Hi,
I'm trying to set up simple bounce handling in Postfix. I was hoping not to
need/want VERP, but simply trying to get Postfix to call a script with the
failed (bounced/delayed) RCPT TO address, instead of sending a bounce e-mail
with that bounced address in the body. (Current version is
- Original Message -
From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
To: Wiebe Cazemier wi...@halfgaar.net
Cc: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Sunday, 17 June, 2012 2:41:29 AM
Subject: Re: Relaying e-mail from the bash command line (with sendmail
probably)
Wiebe Cazemier
- Original Message -
From: Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Sunday, 17 June, 2012 11:15:51 AM
Subject: Re: Relaying e-mail from the bash command line (with sendmail
probably)
Use the content_filter to directly relay to the destination host ?
I
Hi,
In a bash script, I have:
- an e-mail message with full headers in a tmp file.
- A from address (to use for -f with 'sendmail')
- a recipient (u...@example.com).
How do I relay this message to another server than example.com, but do set RCPT
TO to u...@example.com when relaying to that
- Original Message -
From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
To: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Saturday, 16 June, 2012 3:50:40 PM
Subject: Re: Relaying e-mail from the bash command line (with sendmail
probably)
Transport maps can be per-recipient.
But when I want
- Original Message -
From: Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Tuesday, 5 June, 2012 7:51:47 PM
Subject: Re: Sending mail to custom transport and second server
recipient_bcc_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/backup_domains, with the
following content:
- Original Message -
From: Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Tuesday, 5 June, 2012 7:51:47 PM
Subject: Re: Sending mail to custom transport and second server
recipient_bcc_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/backup_domains, with the
following content:
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Saturday, 11 June, 2011 6:23:59 PM
Subject: Re: unverified_recipient_tempfail_action = permit
Am 11.06.2011 16:55, schrieb Wiebe Cazemier:
That's not what I meant. I meant
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Sunday, 12 June, 2011 10:04:02 AM
Subject: Re: unverified_recipient_tempfail_action = permit
Am 12.06.2011 09:06, schrieb Wiebe Cazemier:
so you do not need any backup-MX
- Original Message -
From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
To: Wiebe Cazemier wi...@halfgaar.net
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday, 10 June, 2011 9:37:39 PM
Subject: Re: unverified_recipient_tempfail_action = permit
Wiebe Cazemier:
That's why I was asking
- Original Message -
From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
To: Wiebe Cazemier wi...@halfgaar.net
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday, 10 June, 2011 2:50:34 PM
Subject: Re: unverified_recipient_tempfail_action = permit
Wiebe Cazemier:
- The server is backup MX for mail
- Original Message -
From: Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
To: Wiebe Cazemier wi...@halfgaar.net
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday, 10 June, 2011 5:04:09 PM
Subject: Re: unverified_recipient_tempfail_action = permit
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 05:00:16PM
Hi,
I don't really know where to post feature ideas, but this seems the only viable
option.
I was setting up a fallback MX server with Postfix and was struggling with
preventing backscatter mail. I thought I found a good solution, but it turned
out to be an illegal option.
Postfix has the
Well, when the primar is down, all incoming messages on the fallback are
deferred, because it can't do the verification. This means the result is the
same as having no fallback at all.
Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.net wrote:
On 2011-06-09 Wiebe Cazemier wrote:
I was setting up
14 matches
Mail list logo
