* Wietse Venema wrote :
Troy Piggins:
I'm using sender_bcc maps to archive/backup sent mail. Config
extracts below. It does work, but is creating duplicates when mail
is sent from clients other than localhost. IE if I send mail using
See http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
* Jeroen Geilman wrote :
* On 2011-09-28 11:57, Troy Piggins wrote:
* Wietse Venema wrote :
* Troy Piggins:
I'm using sender_bcc maps to archive/backup sent mail. Config
extracts below. It does work, but is creating duplicates when mail
is sent from clients other than localhost. IE if I
/etc/procmailrc:
...
:0:
* ^X-Original-To:.*_sent@netserv\.ourdomain\.local
| gzip -fc9 ${HOME}/Sent_${DATE}.gz
...
--
Troy Piggins
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:02:21AM +1000, Troy Piggins wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:47:37AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
snip /
It is not a variable expansion. Use this instead:
/(user1)@mydomain.com/ $1_s...@mydomain.com
Read http://www.postfix.org/pcre_table.5.html, section
you think I'm on the right track? Mostly in terms of using pcre for the
table. Wasn't sure whether this or regex would be better?
4. Any other suggestions/advice?
--
Troy Piggins
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:47:37AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 2011-08-10 09:20, Troy Piggins wrote:
snip /
1. Could you please confirm that the pattern between the slashes is just the
sender's address that we're trying to match?
sender_bcc_maps matches the envelope sender address
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:11:49AM +0200, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2011-08-10 Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 2011-08-10 09:20, Troy Piggins wrote:
snip /
It is not a variable expansion. Use this instead:
/(user1)@mydomain.com/ $1_s...@mydomain.com
Read http://www.postfix.org
* Robert Schetterer wrote :
* Am 24.05.2011 13:43, schrieb Noel Jones:
* On 5/24/2011 2:38 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
Just curious if it's possible to pass messages that match certain
header checks to postgrey instead of flat out rejecting them. The
reason I ask is that I was trying out some
positives. One sender
was trying and trying to send, but kept getting the 4xx message and
not getting through.
--
Troy Piggins
, but figured many users here would be
familiar with it?
--
Troy Piggins
* Jeroen Geilman wrote :
* On 05/23/2011 01:25 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
I've recently been keeping an eye on my mail statistics
usingmailgraph http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/ . I'm impressed by
the amount of spam/rejections achieved using just postgrey and some
postfix restrictions.
One
into what that is.
--
Troy Piggins
* Duane Hill wrote :
Thursday, April 28, 2011, 1:19:11 AM, you wrote:
Troy Piggins wrote:
Wondering how you're solving this for emails sent with Date: headers
way in the past or future. What do you think is a reasonably
acceptable in terms of dates. 3 days each side of the correct
that just postgrey alone is sufficient? What would it catch
that postgrey doesn't?
--
Troy Piggins
* Michael Orlitzky wrote :
On 04/28/2011 07:45 PM, Troy Piggins wrote:
Might not be the right place to post this, so just let me know to
move on if so...
I've been using the wonderful postgrey on my server and it seems to
do a wonderful job of cutting down spam. I am now curious about
* Voytek Eymont wrote :
I've followed the recent advice as I'm also getting a lot of
these_long_subjects_emails_with_crap_in_them:
--
* Noel Jones wrote :
On 4/27/2011 6:17 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
Hi there. I'm noticing lately most of the spam that gets through my
They do seem to have non-alnum chars such as ?-. etc. Just no
spaces.
I'm thinking there must be a header check with pcre on Subject that
could catch these. Been googling but can't find anyone that seems
to mention this. Might be my poor search term selection?
Any suggestions?
--
Troy
* Noel Jones wrote :
On 4/27/2011 6:17 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
Hi there. I'm noticing lately most of the spam that gets through my
postgrey/postfix/amavis/spamassassin/procmail rules contains subject
lines that are extremely long strings with no spaces in them. eg:
Subject
* Wietse Venema wrote :
Troy Piggins:
Hi there. I'm noticing lately most of the spam that gets through my
postgrey/postfix/amavis/spamassassin/procmail rules contains subject
lines that are extremely long strings with no spaces in them. eg:
Subject
* Noel Jones wrote :
On 4/27/2011 7:23 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
* Noel Jones wrote :
On 4/27/2011 6:17 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
snip /
regexp and pcre compatible expression:
/^Subject: +[^[:space:]]{60}/ REJECT no spaces
Thanks mate. That works beautifully. One minor improvement. I
encoding, and applies the test on the plaintext.
Thanks for that.
--
Troy Piggins
a cron script that modifies the header_checks file, but
that may be a bit clumsy?
--
Troy Piggins
22 matches
Mail list logo
