Re: relay_recipient_maps question

2010-04-14 Thread Magnus Bäck
On Wed, April 14, 2010 5:01 am, Stan Hoeppner said: Gary Smith put forth on 4/13/2010 7:07 PM: [...] I know some time ago someone had mentioned for the hash lookup table to work correctly it needed a key pair so I would think: j...@domain.tld j...@domain.tld Which is the proper way

Re: relay_recipient_maps question

2010-04-14 Thread Noel Jones
On 4/13/2010 10:01 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Gary Smith put forth on 4/13/2010 7:07 PM: Currently we are using mysql plugin for this and are switching over to static files (or files generated on a schedule from the database). Anyway, looking at the docs, it says that the entry need only been

RE: relay_recipient_maps question

2010-04-14 Thread Gary Smith
No, there must be a result with the address, but postfix doesn't use that result. The file will look like: u...@example.com anything us...@example.com anything us...@example.com anything anything can be any text, such as an administrative comment. That's what I thought. I've

relay_recipient_maps question

2010-04-13 Thread Gary Smith
Currently we are using mysql plugin for this and are switching over to static files (or files generated on a schedule from the database). Anyway, looking at the docs, it says that the entry need only been found in the file to be accepted, otherwise it will be rejected. Postfix needs to know

Re: relay_recipient_maps question

2010-04-13 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Gary Smith put forth on 4/13/2010 7:07 PM: Currently we are using mysql plugin for this and are switching over to static files (or files generated on a schedule from the database). Anyway, looking at the docs, it says that the entry need only been found in the file to be accepted,