On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:28:42 +1000
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 22:15 -0400, John Peach wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:17:00 +1000
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 14:11 +0300, Покотиленко Костик wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:52:27 -0400
John Peach post...@johnpeach.com articulated:
I never said it was a false positive. Just that it's a waste of time
trying to get delisted; we gave up with that years ago.
If you mean years agoliterally, then I might suggest that you revisit
it. The Times They
Noel Butler:
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 12:37 +0300, ??? ?? wrote:
Hehe, noticed I've got just 2 replies on my thread from Noel Butler,
rest is missing:
LOL, hrmm Q, is the postfix lists the only mail coming from
camomile.cloud9.net? or do these servers host other stuff as well
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 02:11:59PM +0300, ??? ?? wrote:
I have the following postfix configuration:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
snip
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
In all this thread, no one that I have seen has yet mentioned that
DSBL has been defunct since 2008, over
Le 26/10/2010 13:11, Покотиленко Костик a écrit :
[snip]
sorbs.net is very agressive, many ISPs get blocked for several years and
are not willing to delist b/c sorbs doesn't offer free delist for them.
- hmmm. if you refer to the delisting fee, this has changed. there's no
fee anymore.
- if
entries in main.cf
2. Implement reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org
See http://www.barracudacentral.org/rbl as sign up is required
3. Implement this dynamic/generic (residential/zombie) blocking PCRE
check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/fqrdns.pcre
http://www.hardwarefreak.com
,
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net,
reject_rbl_client recent.spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net,
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/rhsbl_sender_domain_whitelist,
reject_rhsbl_client dbl.spamhaus.org
Hello all,
I am a bit confused about setting restrictions on which domains can
send through my server. I am utilizing some reject_rbl_client
directives to check mail with free spam repositories. One of the valid
domains sending to this server was blacklisted by one of the
repositories. I would
whitelist.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated,
permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destination,
-- check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_whitelist
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net,
reject_rbl_client
,
permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destination,
-- check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_whitelist
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net,
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_invalid_hostname,
reject_non_fqdn_hostname
. Implement reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org
See http://www.barracudacentral.org/rbl as sign up is required
3. Implement this dynamic/generic (residential/zombie) blocking PCRE
check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/fqrdns.pcre
http://www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.pcre
Put the PCRE check
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 14:11 +0300, Покотиленко Костик wrote:
sorbs.net is very agressive, many ISPs get blocked for several years and
are not willing to delist b/c sorbs doesn't offer free delist for them.
That is complete FUD, yes, I know what their website says, but knowing
the people
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:17:00 +1000
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 14:11 +0300, Покотиленко Костик wrote:
sorbs.net is very agressive, many ISPs get blocked for several years and
are not willing to delist b/c sorbs doesn't offer free delist for them.
Hi,
sorbs.net is very agressive, many ISPs get blocked for several
years and
are not willing to delist b/c sorbs doesn't offer free delist for
them.
So there is problem with false-positives. There are not much of them,
but all cases needs additional investigation.
I removed several
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 22:15 -0400, John Peach wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:17:00 +1000
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 14:11 +0300, Покотиленко Костик wrote:
sorbs.net is very agressive, many ISPs get blocked for several years and
are not
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 21:48 -0500, Al Zick wrote:
internal mail which is only imap would be
require [fileinto];
if header :contains X-Spam-Status [Yes,] {
fileinto Junk;
stop;
}
I have found 2 packages:
dovecot-sieve
libsieve
Could you tell me which one you are
,
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/recipients_access,
check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/access_noauth,
reject_unauth_destination,
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/rbl_whitelist,
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/rbl_sender_whitelist,
reject_rbl_client
/access_noauth,
reject_unauth_destination,
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/rbl_whitelist,
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/rbl_sender_whitelist,
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
* Vasya Pupkin postfix-l...@bsrealm.net:
Hello.
I wonder, how postfix handles multiple entries like this:
reject_rbl_client hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.2,
reject_rbl_client hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.4,
Will it try to lookup address every time
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
Indeed. And that's actually documented
http://www.postfix.org/STRESS_README.html
Although the above example shows three RBL lookups (lines 4-6),
Postfix will only do a single DNS query, so it does not affect the
performance.
--
Ralf
=
...
...
reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
...
...
permit
My question is to see what I recommended for urls reject_rbl_client in
place, if you need more than that I have there? alone or with just
one?, what?
Thank you.
Using Postfix 2.3.8-2 + etch1
--
Jose
:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
...
reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
...
...
permit
My question is to see what I recommended for urls reject_rbl_client in
place, if you need more than that I have there? alone or with just
one?, what?
Thank you.
Using Postfix 2.3.8-2
:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
...
reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
dsbl is dead.
...
...
permit
My question is to see what I recommended for urls reject_rbl_client in
place, if you need more than that I have there? alone or with just
one?, what
* Harakiri harakiri...@yahoo.com:
Is it possible to specify the blackhole servers in a separate file? I
only found the option, that you specify reject_rbl_client in the
main.cf multiple times. My problem is that i have a cluster of postfix
servers and settings like transport map and relay
Harakiri a écrit :
--- On Wed, 6/10/09, Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
From: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
Subject: Re: reject_rbl_client config in map file?
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 6:45 AM
* Harakiri harakiri
mouss wrote:
Harakiri a écrit :
--- On Wed, 6/10/09, Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
From: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
Subject: Re: reject_rbl_client config in map file?
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 6:45 AM
* Harakiri
To: georgeforma...@hotmail.com; postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: using reject_rbl_client with rbldnsd daemon
George Forman wrote:
Hi,
I am attempting to setup and run my own dnsbl service.
I am using rbldnsd: Small Daemon for DNSBLs from
http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/rbldnsd.html
I have
George Forman wrote:
Hi,
I am attempting to setup and run my own dnsbl service.
I am using rbldnsd: Small Daemon for DNSBLs from
http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/rbldnsd.html
I have setup the dnsbl daemon to run on server3.com (same server postfix
is running on).
I have verified using dig that the A
Noel Jones wrote:
George Forman wrote:
Hi,
I am attempting to setup and run my own dnsbl service.
I am using rbldnsd: Small Daemon for DNSBLs from
http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/rbldnsd.html
I have setup the dnsbl daemon to run on server3.com (same server
postfix is running on).
I have verified
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:48:27 -0500
Brian Evans - Postfix List grkni...@scent-team.com wrote:
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org
Wietse answered the main question, however dsbl.org is gone.
Recommend to remove it from all configs to prevent breakage in the
future.
I know, I just played
Apparently, this:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org
reject_rbl_client virbl.dnsbl.bit.nl
replaced by this:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
hash:/etc/postfix/hash-tables/reject_rbl_client
cat hash:/etc/postfix/hash-tables
richard lucassen:
Apparently, this:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org
reject_rbl_client virbl.dnsbl.bit.nl
The above does RBL lookups (as requested by reject_rbl_client).
replaced by this:
smtpd_client_restrictions
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:37:09 -0500 (EST)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
richard lucassen:
Apparently, this:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org
reject_rbl_client virbl.dnsbl.bit.nl
The above does RBL
richard lucassen wrote:
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org
Wietse answered the main question, however dsbl.org is gone.
Recommend to remove it from all configs to prevent breakage in the future.
Brian
reject_rbl_client sip.invaluement.local
reject_rbl_client sip24.invaluement.local
check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:9997,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
Greylisting server returns defer_if_permit to defer a mail. My
objective is to lookup only those domains in zen
,
reject_unauth_destination
reject_rbl_client sip.invaluement.local
reject_rbl_client sip24.invaluement.local
check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:9997,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
Greylisting server returns defer_if_permit to defer a mail. My
objective
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 5:47 PM, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
snip
check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:9997,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
Greylisting server returns defer_if_permit to defer a mail. My
objective is to lookup only
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:19 PM, mouss mo...@netoyen.net wrote:
just use:
450 4.7.1 Greylisted Come back after 30 seconds
Thanks!
raj
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Rajkumar S rajkum...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:19 PM, mouss mo...@netoyen.net wrote:
just use:
450 4.7.1 Greylisted Come back after 30 seconds
Ooops I still get postfix/smtpd[27954]: warning: restriction
`450' after `defer' is ignored
Rajkumar S a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:19 PM, mouss mo...@netoyen.net wrote:
just use:
450 4.7.1 Greylisted Come back after 30 seconds
Ooops I still get postfix/smtpd[27954]: warning: restriction
`450' after `defer' is ignored
Remove the defer keyword. Return
450 4.7.1
101 - 140 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
