On Jan 14, 2015, at 17:20, Mullis, Josh (CCI-Atlanta) josh.mul...@cox.com
wrote:
Is there a way to configure postfix to remove old mail when the mailbox size
limit is reached instead of new mail being rejected?
As others have said, this is a function of the LDA, but it is also a terrible
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.11.4.html]
Postfix legacy releases 2.11.4, 2.10.6, 2.9.12, and 2.8.20 are
available. They contain fixes and workarounds that are also part
of Postfix 3.0. This is the final update for
On 10/02/2015 5:49 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 05:32:41PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
You have recipient address verification configured, and have somehow
managed to disable recipient rewriting in the cleanup(8) service
used by the verify(8) service. Non-default entries
On 10/02/2015 5:49 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 05:32:41PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
You have recipient address verification configured, and have somehow
managed to disable recipient rewriting in the cleanup(8) service
used by the verify(8) service. Non-default entries
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 05:58:34PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
IN OTHER WORDS: post the output of /usr/pkg/sbin/postconf -Mf
(non-comment /usr/pkg/etc/postfix/master.cf file content)!
bash-4.3# /usr/pkg/sbin/postconf -Mf
smtp inet n - n - 1 postscreen
On 10/02/2015 6:05 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 05:58:34PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
IN OTHER WORDS: post the output of /usr/pkg/sbin/postconf -Mf
(non-comment /usr/pkg/etc/postfix/master.cf file content)!
bash-4.3# /usr/pkg/sbin/postconf -Mf
smtp inet n -
Am 08.02.2015 um 23:29 schrieb Wietse Venema:
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-3.0.0.html]
Postfix stable release 3.0.0 is available. This release ends support
for Postfix 2.8
thanks - especially for the header_checks
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 07:47:50PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
one question:
why are postfix-files, main.cf.proto and master.cf.proto below /etc
since they are not intended to get modified by the admin and hence belongs
somewhere below /usr?
They are not in /etc:
$ egrep
On 2/9/2015 1:47 PM, Ralf Hauser wrote:
Hi,
The following rule has served us well for a long time:
/^Subject:.*Urgent\/.*/ FILTER relay...
Today, it missed the following
Feb 9 09:58:27 mail13 postfix/cleanup[8310]: A1D63200A290: warning:
header Subject:
Wietse Venema:
Ralf Hauser:
Hi,
The following rule has served us well for a long time:
/^Subject:.*Urgent\/.*/ FILTER relay...
Today, it missed the following
Feb 9 09:58:27 mail13 postfix/cleanup[8310]: A1D63200A290: warning:
header Subject:
On 10/02/2015 6:31 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:25:22PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
Have you checked that the postmapped virtual alias table actually
contains the address that fails verification? Report the output of:
bash-4.3# export PATH=/usr/pkg/sbin:$PATH
On 10/02/2015 6:21 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:10:42PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
/usr/pkg/sbin/postconf -n
mailbox_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/imap/socket/lmtp
queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:10:42PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
/usr/pkg/sbin/postconf -n
mailbox_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/imap/socket/lmtp
queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks reject_unauth_destination
reject_unknown_recipient_domain
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:25:22PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
Have you checked that the postmapped virtual alias table actually
contains the address that fails verification? Report the output of:
bash-4.3# export PATH=/usr/pkg/sbin:$PATH
bash-4.3# addr=x...@aboc.com.au
bash-4.3# postmap -q
On 10/02/2015 5:10 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:05:08PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
I'm trying to get my head around how to get virtual aliases to work with my
cyrus setup (NetBSD, postfix 2.11.0).
I'm using 2.11.3 from pkgsrc, and I imagine 2.11.4 will be out
soonish.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 05:32:41PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
You have recipient address verification configured, and have somehow
managed to disable recipient rewriting in the cleanup(8) service
used by the verify(8) service. Non-default entries in your master.cf
file should tell the whole
Am 09.02.2015 um 20:32 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 08:22:12PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
I don't set meta_directory to
/etc in my builds. Indeed none of the meta_directory files are
intended to be configuration files that are hand-edited. They
should only be
Am 09.02.2015 um 21:51 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
Am 09.02.2015 um 21:46 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
well, meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir} at build leads in
/usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-files instead /etc/postfix/postfix-files
but postfix refuses to start like below
cp
li...@rhsoft.net:
well, meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir} at build leads in
/usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-files instead /etc/postfix/postfix-files
but postfix refuses to start like below
cp /usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-files /etc/postfix/postfix-files
Please do a proper install without
Am 09.02.2015 um 21:46 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
well, meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir} at build leads in
/usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-files instead /etc/postfix/postfix-files
but postfix refuses to start like below
cp /usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-files
li...@rhsoft.net:
Am 09.02.2015 um 21:46 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
well, meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir} at build leads in
/usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-files instead /etc/postfix/postfix-files
but postfix refuses to start like below
cp
Am 09.02.2015 um 20:13 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 07:47:50PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
one question:
why are postfix-files, main.cf.proto and master.cf.proto below /etc
since they are not intended to get modified by the admin and hence belongs
somewhere below /usr?
Hi,
The following rule has served us well for a long time:
/^Subject:.*Urgent\/.*/ FILTER relay...
Today, it missed the following
Feb 9 09:58:27 mail13 postfix/cleanup[8310]: A1D63200A290: warning:
header Subject:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?WG:_Jugement_int=E9gral_Frenner_Pierre_Alain,_13.11.1977_Urg
Ralf Hauser:
Hi,
The following rule has served us well for a long time:
/^Subject:.*Urgent\/.*/ FILTER relay...
Today, it missed the following
Feb 9 09:58:27 mail13 postfix/cleanup[8310]: A1D63200A290: warning:
header Subject:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:05:08PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
I'm trying to get my head around how to get virtual aliases to work with my
cyrus setup (NetBSD, postfix 2.11.0).
I'm using 2.11.3 from pkgsrc, and I imagine 2.11.4 will be out
soonish. You should upgrade when that happens.
I have
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 08:22:12PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
I don't set meta_directory to
/etc in my builds. Indeed none of the meta_directory files are
intended to be configuration files that are hand-edited. They
should only be modified as a side-effect of package installation
or
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 08:47:15PM +0100, Ralf Hauser wrote:
Today, it missed the following
Feb 9 09:58:27 mail13 postfix/cleanup[8310]: A1D63200A290: warning:
header Subject:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?WG:_Jugement_int=E9gral_Frenner_Pierre_Alain,_13.11.1977_Urg
e?=? =?iso-8859-1?Q?nt/_TestABC_XYZ?=
G'day,
I'm trying to get my head around how to get virtual aliases to work with
my cyrus setup (NetBSD, postfix 2.11.0). I have realtime address
checking using lmtp :
mailbox_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/imap/socket/lmtp
virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/imap/socket/lmtp
and that seems to
28 matches
Mail list logo
