On 10/31/2009 7:39 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Noel Jones put forth on 10/31/2009 1:12 AM:
Each lookup table requires overhead. 30 separate tables requires
considerably more overhead than one table. The size of the dataset
doesn't change, it's the overhead that gets smaller. The more
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
mouss put forth on 10/31/2009 11:06 AM:
mouss, you rock.
you can use a script if you prefer. the advantage of 'make' is that it
only re-generates files when needed (source change).
The only likely changes would be adding another country.
sometimes, you find a
On 10/31/2009 12:32 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
All these cidr maps are a great example of separate tables that should
be combined into a single table with a Makefile.
Interesting. I may take a look into Makefile some time. I was unaware
of it until today. Just out of curiosity, how does
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
[snip]
Thanks for the hints Noel. I may need them down the road, although not
at the moment. Though I am curious and may play around with Makefile
just to learn something.
you can use a script if you prefer. the advantage of 'make' is that it
only re-generates
Noel Jones put forth on 10/31/2009 1:12 AM:
Each lookup table requires overhead. 30 separate tables requires
considerably more overhead than one table. The size of the dataset
doesn't change, it's the overhead that gets smaller. The more
concurrent smtpd processes running, the more it
mouss put forth on 10/31/2009 11:06 AM:
mouss, you rock.
you can use a script if you prefer. the advantage of 'make' is that it
only re-generates files when needed (source change).
The only likely changes would be adding another country. In this case,
would I just add the file name to the
I would like to confirm my understanding about access files.
Please let me know if any of this is not correct...
The man (5) access description describes a prototype file, where that
file could be a single file describing any host names, network
addresses, envelope senders or recipient
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 10/30/2009 12:55 PM, Robert Lopez wrote:
I would like to confirm my understanding about access files.
Please let me know if any of this is not correct...
The man (5) access description describes a prototype file,
Robert Lopez put forth on 10/30/2009 6:57 PM:
It is not clear to me what the benefit of multiple files is beyond
this association.
Organization and ease of management for one. For example:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/access
On 10/30/2009 9:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Robert Lopez put forth on 10/30/2009 6:57 PM:
It is not clear to me what the benefit of multiple files is beyond
this association.
Organization and ease of management for one. For example:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
On 10/30/2009 6:57 PM, Robert Lopez wrote:
Postfix places no limit on how many maps you can use, but there is system
overhead with each map. Rule of thumb is to combine maps wherever possible
-- don't use two check_sender_access statements if you can do it with one.
The smart way to do this is
Noel Jones put forth on 10/30/2009 11:50 PM:
On 10/30/2009 9:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Robert Lopez put forth on 10/30/2009 6:57 PM:
It is not clear to me what the benefit of multiple files is beyond
this association.
Organization and ease of management for one. For example:
12 matches
Mail list logo
