On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:22 AM, Sufian Hameed wrote:
Dec 9 14:18:18 esprimo postfix/qmgr[8828]: warning: transport smtp failure
-- see a previous warning/fatal/panic logfile record for the problem
description
what does this log entry say ?
On Nov 3, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Edward Carraro wrote:
I would like to set up SMTP, allowing the user to authenticate as their main
address, but still continue to send mail using their alias (without disabling
reject_sender_login_mismatch, as discussed here
On Oct 26, 2010, at 8:47 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
jeffrey j donovan:
greetings
How can I test my local recipient map. Im looking for something similar to a
postmap -q us...@example.com hash:/etc/postfix/myfile
here is my map statement.
local_recipient_maps =
On Oct 8, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
I would like to use LDAP ( OpenLDAP ) aliases from our MX server
in order to forward emails to the internal mailhub.
The MX use the transport utility to forward emails to the mailhub
and does not perform local deliveries.
Thanks
On Oct 6, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 10/05/2010 12:04 PM, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
Hi,
Please suggest me solution on following requirements :
User will send emails on one postfix server then this server will route
email traffic to multiple postfix servers.
For
On Oct 5, 2010, at 6:04 AM, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
Hi,
Please suggest me solution on following requirements :
User will send emails on one postfix server then this server will route email
traffic to multiple postfix servers.
How we can implement this feature ?
Should we use
On Sep 30, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Cimoni Enwis Ogwujiakwu wrote:
Hello,
I have setup a postfix server for scanning mails for spam relayed through it
and I have redirected all port 25 traffic through it from my firewall but
when I try sending mails through
telnet for example smtp.gmail.com 25
greetings
I was reading http://linux.die.net/man/5/ldap_table and was trying to get a
clear picture of what the config would look like, and is postmap required?
would this work
server_host = 127.0.0.1
server_host = 192.168.1.1
server_host = 192.168.1.2
search_base = dc=my,dc=example,dc=com
On Sep 28, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/29/2010 02:35 AM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
greetings
I was reading http://linux.die.net/man/5/ldap_table and was trying to get a
clear picture of what the config would look like, and is postmap required?
server_host (default
On Sep 28, 2010, at 9:42 PM, Troy Campbell wrote:
The first two lines were commented out but when I looked at the server that
used to host mail it was uncommented so I uncommented it on this new machine
and recreated the hash i.e., postmap hash:/etc/postfix/transport
snip
this did not
On Sep 27, 2010, at 6:57 PM, Troy Campbell wrote:
Sorry, this is probably a newbie question but I’m having an issue where I see
a bunch of emails with an “*” next to them when I run postqueue –p but not
being delivered to the local machine. What does the “*” mean. I also
noticed “!”
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
donovan jeffrey j:
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:49 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
donovan jeffrey j:
greetings
i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I
have
greetings
i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have read
in the archives it may be an incorrect user or permission but it's not harmful.
How do i clear the warning ?
I used macports
Sep 10 22:00:22 mx1 postfix/master[191]: daemon started -- version 2.7.1,
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:05 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
greetings
i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have
read in the archives it may be an incorrect user or permission but it's not
harmful. How do i clear the warning ?
I used macports
Sep 10 22
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
donovan jeffrey j:
greetings
i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have
read in the archives it may be an incorrect user or permission but it's not
harmful. How do i clear the warning ?
I used macports
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:49 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
donovan jeffrey j:
greetings
i just upgraded postfix to 2.7.1 on a OSX 10.6.4 machine. From what I have
read in the archives it may be an incorrect user or permission but it's
On Aug 23, 2010, at 11:32 AM, LuKreme wrote:
On 19-Aug-2010, at 13:08, D G Teed wrote:
The only place I've seen which publicly talks about
the reverse DNS requirement is AOL.
Craigslist requires that the reverse DNS match EXACTLY the mail server name.
So, if your mailserver doubles
greetings
all day long I see tons of reject warnings from different ips sample
reject_warning: RCPT from unknown[65.60.20.157]: 450 Client host rejected:
cannot find your hostname, [65.60.20.157];
when I do an nslookup or host that IP it returns a 157.20.60.65.in-addr.arpa
domain name pointer
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/12/2010 1:37 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/12/2010 1:07 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
greetings
all day long I see tons of reject warnings from different ips sample
reject_warning
greetings
this weekend I have been hit with a ton of forged spam messages.
here is a sample header
From: realu...@beth.k12.pa.us
Subject:realu...@beth.k12.pa.us 62% OFF on Pfizer!
Date: August 8, 2010 9:41:57 AM EDT
To: realu...@beth.k12.pa.us
Return-Path:
On Aug 8, 2010, at 2:16 PM, junkyardma...@verizon.net
junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote:
http://www.openspf.org/
thanks for the reply,
since this is not postfix related. I have to go off list. but before I go
i get a little confused when reading the SPF docs. It seems to easy.
from what i
On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Friday, July 30, 2010 at 19:47 CEST,
donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us wrote:
[...]
There is no smtpd.conf that defines what SASL should do for Postfix.
SMTP AUTH can't work!
This is bad.
http://www.postfix.org
Greetings
I have an older relay system accept ssl on port 25, it seems to be working, but
when i test it, STARTTLS shows up but then the session stalls like it's waiting
for me to do something. -probably i do.
smtp2:/etc/postfix root# telnet 127.0.0.1 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to
On Jul 30, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Friday, July 30, 2010 at 17:33 CEST,
donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us wrote:
I have an older relay system accept ssl on port 25, it seems to be
working, but when i test it, STARTTLS shows up but then the session
stalls like
On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
The simplest way to upgrade an existing configuration is:
- Back up the new main.cf, master.cf, postfix-files, postfix-script
and post-install files.
- Install the old main.cf and old master.cf and any files that
you have added to the
On Jul 29, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
donovan jeffrey j:
On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
The simplest way to upgrade an existing configuration is:
- Back up the new main.cf, master.cf, postfix-files, postfix-script
and post-install files.
- Install
version 2.5.5,
greetings
im upgrading a couple of xserves to 10.6 from 10.4. the main.cf used to be
pretty straight forward. The default main.cf on 10.6 snow leopard server has
overwhelmed my old eyeballs. may new lines most i understand but they pretty
much list every option known to man.
On May 4, 2010, at 3:23 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2010-05-03 donovan jeffrey j wrote:
im working on a header check to filter out anything that says Viagra
in the From: line. My question,.. is how do I handle the quotes ?
here is a sample header
From: Viagra US supplier nujue7
Greetings
im working on a header check to filter out anything that says Viagra in the
From: line. My question,.. is how do I handle the quotes ?
here is a sample header
From: Viagra US supplier nujue7...@myfairpoint.net
From: Viagra US dealer izylasaeym6...@bu.edu
here is what i want to use
Greetings
i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems it's not
resolving. at least for me. is anyone else having any problems ?
Apr 19 08:21:48 mail2 postfix/smtpd[21485]: warning:
130.60.141.41.zen.spamhaus.org: RBL lookup error: Host or domain name not
found. Name
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
Greetings
i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems it's not
resolving. at least for me. is anyone else having any problems ?
You might have been blocked because you
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:54 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
I certainly do not want to exceed any limits, how do i avoid that ?
Well, how big is your server?
oh it's about this high - - -
j/k
this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:58 AM, John Peach wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:53:03 -0400
donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us wrote:
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
Greetings
i have been seeing tons of errors coming from
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about 2000 users.
This should well be within the limits. We're execeeding the limit at
about 30k users. Maybe you're using your ISPs
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about 2000 users.
This should
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:36 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:31:19AM -0400, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
abuseat.org is working fine. I'm only having trouble with zen.
Apr 19 08:29:12 mail2 postfix/smtpd[21642]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from unknown[117.201.68.108]: 554 Service
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
donovan jeffrey j:
by the time i typed this email. i got an authoritative answer;
dns:~ root# nslookup 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
Server: 209.96.96.2
Address:209.96.96.2#53
You should do such tests as a non-root user
On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:07 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Rather test with:
2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
which should return:
2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.2
2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.4
2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.10
yes this is working
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:22 PM, Steve wrote:
You can run that caching DNS where ever you want as long as you secure that
DNS. If you use BIND and are using forwarders to your ISP name servers then
that caching will not necessarily help much if your ISP's NS are the problem.
thanks for the
On Apr 9, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2010-04-08 donovan jeffrey j wrote:
On Apr 8, 2010, at 9:57 PM, osmcr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm running Suse 10.3 Server and looking for a script like this that
DOH!
my bad,.. I saw 10.3 Server with one eye, thought he was speaking mac
On Apr 8, 2010, at 9:57 PM, osmcr...@gmail.com wrote:
I’m running Suse 10.3 Server and looking for a script like this that will
backup all the system config files and any others that I would want, this is
a db and mailbox users backup for my mail server ….. But I plan migrating to
a new
On Mar 3, 2010, at 12:09 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
donovan jeffrey j:
SNIP 5468961666%
13235578 6836202 66% /
And that's 26 GBytes as well.
It would be interesting to see what Postfix smtpd logs. You can
turn it on selectively
postconf -e debug_peer_list=127.0.0.1
postfix
On Mar 1, 2010, at 10:56 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
Greetings
I had several of these on my primary MX this weekend and one just
popped up. Can someone explain where this Insufficient system
storage is ?
both mail queues are empty
On Mar 2, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Daniel V. Reinhardt wrote:
this is default on all my systems.
MX1
/dev/disk1s3 77G51G26G66%/
MX2
/dev/disk0s3 234G46G 187G20%/
Can you show the partitioning of these systems?
Thanks
thats all i
On Mar 2, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
It may be worthwhile to run the Postfix fsspace test program.
- Download any Postfix source code that compiles on your system.
- cd into the source tree, then execute the following commands:
make makefiles
cd src/util
make fsspace
Greetings
I had several of these on my primary MX this weekend and one just
popped up. Can someone explain where this Insufficient system storage
is ?
both mail queues are empty, and DF shows 20% on the reporting system.
Out: 220 mx2.beth.k12.pa.us ESMTP Postfix
In: EHLO
On Feb 16, 2010, at 8:09 AM, aa wrote:
Someone advised me to insert in the DNS zone a list of MX records
defined with the same level of priority so the DNS server will
choose one of them without invoking always the same mail server
It could be an idea, in my opinion, but I'd prefer a
On Jan 13, 2010, at 10:23 PM, Jim Seymour wrote:
Hi All,
As many of you may be aware, about a year ago I emailed the list
asking if anybody would be interested in taking over maintenance
of Pflogsumm. Several people volunteered. In the mean-time,
after un-loading a bit (basically taking a
On Oct 22, 2009, at 6:50 AM, ram wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 09:07 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
A lotus notes server of our clients in hugely misconfigured to
send just
a empty HELO. And we are supposed to relay mails for this client.
I know getting the lotus admin to set his MTA is
On Oct 9, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Mark Johnson wrote:
All,
We have an application server to generate mail and use postfix as
relay mail server for outgoing mail. We ran the test and postfix did
catch the error. However, it didn't report back to application server.
We used sendmail as relay mail
On Jul 8, 2009, at 2:16 PM, New Old Stk wrote:
Looks like I spoke to early about tricky Cisco router. Just had our
modem/router equipment replaced, hoping it would fix the problem but
to no avail! I give up.
in the cisco box , did you remove any fixup smtp protocols / ports ?
On Wed,
51 matches
Mail list logo
