Hi,
I searched via Google and via the mailing list archives, but I didn't
find a post which matched my specific situation.
I see those warnings in the logs when the system goes down for a reboot.
Is the mail lost? Should I be using a different approach when rebooting
a server running
deoren:
Hi,
I searched via Google and via the mailing list archives, but I didn't
find a post which matched my specific situation.
I see those warnings in the logs when the system goes down for a reboot.
What warnings? You failed to include the program name. As the system
shuts down, it
List:
I would like to transport messages for a specific address to a python
application to do a few things then push the message back to postfix for
delivery to their maildir. I am wondering what is the best way to put
that message back into postfix without it looping back through the
Am 28.01.2015 um 15:38 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On 28. jan. 2015 14.57.27 li...@rhsoft.net li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
all serious distributions have a newer glibc or offer updates
Jan 28 05:41:58 Updated: glibc-common-2.5-123.el5_11.1.x86_64
Jan 28 05:42:03 Updated: glibc-2.5-123.el5_11.1.x86_64
Am 28.01.2015 um 07:18 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On 28. jan. 2015 06.50.31 Peter pe...@pajamian.dhs.org wrote:
Honestly, I don't know if postfix uses that function or not, but if
postfix isn't vulnerable then you almost certainly have some other
program on your box that is. I would recommend
I am next working on using local database file lookups for Postfix
configuration use.
I see how in the document
http://www.postfix.org/DATABASE_README.html
to use MySQL and LDAP for some things. With some examples and tests I am
sucessful.
I see too the example for hash: or btree: or lmdb:.
On 28. jan. 2015 14.57.27 li...@rhsoft.net li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
all serious distributions have a newer glibc or offer updates
Jan 28 05:41:58 Updated: glibc-common-2.5-123.el5_11.1.x86_64
Jan 28 05:42:03 Updated: glibc-2.5-123.el5_11.1.x86_64
what version of glibc is that ?, did you
I would like to transport messages for a specific address to a python
application to do a few things then push the message back to postfix for
delivery to their maildir. I am wondering what is the best way to put
that message back into postfix without it looping back through the
transport?
I recently integrated DSPAM into my setup. This introduced a change from
SMTP-based inet relaying to LMTP delivery using UNIX sockets.
Old:
scan unix - - n - 16 smtp
-o smtp_bind_address=127.0.0.1
-o smtp_send_xforward_command=yes
-o
Thomas Leuxner:
While everything works fine, I was unable to emulate xforward like I used to.
Does the SMTP server announce XFORWARD in the EHLO response?
Does the client send XFORWARD?
Wietse
Vijay Rajah:
Hello,
I'm sure most of you are aware of the latest Glibc vulnerability. (FYI:
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/01/27/9)
I'm not sure If postfix is vulnerable. I see from that posting that,
exim under certain configurations, is vulnerable.
I think since
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org 2015.01.28 13:20:
Wietse
Oops. Valid point. Just found out that this doesn't seem to be implemented:
$ socat - UNIX-CONNECT:/var/spool/postfix/public/dspam-lmtp
220 DSPAM LMTP 3.10.1 Ready
lhlo localhost
250-localhost.localdomain
250-PIPELINING
deoren:
Jan 27 16:27:56 screech postfix/cleanup[1140]: warning: BFCD1213F8:
sender_canonical_maps map lookup problem for fail2ban-l...@example.com
The cleanup server has a problem.
Jan 27 16:27:56 screech postfix/pickup[1134]: warning:
maildrop/D9D4C21208: error writing BFCD1213F8: queue
Am 28.01.2015 um 15:28 schrieb deoren:
I searched via Google and via the mailing list archives, but I didn't
find a post which matched my specific situation.
I see those warnings in the logs when the system goes down for a reboot.
Is the mail lost? Should I be using a different approach when
On 28. jan. 2015 23.33.45 lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
block spam with Spamassassin
block viruses with ClamAV
greylist mail from freemail domains with one policy
greylist mail from certain countries with another policy
Don't do this. Greylisting should not be used to punish real MTAs. Use
Zitat von srach hndls...@tutanota.de:
I have read the documents for some different Greylisting opportunities for
Postfix
This built into Postfix
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html#greylist
and popular ones
http://wiki.policyd.org
http://postgrey.schweikert.ch
I am not finding
I read the file postfix.txt in shared docs of DSPAM, but I can't make
DSPAM insert any headers into mails if I only specify it as a content
filter under smtp in master.cf, and not under smtps. Probably my
configuration files (with stripped comments) will explain everything better:
dspam.conf:
On 2015-01-28 08:33, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 28.01.2015 um 15:28 schrieb deoren:
I searched via Google and via the mailing list archives, but I didn't
find a post which matched my specific situation.
I see those warnings in the logs when the system goes down for a
reboot.
Is the mail lost?
Am 28.01.2015 um 17:10 schrieb deoren:
On 2015-01-28 08:33, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 28.01.2015 um 15:28 schrieb deoren:
I searched via Google and via the mailing list archives, but I didn't
find a post which matched my specific situation.
I see those warnings in the logs when the system
Thanks for your reply.
1. ...this is the wrong list - disagree: if the result comes from
interaction of two pieces of software (in this case, Postfix and DSPAM),
either list could be considered relevant. Following this idea, I've emailed
my question to DSPAM mailing list too.
2. ...dspam is
I have read the documents for some different Greylisting opportunities for
Postfix
This built into Postfix
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html#greylist
and popular ones
http://wiki.policyd.org
http://postgrey.schweikert.ch
I am not finding a modern comparison of these and a
Hello!
Trying to add DSPAM to my Postfix - Dovecot setup, I came across an
interesting situation, maybe someone here had a similar problem before?
Here's what happens:
Only local mail (i.e. letters sent from one mailbox to another mailbox on
my server) is passed through DSPAM. Emails from other
Am 28.01.2015 um 19:04 schrieb Орхан Ибад-оглы Гасымов:
Trying to add DSPAM to my Postfix - Dovecot setup, I came across an
interesting situation, maybe someone here had a similar problem before?
Here's what happens:
Only local mail (i.e. letters sent from one mailbox to another mailbox
on my
Am 28.01.2015 um 19:38 schrieb srach:
I have read the documents for some different Greylisting opportunities
for Postfix
This built into Postfix
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html#greylist
and popular ones
http://wiki.policyd.org
http://postgrey.schweikert.ch
I am not finding
On 1/28/2015 8:39 AM, List wrote:
I would like to transport messages for a specific address to a
python application to do a few things then push the message back to
postfix for delivery to their maildir. I am wondering what is the
best way to put that message back into postfix without it
...on the dspam list are for sure more people using dspam as here -
probably correct.
That's why I started conversation with a question: Did anyone had this
type of misconfiguration before? If nobody on this list ever used DSPAM,
then there's no point to bother list users with questions about
Am 28.01.2015 um 20:21 schrieb srach:
28. Jan 2015 19:17 by wie...@porcupine.org mailto:wie...@porcupine.org:
There are good reasons to NOT integrate, and instead use the
least-expensive solution before the most-expensive solution.
postscreen implements a least-expensive solution
28. Jan 2015 18:43 by li...@rhsoft.net:
besides that greylisting is harmful in case of large sending clusters not
returning with the same IP while re-try a deferred message postscreen can
do this more or less as side effect with deep protool tests
Yes I see that opportunity in
srach:
And if there will be more checking with the Spamassassin and Clamav too I
think there is good value in all in one policy integration instead of some in
Postscreen too.
There are good reasons to NOT integrate, and instead use the
least-expensive solution before the most-expensive
Am 28.01.2015 um 20:08 schrieb srach:
28. Jan 2015 18:43 by li...@rhsoft.net mailto:li...@rhsoft.net:
besides that greylisting is harmful in case of large sending
clusters not returning with the same IP while re-try a deferred
message postscreen can do this more or less as side
28. Jan 2015 19:17 by wie...@porcupine.org:
There are good reasons to NOT integrate, and instead use the
least-expensive solution before the most-expensive solution.
postscreen implements a least-expensive solution that eliminates
most of the spambots without even allowing them to talk to a
maybe you need some numbers why the below config is good and greylisting
not needed
peak day 2015/01
* postscreen rejects: 9
* spamassassin: 120
* clamav: 15
* delivered mail: 850
that are numbers for a single day
Am 28.01.2015 um 20:19 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
Am 28.01.2015 um 20:08
28. Jan 2015 19:19 by li...@rhsoft.net:
honestly with postscreen *without deep protocol tests) and rbl-scoring (DSNBL
as well as DNSWL) there is no point for greylisting at all
postscreen_dnsbl_ttl = 5m
postscreen_dnsbl_threshold = 8
postscreen_dnsbl_action = enforce
28. Jan 2015 19:28 by li...@rhsoft.net:
maybe you need some numbers why the below config is good and greylisting
not needed
peak day 2015/01
* postscreen rejects: 9
* spamassassin: 120
* clamav: 15
* delivered mail: 850
that are numbers for a single day
Okay that is very
28. Jan 2015 19:19 by li...@rhsoft.net:
postscreen_dnsbl_sites =
http://b.barracudacentral.org=127.0.0.2*7
http://dnsbl.inps.de=127.0.0.2*7
I see from the example you give that these are I think all DNSBL that are
domain name searching only
In the notes I am keeping from reading
Am 28.01.2015 um 20:46 schrieb srach:
28. Jan 2015 19:28 by li...@rhsoft.net mailto:li...@rhsoft.net:
maybe you need some numbers why the below config is good and
greylisting not needed
peak day 2015/01
* postscreen rejects: 9
* spamassassin: 120
* clamav: 15
Am 28.01.2015 um 21:00 schrieb srach:
28. Jan 2015 19:19 by li...@rhsoft.net mailto:li...@rhsoft.net:
postscreen_dnsbl_sites =
http://b.barracudacentral.org=127.0.0.2*7
http://dnsbl.inps.de=127.0.0.2*7
I see from the example you give that these are I think all DNSBL that
are domain
37 matches
Mail list logo
