Peter Uetrecht via Postfix-users:
> Hello list,
>
> is the precision of time in Postfix log files (version 3.8.4) configurable
> (microseconds or milliseconds)?
Postfix does not generate the timestamp for logfiles written by
syslogd or equivalent. That is done by the syslog(3) sy
Hello list,
is the precision of time in Postfix log files (version 3.8.4) configurable
(microseconds or milliseconds)?
Thanks in advance
Peter
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:42:38PM +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Hello,
> this just appeared in my Postfix log:
>
> Aug 22 23:35:50 rafa postfix/smtpd[28891]: connect from unknown[unknown]
> Aug 22 23:35:50 rafa postfix/smtpd[28891]: lost connection after CONNECT from
> unknown
Hello,
this just appeared in my Postfix log:
Aug 22 23:35:50 rafa postfix/smtpd[28891]: connect from unknown[unknown]
Aug 22 23:35:50 rafa postfix/smtpd[28891]: lost connection after CONNECT from
unknown[unknown]
Aug 22 23:35:50 rafa postfix/smtpd[28891]: disconnect from unknown[unknown]
I
On 7 Apr 2021, at 10:25, sandeep pawar wrote:
Hi,
I am using multiple postfix mta instance for internal relaying
purpose. I
am sending postfix logs to ELK and was wondering if it would be
possible to
display message-id in each log line. This could help in various kind
of
searches.
As Rob
On 2021-04-07 09:25, sandeep pawar wrote:
I am using multiple postfix mta instance for internal relaying
purpose. I am sending postfix logs to ELK and was wondering if it
would be possible to display message-id in each log line. This
could help in various kind of searches.
Note that the
Hi,
I am using multiple postfix mta instance for internal relaying purpose. I
am sending postfix logs to ELK and was wondering if it would be possible to
display message-id in each log line. This could help in various kind of
searches.
Is there any configuration which can be tweaked to for
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 12:11:35 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 09.08.19 11:56, Enrico Morelli wrote:
> >I'll try to put
> >
> > postrotate
> > /usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate
> > endscript
> >
> >in my postfix logrotate script to see if it works.
>
> don't. Simply look
On 09.08.19 11:56, Enrico Morelli wrote:
I'll try to put
postrotate
/usr/lib/rsyslog/rsyslog-rotate
endscript
in my postfix logrotate script to see if it works.
don't. Simply look what's in /etc/logrotate.d/*syslog*
it should contain /var/log/mail. files
--
Matus UHLAR -
On 09.08.19 09:32, Enrico Morelli wrote:
I upgraded Debian from version 9 to 10 and consequently postfix 3.1.12
to 3.4.5. I'm checking log with multitail in real time and with the new
postfix version, I've a strange behavior. When the logs rotate, postfix
continues to write in the old file
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 11:17:26 +0200
Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Aug 2019, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > > Thanks, postscript is not part of the Debian package. I'll try to
> > > put: service postfix restart
> >
> > this is not working, postfix send logs to syslogd, so restarting
On Fri, 09 Aug 2019, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Hi,
> > Thanks, postscript is not part of the Debian package. I'll try to put:
> > service postfix restart
>
> this is not working, postfix send logs to syslogd, so restarting postfix is
> not what to do, restart the syslogd will work
>
> please
Enrico Morelli skrev den 2019-08-09 10:45:
Thanks, postscript is not part of the Debian package. I'll try to put:
service postfix restart
this is not working, postfix send logs to syslogd, so restarting postfix
is not what to do, restart the syslogd will work
please create a bug on debian
f the Debian package. I'll try to put:
service postfix restart
> ML
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> On Behalf Of Enrico Morelli Sent:
> 09 August 2019 08:33 To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Postfix log
>
> Dear,
>
&g
exhibit this
behaviour, it handles the log being switched under it just fine) or you could
try it out.
ML
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On
Behalf Of Enrico Morelli
Sent: 09 August 2019 08:33
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Postfix log
Dear,
I upgraded
Dear,
I upgraded Debian from version 9 to 10 and consequently postfix 3.1.12
to 3.4.5. I'm checking log with multitail in real time and with the new
postfix version, I've a strange behavior. When the logs rotate, postfix
continues to write in the old file renamed mail.log.1 instead of the
new
On 30 Jun 2019, at 9:36, dpjanda wrote:
It sure is is, and that's why I posted the original question here. As
it
could, perhaps, be an error on my part how I call it from POSTFIX, so
I
thought I would ask the question here, first.
The us...@spamassassin.apache.org list would be a far better
Thanks Matus
In main.cf
virtual_transport=spamass-dovecot
In master.cf
spamass-dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/bin/spamc -u spamd -e
/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient}
I hope this helps.
Regards
--
Sent from:
On 30.06.19 06:36, dpjanda wrote:
It sure is is, and that's why I posted the original question here. As it
could, perhaps, be an error on my part how I call it from POSTFIX, so I
thought I would ask the question here, first.
you have not attached any information about how you call spamd from
It sure is is, and that's why I posted the original question here. As it
could, perhaps, be an error on my part how I call it from POSTFIX, so I
thought I would ask the question here, first.
--
Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html
dpjanda:
> Thanks.
>
> Yes, I should have clarified that my log file is from multiple sources.
> Sorry about that.
>
> Is it normal to have more than one spamd process per message?
This is the POSTFIX mailing list.
Thanks.
Yes, I should have clarified that my log file is from multiple sources.
Sorry about that.
Is it normal to have more than one spamd process per message?
Regards
--
Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html
dpjanda:
> Jun 29 09:20:10 email spamd[1101]: util: setuid: ruid=5001 euid=5001
> rgid=5001 5001 5001 egid=5001 5001 5001
> Jun 29 09:20:15 email spamd[1102]: util: setuid: ruid=5001 euid=5001
> rgid=5001 5001 5001 egid=5001 5001 5001
First, these lines are logged by different spamd processes.
Greetings
I hope someone can help with what is not a problem as such, but a query. In
every Spamassassin (spamd) exchange there appears to be two lines that are
*almost* identicle.
Jun 29 09:20:09 email spamd[2142]: spamd: connection from ::1 [::1]:57558 to
port 783, fd 5
Jun 29 09:20:09 email
arts.
but while trying to setup it had a problem parsing the postfix log entries.
Error: the entry is not in syslog format
as far as I remember the box running postfix is using the rsyslog daemon
then also had a look at AWStats but here the maillogvonverter.pl perl
script wasn't able to parse the pos
I save correlated logs from postfix (and milter daemons) in mongodb.
https://www.balabit.com/documents/syslog-ng-ose-latest-guides/en/syslog-ng-ose-guide-admin/html/configuring-destinations-mongodb.html
> You might want to look into something like the Logstash
> (https://www.elastic.co/products/logstash).
looks promising! thanks you!
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 10:11:14 -0600
James Reynolds wrote:
> You might want to look into something like the Logstash
>
You might want to look into something like the Logstash
(https://www.elastic.co/products/logstash).
James
> On Aug 27, 2017, at 9:51 PM, Kev wrote:
>
> Hi postfixers,
>
> We have spam filter servers for our down, 5 of them to be exact. we use
> amavisd,
Am 28. August 2017 05:51:10 MESZ schrieb Kev :
>Hi postfixers,
>
>We have spam filter servers for our down, 5 of them to be exact. we use
>amavisd, bitdefender & clamav for spam and virus filter.
>
>we have a self help portal done in php/mysql for users to manage
Hi postfixers,
We have spam filter servers for our down, 5 of them to be exact. we use
amavisd, bitdefender & clamav for spam and virus filter.
we have a self help portal done in php/mysql for users to manage
whitelist/blacklist etc, now i want to allow users to check there email
logs to they
Is there some specific text that rsyslog can key off of? I use this for
Shorewall and dhcpd (right after the RULES line):
if $msg contains 'Shorewall' then {
action(type="omfile" file="/var/log/shorewall.log")
if ($syslogfacility == 0 and $syslogseverity >= 6) then stop # info
}
Hello,
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017, at 06:58 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> That said, both regular and debug logging in Postfix are logged
> at the "info" level, Postfix does not use the syslog "debug" log
> level. Therefore, built-in syslog log filtering cannot isolate
> just the debug messages from
> On Aug 19, 2017, at 11:31 PM, yodel...@yepmail.net wrote:
>
>> but as Noel points out, you really should not have Postfix debug logging
>> enabled on a
>> routine basis.
>
> It's there for a reason isn't it? I use it when there's a problem and I need
> more information. It's great having
> On Aug 19, 2017, at 9:07 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> Sorry, not configurable other than patching the source.
>
> The logging level is specified via the syslog protocol. Every
> syslog-compatible server (syslogd, etc.) will allow you to configure
> handling that
Noel Jones:
> On 8/19/2017 3:53 PM, yodel...@yepmail.net wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I use Postfix's per-domain debug logging a lot.
>
>
> Why? The general opinion here is everything important is already in
> the normal logs, and the debug logs usually just make it hard to
> find the real
On 8/19/2017 3:53 PM, yodel...@yepmail.net wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use Postfix's per-domain debug logging a lot.
Why? The general opinion here is everything important is already in
the normal logs, and the debug logs usually just make it hard to
find the real problem among the noise. Is there
/local/bin:
ddd /usr/libexec/postfix/${process_name} ${process_id} & sleep 5
For the domains in the peer list all the debug level logging still goes into
the systemd journal and I pull out postfix-specific entries with rsyslog into
my main postfix log, /var/log/postfix/postfix.log
It's
Thank you so much for the info and it works now. :)
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 7:59 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Dec 20, 2016, at 12:53 AM, Burn Zero
> > > >
Thank you viktor. It works fantastically now.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > On Dec 20, 2016, at 12:53 AM, Burn Zero wrote:
> >
> > As you can see the orig_to parameter shows the original id to which
> the email
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Dec 20, 2016, at 12:53 AM, Burn Zero
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > As you can see the orig_to parameter shows the original id to
> > > which the email was sent and the to=
Thank you. But when I use
smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions =
check_sender_access static:INFO
I get,
postfix/smtpd[13668]: warning: unknown smtpd restriction: "INFO
postfix/smtpd[13668]: 12E9F6420F: reject: END-OF-MESSAGE from
host[x.x.x.x]: 451 4.3.5 Server configuration error;
> On Dec 20, 2016, at 12:53 AM, Burn Zero wrote:
>
> As you can see the orig_to parameter shows the original id to which the
> email was sent and the to= parameter explains the rewritten email id. I can
> clearly see the email rewriting happened. Similarly, I want to
Burn Zero:
> I guess you didn't get my question. Pardon me if it wasn't clear.
Yes it was.
The pointers that I gave will show you the result of all Postfix
address rewriting, without actually sending email. If you want more
functionality, you are welcome to contribute the code, or to use a
I guess you didn't get my question. Pardon me if it wasn't clear.
I use postfix rewrite feature to rewrite sender and recipient address. When
I receive email from outside, my recipient rewrite is done using
recipient_canonical file. I also check the same in log,
Sep 12 17:23:32 rewritehost
Documentation:
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#debugging
Command:
$ sendmail -f sender -bv recipient
Wietse
Hi,
I'm using postfix SMTP server and I'm rewriting sender and recipient
addresses. From the postfix logs, I can see the recipient address rewriting
logs,
Sep 12 17:23:32 rewritehost postfix/smtp[1223]: 28A6701362:
to=, *orig_to*=,
Hello
We have setup postfix using smtp_bind_address with 100 ips having below
configuration
#
#ip=10.11.17.13 host=multi328.postfix.example.com
10.11.17.13:25 inet n - n - 500 smtpd
-o
On 4/16/2015 6:32 AM, a jalela wrote:
Hello
We have setup postfix using smtp_bind_address with 100 ips having
below configuration
#
#ip=10.11.17.13 host=multi328.postfix.example.com
http://multi328.postfix.example.com
10.11.17.13:25
Hello all,
I've released *Version 0.9.17 of the ELSE* (E-mail Log Search Engine) as
a tar.gz archive on Sourceforge there:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/x-itools/files/X-Itools%20releases/E-mail%20Log%20Search%20Engine/
There is also a *virtual machine for demonstration purpose* if you
Dear Community,
VERSION 0.9.16 OF THE ELSE (E-mail Log Search Engine) has just been
released as a tar.gz archive.
As usual, take a look at the README file for the revision history.
The archive is there:
Dear Community,
*Version 0.9.15* of the ELSE (E-mail Log Search Engine) has been released.
This version is now able to parse Postfix versions =2.9 logs having
long queue IDs.
README including versionning info as well as archive are available there:
Hello,
Can someone explains to me (or give a link) in this log
May 15 10:58:13 LXLYOPFD11 postfix/smtp[12232]: B7B1B4800DC: to=
x...@gmail.com, relay=10.220.8.20[10.220.8.20]:25, conn_use=7, delay=1991,
delays=0.06/1990/0/0.66, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK 1368608293
fe7si6820218wib.77
What does conn_use, delays=a/b/c/d and dsnmeans
http://www.postfix.org/CONNECTION_CACHE_README.html#safety
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#delay_logging_resolution_limit
http://www.postfix.org/DSN_README.html
--
Martin
Thanks for the help
Victor
2013/5/15 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
Martin Sch?tte:
What does conn_use, delays=a/b/c/d and dsnmeans
http://www.postfix.org/CONNECTION_CACHE_README.html#safety
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#delay_logging_resolution_limit
On 23/04/2013 23:29, Nicolas HAHN wrote:
Dear Community,
*Version 0.9.13* of the tool has been released.
My tool is able to parse Postfix Logs (version 2.8 for now), generates
statistics, propose you a great EXTJS 4.1.3 Web 2.0 interface, offers
powerfull search features and so on...
It is
Dear Community,
VERSION 0.9.13 of the tool has been released.
My tool is able to parse Postfix Logs (version 2.8 for now), generates
statistics, propose you a great EXTJS 4.1.3 Web 2.0 interface, offers powerfull
search features and so on...
It is also able to parse Microsoft Exchange Server
On Apr 11, 2013, at 7:29, Nicolas HAHN ha...@erios.org wrote:
a Linux server
It requires Linux? Why would it require Linux?
--
you'd think you could trust a horde of hungarian barbarians
Mmhhh... What can I say???
If somebody can make the full product working on another platform, then
I would be happy to propose the corresponding archive on Sourceforge
available files project page...
But for now the best answer is simply it's like that. ;)
Le 13/04/2013 11:31, LuKreme a
[ Top-posting fixed ]
Le 13/04/2013 11:31, LuKreme a écrit :
On Apr 11, 2013, at 7:29, Nicolas HAHN ha...@erios.org wrote:
a Linux server
It requires Linux? Why would it require Linux?
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:38:07AM +0200, Nicolas HAHN wrote:
Mmhhh... What can I say???
If somebody can
On Apr 13, 2013, at 8:17 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
I think the point is that none of the software you mention are
Linux-specific. Postfix, PostgreSQL, rsyslog, apache (Apache
httpd), and php all work and are commonly seen on other Unix and
Unix-like systems. It doesn't sound
Le 13/04/2013 15:17, /dev/rob0 a écrit :
I think the point is that none of the software you mention are
Linux-specific. Postfix, PostgreSQL, rsyslog, apache (Apache httpd),
and php all work and are commonly seen on other Unix and Unix-like
systems. It doesn't sound likely that you have done
Dear Community,
I just released *version 0.9.11* of the tool.
This version is the *first one to include Microsoft Exchange Server Logs
parsing capabilities*.
README including versionning info as well as archive are available there:
time there but working in the area of SMTP
messaging since a long time. With Postfix, that I really love.
The goal of my e-mail today is just to let you know that I'm working since
some time on my open source GPLv3 project dedicated to *real time*postfix log
analysis, but not only log analysis
Dear Postfix Community,
Instead of reading in my previous email:
The archive I just uploaded this morning deal with Postfix version
=2.8.x logs.
Please read:
The archive I just uploaded this morning deal with Postfix version
_*=2.8.x*_ logs.
This is a misstyping from me ;)
attachment:
time*_ postfix log analysis, but not only log analysis.
This project need several components to work fine, primarily a Linux
server running Apache, Php, Rsyslog, postgreSQL 9.2, SNMPD, ... A lot of
things are described in the INSTALL file.
If you are interested by such project, you can find
This is certainly not of critical importance, but my curiosity makes me
wonder:
May 20 12:28:40 2.6 hyperion postfix/smtpd[22436]:
What does the 2.6 signify in every Postfix log line entry?
I am running postfix-current on FreeBSD 8.3
mail_version = 2.10-20120423
* Henry Stryker he...@hup.org:
This is certainly not of critical importance, but my curiosity makes me
wonder:
May 20 12:28:40 2.6 hyperion postfix/smtpd[22436]:
What does the 2.6 signify in every Postfix log line entry?
Dunno. That's probably a function of your syslog daemon
On 5/22/12 6:31 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
What does the 2.6 signify in every Postfix log line entry?
Dunno. That's probably a function of your syslog daemon
Very good, and thanks for the quick answer. I was able to learn from
/usr/include/sys/syslog.h that this maps to a facility
* Henry Stryker he...@hup.org:
Very good, and thanks for the quick answer. I was able to learn from
/usr/include/sys/syslog.h that this maps to a facility/priority code.
2 = mail
6 = informational
Ah, interesting. Wouldn't have been able to guess this :)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
I've been writing scripts for my loganalysis chores. A typical log
entry for a mail transaction looks like,
Apr 28 07:01:28 liam postfix/smtpd[17751]: connect from
out.somewhere.com[99.99.99.99]
Apr 28 07:01:29 liam postfix/smtpd[17751]: 447FC600E1:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 08:30:54 -0700
kar...@mailcan.com wrote:
I've been writing scripts for my loganalysis chores. A typical log
entry for a mail transaction looks like,
[snip]
Since it's Postfix doing the writing to the logs in the 1st place, is it
possible to config Postfix to
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012, at 11:35 AM, John Peach wrote:
Since it's Postfix doing the writing to the logs in the 1st place, is it
possible to config Postfix to (free)format those
It's not postfix - it's syslog.
If you look in Postfix's source code
./src/util/msg_syslog.c
On 4/28/2012 10:30 AM, kar...@mailcan.com wrote:
I've been writing scripts for my loganalysis chores. A typical log
entry for a mail transaction looks like,
...
Personally, I find that difficult to parse at a glance. Although it's
certainly a matter of personal taste, I prefer a bit
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012, at 12:19 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
While it would be possible to patch postfix to write logs
differently, the better choice is to investigate some of the
existing log parsers, such as pflogsumm or postfix-logwatch, and
possibly customize them.
I'll take a look at both of
kar...@mailcan.com:
The number of record types that Postfix logs ROUTINELY per email
transaction is limited. If takes only a handful of regular expressions
to parse those, and this has in fact already been done many times.
You can make logfile parsing more robust by turning on non-repeating
queue
hi
appreciate if somebody could help interpret the following log:
Mar 22 21:07:25 relay0 postfix/smtpd[61707]: disconnect from
unknown[69.167.155.81]
Mar 22 21:07:36 relay0 postfix/scache[61795]: statistics: start interval
Mar 22 21:03:29
Mar 22 21:07:36 relay0 postfix/scache[61795]: statistics:
On 3/22/2012 2:12 PM, K bharathan wrote:
hi
appreciate if somebody could help interpret the following log:
Mar 22 21:07:25 relay0 postfix/smtpd[61707]: disconnect from
unknown[69.167.155.81]
Mar 22 21:07:36 relay0 postfix/scache[61795]: statistics: start
interval Mar 22 21:03:29
Mar 22
(perpetuating the useless use of cat and the hopelessly muddled top
posting)
cat /var/log/maillog | egrep -i 'from=.*@yahoo\.com.*to='
-- Noel Jones
On 2/11/2012 1:42 AM, kshitij mali wrote:
hi Ralf ,
Thanks for help me .
with the below expression its is showing me the logs for both
hi Ralf ,
Thanks for help me .
with the below expression its is showing me the logs for both from= and
to= logs what i wanted was only
match the expression from each like only from=anythingh...@gmail.com lines
i know this will be tricky i m to trying to solve this expression if u can
then pls
Hi ,
how to trace email from particular domain i want to trace all log from
yahoo.com
cat /var/log/maillog | egrep -i 'from=*@yahoo.com'
the above commad is not working properly pls some help me with regular
expression
Regards
kshitij
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Duane Hill
* kshitij mali foreplay...@gmail.com:
Hi ,
how to trace email from particular domain i want to trace all log from
yahoo.com
cat /var/log/maillog | egrep -i 'from=*@yahoo.com'
cat /var/log/maillog | egrep -i 'from=.*@yahoo\.com'
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung
On 10/02/2012 09:28, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* kshitij maliforeplay...@gmail.com:
cat /var/log/maillog | egrep -i 'from=.*@yahoo\.com'
Why waste processing cycles, just use egrep instead of using cat first.
egrep -i 'from=.*@yahoo\.com' /var/log/maillog
* Tom Kinghorn thomas.kingh...@gmail.com:
On 10/02/2012 09:28, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* kshitij maliforeplay...@gmail.com:
cat /var/log/maillog | egrep -i 'from=.*@yahoo\.com'
Why waste processing cycles, just use egrep instead of using cat first.
egrep -i 'from=.*@yahoo\.com'
Hi all
Is it possible to have postfix log to be written in database instead of
file? If it's not possible could I copy some information out of log file and
then insert them in database?
regards
On 11/18/2011 8:45 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
Hi all
Is it possible to have postfix log to be written in database instead
of file? If it’s not possible could I copy some information out of log
file and then insert them in database?
As reported to you twice in the past week, Postfix logs
Brian Evans - Postfix List:
Hi all
Is it possible to have postfix log to be written in database instead
of file? If it?s not possible could I copy some information out of log
file and then insert them in database?
As reported to you twice in the past week, Postfix logs to your
On Nov 18, 2011, at 8:45 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
Hi all
Is it possible to have postfix log to be written in database instead of file?
If it’s not possible could I copy some information out of log file and then
insert them in database?
regards
you can cat awk grep sed /var/log/filename
You can do a python script to parse/split in different lines or
parameters /var/log/[mail.log | maillog] and insert records into MySQL
database.
Best regards,
Leslie.
--
/***
*Leslie León Sinclair
*Administrador de Redes
*Facultad de Ingenieria
PFlogsumm could help you, there is a nice tutorial in [1], combined with
and mailgraph, I think is a very good option.
HTH,
Leslie.
[1]
http://www.howtoforge.com/postfix-monitoring-with-mailgraph-and-pflogsumm-on-debian-lenny
--
/***
*Leslie
On 10/28/2011 6:17 AM, wei...@dfbnet.org wrote:
Hi all,
I try to create statistics for my postfix mailserver for reporting
puposes. I have different virtual domains on in and do mail routing
for customers.
I want to see which servers connect to deliver, how many mails
are send to which
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:17:12 +0200
wei...@dfbnet.org wrote:
Hi all,
[snip]
I read about mailgraph and pflogsumm but these stats are not
as detailed as i try to have.
You want *more* detail than Pflogsumm gives? Wow. Most people have
been pestering me to *reduce* it.
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011
On 10/28/2011 02:23 PM, James Seymour wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:17:12 +0200
wei...@dfbnet.org wrote:
Hi all,
[snip]
I read about mailgraph and pflogsumm but these stats are not
as detailed as i try to have.
You want *more* detail than Pflogsumm gives? Wow. Most people have
been
I want to list email send to the domain gmail.com how to achive it
cat /var/log/maillog | grep -i cleanup | egrep 'to=*@gmail.com'
where * = all user of gmail.com domain i think
is the above reular expression is correct ?
Please help i want the count for how mail email are sent to
* kshitij mali foreplay...@gmail.com:
I want to list email send to the domain gmail.com how to achive it
cat /var/log/maillog | grep -i cleanup | egrep 'to=*@gmail.com'
where * = all user of gmail.com domain i think
is the above reular expression is correct ?
No.
egrep
Thank u ralf
Can u please give me link for learn regular experssion
all alway get complex reqirement to track the postfix log more oftenly which
will help
me .
for example 1. how many email got dilver from one intenal user for certain
domain in last 5 hrs
2. how many email got
* kshitij mali foreplay...@gmail.com:
Thank u ralf
Can u please give me link for learn regular experssion
The best book is:
http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596002893
(IMHO of course)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
experssion
all alway get complex reqirement to track the postfix log more oftenly
which will help
me .
for example 1. how many email got dilver from one intenal user for
certain domain in last 5 hrs
2. how many email got deliver from one user to
external domains for last 3 week
Wednesday, June 1, 2011, 3:33:41 AM, Ralf wrote:
* kshitij mali foreplay...@gmail.com:
Thank u ralf
Can u please give me link for learn regular experssion
The best book is:
http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596002893
(IMHO of course)
I also use:
http://www.regular-expressions.info/
--
Hello
I have Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, postfix 2.3.3 and dovecot 2.0.9. Mails are
delivered to dovecot by virtual_transport=dovecot and the mailbox_command is
/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver. Everything works as expected.
In dovecot I am testing enabling zlib compression to save some IOPs and
Hello How do I increase the number of /delivery slots/. I have
/dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1/ in main.cf. In the postfix man page
(8) of /pipe/ talks about single recipient delivery, and dovecot doc talks
about not increasing this limit. Should I increase this parameter? Or the
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo