On Fri, 31 Dec 2021, Wietse Venema wrote:
John Fawcett:
On 31/12/2021 10:36, Doug Denault wrote:
This is a postfix/cyrus/mysql system running in a FreeBSD jail. It is
(as far as I can make it) identical to a bare metal with the same
configuration. Delivery & reading email works fine, the
John Fawcett:
> On 31/12/2021 10:36, Doug Denault wrote:
> > This is a postfix/cyrus/mysql system running in a FreeBSD jail. It is
> > (as far as I can make it) identical to a bare metal with the same
> > configuration. Delivery & reading email works fine, the jailed system
> > will not send
On 31/12/2021 11:56, John Fawcett wrote:
On 31/12/2021 10:36, Doug Denault wrote:
This is a postfix/cyrus/mysql system running in a FreeBSD jail. It is
(as far as I can make it) identical to a bare metal with the same
configuration. Delivery & reading email works fine, the jailed system
will
On 2021-12-31 10:36, Doug Denault wrote:
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
not needed in 2022
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
this is undesired since it open sasl auth on port 25
don't see it and all the internet seems to use dovecot but I don't see
how whatever imap impacks smtp. Thanks for
On 31/12/2021 10:36, Doug Denault wrote:
This is a postfix/cyrus/mysql system running in a FreeBSD jail. It is
(as far as I can make it) identical to a bare metal with the same
configuration. Delivery & reading email works fine, the jailed system
will not send email failing with:
cyrus
This is a postfix/cyrus/mysql system running in a FreeBSD jail. It is (as
far as I can make it) identical to a bare metal with the same
configuration. Delivery & reading email works fine, the jailed system will
not send email failing with:
cyrus postfix/smtpd[51745]: warning: SASL: Connect to
Hi,
yesterday i noticed an unexpected behaviour. This mail is lingering in the
outbound queue on my mailserver:
54086E032F 10413683 Fri Feb 7 14:04:21 some.user@my.domain
(lost connection with apple.de[17.149.160.31] while receiving the initial
server greeting)
pre...@apple.de
Searching the
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 09:48:29AM CET, Klaffehn, Peter
peter.klaff...@westermann.de said:
Now the strange thing. There is no mx record for apple.de:
root@mx-50:~# host -t mx apple.de
apple.de has no MX record
So how could postfix determine the mxer for this Domain?
On 11 Feb 2014, at 09:48, Klaffehn, Peter peter.klaff...@westermann.de wrote:
yesterday i noticed an unexpected behaviour. This mail is lingering in the
outbound queue on my mailserver:
54086E032F 10413683 Fri Feb 7 14:04:21 some.user@my.domain
(lost connection with
Make sure you understand address classes.
We are not a virtual mailbox domain, we are a virtual alias domain
because we use UNIX accounts for the few mailboxes we have, and alias
several other addresses to them. Here is the definition of a virtual
alias domain straight from the manual:
The
On 10/15/2013 4:02 AM, Chad Elliott wrote:
Make sure you understand address classes.
We are not a virtual mailbox domain, we are a virtual alias domain
because we use UNIX accounts for the few mailboxes we have, and alias
several other addresses to them.
Your setup is badly broken. The
Eureka! I have changed the following in main.cf:
virtual_mailbox_domains = hash:/etc/postfix/mydomains
SHOULD BE
virtual_alias_domains = hash:/etc/postfix/mydomains
Many thanks to Noel Jones for pointing out that postfix thought we
were a virtual mailbox domain, and to everyone who chimed in
On 10/15/2013 4:02 AM, Chad Elliott wrote:
Make sure you understand address classes.
We are not a virtual mailbox domain, we are a virtual alias domain
because we use UNIX accounts for the few mailboxes we have, ...
Noel is correct. You're broken. And you are using
virtual_mailbox_domains.
On 10/15/2013 7:31 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
This should have read:
/etc/postfix/shield_acct_names
mrwh...@breakingbad.com REJECT unknown user
jes...@breakingbad.com REJECT unknown user
g...@breakingbad.comREJECT unknown user
--
Stan
Sorry if this question gets asked too often, but I followed the
instructions to stop backscatter email from my server, yet it continues to
send bounces. Here is the output of postconf -n:
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
Logs?
On 2013-10-14 4:00 PM, Chad Elliott waypostsoftw...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry if this question gets asked too often, but I followed the
instructions to stop backscatter email from my server, yet it
continues to send bounces. Here is the output of postconf -n:
alias_maps =
:
lksjdflkajsflkas...@mycompany.com
Oct 14 12:44:46 mail postfix/smtpd[2527]: smtpd_check_addr: addr=
lksjdflkajsflkas...@mycompany.com
Oct 14 12:44:46 mail postfix/smtpd[2527]: ctable_locate: purge entry key
z04...@.com
Oct 14 12:44:46 mail postfix/smtpd[2527]: send attr request = rewrite
Oct 14
On 10/14/2013 3:00 PM, Chad Elliott wrote:
Sorry if this question gets asked too often, but I followed the
instructions to stop backscatter email from my server, yet it
continues to send bounces. Here is the output of postconf -n:
Without context, we can't provide much help.
- what
Without context, we can't provide much help.
- what instructions did you follow?
I set up local_recipient_maps = $virtual_alias_maps and
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550 per instructions located
here:
http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html
- what is being bounced?
mail sent to
On 2013-10-14 4:41 PM, Chad Elliott waypostsoftw...@gmail.com wrote:
- what is being bounced?
mail sent to non-existent aliases/users (not in virtual_alias_maps)
This is the DESIRED result... what is the problem?
--
Best regards,
*/Charles
/*
On 2013-10-14 4:00 PM, Chad Elliott waypostsoftw...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry if this question gets asked too often, but I followed the
instructions to stop backscatter email from my server,
and
On 2013-10-14 4:41 PM, Chad Elliott waypostsoftw...@gmail.com wrote:
- what is being bounced?
mail
On 2013-10-14 4:54 PM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2013-10-14 4:00 PM, Chad Elliott waypostsoftw...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry if this question gets asked too often, but I followed the
instructions to stop backscatter email from my server,
and
On 2013-10-14 4:41 PM, Chad
On 2013-10-14 4:00 PM, Chad Elliott waypostsoftw...@gmail.com wrote:
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
virtual_mailbox_base = /var/spool/mail
virtual_mailbox_domains = hash:/etc/postfix/mydomains
There are no wildcards in virtual_alias_maps or alias_maps
Tests against your maps?
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2013-10-14 4:00 PM, Chad Elliott waypostsoftw...@gmail.com wrote:
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
virtual_mailbox_base = /var/spool/mail
virtual_mailbox_domains = hash:/etc/postfix/mydomains
On 10/14/2013 3:41 PM, Chad Elliott wrote:
Without context, we can't provide much help.
- what instructions did you follow?
I set up local_recipient_maps = $virtual_alias_maps and
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550 per instructions located
here:
I am concerned a configuration that has been unchanged for a few years may
have an error that is now showing up as a problem.
I received this email that is a non-delivery notice sent to us (
postmas...@cnm.edu) that a non-delivery notice our gateway sent could not
be delivered:
From:
Hi,
And these are the logfile lines for our sending of the non-delivery
notice we sent. One item in these log lines I do not understand at all
is relay=server50.appriver.com
http://server50.appriver.com[204.232.236.138]:25. I do not
understand where were that information is sourced. It looks
That was a fast response Jan. Thanks. Is the overall situation suggestive
of any misconfiguration here?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Jan P. Kessler post...@jpkessler.infowrote:
Hi,
And these are the logfile lines for our sending of the non-delivery
notice we sent. One item in these
On 4/11/2013 2:42 PM, Robert Lopez wrote:
That was a fast response Jan. Thanks. Is the overall situation
suggestive of any misconfiguration here?
[please don't top-post]
It appears you're generating a bounce for spam. Don't do that; the
spam sender address is often forged causing your notice
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 4/11/2013 2:42 PM, Robert Lopez wrote:
That was a fast response Jan. Thanks. Is the overall situation
suggestive of any misconfiguration here?
[please don't top-post]
It appears you're generating a bounce for
Is postscreen able to identify email as spam to prevent bouncing it?
Is there a way to alter my postfix configuration to prevent bouncing it?
This is not a matter of 'spam detection'. You have to verify for valid
(means existing) recipients *before* you accept mail.
Look for
Robert Lopez:
Is postscreen able to identify email as spam to prevent bouncing it? Is
there a way to alter my postfix configuration to prevent bouncing it?
Both postscreen and a before-queue content filter block mail before
it is allowed into the Postfix queue.
Postfix will therefore not
Is postscreen able to identify email as spam to prevent bouncing it?
Is there a way to alter my postfix configuration to prevent bouncing it?
This is not a matter of 'spam detection'. You have to verify for valid
(means existing) recipients *before* you accept mail.
Look for
On Apr 11, 2013, at 15:56, Jan P. Kessler post...@jpkessler.info wrote:
do not reject mails by content filters (as said: use prequeue filters
or tag spam mails)
to be clear, do not bounce emails based on content filters AFTER the SMTP
transaction. You can certainly reject email based on any
kshitij mali:
I have postfix chroot i think
[master.cf]
Indeed. Both smtpd (server) and smtp (client) are chrooted. Your
current problem is with the client. You may run into other problems
with the server.
but i want to know that the problem is with the resolution and sending
email to specfic
kshitij mali:
Feb 20 00:54:17 D1OKH680RL postfix/smtp[4993]: 390077605C3: to=
xxx...@lcit.com teera...@mitsubishielevatorasia.co.th, relay=none,
delay=13164, delays=13144/0/20/0, dsn=4.4.3, status=deferred (Host or
domain name not found. Name service error for name=lcit.com type=MX: Host
not
Hi,
I'm stuck into a problem.
I'm using content filter, which parses email from my postfix server.
My postfix server sometimes sends a command which is less than 4 alphabets.
I don't know what to do for that command, as I don't know which command is
that...
Can anybody tell me, is there any
Arora, Sumit:
Hi,
I'm stuck into a problem.
I'm using content filter, which parses email from my postfix server.
My postfix server sometimes sends a command which is less than 4 alphabets.
I don't know what to do for that command, as I don't know which command is
that...
Can anybody
* Arora, Sumit sumit.ar...@hp.com:
Hi,
I'm stuck into a problem.
I'm using content filter, which parses email from my postfix server.
My postfix server sometimes sends a command which is less than 4 alphabets.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphabet
I don't know what to do for that
I'm using content filter, which parses email from my postfix server.
My postfix server sometimes sends a command which is less than 4
alphabets.
I don't know what to do for that command, as I don't know which command
is that... Can anybody tell me, is there any command of less than 4
40 matches
Mail list logo
