Re: Malformed DNS server reply

2011-05-02 Thread Бак Микаел
Wietse Venema wrote: Hi list, I saw this in my logs: Apr 29 14:58:08 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: connect from xxx.yyy.zzz[xxx.yyy.zzz.xxx] Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: valid_hostname: empty hostname Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: malformed domain name in

Re: Malformed DNS server reply

2011-05-02 Thread Бак Микаел
Victor Duchovni wrote: On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:39:10AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: This looks like a Null MX record: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delany-nullmx-00 If the domain owner declares that this domain never sends or recieves email, then shouldn't postfix reject the above

Re: Malformed DNS server reply

2011-04-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Hi list, I saw this in my logs: Apr 29 14:58:08 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: connect from xxx.yyy.zzz[xxx.yyy.zzz.xxx] Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: valid_hostname: empty hostname Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: malformed domain name in resource data of

Re: Malformed DNS server reply

2011-04-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.04.2011 15:15, schrieb Бак Микаел: Apr 29 14:58:08 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: connect from xxx.yyy.zzz[xxx.yyy.zzz.xxx] Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: valid_hostname: empty hostname Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: malformed domain name in resource data

Re: Malformed DNS server reply

2011-04-29 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:39:10AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: This looks like a Null MX record: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delany-nullmx-00 If the domain owner declares that this domain never sends or recieves email, then shouldn't postfix reject the above message with a

Re: Malformed DNS server reply

2011-04-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Victor Duchovni: On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:39:10AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: This looks like a Null MX record: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delany-nullmx-00 If the domain owner declares that this domain never sends or recieves email, then shouldn't postfix reject the