On 21 Dec 2016, at 5:42, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
Hello Noel,
Would you please stop say that im labeling.. im not.
Sorry im so bad in explaining things in english.
I just trying to explain something based on what i did read here:
On 12/21/2016 5:42 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
Hello Noel,
Would you please stop say that im labeling.. im not.
Noel n'a pas dit que vous êtes "labeling" quelque chose.
Il a dit quand Postfix marque ("labels") une addresse IP comme "unknown".
Le mot anglais "label" n'est pas toujours une
Jones
> Verzonden: dinsdag 20 december 2016 17:50
> Aan: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Onderwerp: Re: request improved logging for postfix.
>
> On 12/20/2016 3:17 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> >
> > postfix/ [smtp/smtpd/postscreen] show [client-hostname or unknown] IP
&g
On 12/20/2016 3:17 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
>
> postfix/ [smtp/smtpd/postscreen] show [client-hostname or unknown] IP
>
> (*always unknown if A/PTR mismatches in client hostname OR helo
> hostname)
Labeling a client as unknown has nothing to do with the helo name.
See the description for
n: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
> Namens Noel Jones
> Verzonden: maandag 19 december 2016 17:43
> Aan: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Onderwerp: Re: request improved logging for postfix.
>
> On 12/19/2016 3:31 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
>
On 12/19/2016 3:31 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
>
> So when everything is setup correct the helo and hostname ares shown
> in the logs,
On a normal, accepted connection, the HELO name is never shown in
the logs. The client is identified by the source IP and port and
verified client hostname if
rg]
> Namens Noel Jones
> Verzonden: vrijdag 16 december 2016 16:56
> Aan: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Onderwerp: Re: request improved logging for postfix.
>
> On 12/16/2016 5:13 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
>
> > Maybe im totaly incorrect here so correct me if needed.
On 12/16/2016 10:27 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:56:26AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
>> No fixes are necessary, other than maybe I should write a tutorial
>> on reading logs.
>
> Oh, a LOG_README, an excellent idea! Later it can branch out into
> the various configuration
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:56:26AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> No fixes are necessary, other than maybe I should write a tutorial
> on reading logs.
Oh, a LOG_README, an excellent idea! Later it can branch out into
the various configuration knobs we might eventually see.
Do you think you could
> No fixes are necessary, other than maybe I should write a tutorial
> on reading logs.
>
> -- Noel Jones
+1 In particular, your writing style is exceptionally clear!
Michael
On 12/16/2016 5:13 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> Maybe im totaly incorrect here so correct me if needed.
Yes.
> Now, Im running Debian Wheezy, postfix ( debian backport )
> 2.11.2-1~bpo70+1. Kernel : 3.2.82-1
>
> I’ve increased the debug level in postfix for the domains.
Don't use debug
>Now, here is an inconistany of logging ( i think ) by postfix.
>
>I point to this line,: ?sweeper2.stater.com[193.172.8.206]:25:
>220-sweeper.stater.com ESMTP ?
>
>More consistand would be (sweeper2.stater.com[193.172.8.206]):25:
>220-sweeper.stater.com ESMTP ?
The form:
client: request
Hello,
After the message from yesterday, im asking if the postfix logging can be
changed.
To improve the loggings and a better more clear reject message.
A small change maybe, i dont know, i’ll show what i mean below.
Maybe im totaly incorrect here so correct me if needed.
Now,
13 matches
Mail list logo
