Hi,
I've read a few archive posts regarding the generation of bounce/ndr
messages and I can understand some of the cutting remarks such as 'don't
accept mail for invalid users in the first place'.
That aside, is it actually possible to stop the SENDING (or the
generation) of NDR/Bounce messages.
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 20:44 +0100, Steve wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 14:38 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Steve wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking at some archive posts regarding white listing by
intended recipient domain.
Say for example I wish to white list any incoming mail for:
Hello,
We scan all outgoing mail as we absolutely don't want to send out any
virusses. To accomplish this, we have a two-stage (separate) Postfix
setup, connected via a content_filter for Amavis/ClamAV:
Postfix (incoming stage) -- Amavis/ClamAV -- Postfix (sending stage)
However, during the
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 10:49 +0200, Willy Janssen wrote:
Hello,
We scan all outgoing mail as we absolutely don't want to send out any
virusses. To accomplish this, we have a two-stage (separate) Postfix
setup, connected via a content_filter for Amavis/ClamAV:
Postfix (incoming stage) --
hi all
currently i've gota smtp out postfix server and one main and several
subdomains are using it to send mails out
want to put a DKIM sign on all the outbound mails; understand there are
MAIL-DKIM and DKIMproxy, DKIM-milters etc..
which one i can choose for this purpose
do i've to add anything
The one observation I've made is there is no way of spotting in the logs
that the mail was subjected to a whitelist. For example;
map:
example.com OK putting text here does not log it
I'm guessing I can do this
example.com WARN whitelisted
example.com OK
But is there a way to get OK to
Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Monday, June 29, 2009 at 06:11 CEST,
R Pradeepa prade...@bheltry.co.in wrote:
Can we have restriction on smtpd_recipient_limit parameter for one
group of users whereas for others we dont need this limitation.
There is no Postfix builtin for this, but a custom policy
Please note:
# wants exclusive mails only ;-)
id=GROUP3; recipient==j...@doe.local; recipient_count=1; \
action=REJECT too many rcpts $$recipient_count = 1
The recipient attribute is only valid for single recipient mails at
smtpd_data_restrictions. So this rule works, but other
Hello,
I have a virtual domain hosting posfix config here with amavisd-new. I
needed to silently bcc any recieved messages from one user to two other
users.
I've managed to do it with help like this
recipient_bcc original user to alias
u...@capriolobike.com - silental...@capriolobike.com
On 6/29/2009, Steve (steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk) wrote:
I've read a few archive posts regarding the generation of bounce/ndr
messages and I can understand some of the cutting remarks such as 'don't
accept mail for invalid users in the first place'.
Yep - but accepting for invalid users
On Jun 29, 2009, at 5:41 PM, K bharathan wrote:
hi all
currently i've gota smtp out postfix server and one main and several
subdomains are using it to send mails out
want to put a DKIM sign on all the outbound mails; understand there
are MAIL-DKIM and DKIMproxy, DKIM-milters etc..
which
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 07:17:02AM +0200, Magnus B?ck wrote:
Nitpick: I believe any time means at the very earliest the next
second, i.e. a queue id won't be reused until the second component
of the current time has rolled over to the next.
Where next is measured from the time the queue file
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:49:34AM +0200, Willy Janssen wrote:
We scan all outgoing mail as we absolutely don't want to send out any
virusses. To accomplish this, we have a two-stage (separate) Postfix setup,
connected via a content_filter for Amavis/ClamAV:
Postfix (incoming stage) --
Steve wrote:
The one observation I've made is there is no way of spotting in the logs
that the mail was subjected to a whitelist. For example;
map:
example.com OK putting text here does not log it
I'm guessing I can do this
example.com WARN whitelisted
example.com OK
Only one action is
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 09:19 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Only one action is allowed per lookup. If you want to note in
the logs or use PREPEND to add a header indicating the mail
was whitelisted, you'll need two lookup tables - first to WARN
or PREPEND, then another table to OK.
I suppose
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 08:20 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 6/29/2009, Steve (steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk) wrote:
I've read a few archive posts regarding the generation of bounce/ndr
messages and I can understand some of the cutting remarks such as
'don't
accept mail for invalid users
I would like to add custom headers to outgoing messages only:
X-Custom: my-header
I tried that with:
smtpd_data_restrictions =
check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/add_headers/header
and the content of that file:
127.0.0.1 PREPEND X-Custom: my-header
But it gets appended to both
EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
Appreciate that - but to do this defeats the object of rejecting mail at
SMTP time (to avoid the bounce in the first place). What appears to
happening is the spambot sending the mail does not hang around for the
250 OK at the end of the lf.lf. If it did,
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I would like to add custom headers to outgoing messages only:
X-Custom: my-header
I tried that with:
smtpd_data_restrictions =
check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/add_headers/header
and the content of that file:
127.0.0.1 PREPEND X-Custom: my-header
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:35:58AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I would like to add custom headers to outgoing messages only:
X-Custom: my-header
I tried that with:
smtpd_data_restrictions =
check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/add_headers/header
and the
-Original Message-
From: Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 7:19 AM
To: steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk; postfix users list
postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Whitelisting by recipient domain name
Steve wrote:
The one observation I've made is there is
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 11:32 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
Appreciate that - but to do this defeats the object of rejecting mail at
SMTP time (to avoid the bounce in the first place). What appears to
happening is the spambot sending the mail does not
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 09:19 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Steve wrote:
The one observation I've made is there is no way of spotting in the logs
that the mail was subjected to a whitelist. For example;
map:
example.com OK putting text here does not log it
I'm guessing I can do this
EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 11:32 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
Appreciate that - but to do this defeats the object of rejecting mail at
SMTP time (to avoid the bounce in the first place). What appears to
happening
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:52 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 11:32 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
Appreciate that - but to do this defeats the object of rejecting mail at
SMTP time (to avoid
Steve, you know the answer to this question: I will repeat it once
more time. Don't reject mail after accepting it.
Wietse
Wietse,
You are, of course, correct. It would be totally retarded to be able to
switch of bounce/ndr messages. Mail admins are totally perfect and never
make
On 6/29/2009, Steve (steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk) wrote:
You are, of course, correct. It would be totally retarded to be able to
switch of bounce/ndr messages.
Yes, it would, since it breaks smtp...
Otherwise, the CEO of your new biggest prospect will never know that his
'I'll take it!'
i hope i've come to the right list for this. i didn't think
this was a developer issue.
trying to set up:
solaris 10
postfix-2.6.2 w/ tls, compiled from source
cyrus-sasl-2.1.23, compiled from source
the postfix-tls part was/is working. i can send/recv mail
and it has the tls header in it. i
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 14:24 -0400, Terry Carmen wrote:
Steve, you know the answer to this question: I will repeat it once
more time. Don't reject mail after accepting it.
Wietse
Wietse,
You are, of course, correct. It would be totally retarded to be able to
switch of
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 14:29 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 6/29/2009, Steve (steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk) wrote:
You are, of course, correct. It would be totally retarded to be able to
switch of bounce/ndr messages.
Yes, it would, since it breaks smtp...
So does the notion of
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 19:41 +0100, Steve wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 14:29 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 6/29/2009, Steve (steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk) wrote:
You are, of course, correct. It would be totally retarded to be able to
switch of bounce/ndr messages.
Yes, it
On 6/29/2009 2:41 PM, Steve wrote:
You are, of course, correct. It would be totally retarded to be able to
switch of bounce/ndr messages.
Yes, it would, since it breaks smtp...
So does the notion of 'Before Queue Filtering'. I think it goes
something like 'You must decide to accept or
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:38:11PM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
-
/etc/postfix/main.cf snippet:
-
smtpd_sasl_path = smtpd
---
now,
smtpd_sasl_path = smtpd
means this
On 6/29/2009, EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk wrote:
And this come to think of it: strict_rfc821_envelopes
We can disable.
? It is disabled by default.
If you mean you can enable this, you should be aware it *will* block
legitimate mail.
That said, it has nothing to do with your desire
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 14:24 -0400, Terry Carmen wrote:
Whilst Wietse's Postfix mostly rocks you need to drop that 'God' like
arse licking Terry. It makes you look a tit dude. If something sucks it
sucks. No matter who wrote it, who's project it is, or the cost of it.
I appreciate Wietse's
Please don't feed the trolls. :)
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 14:56 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 6/29/2009 2:41 PM, Steve wrote:
You are, of course, correct. It would be totally retarded to be able to
switch of bounce/ndr messages.
Yes, it would, since it breaks smtp...
So does the notion of 'Before Queue Filtering'. I
Le Mon 29/06/2009, EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk disait
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 14:56 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 6/29/2009 2:41 PM, Steve wrote:
You are, of course, correct. It would be totally retarded to be able to
switch of bounce/ndr messages.
Yes, it would, since it
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 15:13 -0400, Terry Carmen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 14:24 -0400, Terry Carmen wrote:
Whilst Wietse's Postfix mostly rocks you need to drop that 'God' like
arse licking Terry. It makes you look a tit dude. If something sucks it
sucks. No matter who wrote it, who's
i dkimproxy update to the latest version which is in beta
my secondary dns is not to me he plays tricks
Le lundi 29 juin 2009 05:12, Byung-Hee HWANG a écrit :
fake...@fakessh.eu fake...@fakessh.eu writes:
that right now
[swilt...@your-ab6cd29f8e ~]$ host -t txt
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 21:36 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
2821
Indeed. I'm glad you pointed that out;
4.2.5 Reply Codes After DATA and the Subsequent CRLF.CRLF
When an SMTP server returns a positive completion status (2yz code)
after the DATA command is completed with CRLF.CRLF, it accepts
On 6/29/2009, Steve (steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk) wrote:
Genius coders often don't see why something matters to an end user.
They get stuck in arguing the semantics.
It is impossible to communicate effectively without using well defined
terms...
Maybe you should look up the meaning of
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 02:56:51PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:38:11PM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
-
/etc/postfix/main.cf snippet:
-
smtpd_sasl_path = smtpd
I get a weird error
[swilt...@localhost ~]$ host -t txt mail._domainkey.fakessh.eu.
bitsy.mit.edu.
Using domain server:
Name: bitsy.mit.edu.
Address: 18.72.0.3#53
Aliases:
Host mail._domainkey.fakessh.eu not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
[swilt...@localhost ~]$
[swilt...@localhost ~]$ host -t txt
The postconf(5) manage says: 'a result of OK is not allowed for safety
reasons.'
Is there a way to bypass this? I wish to make check_recipient_mx_access into a
whitelist instead of a blacklist.
Alternatively is there a way of REJECT-ing all mail that does not match the
desired entries
On Jun 29, 2009, at 3:51 PM, EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk
wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 15:23 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Please don't feed the trolls. :)
Oh yawn. Is that the best you can do? Can you not contribute something
useful? I don't think
problem solved. I had forgotten it. at the end of the statement
Le lundi 29 juin 2009 22:27, fake...@fakessh.eu a écrit :
I get a weird error
[swilt...@localhost ~]$ host -t txt mail._domainkey.fakessh.eu.
bitsy.mit.edu.
Using domain server:
Name: bitsy.mit.edu.
Address: 18.72.0.3#53
Victor Duchovni wrote:
Anyone there adding custom headers in Postfix?
Use smtp_header_checks, defined in master.cf on the smtp service.
Requires postfix 2.5 or newer.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_header_checks
# master.cf
smtp unix - - n - -
Hi there,
We have a mail relay in the DMZ (SRV1) which receives all mail sent to
example dot com, but we also have an additional server on the internal
network (SRV2) wich receives some mails from the same domain. To do
this in SRV1, the transport has:
us...@example.com smtp:ip_SRV2
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:20:02PM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
To configure the location of the Cyrus config file for smtpd, use:
cyrus_sasl_config_path = /some/path/etc
that didn't work for me, FWIW. trussing the postfix daemons
showed me where it was looking for the file, so i
Robert Becskei a écrit :
Hello,
I have a virtual domain hosting posfix config here with amavisd-new. I
needed to silently bcc any recieved messages from one user to two other
users.
I've managed to do it with help like this
recipient_bcc original user to alias
u...@capriolobike.com -
Steve a écrit :
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 20:44 +0100, Steve wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 14:38 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Steve wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking at some archive posts regarding white listing by
intended recipient domain.
Say for example I wish to white list any incoming mail for:
K bharathan a écrit :
hi all
currently i've gota smtp out postfix server and one main and several
subdomains are using it to send mails out
want to put a DKIM sign on all the outbound mails; understand there are
MAIL-DKIM and DKIMproxy, DKIM-milters etc..
which one i can choose for this
mouss pisze:
all that said, I don't find that dkim is bringing me anything, with all
the problems that it brings. so I am hesitating: unless I see good args,
I will disable it.
About the only one I can see is that I am able to complain loudlier to
some mail service providers arguing that not
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
Anyone there adding custom headers in Postfix?
Use smtp_header_checks, defined in master.cf on the smtp service.
Requires postfix 2.5 or newer.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_header_checks
# master.cf
smtp unix - -
postfix-l...@monmouth.com wrote:
The postconf(5) manage says: 'a result of OK is not allowed for safety
reasons.'
Is there a way to bypass this?
No.
I wish to make check_recipient_mx_access into a whitelist instead of a
blacklist.
Alternatively is there a way of REJECT-ing all mail that
Noel Jones wrote:
postfix-l...@monmouth.com wrote:
The postconf(5) manage says: 'a result of OK is not allowed for
safety reasons.'
Is there a way to bypass this?
No.
Is it possible to use permit_auth_destination here?
Jan P. Kessler wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
postfix-l...@monmouth.com wrote:
The postconf(5) manage says: 'a result of OK is not allowed for
safety reasons.'
Is there a way to bypass this?
No.
Is it possible to use permit_auth_destination here?
No, nothing that resolves to an OK or permit
58 matches
Mail list logo
