Re: postfix maximum load capacities by official document

> On May 1, 2018, at 12:50 PM, Fazzina, Angelo wrote: > > Yes, I was guessing, must have be active and not incoming queue. > Thanks for the explanation of what I was seeing. I hope it is clear that the active queue size limits don't determine the total number of

RE: postfix maximum load capacities by official document

Thanks again, To give you a little insight, I load balance 3 of these for smtp.uconn.edu So back when I saw the 20K limit it was just DNS round robin which is not real load balancing. I doubt latency of throughput will be significant enough that I notice it in the future, my experience seeing

Re: Root user's sent mail

On 2018-04-30 08:07:07 (-0600), LuKreme wrote: The root user sends out some periodic mails to users. These mails get placed in /root/sent (an mbox file) instead of in /root/Maildir/.Sent/ (a Maildir directory). It’s not a big deal, but it makes clearing the mails periodically slightly more

Re: Removing trace records on submission MSA

On 2018-03-10 22:01:01 (+0100), J Doe wrote: I have a question in regards to removing some trace records when providing submission on Postfix 3.1.x and later. Apologies for resurrecting an old thread. I had some time to kill yesterday and I came up with this PCRE monster:

RE: postfix maximum load capacities by official document

Hi again, I guess I don't have a clear understanding of this in the man page ? Ran command [root@mta1 ~]# man 5 postconf default_recipient_limit (default: 2) The default per-transport upper limit on the number of in-memory recipients. These limits take priority over the global

Re: postfix maximum load capacities by official document

Fazzina, Angelo: > Hi again, I guess I don't have a clear understanding of this in the man page ? > > Ran command > [root@mta1 ~]# man 5 postconf > > default_recipient_limit (default: 2) > > The default per-transport upper limit on the number of IN-MEMORY > recipients. The Postfix

RE: postfix maximum load capacities by official document

Hi, okay that makes sense. I guess my next question is what is going on when we get a bulk mail campaign or spam attack and I see the /var/spool/postfix/incoming Directory only allow 20,000 files in there ? Thanks. -ANGELO FAZZINA ITS Service Manager: Spam and Virus Prevention Mass Mailing

Re: postfix maximum load capacities by official document

Fazzina, Angelo: > Hi, okay that makes sense. > > I guess my next question is what is going on when we get a bulk > mail campaign or spam attack and I see the /var/spool/postfix/incoming > Directory only allow 20,000 files in there ? 20,000 FILES? Where did you get that idea from? Postfix

Re: postfix maximum load capacities by official document

> On May 1, 2018, at 10:38 AM, Fazzina, Angelo wrote: > > Hi, okay that makes sense. > > I guess my next question is what is going on when we get a bulk mail campaign > or spam attack and I see the /var/spool/postfix/incoming > Directory only allow 20,000 files in

RE: postfix maximum load capacities by official document

Yes, I was guessing, must have be active and not incoming queue. Thanks for the explanation of what I was seeing. Have a good week. -ANGELO FAZZINA ITS Service Manager: Spam and Virus Prevention Mass Mailing G Suite/Gmail ang...@uconn.edu University of Connecticut,  ITS, SSG, Server Systems