Dabrien 'Dabe' Murphy:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Instead of having to maintain a bazillion different reply parameters,
would not it be sufficient to have one generic reply line that
gets appended to all those reject commands?
Hi Wietse,
If the dilemma is between:
I was thinking of
Wietse Venema wrote:
I was thinking of adding a second line to the antispam reject
messages. For example:
550-5.7.1 The existing reject message
550 5.7.1 Please see http://foo.example.com/ for support.
Nice.
One catch-all banner is infinitely better than nothing, and it's a
enhancement.
Thanks, all! :-D
--
:- Dabe
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Configurable-replies-for-hardcoded-REJECTS--tp23096401p24928488.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Wietse,
a customer asked me to help them customize Postfix replies, so clients
(better: users) can get a hint why their message is being rejected.
The idea is to refer to an URL in the reply where (generic) verbose
explanations on the reject reason can be found. Something along these lines:
Patrick Ben Koetter:
Wietse,
a customer asked me to help them customize Postfix replies, so clients
(better: users) can get a hint why their message is being rejected.
The idea is to refer to an URL in the reply where (generic) verbose
explanations on the reject reason can be found.
* Wietse Venema postfix-users@postfix.org:
a customer asked me to help them customize Postfix replies, so clients
(better: users) can get a hint why their message is being rejected.
The idea is to refer to an URL in the reply where (generic) verbose
explanations on the reject reason can
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
I don't think it is a good idea to tweak each individual reject
message. It makes perhaps more sense to append the same for support
please (call xxx|see http://mumble/) text to all reject messages.
That was my proposal when he called me.
Of couse no-one
