On 2010-09-08 06:02, pf at alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
Am I missing something obvious?
With many ISPs providing generic PTR,
reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname is too gentle.
I'd really like to implement reject_unknown_client_hostname, but I've
seen too many cases where address-name mapping
pf at alt-ctrl-del.org:
Am I missing something obvious?
Yes.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
Wietse
pf at alt-ctrl-del.org put forth on 9/7/2010 11:02 PM:
Am I missing something obvious?
With many ISPs providing generic PTR,
reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname is too gentle.
I'd really like to implement reject_unknown_client_hostname, but I've
seen too many cases where address-name
Am I missing something obvious?
With many ISPs providing generic PTR, reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
is too gentle.
I'd really like to implement reject_unknown_client_hostname, but I've seen
too many cases where address-name mapping = exists, the name-address
mapping = exists, BUT
