Martin Vila a écrit :
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destina tion
Could it be this line, which as reject_unauth_destina tion
or is this my email viewer of your cut/paste process?
Thanks Olivier, I just tried only: smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
The question may sound odd, but here's what I'm trying to do:
There are number of virtual domains defined on the local server that
is the final destination for these domains. Yet the MX record in the
DNS for these domains points to the mail exchangers of an external
spam filtering service which
What I meant Martin was that there was a space in the destination word, which
was written as destina tion rather than destination.
If you make
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination
Does it work?
Olivier
--
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond, Ph.D
Global
Also check SElinux if you are running this. It may prevent changes to the port
config from taking place.
You can see entries in the logfile called /var/log/messages
Regards,
Olivier
--
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond, Ph.D
Global Information Highway Ltd
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
-
Oh sorry. In the configuration file it was always set as:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destination
About telneting from the server's shell, all the smtp commands pass fine. No
problem with the . ending. The error happens always only from certain domains
on
Hi
I'd like to ask you if it is possible to somehow manage active queue
For example from the qshape program I can see that there is some mails
in the active queue.
How can I examine them or delete only special mails from the active
queue
I cannot examine logs, cause it's a lot of mega's and it
Hello,
I have a post-office platform based on
Postfix-2.5.2+Courier-IMAP-4.0.1-Courier-authlib-0.53+MySQL-5.0.33.
Can someone give some hint on how enable (and verify that works) quota
on mailboxes?
Thanks,
rocsca
i have a very simple postfix setup running at school.
now the principal wants to send mails to all the parents that registered
their emailaddress and signed on for a newsletter every week.
This causes him to get a 452: 4.5.3 Too many recipients.
I tried setting the
Michael De Groote:
i have a very simple postfix setup running at school.
now the principal wants to send mails to all the parents that registered
their emailaddress and signed on for a newsletter every week.
This causes him to get a 452: 4.5.3 Too many recipients.
The internet mail standard
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:39 AM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you have no domains in relay_domains, then you don't need
relay_recipient_maps nor reject_unverified_domains.
you are using a non standard setup in the sense that you are declaring
the domains as virtual_alias_domains when
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:39 AM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you have no domains in relay_domains, then you don't need
relay_recipient_maps nor reject_unverified_domains.
you are using a non standard setup in the sense that you are declaring
the domains as virtual_alias_domains when
Jevos, Peter wrote:
Hi
I'd like to ask you if it is possible to somehow manage active queue
For example from the qshape program I can see that there is some mails
in the active queue.
How can I examine them or delete only special mails from the active
queue
I cannot examine logs, cause
Hi
I'd like to ask you if it is possible to somehow manage active queue
For example from the qshape program I can see that there is some
mails
in the active queue.
How can I examine them or delete only special mails from the active
queue
I cannot examine logs, cause it's a
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Jevos, Peter wrote:
Hi
I'd like to ask you if it is possible to somehow manage active queue
For example from the qshape program I can see that there is some mails
in the active queue.
How can I examine them or delete only special mails from the active
Hi postfix-users,
We recently migrated from a Sendmail/Cyrus environment to a Postfix/Courier
setup. Some of the users had .forward files that would forward their mail
to an exchange server in our network, and this was done with a file like this
one :
===
@ms-exch.example.com:[EMAIL
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:39 AM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you have no domains in relay_domains, then you don't need
relay_recipient_maps nor reject_unverified_domains.
you are using a non standard setup in
Michael De Groote wrote:
i have a very simple postfix setup running at school.
now the principal wants to send mails to all the parents that
registered their emailaddress and signed on for a newsletter every
week. This causes him to get a 452: 4.5.3 Too many recipients.
I tried setting
Khosrow Ebrahimpour wrote:
Hi postfix-users,
We recently migrated from a Sendmail/Cyrus environment to a Postfix/Courier
setup. Some of the users had .forward files that would forward their mail
to an exchange server in our network, and this was done with a file like this
one :
===
D G Teed a écrit :
Perhaps non standard but it works best for us.
98% of our virtual map is mapped to one of three inbox
servers, while the other 2% want to forward their
stuff to gmail or some special service. It seems
the most flexible way to run a mapping.
but it is not. actually,
D G Teed a écrit :
I'd like to see an example of a set up where we could use relay_domains
and provide the flexibility of sending to any of our inbox servers
within our domain, or forwarding a particular addresses email
to an outside email address like gmail.com http://gmail.com
it doesn't
Khosrow Ebrahimpour:
Hi postfix-users,
We recently migrated from a Sendmail/Cyrus environment to a Postfix/Courier
setup. Some of the users had .forward files that would forward their mail
to an exchange server in our network, and this was done with a file like this
one :
===
In my attempt to block my Postfix email server from receiving and
sending email to gmail, yahoo, hotmail, aol, and msn email accounts, I
created the following:
vim /etc/postfix/main.cf
smtpd_sender_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/access
reject_unauth_destination = hash:/etc/postfix/access
Then
Carlos Williams wrote:
In my attempt to block my Postfix email server from receiving and
sending email to gmail, yahoo, hotmail, aol, and msn email accounts, I
created the following:
vim /etc/postfix/main.cf
smtpd_sender_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/access
reject_unauth_destination =
Carlos Williams wrote:
In my attempt to block my Postfix email server from receiving and
sending email to gmail, yahoo, hotmail, aol, and msn email accounts, I
created the following:
vim /etc/postfix/main.cf
We prefer 'postconf -n' for a good reason. It shows you (most times)
what
Hi,
First, sorry if this lacks some detail, dealing with email delivery is not
my normal thing (I generally work more purely in code realms. :P ).
However, I've been assigned to write a milter to deal with backscatter spam
that can be generated by our virtual domain setup, and first I'd like
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:06:17PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] conf]$ grep ldap main.cf
sender_canonical_maps = proxy:ldap:/opt/zimbra/conf/ldap-scm.cf
Don't use sender_canonical_maps. Use either canonical_maps or
smtp_generic_maps as appropriate. Header recipients
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 08:34:35PM +, Khosrow Ebrahimpour wrote:
A transport maps entry like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp:ms-exch.example.com
Should do the job.
But may cause a loop if the mail ultimately returns to the same
server for final delivery. The OP has
Just a correction. The solution that Wietse had suggested does work. I had
forgotten one crucial step: re-building the lookup table. After I
ran postmap /etc/postfix/transport the forwarding now works correctly.
Jevos, Peter wrote:
Hi
I'd like to ask you if it is possible to somehow manage active queue
For example from the qshape program I can see that there is some
mails
in the active queue.
How can I examine them or delete only special mails from the active
queue
I cannot examine logs, cause
Jason Wohlford wrote:
On Nov 15, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Jason Wohlford wrote:
Is there any way to perform an address verification on a message and
then add a header to the message? I'd like to let postfix do address
verification and then report the result to spamassassin.
Rocco Scappatura a écrit :
Hello,
I have a post-office platform based on
Postfix-2.5.2+Courier-IMAP-4.0.1-Courier-authlib-0.53+MySQL-5.0.33.
Can someone give some hint on how enable (and verify that works) quota
on mailboxes?
1- there is no quota support in postfix.
2- there is no safe
Carlos Williams a écrit :
In my attempt to block my Postfix email server from receiving and
sending email to gmail, yahoo, hotmail, aol, and msn email accounts, I
created the following:
vim /etc/postfix/main.cf
smtpd_sender_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/access
--On Friday, November 21, 2008 3:15 PM -0500 Victor Duchovni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:06:17PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] conf]$ grep ldap main.cf
sender_canonical_maps = proxy:ldap:/opt/zimbra/conf/ldap-scm.cf
Don't use
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A transport maps entry like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]smtp:ms-exch.example.com
It also seems to be possible to redirect an entire domain to another
smtp server..
@example.comsmtp:ms-exch.example.com
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 04:37:04PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
My end goal is to let postfix handle the address verification, while
another process handles the rejection. A spamassassin plugin (or another
bit of software) could query the address_verify_map (or mail logs) and
then act
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:13:51PM -0600, Ville Walveranta wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A transport maps entry like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]smtp:ms-exch.example.com
It also seems to be possible to redirect an entire domain to
Is it possible to limit header_checks either by recipient domain or by
listening interface? I'd like to remove certain headers, but only from
specific domains.
Ville
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:29:55PM -0600, Ville Walveranta wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Victor Duchovni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wrong syntax. In the transport table, domains don't start with
an @.
Ok, I corrected it (although it seemed to work with an @, too).
Your
On Nov 21, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 04:37:04PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
My end goal is to let postfix handle the address verification, while
another process handles the rejection. A spamassassin plugin (or
another
bit of software) could query the
On Nov 21, 2008, at 4:37 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Jason Wohlford wrote:
On Nov 15, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Jason Wohlford wrote:
Is there any way to perform an address verification on a message
and then add a header to the message? I'd like to let postfix do
address verification
40 matches
Mail list logo
