On 3/5/2011 1:35 πμ, Steve Jenkins wrote:
I actually didn't have it in either - I was under the (apparently
false) impression that just putting the exclude in yum.conf would
apply to any repo. It's in the CentOS-Base.repo file in [base] and
[updates] now, tho. Thank you. :)
I also have
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote:
I only have an exclude for postfix* in yum.conf and all upgrades (with yum
update) went without problems. My Postfix was not replaced by the
distribution's package.
Ahhh... found the problem. I had excluded postfix-* instead
This isn't a Postfix issue, just an FYI for those running updated
versions of Postfix on CentOS.
I recently updated one of my CentOS 5.5 systems (which was running
Postfix 2.8.2 compiled from source) to CentOS 5.6. The Postfix package
appeared nowhere on the upgrade list, and my /etc/yum.conf has
On 02/05/11 17:21, Steve Jenkins wrote:
This isn't a Postfix issue, just an FYI for those running updated
versions of Postfix on CentOS.
I recently updated one of my CentOS 5.5 systems (which was running
Postfix 2.8.2 compiled from source) to CentOS 5.6. The Postfix package
appeared nowhere on
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
There was a (Red Hat/CentOS) security update to Postfix issued almost 3
months after the upstream release of 5.6:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0422.html
However, because CentOS were slow with the release of 5.6,
