On 01 Sep 2013, at 08:51 , Charles Marcus wrote:
> Everyone else - I'm very curious how many people are relying solely on
> postfix/postcreen settings for their anti-spam measures, and how effective
> they seem to be as compared to other anti-spam measures - ie, using
> outsourced anti-spam S
Charles Marcus:
> If postfix is good enough now with the addition of postscreen to block
> 95+% of spam, maybe it is time to do away with the hassle of 3rd party
> anti-spam tools.
Important:
1) postscreen decides if the SMTP client is a spammer.
It makes these decisions without receiving ma
Hi all,
On 2013-09-01 6:09 AM, Grant wrote:
Thanks James. This is all very cool. A blacklist (zen.spamhaus.org),
a whitelist (list.dnswl.org), and a "greylist". 2.11 looks to be a
fantastic release for easily-configured anti-spam measures. I'm just
not getting spam anymore and I don't think
