[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-17 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
Dnia 17.04.2023 o godz. 01:44:34 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users pisze: > > Common practice in Germany is: once your server accepts an email it is > responsible for delivery. You cannot silently discard it. But you can still reject a submission and not accept it in the first place. Why aren't

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-16 Thread Gerald Galster via Postfix-users
> Wietse Venema via Postfix-users : > > Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users: >> Dnia 16.04.2023 o godz. 16:32:41 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users pisze: >>> >>> Mails classified as spam or external forwards seemingly take another route >>> via mout-xforward.web.de. These servers are SBL-listed by

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-16 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users: > Dnia 16.04.2023 o godz. 16:32:41 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users pisze: > > > > Mails classified as spam or external forwards seemingly take another route > > via mout-xforward.web.de. These servers are SBL-listed by intention, most > > likely because the spam

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-16 Thread John Levine via Postfix-users
It appears that Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users said: >Dnia 16.04.2023 o godz. 16:32:41 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users pisze: >> >> Mails classified as spam or external forwards seemingly take another route >> via mout-xforward.web.de. These servers are SBL-listed by intention, most >> likely

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-16 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
Dnia 16.04.2023 o godz. 16:32:41 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users pisze: > > Mails classified as spam or external forwards seemingly take another route > via mout-xforward.web.de. These servers are SBL-listed by intention, most > likely because the spam probability is higher in this context. This

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-16 Thread Gerald Galster via Postfix-users
> John Levine via Postfix-users : > [...] > If you are a customer, what happened when you contacted them through > their customer support channels and asekd for the support you are > paying for? Web.de is a german freemail provider like gmail. They might provide support for paid accounts only.

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-16 Thread Gerald Galster via Postfix-users
> one of web.de's sender IPs is listed into zen.spamhaus.org as the following > info. > > 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [82.165.159.35] blocked using z > en.spamhaus.org; https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL175032 Try to send your email via web.de (browser), which might use

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-16 Thread John Levine via Postfix-users
It appears that tom--- via Postfix-users said: >$ dig -x 82.165.159.35 +short >mout-xforward.web.de. > >Can anyone from web.de help with this? The only people who should be able to send mail through that server are web.de customers. If you are a customer, what happened when you contacted them

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-16 Thread Jan Ceuleers via Postfix-users
On 16/04/2023 05:57, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote: > Intentionally at the request of web.de it seems.  Did you read: >> >>     https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL175032 >> >> If your message was blocked, and was not spam, contact: >> >>     https://postmaster.web.de/en/case?c=uar > > I sent

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-15 Thread tom--- via Postfix-users
On 2023-04-16 09:33, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 09:15:24AM +0800, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote: one of web.de's sender IPs is listed into zen.spamhaus.org as the following info. 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [82.165.159.35] blocked using

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-15 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 09:15:24AM +0800, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote: > one of web.de's sender IPs is listed into zen.spamhaus.org as the > following info. > > 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [82.165.159.35] blocked using > zen.spamhaus.org;