Re: SPF Temperrors - minor thing

2019-03-27 Thread Esteban L
-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: SPF Temperrors - minor thing Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 01:57:12 +0100 Thank you Scott K. I just read the RFC7208, very well written. My favorite line was at the end in the second to last paragraph, talking about TempError local policy considerations:  "..this add

Re: SPF Temperrors - minor thing

2019-03-27 Thread Esteban L
=167.89.106.69; helo=o1.31qt.s2shared.sendgrid.net; envelope-from=bounces+9243903-ab61- esteban=little-beak@em8306.emailtester.org; receiver=esteban@little -beak.com -Original Message- From: Scott Kitterman To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: SPF Temperrors - minor thing Date: We

Re: SPF Temperrors - minor thing

2019-03-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 27, 2019 12:57:12 AM UTC, Esteban L wrote: >Thank you Scott K. > >I just read the RFC7208, very well written. > >My favorite line was at the end in the second to last paragraph, >talking about TempError local policy considerations: > >"..this adds one more piece of complexity to an

Re: SPF Temperrors - minor thing

2019-03-26 Thread Esteban L
will look at it some more tomorrow, I suspected somehow my server/system was not doing dns lookups properly, getting an "Errno 22 Invalid dns argument" in my mail.log. -Original Message- From: Scott Kitterman To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: SPF Temperrors - minor thing Date:

Re: SPF Temperrors - minor thing

2019-03-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, March 26, 2019 01:49:08 PM Esteban L wrote: > Hello, > > My SPF record appears to be in order, using the SPF query tool at > kitterman dot com. > > Also, I do not appear to have any problems receiving or sending emails, > outside of this minor temperror message. > > However, the

SPF Temperrors - minor thing

2019-03-26 Thread Esteban L
Hello, My SPF record appears to be in order, using the SPF query tool at kitterman dot com. Also, I do not appear to have any problems receiving or sending emails, outside of this minor temperror message. However, the header kind of irks me, since it always returns the following header.