If I were to depart from the unstructured text syslog format, I'd shift to
CSV; with a reasonable choice of quoting rules it can robustly round-trip a
lot of tabular data, and very fast writers and parsers are available. I,
personally, wouldn't find a more complex structure that easily represents
On 2018-10-01 09:32:58 (+0200), Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Илья Шипицин :
Here is an idea: combine log analysis with a web API. End of
problem.
that was what I was going to implement.
however, I do not like to implement thing that are implemented
already.
so, I did a google search and I
пн, 1 окт. 2018 г. в 12:30, Tom Hendrikx :
> Hi,
>
> I have a set of grok patterns for logstash. You can send the postfix
> logs to logstash, have them parsed into something more or less
> structured by the pattersn, then expose the logstash data through some api.
>
>
* Илья Шипицин :
> > Here is an idea: combine log analysis with a web API. End of problem.
>
> that was what I was going to implement.
> however, I do not like to implement thing that are implemented already.
> so, I did a google search and I asked mailing list.
>
> seems, I need to implement
Hi,
I have a set of grok patterns for logstash. You can send the postfix
logs to logstash, have them parsed into something more or less
structured by the pattersn, then expose the logstash data through some api.
https://github.com/whyscream/postfix-grok-patterns/
Kind regards,
Tom
On
вс, 30 сент. 2018 г. в 4:40, Wietse Venema :
> Wietse:
> > > Open a web search engine, ask for for 'logfile analysis tools'.
>
> ???:
> > logfile analys is good for human, it is not rest api.
> > I did search already
>
> Here is an idea: combine log analysis with a web API. End of
Wietse:
> > Open a web search engine, ask for for 'logfile analysis tools'.
???:
> logfile analys is good for human, it is not rest api.
> I did search already
Here is an idea: combine log analysis with a web API. End of problem.
Wietse
Am 29.09.2018 um 15:32 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
> On 29.09.18 16:42, Илья Шипицин wrote:
>> logfile analys is good for human, it is not rest api.
>
> postfix produces logs, does not read nor parse them.
>
>> I did search already
>>
>> any rest api ?
>
> please tell us when you find one.
On 29.09.18 16:42, Илья Шипицин wrote:
logfile analys is good for human, it is not rest api.
postfix produces logs, does not read nor parse them.
I did search already
any rest api ?
please tell us when you find one.
guys may add it to http://www.postfix.org/addon.html#logfile
logfile analys is good for human, it is not rest api.
I did search already
any rest api ?
сб, 29 сент. 2018 г. в 16:21, Wietse Venema :
> ???:
> > Hello,
> >
> > we use automation to send messages.
> > from the automation point of view it is nice to know what happened to
> > message
>
???:
> Hello,
>
> we use automation to send messages.
> from the automation point of view it is nice to know what happened to
> message
>
> I think about the following
>
> 1) automation send email via smtp --> id of message
> 2) automation ask postfix via (rest) api "hey, tell me
Hello,
we use automation to send messages.
from the automation point of view it is nice to know what happened to
message
I think about the following
1) automation send email via smtp --> id of message
2) automation ask postfix via (rest) api "hey, tell me history of message
id ..."
any
12 matches
Mail list logo
