Hello,
currently we manually use text files for mapping/routing:
# postconf -n |grep -e transport -e alias
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
allow_mail_to_commands = alias,forward,include
local_transport =
Hello,
i am running 3.4.14 smoothly. However, after adding a virtual ip and
some mailrouting (migration from an old sendmail host) i have the
problem, that if i add "reject_unverified_recipient":
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks
reject_unknown_recipient_domain
Hello List,
i am running Postfix 3.4.14 and try to set up mailrouting to multiple
smtp hosts.
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/mailertable
example.com smtp:[mx1.foobar.com],smtp:[mx2.foobar.com]
However i get:
fatal: garbage after "]" in server description:
On 2015-01-19 01:36, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
Perhaps we could pass ${sender} to our custom script
and then use sendmail's -f argument to change the Return-Path header ?
The -f argument IS THE RETURN-PATH ADDRESS.
SENDMAIL(1)
On 2015-01-19 13:32, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
[sendmail -f]
This solved the issue.
As you can see it was under your nose all the time but you were
too busy insulting us:
Postfix has hundreds of parameters and dozens of comand-line options.
Figuring which of these was
On 2015-01-18 23:35, Christian Rößner wrote:
Am 18.01.2015 um 23:27 schrieb m...@ruggedinbox.com:
Return-Path: vm...@ruggedinbox.com
Delivered-To: m...@ruggedinbox.com
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by ruggedinbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7693331405C7
On 2015-01-18 23:51, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
and the header is still there.
By default, Postfix REMOVES Return-Path headers from email messages.
The default setting is:
message_drop_headers = bcc, content-length, resent-bcc, return-path
You claim that you
On 2015-01-19 00:53, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
By default, Postfix REMOVES Return-Path headers from email messages.
The default setting is:
message_drop_headers = bcc, content-length, resent-bcc, return-path
That is the default setting.
We tried to use the
On 2015-01-18 18:43, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
Hi!
At the end of the /etc/postfix/master.cf file (Debian Wheezy)
we have a nice custom PHP script which checks and limits outgoing
emails:
outCustomFilter unix - n n - - pipe
flags=F user=vmail:vmail
Hi!
At the end of the /etc/postfix/master.cf file (Debian Wheezy)
we have a nice custom PHP script which checks and limits outgoing
emails:
outCustomFilter unix - n n - - pipe
flags=F user=vmail:vmail argv=/etc/postfix/outCustomFilter.php
${recipient}
This script does its checks and if
On 2015-01-18 22:17, KSB wrote:
On 19.01.2015. 0:01, Wietse Venema wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
did a postfix restart (of course) and sent a test email:
There is no such thing as postfix restart. In other words,
Postfix keeps using the old configuration.
Wietse
Probably ML used
On 2015-01-18 22:01, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
Ok the new rule is:
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
user=debian-spamd argv=/usr/bin/spamc -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f
-G
${sender} -- ${recipient}
You can't put -G between -f and sender. I assumed that you would be
On 2015-01-18 20:48, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
flags=R user=debian-spamd argv=/usr/bin/spamc -e /usr/sbin/sendmail
-oi -f
${sender} ${recipient}
This is not final delivery, don't use R here. And don't forget --
before the
On 2015-01-18 21:17, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
user=debian-spamd
argv=/usr/bin/spamc -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f ${sender} --
${recipient}
This is better, without R flags and with -- before the recipients.
The Postfix
On 2015-01-18 19:53, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 07:41:15PM +, m...@ruggedinbox.com wrote:
Hi ok we double checked and this is the source of an email sent from
m...@ruggedinbox.com to m...@ruggedinbox.com:
Return-Path: vm...@ruggedinbox.com
Delivered-To:
Hi all, when hardening dovecot against the POODLE vulnerability,
we followed the advise to disable SSL2 and SSL3
but this is giving problems with some email clients (claws-mail).
ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3
results in the following error:
dovecot: pop3-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts
...@rhsoft.net:
Am 15.08.2014 um 08:22 schrieb ml ml:
why does postfix use a empty from= envelope when it tried to verify
the recioient?
* because it is the correct way of doing it
* because an ordianry address may get blocked
* because the other side knows and has to know
Hello list,
from time to time i get hit by mass mail with fake sender addresses.
By default my postfix accepted those mails until it found out that the
recipent does not exists. Then postfix tries to send back that 550
User Unknown error mail.
However, the sender is fake. Therefore the mails
Hi Wietse,
may i kindly ask why the original sender address cant be passed for
the address_verify_sender feature? Is there a specific reason?
Thanks a lot,
Mario
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
ml ml:
Hello Robert,
thanks for your reply.
Can i
...@grinta.net wrote:
On 20/08/2014 10:56, ml ml wrote:
By default my postfix accepted those mails until it found out that the
recipent does not exists. Then postfix tries to send back that 550
User Unknown error mail.
I doubt that Postfix by default accepts mail for users it does not know
about
Hello List,
why does postfix use a empty from= envelope when it tried to verify the
recioient?:
Aug 14 17:59:35 mailout9 postfix/smtpd[26204]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
smtp.example.net[212.87.132.35]: 450 4.1.1 f...@bar.com: Recipient address
rejected: unverified address: Address verification
Hi nice people, easy question for this nice Sunday :D
Are you aware of any solution that would replicate (or even improve) the
technology that was developed by lavabit to encrypt their users
mailboxes ?
There is an architecture description here:
On 2014-06-29 13:07, martijn.list wrote:
On 06/29/2014 02:02 PM, m...@ruggedinbox.com wrote:
Hi nice people, easy question for this nice Sunday :D Are you aware of any
solution that would replicate (or even improve) the technology that was
developed by lavabit to encrypt their users
guides or best practices for this purpose? I could not find
anything on postfix.org.
Regards,
ML
]: Client host
rejected: Access denied; from=t...@domain.tld to=validem...@yahoo.com
proto=ESMTP helo=desktop.local
What could I have done wrong here?
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:18 PM, Wijatmoko U. Prayitno k...@crypto.my.id
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 03:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
ML mail mlnos
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:29 PM, li...@rhsoft.net li...@rhsoft.net
wrote:
Am 20.03.2014 12:24, schrieb ML mail:
That's actually the guide I have followed but I thought there must be
something missing because I alwayse get the
following Access denied error message:
Mar 20 12:22
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:48 PM, Wijatmoko U. Prayitno k...@crypto.my.id
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
ML mail mlnos...@yahoo.com wrote:
Sorry about that. Here below is the output of a postconf -n:
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
config_directory = /etc
On , ML mail mlnos...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:48 PM, Wijatmoko U. Prayitno k...@crypto.my.id
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
ML mail mlnos...@yahoo.com wrote:
Sorry about that.
Here below is the output of a postconf -n
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:23 PM, li...@rhsoft.net li...@rhsoft.net
wrote:
why do you still post in HTML?
Am 20.03.2014 13:16, schrieb ML mail:
Sorry my fault, it is working now! I have forgotten to add user
authentication into my mail client for testing :(
and that is what i said
regards
ML
: ignoring
unrecognized request
Any idea what I did wrong here?
Regards
ML
On Thursday, March 13, 2014 12:34 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 3/13/2014 5:33 AM, ML mail wrote:
Hello,
I am using the recipient_canonical_maps as PCRE map in order to
convert some recipient e
Il 06/11/2013 09:46, Ian Evans ha scritto:
About three days into my postfix/postgrey experience after migrating
from qmail. Enjoying it.
Of course, like a new dad, I'm sitting here watching the logs. For the
last two hours I've been getting postfix/smtpd: lost connection after
RSET from
Le 2013-01-26 17:45, King™ a écrit :
Dear ML,
I added to DNS record following your guide, but when I send email to
Hotmail, it still spam in Hotmail.
Have any idea ? help me
add the sender id and dkim milter
and declare the hostname in microsoft senderid form
-Original Message
hello guys
hello I'm fine and everything is going well on the whole better. I want
to evoke a thought higher of us. I followed the outstanding issues
lately on hotmail and problems of validation spf (the spf is: do the
simplest and shortest possible). I noticed the strange behavior in my
Le 2013-01-24 09:14, KingT a écrit :
My email server send mail to Hotmail into junk, how to fix it ?
I search on google and found setup sender-id. Have any idea ?
Thanks all.
hey KingT
I send emails to hotmail without tag but it is necessary to declare
spf1 spf2 dkim my example and my
-211311-ml=smtp.fakessh...@ml.ovh.net
(host ks3.kimsufi.com[/var/run/dspam/dspam.sock] said: 421 4.3.0
fake...@localhost.ks3.kimsufi.com Deferred: 451-4.7.0 DNS timeout
(in reply to end of DATA command))
fake...@localhost.ks3.kimsufi.com
3YQkdD5g2FzgwCn 5571 Tue Dec 18 17:06:56
is a guilty network for a freedom
Le 2012-08-08 20:07, Ben Rosengart a écrit :
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:48:40PM +0800, Alvin Wong wrote:
With just a single binary I have 80% thought of it being a Trojan.
23 lines of non-obfuscated bash.
--
Le 2012-07-12 14:53, Wietse Venema a écrit :
OK, now update /etc/postfix/master.cf, add a -v option at the end
after the word ``cleanup'', then send some mail.
Do ``grep cleanup /var/log/maillog'' until you one have good and
one bad example.
Then do ``grep cleanup.x /var/log/maillog'' to
dear honorable doctor master of C Fu
dear honorable Doctor Wietse
i am beginners in C
but I have ideas of proto meta language that is based on rectangular
shapes and curvilinear orthonormal
to transmit the information I have to use a protocol and I think the
SMTP procole and easiest and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hello honorable doctor master of C Fu hello doctor Wietse
i am continu my tentative to wrote a minimal mail server
that would work as open relay
my work is this
https://gitorious.org/openrelay/openrelay/trees/
work well on centos 6 and 5
to be
Le mardi 12 juin 2012 à 19:28 +0200, ml a écrit :
hello masters of postfix masters of c honorable and doctors
and especially to master Wietse
I am looking for a mini smtp server that takes a few lines or file.
as it is possible to write an smtp client in c in a few hundred lines
https
hello masters of postfix masters of c honorable and doctors
and especially to master Wietse
I am looking for a mini smtp server that takes a few lines or file.
as it is possible to write an smtp client in c in a few hundred lines
Le jeudi 31 mai 2012 à 13:37 -0500, kazabe a écrit :
Hi.
From yesterday many servers to i admin has been banned to send
messages to hotmail. The error is related to said: 550 SC-001
Do you are experimenting the same issue today?
Thanks and regards.
I do not encounter any problem for
Le lundi 21 mai 2012 à 08:55 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.3.html]
Postfix stable release 2.9.3, and legacy releases 2.8.11, 2.7.10,
2.6.16 are available. They contains workarounds
I just ran saslauthd with -d. I can see the auth requests if u run
/usr/sbin/testsaslauthd -u admin -p -s smtp -f
/var/run/saslauthd/mux as postfix user. But i DO NOT see any auth
requests if I connect with my thunderbird client.
So i guess postfix somehow can`t or won't connect to my
Hello List,
i cant get postfix with smtpd saslauthd working and its driving me crazy!
warning: SASL authentication problem: unknown password verifier
warning: unknown[192.168.10.30]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: no
mechanism available
Basically i followed the howto from
Le lundi 02 avril 2012 à 11:36 +0200, Benny Pedersen a écrit :
Den 2012-04-01 21:18, ml skrev:
I just made the changes I think the problem is solved
thank you for the fruitful comments
nope !DSPAM sigs is still sent to me :)
that means i can now train my m...@junc.org on your server
Le samedi 31 mars 2012 à 08:39 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
ml:
hello list
hello guru of the soft
hello all
hello I seek again to set up dspam in my messaging solution but I am
having a problem mails locals are no longer distributed
I know the option is in postfix is pickup
Le dimanche 01 avril 2012 à 19:25 +0200, Benny Pedersen a écrit :
Den 2012-04-01 17:58, ml skrev:
I managed to fully operate the software and my question is zero.
one left things to check is that why is dspam sign mails to recipient
that is not local ? :=)
eg what should maillist
hello list
hello guru of the soft
hello all
hello I seek again to set up dspam in my messaging solution but I am
having a problem mails locals are no longer distributed
I know the option is in postfix is pickup
can you help me put to good value of this variable
sincerely
my current config is a
you will tell me I'm stupid but I find it on the mirrors
Le vendredi 30 mars 2012 à 17:38 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
Another option is to extend smtpd_reject_footer's feature set,
so that
smtpd_reject_footer = \c
Le 2012-03-10 05:46, The_Ace a écrit :
2012/3/10 ml m...@smtp.fakessh.eu
Le samedi 10 mars 2012 à 09:28 +0530, The_Ace a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr
wrote:
On 8/3/2012 6:40 πμ, Eero Volotinen wrote:
What is the best
Le samedi 10 mars 2012 à 09:28 +0530, The_Ace a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote:
On 8/3/2012 6:40 πμ, Eero Volotinen wrote:
What is the best / reliable site to find newer postfix
rpm packages
On 2/28/2012 09:27 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Wildcard domain transports are probably a mistake, quite likely to come
back and bite you later.
Anyway, your regexp is wrong.
...
So the user is unknown for a domain listed in $mydestination.
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_CLASS_README.html
Hello the list..
I'm asking your support for a problem we are facing using Postfix server
configuration.
We are trying to setup an internal CRM Solution, that has to manage mail
returns depending type of message.
We have actually 2 sorts of email types :
Le 2012-02-04 11:21, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de a écrit :
Zitat von ml m...@smtp.fakessh.eu:
hello postfix list
hello guru of Fu
I am having problems with my secondary mx some mails that are
blocked on
the secondary remain above with an error
4D5BDCA1C9 4344 Thu Feb 2 23:19:41 centos-boun
hello postfix list
hello guru of Fu
I am having problems with my secondary mx some mails that are blocked on
the secondary remain above with an error
4D5BDCA1C9 4344 Thu Feb 2 23:19:41 centos-boun...@centos.org
(Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=fakessh.eu
Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 23:01 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
Le jeudi 02 février 2012 à 03:13 +0100, ml a écrit :
Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 23:01 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
wrote:
[An on-line version of this announcement
Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 19:30 -0800, Ori Bani a écrit :
2012/2/1 ml m...@smtp.fakessh.eu:
Le jeudi 02 février 2012 à 03:13 +0100, ml a écrit :
Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 23:01 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5
Le 25.12.2011 06:35, fakessh @ a écrit :
Le dimanche 25 décembre 2011 06:06, fakessh @ a écrit :
Le jeudi 22 décembre 2011 22:19, Andreas Berton a écrit :
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, fakessh @ wrote:
hello list
hello geek
hello guru
hello Fu
Hi
Problem usually occur when you run dspam
Le jeudi 08 décembre 2011 à 15:33 +1300, Peter a écrit :
On 08/12/11 15:28, Kwasi Gyasi - Agyei wrote:
Thanks, where can I get src.rpm for v2.6.6, the highest version from
here http://postfix.wl0.org/en/available-packages/ is 2.5.
...picking a CentOS mirror at random:
not know if the
compilation of Simon J Mudd rpm is possible in such a case. do with
SJMudd and Wietse
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:40 PM, ml m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
Le jeudi 08 décembre 2011 à 15:33 +1300, Peter a écrit :
On 08/12/11 15:28, Kwasi Gyasi - Agyei wrote:
Thanks, where can I
Le 18.11.2011 23:21, Wietse Venema a écrit :
peng...@sepserver.net:
I have in my /etc/aliases the text postmaster: root. I sent an
email to
postmas...@mydomain.com. I checked the log files of the server but
do not
see any indication of any email being received. Would there be a log
of
All
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:04:10 +0200, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
hi folks
I asked a question.
there are providers that remove information from headers like
X-Mailer
Received
when is there any good uses and customs
This is easy to set up with information like this
/^Received:/IGNORE
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:28:02 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
On 6/10/2011 4:04 PM, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
hi folks
I asked a question.
there are providers that remove information from headers like
X-Mailer
Received
when is there any good uses and customs
This is easy to set up with
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:28:02 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
On 6/10/2011 4:04 PM, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
hi folks
I asked a question.
there are providers that remove information from headers like
X-Mailer
Received
when is there any good uses and customs
This is easy to set up with
On Fri, 27 May 2011 00:03:26 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 05/26/2011 11:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
can somebody please remove the idiots from LinkedIn from
mailing-lists?
s/from LinkedIn//
go back home new guy
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x092164A7
gpg
Hello List,
is it possible to submit locally-generated mail via SMTP somehow?! If
yes, how?!
I am asking because i would like to use stream_by_receipient from
mimedefang and i ran into this problem here:
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2010-June/035844.html
(...)Convince
Hello List,
there are such LDAP variables such as %s and %d to do ldap based
queries. I am looking for the varibale which is the ip adress. I want
to check my ldap for IP-Addresses that i allow relay for.
I did have a look at http://www.postfix.org/ldap_table.5.html, but was unlucky.
Cheers,
Hello List,
i would like to have a ldap based auto reply feature in a virtual
hosting environment. I had a look at gnarwl, but it was removed from
Debian lenny due to some security issues:
http://www.downloadpipe.com/forums/linux/Bug-457279-remove-gnarwl-lenny-ftopict57832.html
Is there any
Hello List,
we are planing to set up a new E-Mail (Cluster) system with postfix.
Our goal is that this is all ldap based and that our customers can
manage their own:
- E-Mail Addresses
- Passwords
- Black/White lists
- Spamasassin reports
- Autoreply/vacatation
- Filter rules
- etc..
Ldap is the
Hi All,
I have some confusion about multiple reverse PTR records per IP.
Comcast has told me that they can only assign 2 reverse PTR records per IP.
So if I have mail.domainA.com and mail.domainB.com this is fine. If the reverse
lookup is done and it is not correct, it will retry and get the
Hi Wietse,
I have some confusion about multiple reverse PTR records per IP.
You need only one.
The name (from the address-name) lookup must resolve to the address.
I am still confused.
Like my example below, what happens if I want to setup a single mail server
that hosts mail for 20
Stan,
ML put forth on 11/23/2009 7:33 PM:
I am still confused.
[snip]
Sending spam will get you blacklisted. Sending backscatter will get you
blacklisted. Having mismatched A and PTR records will _NOT_ get you
blacklisted. If might get you deferred by Yahoo for longer than you
might
is going to have a problem with
the name (and possibly request that you change it, or give them their own).
Thank you, I appreciate the advice. It was excellent.
-ML
Le 3 nov. 08 à 20:24, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:12:50PM +0100, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
you need both redirect (to other alias and to mailbox) in
virtual_alias_maps, reading your postconf i would suggest the
following lines :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
Hi,
I wonder how to bypass a dspam filter for some sender only (aka a
filter whitelist), the issue is that i'm using a double filtering
system :
#main.cf
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
reject_unauth_destination,
...
check_recipient_access
78 matches
Mail list logo
