Le 18/10/2010 22:22, Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 2010-10-18 4:02 PM, Christopher Koeber wrote:
OK, based on the config below I have achieved what I set out to do
below.
I'm far from expert, but some comments...
First - you are explicitly setting a lot of settings to their defaults -
this
Le 21/10/2010 03:59, Christopher Koeber a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de mailto:ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
* Christopher Koeber ckoe...@gmail.com mailto:ckoe...@gmail.com:
inet_interfaces = all
default
mydomain
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:54:22AM -0400, Christopher Koeber wrote:
I never knew that if an A record points to the mail host then you don't need
the MX record for said host.
Should I remove the record?
No. It does no harm, and possibly a tiny bit of good. There
is nothing wrong with MX
On 10/22/2010 06:54 AM, Christopher Koeber wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl
mailto:jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
No.
foo.bar MX 10 foo.bar is unnecessary, as any valid A record can
receive mail.
Since foo.bar has to be an A record (you're using
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
I wouldn't - but then again, I wouldn't run a mail server on the domain A
record either :)
Why not?
Regards,
Christopher koeber
There are MTAs that want a mail *sender* to have an MX record (which is
silly), but it
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
No. It does no harm, and possibly a tiny bit of good. There
is nothing wrong with MX records even when an A record is present
for the same domain, and the MX points the domain at itself.
--
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.comwrote:
Do you understand what I meant by ^^^ that? It really does make working
with postfix easier if you comment out 'defaults'... I cut my postconf
-n output in half by doing this.
Just compare output of postconf -d
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:49:32PM -0400, Christopher Koeber wrote:
After making the changes where only I was explicitly setting things to what
I needed them to be versus the default the postfix system seems faster, too!
This is an optical illusion. Removing default settings simplifies your
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:49:32PM -0400, Christopher Koeber wrote:
After making the changes where only I was explicitly setting things to
what
I needed them to be versus the default the postfix
On 10/21/2010 04:02 AM, Christopher Koeber wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl
mailto:jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
On 10/19/2010 06:12 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
Not if the students subdomain has different MX details to the main
domain, which
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
No.
foo.bar MX 10 foo.bar is unnecessary, as any valid A record can receive
mail.
Since foo.bar has to be an A record (you're using it as the MX value) the
MX record is superfluous.
--
J.
I guess I am being
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
* Christopher Koeber ckoe...@gmail.com:
inet_interfaces = all
default
mydomain = students.wesleyseminary.edu
myhostname = students.wesleyseminary.edu
I'd say myhostname = students.wesleyseminary.edu
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
On 10/19/2010 06:12 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
Not if the students subdomain has different MX details to the main
domain, which appears to be the case here:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
wesleyseminary.edu. 43098 IN MX
On 19/10/10 8:04 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Christopher Koeber ckoe...@gmail.com:
inet_interfaces = all
default
mydomain = students.wesleyseminary.edu
myhostname = students.wesleyseminary.edu
I'd say myhostname = students.wesleyseminary.edu
which implies mydomain =
On 10/19/2010 06:12 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
Not if the students subdomain has different MX details to the main
domain, which appears to be the case here:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
wesleyseminary.edu. 43098 IN MX 10 mail1.no-ip.com.
wesleyseminary.edu. 43098 IN MX 15
OK, based on the config below I have achieved what I set out to do below.
Everything is done properly. For getting mailman to work with postfix with
the local domains and without the need for subdomains I used transport maps
to switch for local to virtual.
See below if people need help with it.
On 2010-10-18 4:02 PM, Christopher Koeber wrote:
OK, based on the config below I have achieved what I set out to do
below.
I'm far from expert, but some comments...
First - you are explicitly setting a lot of settings to their defaults -
this clutters postconf -n output needlessly.
postconf
* Christopher Koeber ckoe...@gmail.com:
inet_interfaces = all
default
mydomain = students.wesleyseminary.edu
myhostname = students.wesleyseminary.edu
I'd say myhostname = students.wesleyseminary.edu
which implies mydomain = wesleyseminary.edu
Setting mydomain equal to myhostname strikes me
On 10/05/2010 08:35 PM, Christopher Kurtis Koeber wrote:
Hello,
I have emailed about integrating my Postfix installation with Mailman
and discovered that I will need to redesign my Postfix configuration
to make it work. Therefore, I am asking for assistance in this task.
Here is what my
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
If the lists are managed by a listserv software such as mailman ...
Please excuse the brief aside but as someone who has been involved
slightly with Mailman (as the author of some installation instructions),
please do not use listserv as a generic
On 10/06/2010 09:48 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
If the lists are managed by a listserv software such as mailman ...
Please excuse the brief aside but as someone who has been involved
slightly with Mailman (as the author of some installation
On 7/10/10 6:49 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 10/06/2010 09:48 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
To call all mailing list managers listservs is as wrong as calling
all MTAs Postfixes. :-)
That would not be a bad idea.
Yes it would, we'd end up in a world where people genuinely thought that
Exchange or
22 matches
Mail list logo
