I wonder if some of you guys could help me identify where an issue
lies within my Postfix setup. Let me first say that I have got a
completely working Postfix installation that accepts external mail and
forwards it on when neccessary and I can also send mail locally using
mail/mailx... the
Ralf
What are the permissions on /var/clamav/clmilter.socket ?
The permissions are;
srwxrwxr-x 1 clamav postfix 0 Aug 21 12:30 clmilter.socket
Which I believe I found from here:
http://www.jasonbrown.us/blog/post_clamav_rhelcentos
According to the docs:
You specify SMTP-only Milter
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Nick Rosiernick.ros...@gmail.com:
is it possible to configure Postfix to send an interim non-delivery
report? I'm using the default settings so Postfix will try to deliver
a mail for 5 days. So if a mail fails to get sent users are only
informed after 5 days. I would
Benny Pedersen:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
Den 2012-08-24 14:17, Wietse Venema skrev:
Shane:
Excellent! Issue solved with the following line in my main.cf
inet_protocols = ipv4
Postfix as distributed from postfix.org adds that by default.
in 2.9.x this is not
Good evening,
I was wonder if there is someone who could help point me in the right
direction so I can solve a spam problem I have.
I am running a mail server with Ubuntu + Postfix + Maia Mailguard +
Dovecot, all has been working well until recently people have started
receiving spam email that
* Nick Rosier nick.ros...@gmail.com:
recently noticed some mails got stuck in the queue due to a
misconfiguration so at least now the users (and me) will get notified
early. I've also modified the notify-classes so I'm also notified and
take action when needed.
I personally look at the queue
Am 27.08.2012 13:17, schrieb Jan Geep:
Good evening,
I was wonder if there is someone who could help point me in the right
direction so I can solve a spam problem I have.
I am running a mail server with Ubuntu + Postfix + Maia Mailguard +
Dovecot, all has been working well until
On 27/08/2012 13:17, Jan Geep wrote :
Good evening,
I was wonder if there is someone who could help point me in the right
direction so I can solve a spam problem I have.
I am running a mail server with Ubuntu + Postfix + Maia Mailguard +
Dovecot, all has been working well until recently people
Benny Pedersen:
Den 2012-08-27 12:52, Wietse Venema skrev:
Postfix 2.9 edits main.cf and adds inet_protocols = ipv4
if you don't have an inet_protocols line in main.cf.
why is this done ? this is breaking that main.cf could be 100% empty
It is a forwards compatibility migration
- Message from an...@isac.gov.in -
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 15:50:33 +0530
From: an...@isac.gov.in
Subject: Re: exceptions for smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
- Message from Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org -
Date: Fri, 24 Aug
Thanks, Stan--working on it!
/mike
On Aug 26, 2012, at 12:06 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Did you get a chance to digest my suggestions on this yet? I gave you
nearly everything you need to know implement this with Postfix, sans
rewriting the JAVA app for parallel
On 8/26/2012 11:49 PM, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
On Mon, August 27, 2012 6:27 am, Reindl Harald wrote:
Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max connection rate
15/1800s for (smtp:27.115.112.50) at Aug 27 05:59:14
Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max connection count
On 8/27/2012 7:56 AM, an...@isac.gov.in wrote:
- Message from an...@isac.gov.in -
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 15:50:33 +0530
From: an...@isac.gov.in
Subject: Re: exceptions for smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
- Message from Noel Jones
Greetings!
I'm using Posfix for years and like it a lot, but now I'm a bit confused what
will be best option for smtpd_proxy_filter failover. One possible option is to
use multiple A records on DNS, but dependency on one more service is unwanted
thing. Any other options there?
--
Regards,
KSB
Am 27.08.2012 13:17, schrieb Jan Geep:
[...] until recently people have started
receiving spam email that appear to be sent from my domain.
For example
From: myn...@example.com
To: myn...@example.com
Subject: Fwd: Re: Scan from a Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 1234
But the return path
Am 27.08.2012 16:30, schrieb Ilja Beeskow:
Am 27.08.2012 13:17, schrieb Jan Geep:
[...] until recently people have started
receiving spam email that appear to be sent from my domain.
From: myn...@example.com
To: myn...@example.com
Subject: Fwd: Re: Scan from a
KSB:
Greetings!
I'm using Posfix for years and like it a lot, but now I'm a bit
confused what will be best option for smtpd_proxy_filter failover.
One possible option is to use multiple A records on DNS, but
dependency on one more service is unwanted thing. Any other options
there?
Many
My postfix server is configured to receive email from authorized
non-local MUAs on port 587 using SASL PLAIN SMTP AUTH over TLS.
It is also configured to receive general inbound delivery on the
usual port 25.
The server is also running mailman (I host a mailing list). The
mailman daemons inject
Rich Carreiro:
But in the short term, is there any way to reduce postscreen's
logging level or do tell it not to log uninteresting
connections such as those from localhost?
Postfix logging exists so that you can fix a problem LATER. Therefore
there are no features to turn off logging for
On 08/27/12 11:25, Rich Carreiro wrote:
I know the real answer is to figure out how to modify the
relevant logwatch service script and/or to figure out how to get
mailmain to submit on 587.
Update postfix-logwatch[1], this should already be fixed.
[1] http://logreporters.sourceforge.net/
Am 27.08.2012 16:33, schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 27.08.2012 16:30, schrieb Ilja Beeskow:
Am 27.08.2012 13:17, schrieb Jan Geep:
[...] until recently people have started
receiving spam email that appear to be sent from my domain.
From: myn...@example.com
To: myn...@example.com
I'm copying this response back to the list, as this discussion needs to
be in the various list archives for other who may intend to follow in
your footsteps.
On 8/27/2012 8:09 AM, Mike Mitchell wrote:
I do have to say, I was originally hoping that I could optimize things
merely with some
All this makes perfect sense, thanks for the additional detail, Stan.
/mike
On Aug 27, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
I'm copying this response back to the list, as this discussion needs to
be in the various list archives for other who may intend to follow in
Ralf
So, are you saying that there is no reason why these options shouldn't work?
Exactly. Either both or non should work. Hm. Maybe a chroot issue?
I'm not using a chroot jail, so I'm pretty sure it won't be that... I
might have to remove the ClamAV integration with Postfix if I can't
solve
* John Gardner jeg1...@gmail.com:
Ralf
So, are you saying that there is no reason why these options shouldn't
work?
Exactly. Either both or non should work. Hm. Maybe a chroot issue?
I'm not using a chroot jail, so I'm pretty sure it won't be that... I
might have to remove the
Futchko, Rose:
Good Afternoon. This is to confirm that the information located at
http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html#quick is the right
documentation to setup a multi-instance of Postfix within the following
environment:
MULTI_INSTANCE_README describes multiple MTAs that run on
Hello everybody,
Please excuse my probably rather novice question but I couldn't find any hint
on this. The document at http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html says it
should be possible to reject an email with a before-queue content filter ...
but how would I exactly accomplish this?
On 8/27/2012 3:03 PM, Juerg Reimann wrote:
Hello everybody,
Please excuse my probably rather novice question but I couldn't find any hint
on this. The document at http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html says
it should be possible to reject an email with a before-queue content filter
On 8/27/2012 2:03 PM, Juerg Reimann wrote:
Hello everybody,
Please excuse my probably rather novice question but I couldn't find any hint
on this. The document at http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html says
it should be possible to reject an email with a before-queue content filter
On 2012.08.27. 22:15, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
I'm sure there are before-queue filters out there, but you cannot use a
pipe.
You must create/find a front-end that speaks SMTP as noted at the bottom
of the SMTPD_PROXY_README.
Brian
For example spampd.
__
KSB
* Juerg Reimann j...@jworld.ch:
Hello everybody,
Please excuse my probably rather novice question but I couldn't find any hint
on this. The document at http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html says
it should be possible to reject an email with a before-queue content filter
... but
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:25:29AM -0400, Rich Carreiro wrote:
I know the real answer is to figure out how to modify the
relevant logwatch service script and/or to figure out how to get
mailmain to submit on 587.
The real answer is trivial. My Mailman submits on 587.
mm_cfg.py ::
SMTPPORT =
In an attempt to allow rsync to backup email to another server in another
location, I seem to have messed something up, but I'll be darned if I can find
it I'd really appreciate any help. The user is attymatter. Attymatter's
home is /attymatter/home/attymatter :
Hello Folks,
I'm using postfix-2.9.20120102-sasl2 with cyrus-imapd-2.4.13p0 on OpenBSD v5.1.
There are unix-users and pure-cyrus-users on the system. Most of the unix-users
have mail delivered to an identical cyrus-user, but for a few local transport
should be used.
What is the best way to
On Aug 27, 2012, at 8:36 PM, Warren H. Prince wpri...@princelaw.com wrote:
In an attempt to allow rsync to backup email to another server in another
location, I seem to have messed something up, but I'll be darned if I can
find it I'd really appreciate any help. The user is attymatter.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/27/2012 8:10 PM, IMAP List Administration wrote:
Hello Folks,
I'm using postfix-2.9.20120102-sasl2 with cyrus-imapd-2.4.13p0
on OpenBSD v5.1.
There are unix-users and pure-cyrus-users on the system. Most
of the unix-users have mail
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 3:00 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Postfix Multi-Instance on multiple hosts
Futchko, Rose:
Good Afternoon. This is to confirm
- Message from Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org -
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:57:11 -0500
From: Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
Reply-To: postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: exceptions for smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Dear List,
right now, in one of my servers, only one instance of postfix is
running. This is already integrated with amavisd-new running on the
same server.
My question is, if I create another instance of postfix, do I need to
create another instance of amavisd-new/Clamav?
Regards,
39 matches
Mail list logo
