Re: memcache client for Postfix

2011-12-13 Thread Wietse Venema
Combining memcache and proxymap --- It seems that memcache is best for (surprise) doing what it was designed for: a cache layer on top of a persistent database, where the cache is maintained by the clients of the persistent database. Completed in snapshot

RE: memcache client for Postfix

2011-12-13 Thread Mueller, Martin (Messaging)
To: Wietse Venema Cc: Postfix users Subject: Re: memcache client for Postfix Combining memcache and proxymap --- It seems that memcache is best for (surprise) doing what it was designed for: a cache layer on top of a persistent database, where the cache

Re: memcache client for Postfix

2011-12-13 Thread Wietse Venema
-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 8:08 AM To: Wietse Venema Cc: Postfix users Subject: Re: memcache client for Postfix Combining memcache and proxymap --- It seems that memcache is best for (surprise) doing what

Re: memcache client for Postfix

2011-12-13 Thread Wietse Venema
...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 8:08 AM To: Wietse Venema Cc: Postfix users Subject: Re: memcache client for Postfix Combining memcache and proxymap --- It seems

Re: memcache client for Postfix

2011-12-13 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Wietse Venema postfix-users@postfix.org: Wietse Venema: Mueller, Martin (Messaging): Thanks for all the work making memcache support available, any thoughts on the potential use of this for anvil? As documented, anvil blocks a client that overwhelms the server. For that, there is

Re: memcache client for Postfix

2011-12-13 Thread Wietse Venema
Patrick Ben Koetter: * Wietse Venema postfix-users@postfix.org: Wietse Venema: Mueller, Martin (Messaging): Thanks for all the work making memcache support available, any thoughts on the potential use of this for anvil? As documented, anvil blocks a client that overwhelms the

Re: memcache client for Postfix

2011-12-11 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 12/9/2011 7:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Wietse Venema: This week I implemented a memcache client for Postfix in the hope that it would be useful to share postscreen(8) or verify(8) caches among multiple MTAs. The implementation is based on libmemcache. This was not too much work

Re: memcache client for Postfix

2011-12-11 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse Venema: This week I implemented a memcache client for Postfix in the hope that it would be useful to share postscreen(8) or verify(8) caches among multiple MTAs. ... Considering that memcache patches are floating around with several problems, and the amount of time that I put

Re: memcache client for Postfix

2011-12-11 Thread Wietse Venema
One missing word makes all the difference. Wietse Wietse Venema: This week I implemented a memcache client for Postfix in the hope that it would be useful to share postscreen(8) or verify(8) caches among multiple MTAs. ... Considering that memcache patches are floating around

Re: memcache client for Postfix

2011-12-11 Thread Pau Amma
On Sun, December 11, 2011 5:44 pm, Wietse Venema wrote: Combining memcache and proxymap --- It seems that memcache is best for (surprise) doing what it was designed for: a cache layer on top of a persistent database, where the cache is maintained by the clients of

Re: memcache client for Postfix

2011-12-09 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse Venema: This week I implemented a memcache client for Postfix in the hope that it would be useful to share postscreen(8) or verify(8) caches among multiple MTAs. The implementation is based on libmemcache. This was not too much work, given a few examples (libmemcache is under

memcache client for Postfix

2011-12-08 Thread Wietse Venema
This week I implemented a memcache client for Postfix in the hope that it would be useful to share postscreen(8) or verify(8) caches among multiple MTAs. The implementation is based on libmemcache. This was not too much work, given a few examples (libmemcache is under-documented). However