Re: Difficulty creating a "nobody@" address

2017-01-31 Thread Tim Smith
> Alternately, you can use a check_recipient_access table to reject > the recipient, or you can just not create that user in the first > place and let postfix reject it as an unknown recipient... seems > like that was where we started this conversation. > Sorry for the confusion, perhaps I had

Re: Difficulty creating a "nobody@" address

2017-01-31 Thread Tim Smith
> > If someone less computer-savvy takes the time to reply to your > confirmation, why would you throw away his response? Well, ok, if you really *must* know ;-) This is for an internal application, forwarding notifications from "something" to a group of people. Thus there is no need for

Re: Difficulty creating a "nobody@" address

2017-01-31 Thread Tim Smith
Sorry, one more question ! Is it possible to issue a 554 to the sending server using discard: ?

Re: Difficulty creating a "nobody@" address

2017-01-31 Thread Tim Smith
>> > > The relay_recipient_maps table is for listing valid recipients in > relay_domains. > > Discard that recipient's mail with a transport map entry > # transport > nob...@example.com discard: > > You may also need to add that user to your virtual mailbox table so > it will be accepted as a

Difficulty creating a "nobody@" address

2017-01-31 Thread Tim Smith
Hi, I’m trying to create a “nobody@“ email address for outbound-only transaction confirmations that will /dev/null any attempts to email it. In my main.cf on the inbound mail gateway I have: relay_recipient_maps = ${indexed}XYZ_relay_recipients And in the map file I have : nob...@example.com

Re: OpenDKIM, Milters and Postfix .... config pointer needed

2017-01-26 Thread Tim Smith
Just for anyone who reads this thread in the future... A **BIG** thank you to the awesome Benny ! A little bit of off-list help lead me to discovering two missing config lines : #master.cf -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING # opendkim.conf MTA

OpenDKIM, Milters and Postfix .... config pointer needed

2017-01-25 Thread Tim Smith
Hi, I am trying to get OpenDKIM 2.11.0 running with Postfix 3.1.4. When a SASL authenticated client sends an email via Postfix, the following is logged : Jan 25 15:15:59 bob opendkim[1016]: DDD1F400A1B2: [192.0.2.43] [192.0.2.43] not internal Jan 25 15:15:59 bob opendkim[1016]: DDD1F400A1B2:

Re: Postfix instance not listening

2017-01-20 Thread Tim Smith
Viktor, I'm sorry I'm obviously not as perfect as you. Obviously, given your level of godly perfection, you've never suffered from "config file blindness" you know after starting a whole bunch of them for a while suddenly the obvious gets hidden. Thanks a bunch

Postfix instance not listening

2017-01-20 Thread Tim Smith
Hi, I need a second pair of eyes on this. My postmulti instance as configured below is not listening and I can't figure out why ! As you can see below, "postfix-authrelay" is active : $ sudo postmulti -l - - y /etc/postfix postfix-authrelay mta y

Re: Reverse DNS Lookup

2014-04-22 Thread Tim Smith
. Is there some kind of fix I can employ here for this particular server? Would entries in the /etc/hosts file work? I assume that if I have multi on, I can put an entry in for each A record? On 22/04/14 17:09, Wietse Venema wrote: Tim Smith: Cheers for that. The output I get is: *./getaddrinfo

Re: Mail Server Accused of Spam!

2014-03-18 Thread Tim Smith
Thanks for the suggestion. The client in question is not too tech savvy so explaining the POP thing will probably not help. I have used that method before on a previous mail server with a different client and it worked perfectly. At the moment, all the spam is being directed to me by way of a

Mail Server Accused of Spam!

2014-03-15 Thread Tim Smith
Hello, I have a few users who just want their email forwarded onto GMail Accounts however these users seem to receive an inordinate amount of spam and so I get a message from Google in my logs stating: /Feb 7 09:39:53 xxx postfix/smtp[15191]: 118C8C0C2A6: host

Out Of Office Responders

2012-12-29 Thread Tim Smith
Had a quick look around on Google for this but no definitive answer. I am looking to incorporate some Out Of Office functionality with my dovecot/postfix set up. I need this to work with a variety of email clients if those clients support that functionality. Ideally, it would work out of teh

Re: Out Of Office Responders

2012-12-29 Thread Tim Smith
are invariably MS compatible) across to my servers so need to offer this in a seamless fashion. Is this do-able? Thanks, Tim On 29/12/12 13:55, Wietse Venema wrote: Tim Smith: I notice that postfix comes with a program called vacation. Is this something that can be configured by the client