El Miércoles 22 Junio 2016, Admin Beckspaced escribió:
> Am 22.06.2016 um 15:32 schrieb Christian Schmitz (list):
> > Hi:
> > I have a postfix running on opensuse LEAP42.1. This distro have journal
> > as default logging system, i really dislike this system and i want th
Hi:
I have a postfix running on opensuse LEAP42.1. This distro have journal as
default logging system, i really dislike this system and i want that postfix
create their own "/var/log/mail-postfix" file.
Is possible?
If yes, How i can do it?
If no, how i can change the logging system?
Best
We would like to use the Cassandra database to persist the state of
abusive IPs which we would block from connecting in one of the
smtpd_xxx_restrictions clauses. We have systems that exist in multiple
data centers and Cassandra works really well for persisting data between
them, but Postfix
I would like to transport messages for a specific address to a python
application to do a few things then push the message back to postfix for
delivery to their maildir. I am wondering what is the best way to put
that message back into postfix without it looping back through the
transport?
/smtpd[16181]: fatal: no SASL
authentication mechanisms
I'm probably doing something very simple wrong, but I can't see it. I
was hoping some of the august lurkers on this list could take a look at my
settings and see where I'm going wrong.
Here are my settings for postfix and dovecot
postconf -n
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:05:26 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter p...@sys4.de wrote:
* Mail List maill...@nerdworld.org:
I am in the process of setting up postfix 2.9.6, postgrey, and dovecot
2.1.7 on a clean install of Debian wheezy 7.6 AMD. I'm doing this very
systematically in a VirtualBox virtual
On 08/04/2014 01:58 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
However, this is generally a waste of
time, nobody cares what the server's banner or EHLO name says.
I care that EHLO contains something reasonable, or I will reject the
connection. But that's me.
(signed)
Bastard Mail Admin from Hell
Hi we have a virtual domain setup when sending emails from a virtual
somain dont want the local domain to appear in the headers.
For example as you can see bellow when sending emails from a virtual
email account (con...@vmail.eu) .
inside the header information the localhostt is sent(
I am running postfix 2.6.6 and trying to setup check_client_access using
a mysql lookup under the smtpd_client_restrictions, which does not
appear to be rejecting clients when the query returns REJECT (which
has been confirmed to return REJECT using postmap -q xxx mysql:..).
When I change it
On 4/15/14, 2:50 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 2:27 PM, List wrote:
I am running postfix 2.6.6 and trying to setup check_client_access
using a mysql lookup under the smtpd_client_restrictions, which does
not appear to be rejecting clients when the query returns REJECT
(which has been
On 4/15/14, 3:12 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 3:02 PM, List wrote:
On 4/15/14, 2:50 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 2:27 PM, List wrote:
I am running postfix 2.6.6 and trying to setup check_client_access
using a mysql lookup under the smtpd_client_restrictions, which does
not appear
On 4/15/14, 3:33 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 3:25 PM, List wrote:
On 4/15/14, 3:12 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 3:02 PM, List wrote:
On 4/15/14, 2:50 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 2:27 PM, List wrote:
I am running postfix 2.6.6 and trying to setup check_client_access
using
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 01:44:07AM -0500, Ron Scott-Adams wrote:
I?ve updated a working user on this test server from r...@tohuw.net to
r...@joab.tohuw.net. Under the previous address, I could successfully
complete a telnet session and convey mail for r...@tohuw.net to the local MTA.
domains?
That's not exactly what you said, is it?
Does your domain registrar control (or even ask to control) what you
list in your /etc/resolv.conf file? Mine doesn't. And my resolv.conf
points to nameserver 127.0.0.1, my own local resolver, which does
perform DNSSEC validation
[resending to list, where I meant to send it...]
Hi Wietse,
On 01/31/2014 04:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
IMAP List Administration:
Hello List,
a week or so ago I upgraded my OpenBSD mail server from OpenBSD 5.3 to 5.4,
and
at the same time went from postfix-2.9.6 to postfix-2.11.20130710
Hello Michael,
On 02/03/2014 02:41 PM, m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
3 feb 2014 г. 17:08:31 GMT+04:00, IMAP List Administration li...@y42.org
wrote:
Indeed, the problem was being caused by bug(s) in the OpenBSD
implementation of
gethostbyaddr().
Care to give some more information about those
Hello List,
a week or so ago I upgraded my OpenBSD mail server from OpenBSD 5.3 to 5.4, and
at the same time went from postfix-2.9.6 to postfix-2.11.20130710.
postfix-2.11.20130710 is the OpenBSD 5.4 default package, in case someone is
wondering why that?.
I've been using
Yes. But, are you sure the problem is the mail header and not the
MAIL FROM command?
No, I'm not sure. However, considering some servers will also reject
mail where the From: header domain is inconsistent with envelope
hostnames, I suppose it doesn't matter. Either way, I need postfix to
So here's the problem:
An unusual server rejects mail on the basis that the domain portion
of the FROM address in the header does not match the IP address of
the server.
So I need to compose a message like this:
From: anything@let postfix choose
To: ...
Subject: ...
and I need
I am building a script to handle some specific recipients so I will be
using transport to handle their domain. The script may run for a long
period of time (up to 30 seconds) and I am wondering if there is a way
for the script to let postfix know I have received the message and let
it
On 11/13/13, 11:52 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:18:32AM -0600, List wrote:
I am building a script to handle some specific recipients so I will
be using transport to handle their domain. The script may run for a
long period of time (up to 30 seconds) and I am wondering
On 10/19/13 3:24 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:56:59AM -0500, List wrote:
For example we have the address distgr...@domain.tld which
is an alias to 3000 local users.
What kind of alias? Are you using virtual(5) aliases via
virtual_alias_maps, and with backend database
I wanted to confirm the behavior we are experiencing at the moment when
delivering messages to addresses aliased to thousands of local users.
For example we have the address distgr...@domain.tld which is an alias
to 3000 local users. When our inbound spam filter connects to the
Postfix
We are currently using dovecot for smtp auth, and due to an increase in
spammers abusing smtp auth we setup dovecot to return an invalid login
for user's that have been set to disabled in our provisioning system.
This seemed to work for a while (preventing spammers that are using
auth), but
On 10/2/13 10:32 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:17:16AM -0500, List wrote:
We are currently using dovecot for smtp auth, and due to an increase
in spammers abusing smtp auth we setup dovecot to return an invalid
login for user's that have been set to disabled in our
On 2013-05-02 23:02, Nick Bright wrote:
On 5/2/2013 10:53 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
Greetings,
After having a problem with a lot of mail being queued by a
compromised end users mailbox, I was unable to find a script able to
remove messages from the queue based on the sasl_username.
The pfdel
+0100,
IMAP List Administration wrote:
I'm running a postfix (postfix-2.9.20120102-sasl2) server on
That's a pre-release snapshot. Postfix 2.9 is up to patchlevel 4.
so now I have a release version of postfix.
That's very old. 9.4.3 was EOL almost three years ago.
so no change here.
I still
On 11/14/2012 11:06 AM, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
I've been getting client requests from this ip as well, i've put it into a
permenant spamd(8) blacklist.
that's highly interesting, but:
1) the sender was legitimate
2) my problem is some sort of intermittent DNS lookup failure
3) that
Hello Folks,
I'm running a postfix (postfix-2.9.20120102-sasl2) server on OpenBSD v5.1. We
have a number of anti-UCE postfix measures in place, including
reject_unknown_client_hostname, which we quite like. It's hard to believe
there are so many spammers that can't overcome such a low obstacle.
On 10/10/2012 11:04 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I think I may not what's wrong. Here's the master.cf settings:
In reading the docs it says to comment out the smtp line and uncomment
the one that routes to postscreen. I have both uncommented.
# grep -v # /usr/local/etc/postfix/master.cf | grep
in the RFC that prohibits the - at the
start of the local part? Because this limitation only exists for domain parts
afaik. -u...@domain.com should be OK! u...@-domain.com should NOT!
As noted on this list by Noel Jones two days ago:
Postfix by default rejects addresses starting with - to protect
On 9/7/2012 4:44 PM, General Mail wrote:
On 9/7/2012 4:04 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
General Mail:
On 9/7/2012 3:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
General Mail:
/etc/postfix/access
ad...@bombshellz.net OK
no-re...@bombshellz.net OK
* REJECT $access_map_reject_code You can't send E-Mails from
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Jack S jacklistm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I have a problem that I am trying to resolve in emergency mode.
I have a bunch of email in the derferred queue for a domain, their
destination server will be down for a while so I need to create a way
to get
On 8/27/2012 3:03 PM, Juerg Reimann wrote:
Hello everybody,
Please excuse my probably rather novice question but I couldn't find any hint
on this. The document at http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html says
it should be possible to reject an email with a before-queue content filter
Hello Folks,
I'm using postfix-2.9.20120102-sasl2 with cyrus-imapd-2.4.13p0 on OpenBSD v5.1.
There are unix-users and pure-cyrus-users on the system. Most of the unix-users
have mail delivered to an identical cyrus-user, but for a few local transport
should be used.
What is the best way to
On 8/21/2012 10:03 AM, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
Hi everyone.
I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have the
configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not to be
working.
I'm testing with http://www.crynwr.com/spam/ Spamhaus has that ip
On 8/21/2012 11:02 AM, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
On 8/21/12 9:57 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménezare...@ibossmonitor.com:
Thanks it seems to be an issue with spamhaus, here's the result:
[root@mail ~]# host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
Host
On 8/15/2012 6:41 AM, Sense Zeng wrote:
postfix version: 2.9.3-2
system: ubuntu 12.04
postfix is configure as a smarthost
How can I permit some localuser send mail in shell (run sendmail) and
deny other users?
Please refer to 'man 5 postconf' and search for authorized_submit_users
or
Hi,
I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
In summary,
Why do body/header checks generate 5xx rejects even with soft_bounce=yes?
Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:21 AM, mailing list subscriber
mailinglist...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have two issues.
After hard reading
On 8/8/2012 3:03 PM, email builder wrote:
I don't think mine is so confusing as you suggest if you take a second to
understand it. Maybe if you read it with some whitespace:
select
if ('%d' = 'example-2.com',
IFNULL(
(select dest from aliases where addr =
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 8/8/2012 4:22 AM, mailing list subscriber wrote:
Hi,
I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
In summary,
Why do body/header checks generate 5xx rejects even with soft_bounce=yes?
soft_bounce works
update: interesting, header_check gives 5xx but user unknown gives
correct 4xx response:
Jul 30 01:49:01 mailhost postfix-in/smtpd[3685]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from relay3.isp.ro[IP_ADDR]: 450 4.1.1 oldu...@mydomain.ro:
Recipient address rejected: User unknown;
On 7/26/2012 8:31 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-07-26 13:16, Wietse Venema skrev:
will it be possible at all to drop berkdb now ?
Postfix has always supported systems without Berkeley DB. Such
systems have some other default_database_type setting. For example,
SunOS, HP-UX, Ultrix
Ok, this¹ has been raised over a few times in the past, but I'm not
satisfied with the answer (referral to man page of lmtp/smtp instead
of idiot-proof narrative version like other *_README howtos).
1. Do the cached file contents still apply to current release version
of postfix?
2. If yes, why is
On 7/10/2012 11:52 AM, Feel Zhou wrote:
Hello My friend
My system is Centos 6.2 with postfix-2.6.6, When I use command
postconf -m, and got many support:
btree;cidr;environ;hash;ldap;mysql;nis;pcre;proxy;regexp;static;unix;
So I down the new version postfix-2.9.3, and use make install, got
On 7/10/2012 1:36 PM, Feel Zhou wrote:
Thanks for Brian's answer*
*
1 I add the missed,such as
[root@mail postfix-2.9.3]# make -f Makefile.init makefiles
CCARGS=-DHAS_MYSQL -I/usr/local/mysql/include
AUXLIBS=-L/usr/local/mysql/lib -lmysqlclient
and still have the problem,
On 7/3/2012 11:02 AM, Marko Weber wrote:
hello,
when i do on console
# postfix reload
i get:
/usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter:
virtual_create_maildirsize=yes
/usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter:
On 6/26/2012 2:46 AM, Ram wrote:
I have a custom milter in C ( for email archiving ) which works fine
on my servers with postfix 2.8+. ( RHEL 5.5 )
When I tried to install the milter on a ubuntu box with postfix 2.7 ,
unless I create the socket inside spool directory for eg.
On 6/15/2012 9:26 AM, Alain Deseine wrote:
When i try locally, using telnet, it's ok again :
*ks3094730:~ # telnet localhost 25
Trying ::1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 xxx..fr ESMTP Postfix
EHLO TETE
250-AUTH GSSAPI LOGIN PLAIN DIGEST-MD5
*
Notice that
On 6/4/2012 2:07 PM, james wrote:
We are seeing a message that I don't understand on our postfix servers
with postscreen enabled. Here is a rejection message from maillog when
a test tries to e-mail abuse@ address:
2012-06-04T12:45:23.773219-04:00 mx2 postfix/postscreen[4312]:
NOQUEUE:
On 5/25/2012 1:13 PM, JL Picard wrote:
#Here are some modifications (in diff format) to master.cf to get more
logging:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -v
smtp unix - - n - - smtp -v
Please do not post or enable verbose logging unless asked. It generally
masks the real issue.
#Here is the local
On 5/22/2012 10:33 AM, varad gupta wrote:
Hi All
I need to replace all occurences of text1 in mailbody with text2.
The regexp =
/^(.*)text1(.*)$/ REPLACE $1text2$2 works if there is only one
occurence of text1 in a line.
It changes only the last occurence of text1 in a single line
is to reject unknown users.
You should list valid users as noted in the ADDRESS_CLASS_README.
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_CLASS_README.html
Once this is accomplished, unknown recipients will be rejected individually.
Most MTAs will continue delivering the message.
Many MUAs will alert the user
On 5/16/2012 2:07 PM, James Lay wrote:
On May 16, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
The answer to that question can be found in man 5 transport.
However, you don't want to mess around with a reject-users table in
the first place (particularly not as a transport map). Instead just
how high you set this or issues may arise.
There have been reports to this list where overflows have occurred.
It may be platform dependent, but my minimal research found the
(message|mailbox)_size_limit parameters are a signed 32-bit integer.
This will limit the parameters to around 2GB.
I checked
On 4/17/2012 3:55 PM, n756...@50mail.com wrote:
FROM: n###@###.com
TO: b...@domain.com, m...@domain.com
For that message send, postfix logs on my end show:
Apr 17 11:52:48 mail postfix/smtpd[23367]: connect from
smtp.myprovider.com[1.2.3.4]
Apr 17 11:52:48 mail
to restart.
That is why I resort to this. Is there another way around this?
Welcome to the list!
Unfortunately, you seem to have missed the important welcome message:
TO REPORT A PROBLEM, PLEASE SEE
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail;
Specifically we need the output of 'postconf -n
On 4/3/2012 9:32 AM, Kizito Thomas wrote:
Dear good people,
I am trying out Mailscanner for the first time in my life, I have this
test postfix server that has been working properly until when I added
a line:
/**/
I highly recommend to use amavisd-new instead of Mailscanner.
The former uses
On 3/29/2012 6:56 AM, Phill Edwards wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated,
permit_mynetworks, check_relay_domains
You'll want a reject_unauth_destination after these.
Sorry but I don't have any idea what that means. Could you please
explain a little
On 3/28/2012 5:19 AM, Priscilla V wrote:
We have configured to consider ldap users also in /etc/nsswitch.conf.
I'm not an LDAP expert, but it seems as if you are looking up a full
email address.
Please be aware that alias_maps lookups only send the bare user name.
Queries targeting
short, heres my main.cf:
This list prefers 'postconf -n' because of mistakes people make,
including spelling and listing a parameter twice.
The command shows what Postfix is running and in alphabetical order for
easy reading.
disable_vrfy_command = yes
myorigin = mysubdomain.mydomain.com
mydomain
On 3/1/2012 11:49 AM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I had thought it was related, but another issue I'm trying to figure
out is how to prevent a single remote server from sending thousands of
messages at a time, filling the queue, and causing significant
delivery delays for all mail.
Is it safe to assume
On 2/28/2012 11:48 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
I'm new to postfix so I've got a lot of learning to do.
Welcome to Postfix.
One of the basic questions I have is this:
I'm wanting to use bl.spamcop.net. From what I can discern, I've got
to put this in my main.cf in a section named
On 2/28/2012 1:54 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
On 2/28/2012 12:25 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 2/28/2012 11:48 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
I'm new to postfix so I've got a lot of learning to do.
Welcome to Postfix.
One of the basic questions I have is this:
I'm wanting to use
On 2/16/2012 2:15 PM, Toomas Vendelin wrote:
Hello list,
I have set up a home e-mail server with Postfix and Cyrus, and
everything seems to work. There is one matter I'd like to clarify,
though.
Is it so, that if I use non-Postfix virtual mail delivery (in my
case, to Cyrus accounts via
On 2/15/2012 11:57 AM, Jack Knowlton wrote:
On Wed, February 15, 2012 5:37 pm, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:50:00PM +0100, Jack Knowlton wrote:
I'm looking into implementing a check_recipient_access as a table
inside a MySQL database. It's basically a list of users that have
Wondering if anyone has made this leap recently, and what changes/gotchas
might be pertinent?
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 15:32:55 +, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:25:04PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
SIX major releases is a lot, even having the fact
that Wietse is very careful with changes in mind
the problem is that even he can not say
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 17:19:05 -0800, Ori Bani orib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to know if anyone here has any thoughts or opinions about the
best linux filesystem to use for an email system. There will be some
small amount of website data on the system (including webmail to read
the
On 1/31/2012 9:54 AM, Eric Jacobs wrote:
Hi folks -
I'm new to postfix. Been working with sendmail forever but for a new
mailserver my boss (actually his boss) has a thing for postfix and
against sendmail. So I'm scrambling to learn.
One thing that has come up is that in the near future
We run a small cluster of postfix servers that are dedicated outbound
relayhosts for our customers. Beyond the outbound postfix cluster we have
another cluster of mail filtering appliances that have served their purpose
very well, but we are starting to get more compromised account due to
On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
Hi,
We have a postfix machine setup as described here:
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-ubuntu-11.10
and we would like to use a third party to
On 1/18/2012 12:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.01.2012 17:59, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
Hi,
We have a postfix machine setup as described here:
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users
On 1/18/2012 12:10 PM, Jon August wrote:
On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
Hi,
We have a postfix machine setup as described here:
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users
On 12/13/2011 2:17 PM, Gonzo Fernandez wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not too familiar with postfix but our server seems to stop sending
emails usually only on the weekends. The rest of the week it's fine
but once it gets to about Saturday/Sunday morning it gets stuck. I've
come in usually on Monday
We currently run three load balanced outbound postfix servers and need to
integrate a policy service that can track messages per hour for SASL users.
We hope to have a service that can be cluster aware, or know how many
cumulative messages have been sent by all the servers in the cluster per
user
On 12/8/2011 2:17 PM, Peter L. Berghold wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
permit_auth_destination,
This restriction at this location will IGNORE all RBL lookups when mail
is destined for your system.
I suggest removing it as it is implied if
On 11/30/2011 12:55 PM, Peter Tselios wrote:
Hallo,
I would to like to enable SMTP authentication, as an option feature for our
users, but I have some questions before doing so.
1st: Is it possible to enable it, without Cyrus of Dovecot? I do not want to
install Cyrus of Dovecot on my
or
Dovecot.
P.
The Postfix documentation is quite extensive on this subject.
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#server_sasl
Brian
- Αρχικό μήνυμα -
Απο: Brian Evans - Postfix List grkni...@scent-team.com
Προς: postfix-users@postfix.org
Κοιν.:
Στάλθηκε: 8:08 μ.μ. Τετάρτη, 30
On 11/22/2011 6:35 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Mark Goodge m...@good-stuff.co.uk:
I am suffering from AOL numpties who click this is spam on
notification emails they get (by their request!) from a forum and
mailing list hosted on my server. In order to trap these, I've set up
a feedback
to your syslog
daemon.
It will basically only send the facility, level and message.
It does not choose what to do with it.
Some syslog daemons, such as syslog-ng, can log to a database.
This is beyond the scope of this list and you should really find support
for your syslog daemon or, perhaps, your OS
On 11/15/2011 3:48 PM, Justin wrote:
New to postfix please bare with us. :)
We like to accept special characters in email id so surrounding the
email names with , but still these emails are sent to fallback maildir.
Followed this man page -- http://www.postfix.org/aliases.5.html
The name
On 11/10/2011 7:26 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
Hi all
I have configured two instances of postfix 2.8 and it’s working fine
but I want to separate logs of each instance to be different than the
other instance .
How can I do that?
Regards
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#syslog_name
On 11/3/2011 9:32 AM, David Southwell wrote:
Hi I am just trying to run policyd-spf and postgrey. However whatever I do I
seem to get errors of the form:
[root@dns1 /usr/ports/mail/postfix-policyd-spf-perl]# postfix reload
postfix: fatal: /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf, line 227: missing '='
In mynetworks I have the following IP configured (among others):
204.9.157.0/24 OK
In main.cf mynetworks is listed in the recipient restrictions:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/popimap_access,
Kshitij,
To clarify we have three methods of relay. The first being the
mynetworks, the second a dynamically generated file (popimap_access) that
has remote ips for pop and imap clients added for relay, and the third is
smtp auth. We need to be able to do all three methods.
Thanks
On Thu, 3
However I am getting relay denied errors for clients using an IP in
that
range:
CIDR notation is not supported in indexed files.
If you want to use CIDR notation, you must either use a plain text
file (just a list, not an indexed table) or a cidr: table.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5
point me to examples, howtos, or what have you on building a
high-availability mail cluster - I'm running Postfix, Amavisd,
Spammassassin, ClamAV (plus Sympa for list management, and UW IMAP - but
those aren't technically part of the mail processing). I'm specifically
looking for approaches
On 10/10/2011 2:32 PM, Erik Christiansson wrote:
I'm trying to get postgrey up and running, but I seem to have a
problem with the ordering of my restrictions.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated,
permit_mynetworks,
reject_invalid_helo_hostname,
On 10/5/2011 4:01 AM, Matthias Fechner wrote:
But dspam crashed and I removed dspam again to get mail traffic up.
My problem is now that some mails are queued and I cannot resend them
because it seems that postfix want to use a content filter I alread
disabled.
The old line in master.cf was:
We currently have a system setup to allow mass mailings sent via a single
one time address with an :include: statement that points to a list of local
users. We would like to simplify the process by having this done using the
existing mysql database of users based on their gid, but not sure how
I was wondering if ODBC support was on the road map for Postfix, or if it
has ever been discussed?
Thanks.
: Friday, September 02, 2011 5:44 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: mail list
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 17:25:12 +0200
Amira Othman articulated:
I want send mail to all users I have on my mail server I tried
aliases but I failed to send mail. I am using virtual domains and i
want to send
On 9/2/2011 12:28 PM, Michael B Allen wrote:
Hello,
I am using postfix 2.3 on CentOS and I would like to disable SSLv2. If
I do the following:
smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = SSLv3, TLSv1
smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers = medium, high
but despite the fact that this configuration has been
version.
They have been discussed many times on this list.
Alternatively, if you must stay with pure CentOS, version 6 includes
Postfix 2.6.6 (http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=centos).
Version 2.3.x (and 2.4.x) has expired in support for development updates.
If you need a new feature
On 8/30/2011 3:23 PM, Tim Eberhardt wrote:
# postconf -n | grep mailbox_size_limit
mailbox_size_limit = 4294967296
I tried reducing the number which worked and the errors siappeared:
# postconf -n | grep mailbox_size_limit
mailbox_size_limit = 20
What could be the cause to this?
On 8/30/2011 4:32 PM, Tim Eberhardt wrote:
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 16:08:35 schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
According to the sources (2.8.4 as a reference),
mailbox_size_limit is a signed 32-bit integer. (On x86(_64) arch)
code
global/mail_params.h
580:extern int var_mailbox_limit
in
Postfix:
http://www.ipv6whitelist.eu/implementation-instructions/
Pim
To me, they seem to be throwing the baby out with the bath water.
That list explicitly states a few bad ideas IMO:
1) If you're in one of our Supported Countries and not on our
whitelist, we blacklist you.
2) What happens
would like to block
absolutely everything to or from this domain no matter what. I found
a couple of examples but they don't seem to want to work for me. I
can post my conf and hash files if needed.
Welcome to the list!
Unfortunately, you seem to have missed the important welcome message
We recently (within the last two weeks) started getting a very large
number of logs like this:
postfix/smtpd[29456]: lost connection after RCPT from
cel-broadband1-ws-72.dsl.airstreamcomm.net[64.33.198.73]
After doing packet traces it appears that the client is sending RST
packets to our server,
1 - 100 of 497 matches
Mail list logo
