result_format = 'reject %s Mailbox disabled'
>
> Look up the appropriate SMTP code in RFC 5321, and DSN in RFC 3463 if
> desired. I think it would be '550 5.2.1 %s Mailbox disabled'.
looks like nice solutions thx for the tip
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
user/mailbox/alias should exist or not, so i told my users not to use
this feature
anyway postfix does its job right, in my case it bounces
incomming mail to inactive set mailboxes, but i didnt investigate
in more tests about it, perhaps there may be chances to change the
failure behave ( giving othe
;ll elaborate further later.
> Please feel free to question my motives / assumptions / plans and suggest
> better alternatives. I want to do this right and not have some hack job.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Fred Kilbourn
>
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
ieve
choose what fits best to your need and setup
"normally" youre doing procmail with local users
maildrop with courier
sieve with cyrus and dovecot
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
stuff and
finance, you should contact professionals for such setup to help
>
> Thanks!
> Yongsan
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
ix Debug instructions.
>
> p@rick
>
here is another link for special dovecot/postfix ubuntu
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PostfixDovecotSASL
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
re current off
perhaps look
http://www.howtoforge.com/ubuntu-postfix-saslauthd-sasl-authentication-failure-cannot-connect-to-saslauthd-server-permission-denied
perhaps this helps
--snip
Solution
Add the postfix user to the sasl group (this makes sure that Postfix has
the permission to access saslauthd):
--sn
Am 21.10.2011 18:10, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 21.10.2011 15:27, schrieb Miles Fidelman:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I'm about to rebuild a server farm, and I'm thinking about alternate
>> approaches to high-availability for our mail services.
>>
>&g
on linux ubuntu lucid up to 5000 maildir mailboxes
2 lbs, 2 mail/imap/pop3servers, 1 central logging and backupserver
nfs/syslog
but thats only one choice, there are a lot of choices left
which would work too
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;vps.ozses.net. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
ozses.net. 3600IN SOA ns01.ozses.net.
root.ozses.net. 2011100101 10800 15 604800 10800
;; Query time: 112 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Wed Oct 19 14:59:42 2011
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 77
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
ail sits in the queue
> for 5 days before timing out.
>
> Simon
>
dont double post lists, this is a smtp attack, not imap/pop3
use i.e fail2ban postfix rules for blocking
what happens sometimes/someothercases if not brute force is,
somebody missconfigured his client, and has stuff like
try out sending mails of i.e kind an outgoing folder
in short time terms and the computer is left alone alone with this (
mostly over night )
most outlook people...
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
ounce pipelining to that ip
smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps =
hash:/etc/postfix/smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword
/etc/postfix/smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx pipelining
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
etc/postfix/restrictioinincoming has
>>>
>>> ` ` ` `
>>> nore...@mail.com REJECT We said noreply!
>>> ` ` ` `
>>>
>>> then
>>>
>>> # postmap /etc/postfix/restrictioinincoming
>>> # /etc/init.d/postfix restart
>>>
>>> But still I can send mail at nore...@mail.com
>>>
>>> Have I missed anything ?
>>
>> Where was the message sent from? If the host you sent from is within
>> mynetworks or authenticated, the message would have gone through.
>
>
> Uh, ok... I have tested from a different domain and it is working perfectly
> fine.
> So, how can I then also restrict mynetworks or authenticated for that
> particular
> account ?
>
> TIA
set the restriction before permit i.e
>>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>>> check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/restrictioinincoming,
>>> permit_mynetworks,
>>> permit_sasl_authenticated,
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
35]:25, delay=0.38,
> delays=0.06/0/0.14/0.18, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as
> 88E10FA7CC1)???
>
> So what did server answer: 4xx or 2xx?
this means you sent a mail
>
> 12.10.2011 10:44, Robert Schetterer пишет:
>> Am 12.10.2011 08:38, schrieb Vladimi
ostfix 2.6.12
> Recipient says he cannot find letter in inbox.
you never no what happens to mail after your server delivered it
it s up to the recipients postmaster find out what happend next
perhaps
the problem is not in the computer
the problem is in front of it?
>
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 11.10.2011 09:49, schrieb J. Bakshi:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:53:41 +0200
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 11.10.2011 08:35, schrieb J. Bakshi:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have created some user like nore...@mail.com etc... where automated ma
s table to reject
after all this must not be a good idea by loosing bounces etc
it might be a good idea to add some info text to the reject
i.e
nore...@mail.com REJECT this address is for send only
but be aware that others may not amused of this and block you by whatever
--
Best Regards
MfG
k
i dont think there is a real relation to what youre trying to goal
but it did not work
>
> Any other solution ??
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
nraj Wadhe
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 30.09.2011 19:51, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Robert Schetterer:
>> Hi ,
>>
>> i have i.e.
>> warning: Unable to look up MX host mailin.v6.t-online.de
>> this seems ok, cause we dont have any ip4 con yet
>
> If Postfix is configured for IPv4 only, then lo
refusing your mail; only they can
>> give you an authoritative answer why.
>>
>> From the message returned, I assume they are doing an MX lookup on
>> the MAIL FROM domain, and that lookup fails. This doesn't have
>> anything to do with the pix workarounds.
>>
>>
>> -- Noel Jones
dont top post
use dig for lookups
better with real world examples
mx entries in dns are no secrets
after all i think your question was allready answered by Noel
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 30.09.2011 17:11, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Hi ,
>
> i have i.e.
> warning: Unable to look up MX host mailin.v6.t-online.de
> this seems ok, cause we dont have any ip4 con yet
> also using
>
> smtp_address_preference = ipv4
> inet_protocols = ipv4
&g
REJECT IP address of MX host is a RFC1918 address
192.0.2.0/24REJECT IP address of MX host is a RFC1918 address
240.0.0.0/12REJECT IP address of MX host is a reserved address
is there a way to get out of the log warning..
or should i simply ignore this ?
mails pass in
t function
so its up the user to set it unread after reading it
after all you, you should think about a working workflow for your needs
i.e think of using imap acl folder sharing
perhaps try asking dovecot list etc
i.e look
http://wiki.dovecot.org/ACL
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
or adminstration tasks, editing conf files etc
the permissions there can be configured to users, and/or you may create
your own editors of files or scripts
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
mailer loops, automatic BCC recipients are not generated after
Postfix forwards mail internally, or after Postfix generates mail itself.
Example:
sender_bcc_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sender_bcc
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
#x27;t passes my
>> DKIM signature.
>
> This means they broke it (assuming you aren't doing special
> processing for Mail.RU etc. destinations).
>
> Wietse
the problem also might be
if you changed your sig recent , or have a bug before in your sig, the
problem maybe based on dns caching, so you have to wait until their dns
updated
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 06.09.2011 09:24, schrieb Driessen:
> On Behalf Of Robert Schetterer
>>
>> Hallo Leute , ich hab derzeit zb
>>
>> Sep 6 08:37:02 mail02 postfix/smtpd[531]: warning:
>> 11.60.44.88.ix.dnsbl.manitu.net: RBL lookup error: Host or domain name
>> not found.
Am 06.09.2011 09:17, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Hallo Leute , ich hab derzeit zb
>
> Sep 6 08:37:02 mail02 postfix/smtpd[531]: warning:
> 11.60.44.88.ix.dnsbl.manitu.net: RBL lookup error: Host or domain name
> not found. Name service error for name=11.60.44.88.ix.dnsbl.mani
Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
recommend it as general tool, but in parts it can be very
helpfull, you may use a seperate webmin user and restrict/hide editing
parameter settings etc
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
e less greylisting since postscreen setup
i only used greylisting selective ever, so i see no real reason for
disabling greylisting by enable postscreen, the features are playing
good together if configured right,
i have disabled fail2ban since postscreen, looks like its better
to send a reject via postscreen at once, then blocking bots, but this
may be very special to my hot botted domain
>
> Anyone with similiar observations?
>
> p@rick
>
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
h all solution, perhaps postfix multi instance might help etc
also mailman may have a rate limit solution allready implemented ( didnt
looked at this )
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 06.08.2011 07:37, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 8/5/2011 6:38 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 05.08.2011 13:31, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
>
>>> Multiple options:
>>>
>>> * use a syslogd which can do filtering (syslog-ng) based on regexp
&
r help!
>
> Sincerely,
> Gary Chambers
if you dont like any smtp connects from some servers
block them with your firewall, this sure makes only sense
if they are always the same , if your postfix server allready
rejects it, and your bored of tons of logging, a dynamical
solution would be i.e fail2ban etc
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
-/var/log/pop3d-imapd.log
>
or use seperate dovecot log file
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Logging
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
> Alejandro Facultad
>
> --
> Ralf Hildebrandt
> Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
> Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
> Campus Benjamin Franklin
> Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
> Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
> ralf.hildebra...@charite.de <mailto:ralf.hildebra...@charite.de> |
> http://www.charite.de
>
>
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
database for the MAIL FROM address,
domain, parent domains, or localpart@, and execute the corresponding
action.
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 24.07.2011 11:14, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Hi,
> can i hold undelivered mail notifications
> with i.e some defined text in their body
> for further/later human analyse ?
>
> i tried with body_checks, it didnt
> worked, it was no syntax problem cause
Hi,
can i hold undelivered mail notifications
with i.e some defined text in their body
for further/later human analyse ?
i tried with body_checks, it didnt
worked, it was no syntax problem cause postmap tests worked
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 21.07.2011 19:04, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Robert Schetterer:
>> does it affect milters too ?
>
> Postfix invokes the Milters with each SMTP command.
>
> Postfix invokes the Milters with header/body content after the whole
> message is received.
>
> All this is
Am 21.07.2011 18:42, schrieb Noel Jones:
> On 7/21/2011 10:43 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Hi,
>> is smtpd_proxy_options=speed_adjust
>> known for any problems ?
>
> I assume you read the docs. There are side effects that may cause
> problems in some environm
Am 21.07.2011 18:07, schrieb Christian Roessner:
> Am 21.07.2011 17:43, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> Hi,
>> is smtpd_proxy_options=speed_adjust
>> known for any problems ?
>
> Do you have any problems? What is the reason for your question?
>
> Best wishes
>
Hi,
is smtpd_proxy_options=speed_adjust
known for any problems ?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
re on the list
read archive for solutions may fit to you
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 05.07.2011 21:41, schrieb Stefan Guenther:
> Hello,
>
> we have set "always_bcc = postmappe@localhost" to get a copy of every
> incoming and outgoing email.
>
> The problem now is, that we do not only get one copy of every incoming
> or outgoing email, but TWO.
>
> There reason for this seems
ound you could use clamav-milter
with sanesecurity antipishing sigs, that should help with known wide
spreaded spam
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
sql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
> virtual_gid_maps = static:99
> virtual_mailbox_base = /usr/local/virtual
> virtual_mailbox_domains =
> mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_domains_maps.cf,
> mysql_relay_domains_maps.cf
> virtual_mailbox_limit = 51200000
> virtual_mailbox_maps =
> mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_mailbox_maps.cf
> virtual_minimum_uid = 1001
> virtual_transport = maildrop
> virtual_uid_maps = static:1001
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
;s a great idea!
>
but what if there are other reasons, ok it doesnt hurt to much
to remove dkim sigs, but the admin should be informed
to this, or maybe it should expire, as far i remember this can be done
with fail2ban too ( but i may fail here )
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
e TCP session
>> without a RST (but with a message in the log ... which noone reads).
>
> :(
>
make it more public , firewall admins may awake, in germany heise
postings help sometimes *g
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
t; # this strips a DKIM Signature
>
>
yes there a few of them out there
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 04.06.2011 10:45, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 04.06.2011 06:03, schrieb Goutam Baul:
>> Dear List,
>>
>>
>>
>> We are running our mailing system using Postfix
>> (postfix-2.0.16-14.RHEL3). We need to send communications to our
>> sharehol
;
> With regards,
>
>
>
> Goutam
>
>
>
>
>
15000 news mails are no problem with recent postfix on modern hardware
so perhaps you should upgrade, anyway configure slow transports to i.e
yahoo etc , use their whitelist featuring etc
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
^[^\.]*[0-9]\.[^\.]*[0-9]\.[^\.]+\..+\./check_greylist
/^(dhcp|dialup|ppp|adsl)[^\.]*[0-9]/ check_greylist
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
n line in the SPEC_File and after
> "rpmbuild -bb postfix" you have a clean RPM with the latest
> version fully included in your package-managment
>
agree, however
somebody can search by it own here
http://distrowatch.com/search.php
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 19.04.2011 13:45, schrieb Jerry:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:28:58 +0200
> Robert Schetterer articulated:
>
>> Am 18.04.2011 16:07, schrieb Carlos Mennens:
>>> My default account is getting hammered with spam. I've
>>> got SA / Amavisd-new worki
ticular client I.P.
an easy idea might be reject the postmaster account with additional message
something like in a recipient access table
postmas...@domain.my REJECT please use admin_at_domain_dot_my for
sending us postmaster mail
this will help quick, any human will read the bounce and res
t
-o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
gt; -
> mxtoolbox:
> OK - 111.111.222.333 resolves to server.domain.tld
> Warning - Reverse DNS does not match SMTP Banner
>
>
however you can set
smtpd_banner =
in main.cf
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
t;
> But when sending mail, it still seems to go out on the machine's primary
> network
> interface.
>
> Help much appreciated.
you may use
smtp_bind_address=your.ip.add.here
in main.cf
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
g
Reject a message only if the client's IP is listed on more than
one RBL at the same time
Small learning curve
Syntax heavily inspired by the Squid HTTP proxy ACL system
Various ACLs to use and combine
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
or
> email. The obvious problem with this solution is it requires
> exterminating well over half the human race, including many/most of my
> family members. Not an appealing solution.
>
using clamav-milter with sanessecurity antipish should stop
allready known spam, for sure not new ones
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
e very other on debian
smtpd_milters = unix:/var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.ctl,
inet:localhost:8891, unix:/var/spool/postfix/spamass/spamass.sock
non_smtpd_milters = unix:/var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.ctl,
inet:localhost:8891, unix:/var/spool/postfix/spamass/spamass.sock
check i.e chroot, and your milters setups
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
e = /etc/ssl/certs/ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem
> smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key
> smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache
> smtpd_use_tls = yes
> transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-transport.cf
> unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
> virtual_alias_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-aliases.cf
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 16.02.2011 15:37, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Robert Schetterer:
>>>>>> 1 write [.]:40057: Connection reset by peer
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't use verbose logging for production runs.
>>>>
>>>> sorry Wietse , is see
Am 16.02.2011 14:25, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Robert Schetterer:
>> Am 16.02.2011 12:52, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>>> Robert Schetterer:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> is there an easy "switch" to getout
>>>> of logging "Connection reset by
Am 16.02.2011 14:04, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
>
> Am 16.02.2011 13:55, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> Am 16.02.2011 09:10, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>> This game should be played with the system-logger
>>>
>>> /etc/rsyslog.conf:
>>> :msg, contains,
Am 16.02.2011 12:52, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Robert Schetterer:
>> Hi,
>> is there an easy "switch" to getout
>> of logging "Connection reset by peer" from special ips/net i.e from
>> loadbalancers or montitoring checks?
>> for sure
Am 16.02.2011 09:10, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> This game should be played with the system-logger
>
> /etc/rsyslog.conf:
> :msg, contains, "client=localhost[127.0.0.1]" ~
> :msg, contains, "client=unknown[127.0.0.1]" ~
>
> Am 16.02.2011 09:07, schrieb Robe
Hi,
is there an easy "switch" to getout
of logging "Connection reset by peer" from special ips/net i.e from
loadbalancers or montitoring checks?
for sure only a cosmetic question
snip
1 write [.]:40057: Connection reset by peer
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schett
it I couldn't locate references to was
> the "to= vulnerable to "+:|" in the To address? Or perhaps none are and this
> is simply a failed probe attempt?
>
> Thanks,
> Bob
looks like trying allready fixed bug on spamass-milter
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?29136
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 10.02.2011 13:57, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Robert Schetterer:
>> Am 10.02.2011 12:48, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>>> Robert Schetterer:
>>>> Hi ,
>>>> if i use verify ( via internal network )
>>>> over smtp i want to have some fallback mec
Am 10.02.2011 12:48, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Robert Schetterer:
>> Hi ,
>> if i use verify ( via internal network )
>> over smtp i want to have some fallback mech
>> so if verify fails for one host ( perhabs it is rebooting etc )
>> i wanna fallback to another ho
Am 10.02.2011 12:12, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Hi in
>
> http://www.postfix.org/MYSQL_README.html
>
> we've included the ability to have Postfix reference multiple hosts for
> access to a single mysql map. This will work if sites set up mirrored
> mysql data
user =
password =
hosts = 2
dbname = postfix
query = SELECT address FROM alias WHERE address like '%u\@%d' AND active = 1
?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Hi ,
if i use verify ( via internal network )
over smtp i want to have some fallback mech
so if verify fails for one host ( perhabs it is rebooting etc )
i wanna fallback to another host for verify
is this possible?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 09.02.2011 17:09, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 09.02.2011 16:56, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>> Robert Schetterer:
>>> Hi , i have relay which smtp transports
>>> to an internal mail server ( work wonderfull )
>>> now i want to use always_bcc
>>> to a
Am 09.02.2011 16:56, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Robert Schetterer:
>> Hi , i have relay which smtp transports
>> to an internal mail server ( work wonderfull )
>> now i want to use always_bcc
>> to a local user
>> seems not work any idea how to solve this?
>
>
Hi , i have relay which smtp transports
to an internal mail server ( work wonderfull )
now i want to use always_bcc
to a local user
seems not work any idea how to solve this?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 09.02.2011 09:03, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 09.02.2011 02:50, schrieb Sahil Tandon:
>> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 22:04:38 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, geotrust
>>> has changed ssl procedures
>>> for this in i.e apache
Am 09.02.2011 02:50, schrieb Sahil Tandon:
> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 22:04:38 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Hi, geotrust
>> has changed ssl procedures
>> for this in i.e apache
>> i have to add intermediate in a extra
>> SSLCACertificateFile
>
> [
>
/etc/postfix/wildcard.pem
i am not quite sure if or how i should include
intermediate ca in postfix
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
blem is
> spam.
>
> Thanks
> Ralf
>
>
>
i never was clear why using ironport *g
75 a day mails are not that much, you could use
opensource filtering i.e spamassassin etc
with normal recent server hardware
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 06.02.2011 21:51, schrieb Mark Alan:
> On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 20:01:17 +0100, Robert Schetterer
> wrote:
>
>>> Do you know any reliable Debian/Ubuntu repositories for the
>>> newest Postfix 2.8?
>>
>> http://debian.incertum.net/
>
> Thank you, but
Am 06.02.2011 19:52, schrieb Mark Alan:
> Hello,
>
>
> Do you know any reliable Debian/Ubuntu repositories for the
> newest Postfix 2.8?
>
> Regards,
>
> M.
http://debian.incertum.net/
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
n what they ship with.
>>
>> Joe
>
> guys, we at the bsd balcony find it funny to see linuxers fighting each
> other with "my distro is better" and "I can compile faster than you",
> and more funnily "I was born to destroy bill gates empire".
>
> but all this is off topic here.
so bsd is the answer to all universe questions? *g
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
inform about dropping mail to
them, not longer getting your newsletter etc , usally companies react
better when they get asked by people
from which they want money, in heavy cases this might be work for lawers
whatever your story isnt rare as might you think, there are some big
mail isp out there ,which postmaster support is a desaster
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Hi, @ll, somebody working on
opensuse postfix-2.8 (s)rpm ?
cant find some on the opensuse reps recent
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
ng to you general mail layout )
read carefully altermine stuff about mailclients etc
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
our mail be spam
you might always get into filters at big mail providers, or get in rbls etc
perhaps look i.e. here
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
load.
>
>
i have it up and running with dovecot no need for VDA
dovecot 2.09 has a debian auto build repo here
http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/pool/testing-auto/dovecot-2.0/
if problems with vda ask on their list
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
days or more for update ( caching )
also an rbl sometimes needs time to delist
>
> Thank you so much for your help friends
>
>
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
l in your server and that blocks
>> legitimate senders, then stop using spamcannibal.
>>
>>
>
>
>
some experience might be
spamcannibal is not widly used
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
rd party site
you are trying to contact.
SpamCannibal does not scan remote hosts or otherwise test remote sites.
The ONLY way you can get into SpamCannibal's database is by sending
unsolicited email to our servers!
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
DAEMON comes from your
pop3 downloader putting mail in some remote smtp server
i had failure message in a equal setup by a buggy network interface on
the client pop side only with pdf attachments in the past
provide more info to debug
but postfix is mostly not involved in such problems ( until y
ot;usually signs
>> with DKIM", "has a strict SPF record", "uses MS Exchange", ... etc.
>>
>> postfix can check DNSBL (reject_rbl_client, ... etc). spamassassin can check
>> that and other stuff such as URIBL, SPF, DKIM, ... etc.
>>
you may use http://www.dkim-reputation.org/
too
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 21.12.2010 22:08, schrieb mouss:
> Le 21/12/2010 11:31, Robert Schetterer a écrit :
>> [snip]
>> funny now with 0
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>> aol.com.3600IN MX 0 mailin-04.mx.aol.com.
>> aol.com.
Am 21.12.2010 12:04, schrieb Mark Scholten:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
>> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 11:08 AM
>>
Am 21.12.2010 11:04, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Hi , sorry off topic
> i see disapearing mx record from aol.com
> anyone else ?
>
> Domain Name.. aol.com
> Creation Date 1995-06-22
> Registration Date 2009-10-03
> Expiry Date.. 2011-11-
IN SOA dns-02.ns.aol.com.
hostmaster.aol.net. 304268691 43200 60 1209600 300
;; Query time: 93 msec
;; SERVER: 205.188.157.232#53(205.188.157.232)
;; WHEN: Tue Dec 21 11:01:20 2010
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 89
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
501 - 600 of 765 matches
Mail list logo
