Hi,
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:14 AM Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> > I have a postfix-3.2.6 system that acts as a mail server and
> > pop/imap using dovecot for a small domain. The problem is that
> > people are increasingly using it as a relay to a personal account,
> > such as Gmail and Yahoo.
>
>
> but note in the DMARC record that you quote: ' p=none': Gmail is
> telling other servers *not* to block (or quarantine) emails from
> @gmail.com that do not obey SPF or DKIM rules. Yahoo by contrast:
>
> # dig +short _dmarc.yahoo.com TXT
> "v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;
use SRS when forwarding mail. look for postsrsd or postforward --
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Despite the cost of living,
>
> use SRS when forwarding mail. look for postsrsd or postforward --
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> Despite the
On 11.09.19 22:12, John Regan wrote:
I have a postfix-3.2.6 system that acts as a mail server and pop/imap using
dovecot for a small domain. The problem is that people are increasingly
using it as a relay to a personal account, such as Gmail and Yahoo.
do you mean, they use gmail and yahoo
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 10:24, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>
> > I have a postfix-3.2.6 system that acts as a mail server and
> > pop/imap using dovecot for a small domain. The problem is that
> > people are increasingly using it as a relay to a personal account,
> > such as Gmail and Yahoo.
>
> perhaps
> I have a postfix-3.2.6 system that acts as a mail server and
> pop/imap using dovecot for a small domain. The problem is that
> people are increasingly using it as a relay to a personal account,
> such as Gmail and Yahoo.
perhaps i misunderstand
they are sending email from gmail/yahoo
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 05:14, John Regan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a postfix-3.2.6 system that acts as a mail server and pop/imap
> using dovecot for a small domain. The problem is that people are
> increasingly using it as a relay to a personal account, such as Gmail and
> Yahoo.
>
> This is
Hi,
I have a postfix-3.2.6 system that acts as a mail server and pop/imap using
dovecot for a small domain. The problem is that people are increasingly
using it as a relay to a personal account, such as Gmail and Yahoo.
This is resulting in the receiving system rejecting the message due to SPF
main.es and as i already i had a Postfix mail server working i
> decided
> > to set it up on my MTA system.
> >
> > The issue i'm looking to solve is related to Google Mail forwarding
> system.
> > Some days ago i enabled automatic email forwarding for f...@mydomain.es
>
installed on the server which needs to send email messages on behalf
mydomain.es and as i already i had a Postfix mail server working i decided
to set it up on my MTA system.
The issue i'm looking to solve is related to Google Mail forwarding system.
Some days ago i enabled automatic email forwarding
and in which order?
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Mail-Forwarding-tp91078p91095.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I thought I had everything working, but something broke. What I need to do is
to accept mail for local delivery for several users on a couple domains
(sermon-archive.info and one other) and relay mail for a number of users on
domain (lafn.org) to a variety of different locations. Each user
d it doesn't
> describe Postfix's logic for producing "mail forwarding loop", e.g. does
> it only check on final delivery so if it's a relay then it doesn't care?
The Postfix code that ADDS the delivered-to header will
report a loop if that header already exists.
Doing it otherwi
Hi Bill,
> > If not, what's the closest to a specification?
>
> The documentation in the software that adds it. In this case
> specifically the man page for postconf(5)
I'd already read that, e.g. prepend_delivered_header, and it doesn't
describe Postfix's logic for producing &
On 16 Nov 2016, at 7:43, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Does an RFC cover Delivered-To?
No.
If not, what's the closest to a
specification?
The documentation in the software that adds it. In this case
specifically the man page for postconf(5)
ar to mutt's "bounce"
command.)
Postfix complains of a "mail forwarding loop" by return.
Return-Path: <>
X-Original-To: ra...@inputplus.co.uk
Delivered-To: ra...@inputplus.co.uk
Received: by orac.inputplus.co.uk (Postfix)
id 2DF9D27E4C; Wed, 16 Nov 2
the wisdom of the list.
If I re-mail a message by any of several methods I run into a
rejection on the new outbound server "mail forwarding loop detected"
due to Delivered-To header detection. Of course the new server havoc
has never seen this message before. I am running into Delivered-To
loop
Bob Proulx:
> Nov 18 12:08:16 havoc postfix/cleanup[27515]: 910CE4A0: reject: header
> X-X-Delivered-To: b...@proulx.com from localhost[127.0.0.1];
> from=<b...@proulx.com> to=<r...@example.com> proto=ESMTP
> helo=: 5.7.1 mail forwarding loop detected
This message
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Bob Proulx:
> > Nov 18 12:08:16 havoc postfix/cleanup[27515]: 910CE4A0: reject: header
> > X-X-Delivered-To: b...@proulx.com from localhost[127.0.0.1];
> > from=<b...@proulx.com> to=<r...@example.com> proto=ESMTP
> > hel
On 2/12/2015 12:43 AM, LuKreme wrote:
On Feb 11, 2015, at 6:20 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
LuKreme:
Received: from thenewestsecret.net (unknown [170.130.246.215])
by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E42212DC0
for *bob*@covisp.net; Tue, 10 Feb 2015
On 12 Feb 2015, at 08:25 , Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 2/12/2015 12:43 AM, LuKreme wrote:
On Feb 11, 2015, at 6:20 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
LuKreme:
Received: from thenewestsecret.net (unknown [170.130.246.215])
by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with
LuKreme:
Received: from thenewestsecret.net (unknown [170.130.246.215])
by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E42212DC0
for *bob*@covisp.net; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:53:22 -0700 (MST)
Delivered-To: *bob*@covisp.net
Received: by 170.130.246.215 with SMTP id
On Feb 11, 2015, at 6:20 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
LuKreme:
Received: from thenewestsecret.net (unknown [170.130.246.215])
by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E42212DC0
for *bob*@covisp.net; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:53:22 -0700 (MST)
Delivered-To:
On Feb 6, 2015, at 3:43 PM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
On 06 Feb 2015, at 15:05 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
NORMALLY, that header is present AFTER mail is delivered to b...@covisp.net.
If it is present BEFORE mail is delivered to b...@covisp.net, then you have
a loop
LuKreme:
On 05 Feb 2015, at 15:53 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
LuKreme:
On 05 Feb 2015, at 05:07 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Have you considered the possibility that the mail was sent with a
bogus Delivered-To: header (i.e. the header is present, but
On 06 Feb 2015, at 15:05 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
NORMALLY, that header is present AFTER mail is delivered to b...@covisp.net.
If it is present BEFORE mail is delivered to b...@covisp.net, then you have
a loop (or the sender has added this header to trigger an error).
Ah,
Only other thing I can think of is that this is somehow related to always_bcc?
--
A dyslexic walks into a bra...
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
LuKreme:
On 05 Feb 2015, at 05:07 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Have you considered the possibility that the mail was sent with a
bogus Delivered-To: header (i.e. the header is present, but not
added by Postfix).
Yes, but I'm unsure
LuKreme:
On 05 Feb 2015, at 05:07 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Have you considered the possibility that the mail was sent with a
bogus Delivered-To: header (i.e. the header is present, but not
added by Postfix).
Yes, but I'm unsure how to diagnose that.
header_checks:
On 05 Feb 2015, at 05:07 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Have you considered the possibility that the mail was sent with a
bogus Delivered-To: header (i.e. the header is present, but not
added by Postfix).
Yes, but I’m unsure how to diagnose that.
Here is a full dump of one of
LuKreme:
On Feb 4, 2015, at 9:20 AM, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net
wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
I have a local user who is generating occasional mail forwarding loop
errors, which are causing forged emails to cause NDNs and fill up mailq.
Jan 30 13:46:08 mail postfix
LuKreme wrote:
I have a local user who is generating occasional mail forwarding loop errors,
which are causing forged emails to cause NDNs and fill up mailq.
Jan 30 13:46:08 mail postfix/local[44147]: 7020950D4D4: to=*bob*@covisp.net,
relay=local, delay=0.65, delays=0.59/0/0/0.06, dsn=5.4.6
I have a local user who is generating occasional mail forwarding loop errors,
which are causing forged emails to cause NDNs and fill up mailq.
Jan 30 13:46:08 mail postfix/local[44147]: 7020950D4D4: to=*bob*@covisp.net,
relay=local, delay=0.65, delays=0.59/0/0/0.06, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced
LuKreme:
I have a local user who is generating occasional mail forwarding loop errors,
which are causing forged emails to cause NDNs and fill up mailq.
Jan 30 13:46:08 mail postfix/local[44147]: 7020950D4D4:
to=*bob*@covisp.net, relay=local, delay=0.65, delays=0.59/0/0/0.06,
dsn=5.4.6
On 04 Feb 2015, at 07:38 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
LuKreme:
I have a local user who is generating occasional mail forwarding loop
errors, which are causing forged emails to cause NDNs and fill up mailq.
Jan 30 13:46:08 mail postfix/local[44147]: 7020950D4D4:
to=*bob
Hello,
I have a working setup with a dedicated MX inbound which deliver via transport
to a postfix / dovecot backend server.
I found some mail, probably with forged Delivered-To header that make the
backend bounce with mail forwarding loop
Here is the log of the backend :
Feb 25 05:19:37 mut
is bounced because it contains a Delivered-To: header
with the address of the recipient.
Postfix adds this header upon delivery. The above error normally
means that you have an email fordwading loop.
Wietse
Yes, I already understood that I have a mail forwarding loop
On 18 Oct 2013, at 17:45, Wietse Venema [Masked] wrote:
Wietse:
Does the Delivered-To: header already exist in the message? If that
is the case, you have been forwarding mail back and forth between
Postfix and some other server. That is a mail delivery loop.
Sendu:
Well not back and
Wietse:
Does the Delivered-To: header already exist in the message? If that
is the case, you have been forwarding mail back and forth between
Postfix and some other server. That is a mail delivery loop.
Sendu:
Well not back and forth between my Postfix server. But in any case,
the messages
this header upon delivery. The above error
normally means that you have an email fordwading loop.
Yes, I already understood that I have a mail forwarding loop
according to the error - see the subject line. My question is
what is causing it, and how do I solve it? Why didn't the other
ecd60...@opayq.com:
Sendu:
But in any case, the messages in Google's quarantine do indeed
already have the Delivered-To header prior to delivery.
Wietse:
And what put that header in there?
Sendu:
Google's spam system is adding the header. It is outside of my
control.
If you are passing
suggest that you start over with non-verbose logs (and
perhaps mail headers) which illustrate the problem, and current
postconf -n output.
Please read the thread; these have already been supplied.
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/What-is-causing-this-mail
is, but still have it deliver mail correctly?
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/What-is-causing-this-mail-forwarding-loop-bounce-tp62199p62354.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
sendu:
On 18 Oct 2013, at 18:29, Wietse Venema [via Postfix] [Masked]
fwd_lhtv7...@opayq.com wrote:
At this point I don't care about absolute correctness. I just want
to receive my email.
How do I disable the D flag?
The D flag exists only in the pipe(8) daemon and ADDS
On 2013-10-14 sendu wrote:
I'm using Google's Postini replacement as a spam filter before mail
gets to my smtp server. I currently have a problem where most emails
that get spam trapped by Google disappear when I attempt to have them
delivered. Google gives me the ability to reattempt delivery
Here's another delivery attempt, this time with all verbose logging turned
off:
http://pastebin.com/TtyDXKBX
It bounces; I don't know why. Is there any way to find out?
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/What-is-causing-this-mail-forwarding-loop-bounce
On 2013-10-15 10:01 AM, sendu ecd60...@opayq.com wrote:
Here's another delivery attempt, this time with all verbose logging turned
off:
http://pastebin.com/TtyDXKBX
Please post such things inline in the email body, many people will not
click on links to unknown destinations...
It bounces;
=local, delay=0.6, delays=0.56/0.02/0/0.02, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced
(mail forwarding loop for se...@x.me.uk)
(with X instead of sendu to make life harder for scrapers).
You mail is bounced because it contains a Delivered-To: header
with the address of the recipient.
Postfix adds
You mail is bounced because it contains a Delivered-To: header
with the address of the recipient.
Postfix adds this header upon delivery. The above error normally
means that you have an email fordwading loop.
Wietse
Yes, I already understood that I have a mail forwarding
a mail forwarding loop
according to the error - see the subject line. My question is what
is causing it, and how do I solve it? Why didn't the other email
suffer the same problem?
Does the Delivered-To: header already exist in the message? If that
is the case, you have been forwarding mail back
the same problematic email, this time with
-v verbosity added to just about everything in /etc/postfix/master.cf:
http://pastebin.com/ENkgTXz6
AFAICT, everything seems to go normally but then I get:
send attr reason = mail forwarding loop for se...@sendu.me.uk
and it eventually bounces.
My
Wondering if anyone else has had this issue with Yahoo.
I have a user who setup his mail to forward to his yahoo account. All of his
mail (he changed his forwarding from gmail to yahoo) went to yahoo for about a
month.
About a week after the forward was setup, all mail to yahoo is rejected
Am 30.01.2013 13:13, schrieb Fernando Maior:
In the area where my office is, internet providers cannot offer us links with
fixed ip, only dhcp. I wonder if
someone in the list knows about a mail forwarder server that can receive
emails from my server and forwards them to
the internet in
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:13:58 -0200
Fernando Maior articulated:
In the area where my office is, internet providers cannot offer us
links with fixed ip, only dhcp. I wonder if someone in the list knows
about a mail forwarder server that can receive emails from my server
and forwards them to the
On 1/30/2013 6:13 AM, Fernando Maior wrote:
Hello All,
In the area where my office is, internet providers cannot offer us links
with fixed ip, only dhcp. I wonder if someone in the list knows about a
mail forwarder server that can receive emails from my server and forwards
them to the
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:13:58AM -0200, Fernando Maior wrote:
In the area where my office is, internet providers cannot offer us
links with fixed ip, only dhcp. I wonder if someone in the list
knows about a mail forwarder server that can receive emails from my
server and forwards them to
Le 30/01/2013 13:13, Fernando Maior a écrit :
Hello All,
In the area where my office is, internet providers cannot offer us links
with fixed ip, only dhcp. I wonder if someone in the list knows about a
mail forwarder server that can receive emails from my server and forwards
them to the
a mail forwarding loop. It seems to happen a lot with mail from
a particular spammer.
There was a discussion earlier this month about some spammer
including a Delivered-To: header in their spam. Postfix local(8)
uses this header to detect loops and will bounce messages with a
Delivered
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:02:57PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
On 11/28/2012 1:17 PM, Will Yardley wrote:
I'm having a problem where messages are accepted but then seem to
generate a mail forwarding loop. It seems to happen a lot with mail
from a particular spammer.
There was a discussion
[Apologies in advance for the less than complete information below;
hoping someone may have an idea of what's happening anyway]
I'm having a problem where messages are accepted but then seem to
generate a mail forwarding loop. It seems to happen a lot with mail from
a particular spammer
On 10/11/2012 23:58, Noel Jones wrote:
On 11/10/2012 9:09 AM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
What I observe is that postfix is receiving messages containing a forged
Delivered-To header that makes postfix think it is seeing a mail
forwarding loop. The local(8) daemon bounces the messages, but
those
On 10/11/2012 17:52, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 16:09:24 +0100, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
...
What I observe is that postfix is receiving messages containing a
forged Delivered-To header that makes postfix think it is seeing a
mail forwarding loop. The local(8) daemon bounces
/ Daniele Nicolodi wrote on Fri 9.Nov'12 at 11:01:54 +0100 /
On 09/11/2012 10:35, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
/ Daniele Nicolodi wrote on Fri 9.Nov'12 at 10:06:14 +0100 /
On 09/11/2012 08:40, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
If you want to use content filtering with postfix, you might have
Delivered-To header that makes postfix think it is seeing a mail
forwarding loop. The local(8) daemon bounces the messages, but
those messages are spam and the from addresses are invalid, therefore
the bounces get stock in the delivery queue. This is not a problem in
itself, but I do not like
On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 16:09:24 +0100, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
...
What I observe is that postfix is receiving messages containing a
forged Delivered-To header that makes postfix think it is seeing a
mail forwarding loop. The local(8) daemon bounces the messages, but
those messages are spam
On 11/10/2012 9:09 AM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
What I observe is that postfix is receiving messages containing a forged
Delivered-To header that makes postfix think it is seeing a mail
forwarding loop. The local(8) daemon bounces the messages, but
those messages are spam and the from
On 09/11/2012 08:40, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
/ David Rees wrote on Thu 8.Nov'12 at 14:59:01 -0800 /
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
I think I have a problem with my simple mail server. I noticed several
bounce mails in the queue, which postfix in
/ Daniele Nicolodi wrote on Fri 9.Nov'12 at 10:06:14 +0100 /
On 09/11/2012 08:40, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
/ David Rees wrote on Thu 8.Nov'12 at 14:59:01 -0800 /
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net
wrote:
I think I have a problem with my simple mail
On 09/11/2012 10:35, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
/ Daniele Nicolodi wrote on Fri 9.Nov'12 at 10:06:14 +0100 /
On 09/11/2012 08:40, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
If you want to use content filtering with postfix, you might have
better results if you use amavisd-new + spamassassin + clamav. It's
into postfix after scanning it via local delivery. Spam is then
discarded via a sieve rule (not bounced).
It looks like postfix detects a mail forwarding loop when the mail is
re-injected by spamassassin via local delivery. Why isn't the loop
detected when the mail is received by the smtpd? I do
spamassassin as content filter, which re-injects
the mail into postfix after scanning it via local delivery. Spam is then
discarded via a sieve rule (not bounced).
It looks like postfix detects a mail forwarding loop when the mail is
re-injected by spamassassin via local delivery. Why isn't the loop
detected
spamassassin as content filter, which re-injects
the mail into postfix after scanning it via local delivery. Spam is then
discarded via a sieve rule (not bounced).
It looks like postfix detects a mail forwarding loop when the mail is
re-injected by spamassassin via local delivery. Why isn't the loop
, but I do not follow you. My problem is that a
mail forwarding loop is detected where I suppose there should be none,
not the opposite. The same log you quite, imho shows that a proper FROM
was indeed provided by sendmail, as I believe that Postfix reports the
envelope sendere and not the From: header
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
I think I have a problem with my simple mail server. I noticed several
bounce mails in the queue, which postfix in unable to deliver.
You're seeing the same issue as was posted the other day in the thread
Best way to
for your reply, but I do not follow you. My problem is that a
mail forwarding loop is detected where I suppose there should be none,
not the opposite. The same log you quite, imho shows that a proper FROM
was indeed provided by sendmail, as I believe that Postfix reports the
envelope sendere
/ David Rees wrote on Thu 8.Nov'12 at 14:59:01 -0800 /
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
I think I have a problem with my simple mail server. I noticed several
bounce mails in the queue, which postfix in unable to deliver.
You're seeing the same
Hello,
I have a mail server with postfix 2.5.5 (Debian lenny) which is serving mail
forwarding domains as described in VIRTUAL_README.html without any problems.
The respective part in main.cf contains (domain name removed):
virtual_alias_domains =
virtual_alias_maps = cdb:/etc/postfix
On 7/9/2011 10:10 AM, Christoph Scheurer wrote:
Hello,
I have a mail server with postfix 2.5.5 (Debian lenny) which is serving mail
forwarding domains as described in VIRTUAL_README.html without any problems.
The respective part in main.cf contains (domain name removed
Hello,
I am replying to myself, because I found the problem:
smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
25025 inet n - - - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_auth_only=no
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o
On 26/05/11 21:46, mouss wrote:
Le 26/05/2011 18:41, pch0317 a écrit :
Hi,
I want to forward mail only for one user u...@mydomain.tld to
u...@otherdomain.tld.
I try do it in this way:
/etc/postfix/virtual:
...
u...@mydomain.tld u...@mydomain.tld, u...@otherdomain.tld
...
When I send
Hi,
I want to forward mail only for one user u...@mydomain.tld to
u...@otherdomain.tld.
I try do it in this way:
/etc/postfix/virtual:
...
u...@mydomain.tld u...@mydomain.tld, u...@otherdomain.tld
...
When I send mail to u...@mydomain.tld it receive message but user
Le 26/05/2011 18:41, pch0317 a écrit :
Hi,
I want to forward mail only for one user u...@mydomain.tld to
u...@otherdomain.tld.
I try do it in this way:
/etc/postfix/virtual:
...
u...@mydomain.tld u...@mydomain.tld, u...@otherdomain.tld
...
When I send mail to u...@mydomain.tld
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 09:14:08AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sending a mail to the test-account with a full mailbox results in
postfix/smtpd[29666]: 5A32115CEAA: client=localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
postfix/cleanup[29651]: 5A32115CEAA:
message-id=20101024125249.gb29...@de
Hi,
We are using both mail forwarding (with an alias_database and
$HOME/.forward - files), and a mailbox_size_limit for the user
mailboxes. The local delivery is done by postfix/local.
The problem now is: If the mailbox is full, also the forwarding does not work
anymore -- postfix/local
Axel Freyn:
Hi,
We are using both mail forwarding (with an alias_database and
$HOME/.forward - files), and a mailbox_size_limit for the user
mailboxes. The local delivery is done by postfix/local.
The problem now is: If the mailbox is full, also the forwarding does not work
anymore
On 10/23/2010 01:15 PM, Axel Freyn wrote:
Hi,
We are using both mail forwarding (with an alias_database and
$HOME/.forward - files), and a mailbox_size_limit for the user
mailboxes. The local delivery is done by postfix/local.
No it's not.
mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 08:02:08AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
We are using both mail forwarding (with an alias_database and
$HOME/.forward - files), and a mailbox_size_limit for the user
mailboxes. The local delivery is done by postfix/local.
The problem now is: If the mailbox
Wietse:
PROCMAIL updates the mailbox (and fails because of the limit) before
PROCMAIL forwards the message.
Axel Freyn:
Thanks for your fast reply!
Probably my mail was not clear: I agree, there is now error due to
Postfix. It probably behaves as it is configured and as it should (but:
not
Hi,
I have inherited a postfix MDA that I'm just trying to understand and we
currently have a problem with the forwarding of emails using LDAP lookups.
Currently an email is forwarded if it matches the below map:
virtual_alias_maps = ldap:ldapforward
ldapforward_query_filter =
j...@scusting.com:
Hi,
I have inherited a postfix MDA that I'm just trying to understand and we
currently have a problem with the forwarding of emails using LDAP lookups.
Currently an email is forwarded if it matches the below map:
virtual_alias_maps = ldap:ldapforward
certificate requested) by mail.incertum.net (Postfix) with
ESMTPSA for c...@example.net; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:42:33 +0200 (CEST)
This is working as expected. If I create a new mail and forcibly
insert the above header before I submit it, I get a NDR saying that
there is a mail forwarding loop
that
there is a mail forwarding loop for c...@example.net - which is
As documented, Postfix uses Delivered-To: headers for loop detection.
Local delivery agent:
=
prepend_delivered_header (default: command, file, forward)
The message delivery contexts where the Postfix local(8
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Stefan Förster:
This is working as expected. If I create a new mail and forcibly
insert the above header before I submit it, I get a NDR saying that
there is a mail forwarding loop for c...@example.net - which is
As documented, Postfix uses
Dear all,
I hope you all are very well.
I have come with a strange problem with my email server which is running
almost 2 years now. actually I have never tried the mail forwarding
with the system but it has the option. Today I need to add the mail
forwarding feature and found
On Tue, June 2, 2009 11:08 am, J. Bakshi said:
I have come with a strange problem with my email server which is running
almost 2 years now. actually I have never tried the mail forwarding
with the system but it has the option. Today I need to add the mail
forwarding feature and found
Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Tue, June 2, 2009 11:08 am, J. Bakshi said:
I have come with a strange problem with my email server which is running
almost 2 years now. actually I have never tried the mail forwarding
with the system but it has the option. Today I need to add the mail
forwarding
Hi there,
I am getting error messages for mail sent to
sample.em...@firstdomain.com but in the /etc/postfix/aliases file I have
an entry for sample.email to send to sample.em...@anotherdomain.com .
why am I getting a forwarding loop.
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; mail forwarding
; mail forwarding loop for
sample.em...@firstdomain.com
r...@firstdomain.com:/etc/postfix# cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
174.143.253.66 firstdomain.com
# cat /etc/mailname
firstdomain.com
Please help.
Please read the mailing list welcome message
Can I use Postfix as a host for email forwarding?
The scenario I envision is an Alum or Faculty member authenticates to a web
portal, then tells the system where to forward their email. All email destined
for Staff would go to our current email system.
Any thoughts are welcome.
Regards,
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
