (b...@domain.com forwards all mails to b...@yahoo.com)
||
v
Am 17.02.2012 18:48, schrieb Simon Hintermann:
Okay, the webserver is a Plesk server where users can set an email
redirection to their external address. I don't
know why, but many users do that.
i am out here because i never use such software using server
configuartions natevily all of the
am i th eonly one currently receiving a ton of spam with all
sorts of job vacation to my postmaster-account all day long?
different sender-IPs so abuse to the providr will not help
much, problem here is via RFC postmaster must not be filtered
and so the spamfirewall does not help in any way
how
Am 17.02.2012 21:59, schrieb Peter Blair:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
how do other people act with such braindead sh**t?
Look into greylisting it. You'll find that greylisting could very
well deal with most of the bots that things like
Am 18.02.2012 00:17, schrieb Simon Brereton:
On Feb 17, 2012 6:14 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 17.02.2012 21:59, schrieb Peter Blair:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei
Am 18.02.2012 02:46, schrieb Dennis Carr:
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
what i do not understand is how %#^%$@!! stupid
people are spamming to postmaster/abuse-addresses
Oh. One other thing - they don't care. There is no courtesy. They don't
care if you scream at them
Am 16.02.2012 14:06, schrieb daniel zhou:
Hi Group,
The document segment about the reject_unknown_sender_domain says that it will
reject the domain without A record or
MX record. Does it mean that only domains with both A and MX record will be
accepted? Or, it means any domains with
Am 16.02.2012 18:13, schrieb Dipl.-Ing. Juergen Ladstaetter:
We're currently developing a project where customers can add their own
domains to our mailsystem. The biggest problem would be that a customer adds
a domain he doesn't own or isn't represented by our mail cluster.
For example a
but that has
nothing to do with the initial problem described in my other email.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] Im Auftrag von Reindl Harald
Gesendet: Thursday, February 16, 2012 12:20 PM
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
would work, I just wanted to know if
there is a way to configure one instance to do this. No need to get
impolite...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] Im Auftrag von Reindl Harald
Gesendet: Thursday, February 16, 2012
Am 16.02.2012 19:32, schrieb Dipl.-Ing. Juergen Ladstaetter:
if you have a local-domain it will not make a lookup if it would the mail
could not be delivered local
That's the point. Even though it's configured as local-domain I would want
it to look up any records (MX, A) and try to sent the
Am 17.02.2012 00:07, schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
On 16-02-12 23:52, Dipl.-Ing. Juergen Ladstaetter wrote:
Thank you both very much. That input was very good and I might rethink the
strategy we're aiming at. Probably active DNS checks and periodic re-checks
are better to ensure some security.
Am 16.02.2012 00:14, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Den 2012-02-15 15:50, Jack Knowlton skrev:
u...@domain.com REJECT This particular user has been banned.
us...@domain.com REJECT This particular user has been banned.
select concat(´REJECT This user is banned´) from banned_usertable where
Am 12.02.2012 21:21, schrieb Alex Bligh:
A server I run (let's say mail.example.com) inserts a mail header
similar to the one below, when it receives mail either via normal
SMTP from another MTA, or when it receives mail from an authenticated
MUA.
Received: from [10.10.10.10]
Am 08.02.2012 07:06, schrieb N. Yaakov Ziskind:
DN Singh wrote (on Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:50:50AM +0530):
The setting can be changed in the parameter smtpd_sender_restrictions
reject_unknown_sender_domain, if it is necessary.
That would let in *all* mail from nonexistent domains, which I
Am 08.02.2012 14:57, schrieb Peter Tselios:
Hallo,
So far I have not implemented SMTP Auth for various reasons (on of them was
the fact that I had no Postfix installed). Anyway, I would like to implement
it, but since I have a relatively large base (200K emails), I would like to
do it
Am 08.02.2012 16:20, schrieb l...@airstreamcomm.net:
Wondering if anyone has made this leap recently, and what changes/gotchas
might be pertinent?
clone your configuration in a virtual machine and try it
SIX major releases is a lot, even having the fact
that Wietse is very careful with
Am 08.02.2012 16:32, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:25:04PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
SIX major releases is a lot, even having the fact
that Wietse is very careful with changes in mind
the problem is that even he can not say what exactly
has changed since long
Am 09.02.2012 01:15, schrieb Andre Lopes:
Hi all,
I have configured a Postfix e-mail server but all emails sent to
Hotmail.com go to the trash... the first question is... configuring
SPF should solve that?
SHOULD LOGS
how should anybody gues what can solve this if
nobody is knwoing the
://www.webstershome.co.uk/content/postfix-whitelisting-and-spf-filtering)
or should I go with Perl SPF implementation?
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 09.02.2012 01:15, schrieb Andre Lopes:
Hi all,
I have configured a Postfix e-mail server but all emails
Am 09.02.2012 04:49, schrieb Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa:
Greetings,
Reindi, search through postfix docs for that:
+ permit_sasl_authenticated
+ permit_mynetworks (play with the mynetworks definition, so,
initially you allow all mail from your local network, and when *all*
of your
Am 07.02.2012 09:53, schrieb Joe Wong:
Hello,
Say my MTA has multiple IP addresses on it. Is there a way to
configure Postfix (outbound) to use IP 1 when matching condition A and
IP2 if matching condition B and IP3 and none of the conditions are
matched?
you can define smtp_bind_address
be to telnet localhost 25 which should work.
Regards,
D.
--
Mit besten Grüßen, Reindl Harald
the lounge interactive design GmbH
A-1060 Vienna, Hofmühlgasse 17
CTO / software-development / cms-solutions
p: +43 (1) 595 3999 33, m: +43 (676) 40 221 40
icq: 154546673, http://www.thelounge.net/
http
Am 07.02.2012 22:43, schrieb Andre Lopes:
Hi all,
Thanks for the replies,
I'm using this tutorial for sasl configuration,
http://www.server-world.info/en/note?os=CentOS_6p=mailf=2
There is something wrong here? Better... there is something missing here?
Best Regards
do not take a
= may
smtp_tls_received_header= yes
smtp_tls_note_starttls_offer= yes
smtp_tls_session_cache_timeout = 3600s
smtp_tls_session_cache_database =
btree:/var/lib/postfix/smtp_scache
--
Reindl Harald
the lounge
Am 03.02.2012 13:45, schrieb Alex:
I had previously done something like this with iptables, but it was
mostly ineffective:
iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 25 -i eth0 -m state --state NEW -m recent
--set
iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 25 -i eth0 -m state --state NEW -m
recent --update
Am 03.02.2012 16:12, schrieb TFML:
Could someone point me the right direction...
I'm attempting to send an autoreply on a catchall. We receive message from
sender (From: sen...@domain.tld) to our catchall (Actual mainbox) account
(To: j...@domain.tld), then the autoreply will send a
text PLEASE put your answer also below
because no matter if i answer top or bottem now: the thread is destroyed
On Feb 3, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.02.2012 16:12, schrieb TFML:
Could someone point me the right direction...
I'm attempting to send an autoreply on a catchall
Am 03.02.2012 21:32, schrieb Alex:
Hi,
I had previously done something like this with iptables, but it was
mostly ineffective:
iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 25 -i eth0 -m state --state NEW -m recent
--set
iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 25 -i eth0 -m state --state NEW -m
recent
Am 04.02.2012 01:38, schrieb ml:
hello postfix list
hello guru of Fu
I am having problems with my secondary mx some mails that are blocked on
the secondary remain above with an error
4D5BDCA1C9 4344 Thu Feb 2 23:19:41 centos-boun...@centos.org
(Host or domain name not found.
Am 02.02.2012 16:04, schrieb Dennis Putnam:
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the reply. That link is bad but I have gone to the correct one.
What it is saying is that the from
address is not locally known so it will bounce the mail. That is really a
symptom caused by the MAIL FROM not being
sent.
Am 02.02.2012 16:22, schrieb Dennis Putnam:
But your link appears to be for mail clients. I'm not using a mail
client other than sendmail.
this does not interest the server on the other side
for him you are a client like each other
The from addresses already match ATT mailbox names.
and
Am 02.02.2012 16:36, schrieb Dennis Putnam:
Actually it is ATT and they subcontract out their mail services to Yahoo.
That is the transition I am trying to
resolve. However, you have jogged something in my mind. Although my Postfix
is authenticating as a legitimate user
to the yahoo
Am 01.02.2012 11:09, schrieb Martin Kruse Jensen:
Hi.
I'e got a problem I've been trying to solve for some time now, but I can't
seem to get it to work. I'm running
Postfix on FreeBSD with Maildrop delivery, SASL authentification and
PostGreSQL backend. However I'm sending tons
of
Am 01.02.2012 20:32, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Postfix 2.8.8 is reissued. It contained a change that should not have
been included and that caused a compilation error.
You can undo the unwanted change to the mail_params.h file, or download an
updated 2.8.8 release from the mirrors listed at
Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.0.html]
Postfix stable release 2.9.0 is available. The main changes
Am 01.02.2012 23:27, schrieb ml:
Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 20:36 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 01.02.2012 20:32, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Postfix 2.8.8 is reissued. It contained a change that should not have
been included and that caused a compilation error.
You can undo
Am 30.01.2012 14:47, schrieb James Seymour:
Hi All,
Just upgraded our mailserver. Thought I had everything set the same as
I did with the old one. Nonetheless, of all the people who *can't*
send email, it would have to be the President of the company.
I do have
Am 30.01.2012 15:16, schrieb James Seymour:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:51:51 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
[snip]
at least show some parts of the logfile
Very well. Not much to see...
Jan 29 20:42:26 mail postfix/smtps/smtpd[7781]: connect from
c-68-43-238-106
Am 28.01.2012 15:45, schrieb Reindl Harald:
In short: in reply to RCPT, '550' should be treated as User Unknown unless
it is followed by a standard enhanced status code other than '5.1.1'
(which should be considered as an unequivocal and authoritative statement
that the addressed mailbox
Am 27.01.2012 20:08, schrieb Mailing Lists:
I was curious, is it possible to create custom error messages? For example
when I get a bounce back error:
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
b...@test.com mailto:b...@test.com
(reason: 550 5.1.1
Am 20.01.2012 09:18, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
Hello,
As our internal (main) mail server only accepts mail from two mail gateways
and users submit their mail through
submission port (587), I am planning to explicitly allow accepting mail on
port 25 ONLY by our mail gateway servers
(and
Am 20.01.2012 11:55, schrieb Charles Marcus:
why are you not only opening from the allowed addresses in
the packet-filter (iptables)? so you have no log-entries
from spammers all over the world and any protection should
generally happen as wide as possible before the service
I agree
Am 19.01.2012 17:43, schrieb Nikolaos Milas:
Hello,
When defining options for the submission port (587) daemon in master.cf, we
must re-define explicitly all smtpd_*
settings or not, or some (*which?*) are inherited from the standard main.cf
settings? More specifically, should we
Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
Hi,
We have a postfix machine setup as described here:
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-ubuntu-11.10
and we would like to use a third party to do our spam filtering. So, we'd
like
Am 18.01.2012 17:59, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
Hi,
We have a postfix machine setup as described here:
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql
Am 18.01.2012 18:14, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
On 1/18/2012 12:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.01.2012 17:59, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
Hi,
We have a postfix machine setup
Am 18.01.2012 18:21, schrieb Jon August:
So, both solutions work? I like the idea of a private port for my filtering
service.
If I was to go that route, should I take my smtpd_recipient_restrictions and
mynetworks
lines out of main.cf?
i do not know in detail because we are using the
Am 16.01.2012 22:22, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 1/16/2012 2:34 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:28:34 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
the mail delivering to you once the dnslbl stops listing the world.
See: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_rbl_client
Grüßen, Reindl Harald
the lounge interactive design GmbH
A-1060 Vienna, Hofmühlgasse 17
CTO / software-development / cms-solutions
p: +43 (1) 595 3999 33, m: +43 (676) 40 221 40
icq: 154546673, http://www.thelounge.net/
http://www.thelounge.net/signature.asc.what.htm
signature.asc
Description
When you send the original mail, set the envelope sender to the
bounce address, and all bounces will be returned to that address
automatically. The From: header can still be set to whatever you wish.
-- Noel Jones
--
Mit besten Grüßen, Reindl Harald
the lounge interactive
in the configuration (would
it be better/more secure to create a
bounce-account locally on my mailrelay instead of on our official externally
hosted mailserver) ?
2012/1/12 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net
you really will not do this because you would open
Am 10.01.2012 08:37, schrieb Bastian Blank:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 01:36:42AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.01.2012 22:07, schrieb Noel Jones:
On 1/9/2012 1:24 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Many people (me and most of this list included) reject impersonation
of the sender address unless
Am 10.01.2012 21:32, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:34:09 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
but you have this for your mails rejected outside not
for incoming
poor manns srs is .forward
who cares poor man in context of professional servers?
virtual_alias_maps = proxy:mysql
Am 11.01.2012 00:53, schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
On 01/10/2012 10:45 PM, Leslie León Sinclair wrote:
Can anyone point me in the right direction, I´m stucked here and Google
is not helping...
Best regards.
Participe en Universidad 2012, del 13 al 17 de febrero de 2012.
Habana, Cuba:
Am 11.01.2012 01:26, schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
On 01/11/2012 01:10 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.01.2012 00:53, schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
On 01/10/2012 10:45 PM, Leslie León Sinclair wrote:
Can anyone point me in the right direction, I´m stucked here and Google
is not helping...
Best
Am 11.01.2012 02:51, schrieb Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa:
for disable sending mails via telnet you will not find anything on the
DEBUG-README and finally the OP has proved enough information to
say:
* he do not understand how smtp works
* telnet does nothing other than any client
so NO
Am 11.01.2012 03:04, schrieb Peter:
On 11/01/12 14:57, Reindl Harald wrote:
problem of the OP solved
that he can no longer act as MX properly is another story
...and the fact that openssh s_client gets around that block makes your
answer completely useless, even though it may
Am 09.01.2012 22:07, schrieb Noel Jones:
On 1/9/2012 1:24 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Many people (me and most of this list included) reject impersonation
of the sender address unless it is on an encrypted submission port;
this is the norm rather than the exception nowadays.
Be aware this
Am 10.01.2012 04:32, schrieb Noel Jones:
in this case this is NOT legit mail, sites implementing this
way have to be rejected - a greeting ecard where you can
enter a e-mail-address which will be used as ENVELOPE sender
is badly broken
any web-application using a foreign ENVELOPE sender
Am 05.01.2012 17:18, schrieb Noah:
Sometimes when sending mail to my postfix server I receive the claim that
delivery temporarily suspended:
conversation with, 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out while receiving the initial
server greeting . I am seeing this
message show up to the local
Am 03.01.2012 18:30, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
To add to this sentiment, haven't most/all the viri/malware pushers
switched from an email delivery vector to drive-by downloads? I can't
recall the last time I saw a viral email attachment.
our barracuda saw 2929 in the last year
compared with
Am 03.01.2012 19:42, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2012-01-03 1:18 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
Also blocking unwanted attachments and double extensions (with
mime_header_checks or amavis) leaves only little stuff for clamav to
eat.
Care to share your header_checks
Am 03.01.2012 21:21, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 1/3/2012 12:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.01.2012 18:30, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
To add to this sentiment, haven't most/all the viri/malware pushers
switched from an email delivery vector to drive-by downloads? I can't
recall the last
Am 03.01.2012 22:37, schrieb Tolga:
Hi,
I thought I'd check the logs today, and I found something curious to me:
Jan 3 15:58:44 bilgisayarciniz postfix/smtpd[6179]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from unknown[85.95.233.13]: 554 5.7.1
Service unavailable; Client host [85.95.233.13] blocked
501 - 600 of 1003 matches
Mail list logo
