Scott Kitterman:
> Thanks. I don't think it's worth a lot of effort. I'd imagine it's a pretty
> niche use case to send multi-gigabyte files via SMTP. People do do it though
> (clearly or there wouldn't be a bug).
>
> I wrestled with a few options for a simple explanation, but didn't come up
On Thursday, December 23, 2021 3:51:57 PM EST Wietse Venema wrote:
> Scott Kitterman:
> > Currently, postconf.5 has this to say about message_size_limit:
> >
> > message_size_limit (default: 1024)
> >
> > The maximal size in bytes of a message, including envelope
> > information.
> >
Scott Kitterman:
> Currently, postconf.5 has this to say about message_size_limit:
>
> message_size_limit (default: 1024)
>
> The maximal size in bytes of a message, including envelope information.
>
> Note: be careful when making changes. Excessively small values will result
> in the
Currently, postconf.5 has this to say about message_size_limit:
message_size_limit (default: 1024)
The maximal size in bytes of a message, including envelope information.
Note: be careful when making changes. Excessively small values will result
in the loss of non-delivery
