[pfx] Connect Postfix to Dovecot SASL with TLS?

If I have Postfix configured to use Dovecot SASL via TCP, and Dovecot is running on a remote server, can I set up Postfix to use TLS for its connection to Dovecot SASL? Postfix main.cf: smtpd_sasl_path = inet:dovecot.example.com:12345 smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot Dovecot: service auth {

[pfx] Re: dkim and submission and opendkim

Postfix-users < postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote: > On 24.10.23 14:35, Nick Edwards via Postfix-users wrote: > > I need a refresher hand with DKIM, we have in main.cf > > > >smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891,inet:127.0.0.1:8892 > >non_smtpd_milters = $smtpd_milters

[pfx] dkim and submission and opendkim

, but then you wouldn't do dmarc checking there so I got to thinking again, maybe not.. Just asking the collective guru's here before I change/break anything given my lengthy time away for running pf boxes :) maybe an above option is cancelling out something? -nick

Re: Outlook TLS errors after Microsoft Windows Update

La da da da... Original message From: Phil Stracchino Date: 18/10/22 9:51 AM (GMT+12:00) To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Outlook TLS errors after Microsoft Windows Update On 10/17/22 16:08, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:> Dnia 17.10.2022 o godz. 20:35:11 Gerald Galster

Re: submission configuration and RFC 6409

option "always_add_missing_headers" but it seems to work fine without adding this, and besides this appears to be a cleanup option rather than smtpd option? Thanks, Nick.

submission configuration and RFC 6409

e_clients=static:all* FYI "-o smtpd_delay_reject=no" above is another manual addition of mine, not part of original distro's master.cf. Thanks, Nick.

Re: no shared cipher revisited

. Nick.

Re: reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname not working as I expect

On 11/08/2022 14:49, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 2022-08-11 at 07:56:41 UTC-0400 (Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:56:41 +0100) Nick Howitt is rumored to have said: I can't use reject_unknown_client_hostname as I know at least one major ISP in the UK has their mailserver announcing a ???.local

Re: reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname not working as I expect

On 11/08/2022 11:54, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 11.08.22 11:43, Nick Howitt wrote: [root@server ~]# postconf -n | grep restrictions smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks

Re: Catch-all that pipes to script

you need some whitespace at the start of the second line - e.g. "echo '  flags=R user=...' >> master.cf". Otherwise Postfix isn't going to know that this is a continuation of the first line? Nick.

Re: smtpd_recipient_restrictions usage question.

than check_recipient_a_access)? FYI You can also use OK with check_client_access. Nick.

Re: Mail looping issue

ion ${djigzo_rbl_clients} ${djigzo_reject_unverified_recipient? reject_unverified_recipient}* Which would appear to prevent such a process from sending emails to external (Internet) recipients? Nick.

Re: Mail looping issue

ied_recipient} smtpd_data_restrictions = smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions = Sorry, but my only suggestion is "don't do that"! :-( Nick.

Re: milter_header_checks, pcre, chroot

. The reason is because the results of the first SPF check DNS lookups are cached by the DNS Server, so the second SPF check incurs a negligible delay. Thanks, Nick.

Re: SASL hacking ?

countries. The one I use is: https://www.ip2location.com/free/visitor-blocker Just remember that it will also stop you being able to access/send emails while on your overseas holiday! ;-) Nick.

Re: Adding a header on incoming mail, unintended consequences?

ould result in a higher SPAM score, which could cause the email to be treated differently? Nick.

Re: Advanced content filter with Unix sockets

l 25 2021 external 15076729 4 drwxr-x--- 2 dovecot postfix 4096 Feb 1 21:00 external/dovecot 15073313 0 srw-rw 1 dovecot postfix 0 Feb 1 21:00 external/dovecot/auth-dovecot 15073306 0 srw-rw 1 dovecot postfix 0 Feb 1 21:00 external/dovecot/lmtp-dovecot Nick.

Re: Getting Delivered-To when using LDAP?

Maybe you could funnel the 'forwarded' messages through another Postfix instance that has a policy service (http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html) which looks for "recipient=/something/" in the request, and then returns "action=prepend Delivered-To: /something/"? Nick.

Re: Relay to google chaning from address

On 20/09/2021 11:15, Adam Barnett wrote: Hi, I have setup a postfix relay to allow us t send some of our mail to google My main.cf looks like this inet_protocols = ipv4 append_dot_mydomain = no biff = no config_directory = /etc/postfix mailbox_size_limit = 0

Re: Rewriting the MAILER-DAEMON address and header formats

$val, $m)) { /usr/share/roundcubemail/program/lib/Roundcube/rcube_mime.php: $address = 'MAILER-DAEMON'; Could changing it break other things? Nick

Re: Rewriting the MAILER-DAEMON address and header formats

header checks to them. If you are able to apply a milter to them, you can write a milter that rewrites those headers. I've not been paying particular attention to the thread, but can header_checks be used to rewrite MAILER-DAEMON to mailer-daemon? Nick

Re: multiple ip addresses for submission -- My Google Fu is lacking

On 14/09/2021 04:29, raf wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 01:20:03PM +1000, raf wrote: But chances are that mail clients just do what any other TCP client would do. That might be why you can't find any discussion on the topic. Remember, the only IP address(es) that the mail client will be

Re: How can I temporarily defer internal delivery of e-mails?

On 11/09/2021 20:28, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 08:22:46PM +0100, Nick Howitt wrote: I interpreted this, perhaps mistakenly, as if this were now the running config of postfix. There is no such thing as "the running config of Postfix". There's just main.cf,

Re: How can I temporarily defer internal delivery of e-mails?

On 11/09/2021 20:05, Wietse Venema wrote: Nick Howitt: Partly answering my own question, "postconf -o body_checks=regexp:/etc/postfix/body_checks" seems to do the right thing in that the output of the command shows it is set No it doesn't. Where did you get the idea from that &q

Re: How can I temporarily defer internal delivery of e-mails?

On 11/09/2021 16:40, Nick Howitt wrote: On 11/09/2021 14:03, Nick Howitt wrote: On 11/09/2021 13:57, Nick Howitt wrote: On 11/09/2021 13:24, Kristian wrote: On 11/09/2021 13.43, Nick Howitt wrote: As part of a backup script for cyrus-imapd, I'd like to temporarily stop postfix

Re: How can I temporarily defer internal delivery of e-mails?

On 11/09/2021 14:03, Nick Howitt wrote: On 11/09/2021 13:57, Nick Howitt wrote: On 11/09/2021 13:24, Kristian wrote: On 11/09/2021 13.43, Nick Howitt wrote: As part of a backup script for cyrus-imapd, I'd like to temporarily stop postfix delivering mails to cyrus-imapd and to just

Re: How can I temporarily defer internal delivery of e-mails?

On 11/09/2021 13:57, Nick Howitt wrote: On 11/09/2021 13:24, Kristian wrote: On 11/09/2021 13.43, Nick Howitt wrote: As part of a backup script for cyrus-imapd, I'd like to temporarily stop postfix delivering mails to cyrus-imapd and to just queue them. If it is I believe you can do

Re: How can I temporarily defer internal delivery of e-mails?

On 11/09/2021 13:24, Kristian wrote: On 11/09/2021 13.43, Nick Howitt wrote: As part of a backup script for cyrus-imapd, I'd like to temporarily stop postfix delivering mails to cyrus-imapd and to just queue them. If it is I believe you can do this with check_recipient_access, e.g

Re: How can I temporarily defer internal delivery of e-mails?

On 11/09/2021 13:42, Wietse Venema wrote: Nick Howitt: Hi, As part of a backup script for cyrus-imapd, I'd like to temporarily stop postfix delivering mails to cyrus-imapd and to just queue them. If it is at all possible I'd like to do it without restarting any services (I know I can just

How can I temporarily defer internal delivery of e-mails?

of a more conventional setup. Is there any way of achieving what I want without stopping services? Thanks, Nick

Re: Conditional milter_header_checks?

server administrators to set it up badly, and that's when it causes problems. And FWIW, I've never seen evidence of any DKIM signature breakage from this mailing list (i.e. Postfix Users). But perhaps other mailing list software might be problematic? Nick.

Re: Looking for examples of separated MTA / MDA pairs

the passwords in a single place). And have the mail server postfix deliver to dovecot using lmtp. Hopefully that will get you going? Reach out if you get stuck? Nick.

Re: [NON-HA] Re: Need help with response to HELO, 502 5.5.2 Error

arely nothing as far as protecting the SMTP server and causes more problems than it solves... Have a nice day! Nick

Re: Need help with response to HELO, 502 5.5.2 Error

but I am surprised this would disable regular SMTP ones like HELO. If it is indeed Cisco Pix protocol fixup turn it off, it cause(d) more problems than it solves/solved. Have a nice day! Nick

Re: Want to configure domain localhost to support root

ostmap hash:/etc/postfix/virtual".) I seem to recall there is a bit more to this, including checking that myorigin is set, but hopefully that will get you heading in the right direction? Nick.

Re: Milters and policy

MAILFROM)? Or some other trickery? (AFAIK each invocation of a policy server can only return a single action?) Thanks, Nick.

Re: Certificate Postfix.org missing?

On 22/04/2021 10:32 am, Gary Smith wrote: -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 3:02 PM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: Certificate Postfix.org missing? On Apr 21, 2021, at 4:34 PM, Gary Smith wrote:

Re: connect then disconnect; backscatter?

this: 1. It stops the number of firewall rules growing indefinitely. (Each rule has a cost in terms of processing.) 2. If the IP address gets reassigned to a legitimate user, you aren't penalising them indefinitely for someone else's misbehaviour. Nick. P.S. Although it isn't suitable for use

RE: Problem with starttls / orange.fr

Original message  > smtp_tls_protocols = !SSLv2, !SLv3 TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2You have several issues in the line above. I suggest removing this line and using the default setting?Nick.

Re: Milter Behavior

to signify this, or will it be reflected in the Authentication-Results header? (FWIW Probably the latter would satisfy my requirements.) Thanks, Nick.

Re: ways to process HOLD queue

he message (by adding a header), and then it could still be delivered to the user, optionally using sieve to put it into a different (e.g. Junk) folder? Nick.

Re: client and ehlo hostname mismatch

On 12/02/21 7:12 pm, Bill Cole wrote: Mail transport often involves MTAs not under the control of the original sender or ultimate recipient or the authorities for the sender's domain. Traditional forwarding (e.g. ~/.forward) still exists and many systems supporting it run Sendmail, which will

Re: client and ehlo hostname mismatch

On 12/02/21 6:57 pm, Bob Proulx wrote: Nick Tait wrote: Nick Tait wrote: Perhaps the advice should be: If you are using Sendmail, then (a) you shouldn't publish a DMARC policy and (b) you shouldn't reject emails based on failed DMARC check; but if you aren't using Sendmail then as long as you

Re: client and ehlo hostname mismatch

On 12/02/2021 5:49 pm, Nick Tait wrote: Perhaps the advice should be: If you are using Sendmail, then (a) you shouldn't publish a DMARC policy and (b) you shouldn't reject emails based on failed DMARC check; but if you aren't using Sendmail then as long as you don't mind rejecting emails from

Re: client and ehlo hostname mismatch

. :-( Nick.

Re: Cloud9.net related responses

On 12/02/2021 7:09 am, Jos Chrispijn wrote: Hi team, can it be that responses in this mailinglist are also send by cloud9.net instead of only postfix.org? Just asking to prevent contermination by importing parallel newsgroup source. All mail that I receive from this mailing list is relayed to

Re: Catch a forged Return Path

advantage of the null sender address? Sounds like it might be the latter, in which case Postscreen may prove useful? Nick.

Re: AW: Controlling MS Azure Cloud Spam

On 30/12/2020 2:38 am, ludic...@gmail.com wrote: @Nick A check for a valid FQDN in From is in smtpd_sender_restrictions. At the point where it got to bounce message, SPF was skipped. Would OpenDMARC then still work? The smtpd_sender_restrictions that you specify are applied

Re: Disable unauthenticated sending of OUTGOING email for all local users

t omit permit_mynetworks from the other smtpd_*_restrictions. HTH, -- Nick

Re: Controlling MS Azure Cloud Spam

be rejected. If I understand the RFC correctly this includes the Date and From headers. Nick. On 26/12/20 6:58 am, ludic...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am seeing a wave of MS Azure Cloud Spam these days. Many of these mails come with a header: * Return-Path: * Empty From Field They than pass

Re: Can I somehow customise the From: address when root sends mail?

ix/sender-canonical-map sender-canonical-map root foo-root HTH, -- Nick

Re: Can a more useful bounce message be provided - correction

message in the bounce notification? Which comes back to the original question about whether this message can be customised? But I suspect the answer to that question is still no? Nick.

Re: Limiting HELO spoofing in Postfix?

On 23/10/20 6:26 pm, Nick Tait wrote: In summary, you'd want to create a script in a language of your choice, which in the simplest case does this: 1. Reads in lines until a blank line. 2. Then sees if the lines that it read included the line "client_address=127.0.0.1". 3.

Re: sanity-check postfix XCLIENT usage ?

to do so, which is a win for everyone! Unfortunately, lately I haven't had the time... /[Rhetorical q//uestion to everyone] Have you checked your DMARC lately? ;-)/ Nick.

Re: sanity-check postfix XCLIENT usage ?

Failures true" in /etc/opendmarc.conf currently? Try changing that to false, to allow the email to be delivered, and then see what Authentication-Results headers get added? (E.g. They might suggest something like an alignment failure?) Nick.

Re: Forward mail and obey SPF and DKIM

notifications. So rather than rewriting addresses using sender_canonical_maps, you might be better off looking into Sender Rewriting Scheme (SRS)? Nick.

Re: Limiting HELO spoofing in Postfix?

es work, before implementing what I suggested above. Also remember "warn_if_reject" is your best friend when writing policy scripts! :-) Nick.

Re: Accessing the sending user from a canonical(5) table

that in doing this site.net will also be expected to handle bounce notifications, and then forward them back to the original from address. :-) Nick.

Re: Sub-addressing ("plus-addressing") questions...

Hi! On 2020-10-14 3:33 p.m., Phil Stracchino wrote: On 10/14/20 3:20 PM, Nick wrote: I also have to tell the developers of our applications what should be allowed... Good luck with that one. I have encountered INNUMERABLE werb sites which fervently insist that '+' is not a legal character

Re: Sub-addressing ("plus-addressing") questions...

Hi! On 2020-10-14 9:29 p.m., Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 01:09:33PM +1300, Peter wrote: On 15/10/20 8:20 am, Nick wrote: Is it possible to have more than one "+" sign in the email address, what does Postfix do when it sees that, does it stop at the first one and

Sub-addressing ("plus-addressing") questions...

ails but as long as it is not involved in the reception of the emails there should be no problem, right? (Because the plus sign was always a recognized character by the RFC (originally 822 and 2822 I believe...)) Thank you and have a nice day! Nick

Re: How to allow relaying per domain?

ok <>ok server3_sender_access: example.net ok <>ok I use something like this myself and it works well if the number of servers is small and doesn't change often. Nick. On 25/09/20 2:42 am, Hans van Zijst wrote: Is it possible to let Po

Re: Forward mail and obey SPF and DKIM

to forwarding emails to "user@targetdomain"). Of course the real cost of implementing something like this is the increased effort required to figure out what went wrong when something isn't working properly. :-P Nick.

Re: spam uses my email address as sender in "header from"

On 2020-09-15 19:39 BST, Fourhundred Thecat wrote: > > On 2020-09-15 10:18, Nick wrote: > > <http://www.postfix.org/BUILTIN_FILTER_README.html#mx_submission> > But when I remove it from main.cf and add last line to master.cf: > > smtp inet n - n

Re: spam uses my email address as sender in "header from"

On 2020-09-15 08:53 BST, Fourhundred Thecat wrote: > yes, I am accepting authenticated senders on port 465, and port 25 is > only for unauthenticated. > > But how do I ensure that header_checks only apply to port 25 ? <http://www.postfix.org/BUILTIN_FILTER_README.html#mx_submission> HTH -- Nick

Re: Checking from-addresses on outbound mail

verified_sender } ? For check_sender_access I can use the DISCARD action instead of REJECT, but what should replace reject_unverified_sender? Thanks, -- Nick

Re: Checking from-addresses on outbound mail

need to accept and discard messages, rather than reject > them. I have to ask the stupid question - why? Since "bounce-discard" is working for me in practise, so far, and rejection triggers a notification to postmaster. Please elaborate? Thank you for your comments. -- Nick

Re: Checking from-addresses on outbound mail

=1 quit=1 commands=5 which I interpret as: smtpd-sndmail accepted the mail, then cleanup-sndmail placed the mail into the hold queue. Nothing was sent. It's now impossible, I think, for either a local or a submission user to send mail without a valid address in $mydomain in both the envelope- and header-from. Thanks, comments welcome. -- Nick

Re: Checking from-addresses on outbound mail

It's then for the postmaster to check what's going on. If the mail's from-address is forged, which is my concern in this thread, then it's better that no non-delivery notification is attempted. Thank you for your attention to my question, this is more than I had expected. -- Nick

Re: Checking from-addresses on outbound mail

On 2020-08-30 21:30 BST, Wietse Venema wrote: > Nick: > > I would like to have a postconf(5) parameter such as > > "local_via_submission = yes" which changes that path to something like > > > > sendmail(1) -> postdrop(1) -> maildrop -> pickup(

Re: mynetworks equivalent for sender address

_sasl_enable>. HTH, -- Nick

Re: Checking from-addresses on outbound mail

On 2020-08-09 21:52 BST, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: > On 2020-08-09 Nick wrote: > > For mail sent via submission it's possible to prevent a forged > > mail-from, by using options on the submission service in master.cf. > > > > It's also possible to prevent a f

Checking from-addresses on outbound mail

originating locally via the sendmail command. What does work for that? Thanks -- Nick

Re: Unable to receive emails from btinternet.com

On 19/06/20 8:28 pm, @lbutlr wrote: On 19 Jun 2020, at 02:18, Nick Tait wrote: 1. My server was using the default MTU of 1500 bytes. 2. My connection to my ISP uses PPPoE, which adds an 8-byte header onto all packets travelling between my home to my ISP, effectively reducing the maximum

Re: Unable to receive emails from btinternet.com

e Internet, not traffic between my servers.) Hopefully this helps? Feel free to email me directly if you think this is the cause of your problem, but you need more explanation about anything above? Thanks, Nick.

Re: ADVICE: Best Practice - Usernames with Domain components

so that's why I'm looking to fix it around postfix. Nick On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 13:49, mj wrote: > Hi, > > I have read your mail, and we're using a setup similar to yours (samba, > postfix, debian) and we're using 'regular' usernames, without the domain > prefix. > > Som

ADVICE: Best Practice - Usernames with Domain components

ilbox files DOMAIN\username and domain\username in /var/mail, or is there a solution I can put into postfix to revert back to DOMAIN\username before outputting to the mail file? Thanks in advance, -- Nick

Re: Preferred/maintained greylisting options?

uss. -- Nick

Re: logrotate script for Postfix

10 machines, it's configured in /etc/logrotate.d/rsyslog belonging to the package rsyslog. -- Nick

Re: smtpd and submission inet_interfaces

On 2020-05-08 20:15 BST, Wietse Venema wrote: > Nick: > > I think I found the way, which is to repeat the entire submission > > definition in master.cf and c h a n g e the a d d r e s s [my previous > > post was bounced so I'm trying those words with spaces]. If there is a

Re: smtpd and submission inet_interfaces

On 2020-05-08 20:03 BST, Wietse Venema wrote: > Nick: > > Is there a way to make it work for both ipv4 and ipv6 at the same time? > > I tried "127.0.0.1,[::1]:submission ..." but postfix wouldn't start. > > See: http://www.postfix.org/master.5.html I think I fo

Re: smtpd and submission inet_interfaces

. Is there a way to make it work for both ipv4 and ipv6 at the same time? I tried "127.0.0.1,[::1]:submission ..." but postfix wouldn't start. -- Nick

Re: smtpd and submission inet_interfaces

On 2020-05-08 18:59 BST, Wietse Venema wrote: > Nick: > > Can postfix be configured such that it changes to > > > > 127.0.0.1:submission > >0.0.0.0:smtp > > > > (and similarly for ipv6)? > > If you want two services to listen on different I

Re: smtpd and submission inet_interfaces

I'll try again at my question, maybe it wasn't clear. On my server, 'ss -l -4 -t' show postfix listening on these addresses: 0.0.0.0:submission 0.0.0.0:smtp Can postfix be configured such that it changes to 127.0.0.1:submission 0.0.0.0:smtp (and similarly for ipv6)? Thanks, -- Nick

smtpd and submission inet_interfaces

Can these be different - e.g. smtpd listens on 0.0.0.0 and [::], while submission listens on 127.0.0.1 and [::1]? Adding '-o inet_interfaces=loopback-only' in master.cf under the submission service then restarting postfix made no difference, according to 'ss'. Thanks -- Nick

Re: AUTH Messages in log

an? A pattern like this should catch them, postfix/smtpd\[[0-9]+\]: disconnect from [^[ ]+\[\]( [a-z=0-9/ ]+)? auth=0/[1-9] HTH, -- Nick

Re: Reject external mails to certain aliases

all of them. E.g. smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ... check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/check-recipient-access-inbound In check-recipient-access-inbound, internal-only@REJECT My hovercraft is full of eels Ensure it's set for smtpd only and not for submission. HTH, -- Nick

Re: LMTP and undeliverable addresses

On 2020-01-29 18:38 GMT, Wietse Venema wrote: > Nick: > >local_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp > >local_recipient_maps = $real_recipients, $virtual_alias_maps > >550 5.1.1 : Recipient address > > rejected: undeliverable address: host > &

LMTP and undeliverable addresses

crasis.net (in reply to RCPT TO command) This is dovecot, not postfix, giving the verdict on the validity of 'bogus-recipient', yes? If postfix has "a database that lists all the known user names or addresses", why does postfix consult dovecot? Thanks, -- Nick

Re: Remove part of rbl name from response to blocked client

locked using > sp8lefi4grtb7jftpslxxztu3y.zen.dx.spamhous.net Haven't used it myself but <http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#config> part 7 should help? -- Nick

Re: Question about DMARC

have strict DMARC policy and no difficulty with this list. -- Nick

Re: Relay attempt questions

> be accomplished? > > You can add "reject_unauth_destination" (possibly preceded by > permit_mynetworks) also near the top of the recipient restrictions. I'll try that, thanks. -- Nick

Re: Relay attempt questions

On 2019-11-19 05:59 GMT, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 09:40:24PM +0000, Nick wrote: > > > Why did reject_unauth_destination (line 11) only take effect after the > > probe (line 8, if that's what it is) and after check_policy_service > > (line 1

Re: Relay attempt questions

restrictions applies first, why didn't its reject_unauth_destination cause rejection before anything in smtpd_recipient_restrictions was consulted? -- Nick

Relay attempt questions

**@gmail.com>: Relay access denied; from= to=<***@gmail.com> proto=SMTP helo= 12 Nov 18 01:28:47 rolly postfix/smtpd[26774]: lost connection after RCPT from unknown[162.246.19.201] [End log] -- Nick

Re: Vague error message - SASL plain authentication failed:

f.d/10-master.conf: unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth { mode = 0666 } /etc/postfix/main.cf: smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth HTH, -- Nick

Re: Fwd: Postfix as an outgoing spam filter. How to block email for unknown senders in local network?

anything appears in the HOLD queue, e.g. a cron script that examines 'postqueue' output. HTH, -- Nick

Re: spam from own email address

29 looks really interesting but I have not had the time to try it out yet. Nick

Re: Big problem with this mailing list and Majordomo regarding DMARC

alidate your signature. -- Nick

Re: Is it possible to use header checks on multiple headers

On 13/04/2019 09:26, Andrey Repin wrote: Greetings, Nick Howitt! I am receiving some not very nice spam and I was wondering if I could use as a single filter: To: contains mydomain From: is the same as To: (inside < and >) Return-Path: is not from my domain Or am I using comp

  1   2   3   >