Well after i made some changes the postfix dont want to start. I mean the
smpt, it says it that connect timeout exceeded.
# tail /var/log/maillog
Jul 19 09:01:54 szarlej postfix/master[4428]: warning:
/usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling
Jul 19 09:02:54 szarlej
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:18:24PM +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky, MsU Banska
Bystrica wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to the list. I'm searching for some information on suppossedly
deprecated parameters, however I couldn't find anything.
I have upgraded Debian Squeeze (Postfix 2.7.1) to Wheezy (Postfix
Oh another typo, I suppose:
smtpd_tls_received_header (default: no)
Request that the Postfix SMTP server produces Received: message headers
that include information about the protocol and cipher used, as well as the
remote SMTP client CommonName and client certificate issuer CommonName.
* staticsafe m...@staticsafe.ca:
Oh another typo, I suppose:
smtpd_tls_received_header (default: no)
There's also smtp_tls_received_header.
p@rick
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht
* Patrick Ben Koetter postfix-users@postfix.org:
* staticsafe m...@staticsafe.ca:
Oh another typo, I suppose:
smtpd_tls_received_header (default: no)
There's also smtp_tls_received_header.
Of course there isn't. Excuse the noise. I'll go hiding in a deep dark hole. :/
p@rick
--
[*]
It appears that this message is a way that
the target server responds to email not found.
Thanks for everyone's help on this.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Roman Gelfand:
I am sorry. I posted this only to Stan before. Looking at the
rejected
Thank You, both were probably a typo. After correcting, Postfix stopped
complaining.
(Well, they were probably not so important, since postfix was running
fine for 5 years now :-)
Peter
Dňa 19.07.2013 13:11, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote / napísal(a):
* Patrick Ben Koetter
Roman Gelfand:
550 #5.1.0 Address rejected. (in reply to RCPT TO command)
Wietse:
THAT is qmail not Postfix.
Roman Gelfand:
would you have more info on this, as far as, how to go about
researching this?
Wietse:
Ask the person responsible for this system why they reject this
recipient.
Hello list,
I have configured postfix to not accept connections from clients that fail
the reverse dns check.
But I want to be able to whitelist specific clients, even if the reverse
hostname check fails.
To achieve this I configured the following:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
On 07/19/2013 08:19 AM, L.W. van Braam van Vloten wrote:
Hello list,
I have configured postfix to not accept connections from clients that
fail the reverse dns check.
But I want to be able to whitelist specific clients, even if the reverse
hostname check fails.
To achieve this I
Hello list,
I have a question regarding virtual alias maps.
I currently implement this table to allow me to keep an offsite copy of all
incoming mails for users in the following manner
u...@example.comu...@example.com,u...@offsite.com
So the user will receive the original
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 09:05:52AM +0200, Krzysztof Szarlej wrote:
Well after i made some changes the postfix dont want to start. I
mean the smpt, it says it that connect timeout exceeded.
# tail /var/log/maillog
Jul 19 09:01:54 szarlej postfix/master[4428]: warning:
Hey guys i have finally set my mail server with dovecot and postfix. I
configured also a tls and sasl authentication. I have revdns and txt record
also.
I have a database with 5000 mails and I want to send to each address a mail
with my company offer(not a spam just offer to companies with the
On 2013-07-19 1:23 PM, Krzysztof Szarlej kszarle...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a database with 5000 mails and I want to send to each address a
mail with my company offer(not a spam just offer to companies with the
same profile that my company have)
Do you have their explicit permission to send
I received this database from a government organization because I joined a
export support program held by polish gov organizations . Those companies
I have mails to had to apply for this also because afaik it is also a
project supported by EU.
Because sendmail and postfix cannot run
In an older episode, on 2013-07-19 20:06, Dominik George wrote:
Hi,
the key is that by sendmail, we mean the sendmail command. Postfix
has a sendmail-compatible frontend.
You can just use the mail command like so:
$ mail -a From: Your Name yourm...@example.com -s Your Subject
Hi,
the key is that by sendmail, we mean the sendmail command. Postfix has a
sendmail-compatible frontend.
You can just use the mail command like so:
$ mail -a From: Your Name yourm...@example.com -s Your Subject
recpm...@example.com EOT
Your Text
EOT
-nik
Krzysztof Szarlej
On 7/19/2013 7:19 AM, L.W. van Braam van Vloten wrote:
Hello list,
I have configured postfix to not accept connections from clients
that fail the reverse dns check.
But I want to be able to whitelist specific clients, even if the
reverse hostname check fails.
To achieve this I
On 7/19/2013 8:12 AM, James Day wrote:
Hello list,
I have a question regarding virtual alias maps.
I currently implement this table to allow me to keep an offsite copy of all
incoming mails for users in the following manner
u...@example.com
On 07/19/2013 02:04 PM, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky, MsU Banska Bystrica wrote:
Thank You, both were probably a typo. After correcting, Postfix stopped
complaining.
(Well, they were probably not so important, since postfix was running
fine for 5 years now :-)
As documented, postfix 2.9 introduced
On 19 Jul 2013 23:28, Sam Flint harmonicn...@gmail.com wrote:
my postfix will not accept remote connections, but it will accept local.
postconf -n:
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
config_directory = /etc/postfix
home_mailbox = Maildir/
inet_interfaces = all
inet_protocols = ipv4, ipv6
On 07/19/2013 08:01 PM, Krzysztof Szarlej wrote:
Because sendmail and postfix cannot run simulatenusely
That refers to the postfix sendmail(1)-compatibility interface. It works
even when postfix is not running.
and I am using my email. Also my postfix is configured with ssl certs
and it
I see, but it does nothing.
Sam
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Simon B simon.buongio...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 Jul 2013 23:28, Sam Flint harmonicn...@gmail.com wrote:
my postfix will not accept remote connections, but it will accept local.
postconf -n:
broken_sasl_auth_clients =
relay_domains = .com .org .net .info $mydestination
The above is very bad, change it to empty:
relay_domains =
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
rej
On 7/19/2013 4:58 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
I'm running on a linode, and I'm sorry.
Netstat:
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign
Address State
tcp0232 flintfam.org:ssh
ip98-161-54-206.om.om:52460 http://ip98-161-54-206.om.om:52460
it's already like that
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 7/19/2013 4:26 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
my postfix will not accept remote connections, but it will accept local.
Some linux distros configure postfix to only listen on localhost,
forcing you
Lynn Dobbs:
different places, I read that it is best to have the query return 1 if
a match is found because postfix might not be happy with anything else.
The Postfix documentation is correct. And whatever you read is
incorrect. That is, the text is flawed, or your reading skills.
When
On 19 Jul 2013 23:39, Sam Flint harmonicn...@gmail.com wrote:
I see, but it does nothing.
Don't top-post please.
Rob explained this perfectly in the archives..
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/smtpd-recipient-restrictions-Best-Practices-td10171.html
Sam
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:32
On 7/19/2013 4:53 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
Still nothing
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
relay_domains = .com .org .net .info $mydestination
The above is very bad, change it to empty:
relay_domains =
On 7/19/2013 4:45 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
it's already like that
stop top posting.
Sorry, my crystal ball is at the cleaners. Maybe start with
describing how you're testing.
Also note some ISPs block port 25 on consumer connections, making
running or testing a mail server impossible. You
Still nothing
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
relay_domains = .com .org .net .info $mydestination
The above is very bad, change it to empty:
relay_domains =
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
rej
Sorry, Gmail.
I'm testing by attempting to connect with my android tablet
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 7/19/2013 4:58 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
I'm running on a linode, and I'm sorry.
Netstat:
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address
Ok, well thanks.
I'm sorry, I will try.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 7/19/2013 4:53 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
Still nothing
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
I'm running on a linode, and I'm sorry.
Netstat:
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address
State
tcp0232 flintfam.org:ssh
ip98-161-54-206.om.om:52460ESTABLISHED
tcp0 0 localhost:44273 localhost:mysql
TIME_WAIT
tcp0 0
my postfix will not accept remote connections, but it will accept local.
postconf -n:
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
config_directory = /etc/postfix
home_mailbox = Maildir/
inet_interfaces = all
inet_protocols = ipv4, ipv6
message_size_limit = 3072
mydestination = $myhostname, localhost,
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:02:49PM -0700, Lynn Dobbs wrote:
After I figured out that my pgsql query was returning an empty
row for virtual_mailbox_maps used to reject_unlisted_recipient,
I started thinking about what the query returned when there
was an address match.
It is clear that smtpd
After I figured out that my pgsql query was returning an empty row for
virtual_mailbox_maps used to reject_unlisted_recipient, I started
thinking about what the query returned when there was an address match.
It is clear that smtpd is looking for row or no row. And I've read on
this mailing
On 7/19/2013 4:46 PM, Simon B wrote:
On 19 Jul 2013 23:39, Sam Flint harmonicn...@gmail.com
mailto:harmonicn...@gmail.com wrote:
I see, but it does nothing.
Don't top-post please.
Rob explained this perfectly in the archives..
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 05:51:20PM -0500, Sam Flint wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Sam Flint harmonicn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 7/19/2013 4:58 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
I'm running on a linode, and I'm sorry.
Hi,
what is wrong with the sendmail program and a simple shell script?
What is wrong with sending all mails in a batch?
Last but not least, what aspect of your plan dos NOT match plain spamming?
Cheers,
Nik
Krzysztof Szarlej kszarle...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hey guys i have finally set my mail
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Sam Flint:
Postfix is listening, I can still recieve email.
Hi. I wrote most of Postfix. What evidence do you have (SHOW POSTFIX
LOGGING) that Postfix is receiving mail for you?
Wietse
It arrives in my inbox,
Sam Flint:
Postfix is listening, I can still recieve email.
Hi. I wrote most of Postfix. What evidence do you have (SHOW POSTFIX
LOGGING) that Postfix is receiving mail for you?
Wietse
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Sam Flint harmonicn...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, Gmail.
I'm testing by attempting to connect with my android tablet
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 7/19/2013 4:58 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
I'm running on a linode, and
It shouldn't be...
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:59 PM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 05:51:20PM -0500, Sam Flint wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Sam Flint harmonicn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Sam Flint harmonicn...@gmail.com wrote:
It shouldn't be...
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:59 PM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 05:51:20PM -0500, Sam Flint wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Sam Flint harmonicn...@gmail.com wrote:
On
Sam Flint:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Sam Flint:
Postfix is listening, I can still recieve email.
Hi. I wrote most of Postfix. What evidence do you have (SHOW POSTFIX
LOGGING) that Postfix is receiving mail for you?
Wietse
It
On 7/19/2013 5:11 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
Sorry, Gmail.
I'm testing by attempting to connect with my android tablet
Ok, so this is the real problem you're trying to solve. You believe you
cannot connect to Postfix with the Android tablet, correct?
What operation are you performing that is
On 7/19/2013 4:26 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
my postfix will not accept remote connections, but it will accept local.
Some linux distros configure postfix to only listen on localhost,
forcing you to edit master.cf to listen remotely.
Look for a line in msater.cf something like:
127.0.0.1:smtp inet n
48 matches
Mail list logo
