Zitat von Jeffrey Shawn Klotz j...@jeffklotz.com:
Can anyone recommend any articles / guides / etc to configure a
server for large volume?
I have a server that consistently maxes out it's T1 connection. I'd
like to be sure I've got things configured to make the most of it.
It's not
neugi schrieb:
2008/12/15 Udo Rader list...@bestsolution.at:
neugi schrieb:
how can i check if users use sasl or not?
are there any special settings in the mailclient?
best
2008/12/15 Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com:
On 12/15/2008, neugi (neu...@gmail.com) wrote:
Zitat von Francesco Abeni f.ab...@gibilogic.com:
Francesco Abeni ha scritto:
Good morming everybody. Surely it is my fault, but i am not able to
set helo name as i want.
Here are relevant lines from postconf -n:
myhostname = srv04.givi.it
smtp_helo_name = smtp.givi.it
smtpd_banner =
Marcin Rzepecki a écrit :
Hello,
I have configured DSPAM to act as a deamon and bind it to Postfix via
LMTP:
# forward to dspam
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=lmtp:unix:/var/run/dspam/sock
# back route from dspam
127.0.0.1:10026
Andreas Winkelmann ha scritto:
I have no problem with smtpd_banner, which i am able to set as i like
(of course, i will keep in mind your suggestion about SMTP protocol
requirementes).
I have problem with smtp_helo_name: i set it in the configuration file
as smtp.givi.it but it still appears
You can set different rates for different destinations. For this,
you MUST READ the rest of the URLs in my response.
- specify a different (master.cf) transport for rate limited
destinations.
- specify (main.cf) mumble_destination_rate_delay values in main.cf.
- specify a (main.cf) transport
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:11:57PM +0100, Durk Strooisma wrote:
Hi all,
I'm succesfully using the patterns %1, %2, etc. in my LDAP tables for
virtual_alias_maps and virtual_mailbox_maps. However, in the table for
virtual_mailbox_domains the patterns don't seem to be expanded.
That's right.
My question, is this intended behaviour? Did anyone notice this
behavious as well?
Yes, this is documented intended behaviour. See, ldap_table(5):
%[1-9] The patterns %1, %2, ... %9 are replaced by
the corresponding most significant component
In another thread, i discovered that the only way to change my HELO name
(in response to an HELO command from another SMTP server is to change my
hostname).
As far as postfix is concerned, do you know if this change could cause
any kind of issue?
--
Francesco
On Tue, December 16, 2008 4:04 am, Francesco Abeni wrote:
Good morming everybody. Surely it is my fault, but i am not able to set
helo name as i want.
Here are relevant lines from postconf -n:
myhostname = srv04.givi.it smtp_helo_name = smtp.givi.it smtpd_banner =
$smtp_helo_name ESMTP
Hi all,
I'm succesfully using the patterns %1, %2, etc. in my LDAP tables for
virtual_alias_maps and virtual_mailbox_maps. However, in the table for
virtual_mailbox_domains the patterns don't seem to be expanded.
Tested with Postfix as daemon and postfix -q, using Postfix 2.5.5-1.1 on
Debian 5.0
Hello,
I have configured DSPAM to act as a deamon and bind it to Postfix via
LMTP:
# forward to dspam
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=lmtp:unix:/var/run/dspam/sock
# back route from dspam
127.0.0.1:10026 inet n - n - -
Francesco Abeni ha scritto:
Good morming everybody. Surely it is my fault, but i am not able to set
helo name as i want.
Here are relevant lines from postconf -n:
myhostname = srv04.givi.it
smtp_helo_name = smtp.givi.it
smtpd_banner = $smtp_helo_name ESMTP GIVI srl
I want helo name to be
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of MacShane, Tracy
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 9:18 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: RE: helo being rejected
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
On Tue, December 16, 2008 7:45 am, Francesco Abeni wrote:
In another thread, i discovered that the only way to change my HELO name
(in response to an HELO command from another SMTP server is to change my
hostname).
As far as postfix is concerned, do you know if this change could cause
any
Matt Rude ha scritto:
In another thread, i discovered that the only way to change my HELO name
(in response to an HELO command from another SMTP server is to change my
hostname).
As far as postfix is concerned, do you know if this change could cause
any kind of issue?
Look at
As kindly suggested, I set /etc/postfix/main.cf: smtp_destination_rate_delay
= 2 , It does work.
but Is it possible to give different sending rates for different
destination[ip], ex, for hotmail 30mails/minute, but for Gmail, 60
mails/minute etc.
Thanks in advance.
Tony.
-邮件原件-
An ISP that I do work for recently had an acocunt on their CommuniGatePro
server hijacked by a spammer. Of course this got them on the blacklist of
AOL, Yahoo and others. There are three inbound Postfix relay servers for
blacklisting that are in front of three Barracuda spam filters. I am
As kindly suggested, I set /etc/postfix/main.cf: smtp_destination_rate_delay
to control sending rate , it does work.
But my question is how to set different sending rate according to different
destination. Ex. For hotmail, 30 mails/ min. but for gmail, 60 mails/ m.
Thanks in advance.
Tony.
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:45:31 +0100
Von: Marcin Rzepecki m.rzepe...@iem.pw.edu.pl
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: postfix+dspam+content_filter
Hello,
I have configured DSPAM to act as a deamon and bind it to Postfix via
LMTP:
# forward to
Victor Duchovni escribió:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 05:53:24PM -0700, Jes?s Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
Here is the log with smtpd_tls_loglevel = 4 (with a retry just after the
error) and the corresponding pcap file:
postfix-2.txt http://www.ich.edu.mx/attachments/postfix-2.txt
tcp-2.cap
I am using the sender_bcc_maps, but would like to know if there is the
possibility of doing the audit in e-mail sent from the field for only
domain xyz
thnx.
--
Márcio Luciano Donada mdonada at auroraalimentos dot com dot br
Aurora Alimentos - Cooperativa Central Oeste Catarinense
Departamento
David Koski a écrit :
An ISP that I do work for recently had an acocunt on their CommuniGatePro
server hijacked by a spammer. Of course this got them on the blacklist of
AOL, Yahoo and others. There are three inbound Postfix relay servers for
blacklisting that are in front of three
Hello,
For an e-mail not to fall into spam category, the sourcing server has to
have SPF record I think, or so I've been told. How do I check whether it
has a SPF record or not?
Regards,
mto
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:05:40PM -0700, Jes?s Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
Here are the log and pcap file with the patch:
Mail log http://www.ich.edu.mx/attachments/postfix-3.txt
PCAP file http://www.ich.edu.mx/attachments/tcp-3.cap
Thanks, this is very useful, we are much closer to
Le Tue 16/12/2008, Tolga disait
Hello,
For an e-mail not to fall into spam category, the sourcing server has to
have SPF record I think, or so I've been told.
Some spams are sent from a spf compliant server, many non spam are sent from
servers which do not implement spf. spf is a framework
Tolga a écrit :
Hello,
For an e-mail not to fall into spam category, the sourcing server has to
have SPF record I think, or so I've been told.
No.
$ host -t txt postfix.org
postfix.org has no TXT record
$ host -t txt yahoo.com
yahoo.com has no TXT record
$ host -t txt mail.com
mail.com has
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:14:26 +0200 Tolga to...@ozses.net wrote:
Hello,
For an e-mail not to fall into spam category, the sourcing server has to
have SPF record I think, or so I've been told. How do I check whether it
has a SPF record or not?
Oh dear, no.
You might want to reject mail that
Victor Duchovni escribió:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:05:40PM -0700, Jes?s Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
Here are the log and pcap file with the patch:
Mail log http://www.ich.edu.mx/attachments/postfix-3.txt
PCAP file http://www.ich.edu.mx/attachments/tcp-3.cap
Thanks, this is very
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:45:19PM -0700, Jes?s Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
We need to log the error detail from the SSL library to see what the
library is unhappy about. This sure looks like an SSL library bug,
compiler bug or hardware issue. The kernel is no longer suspect for now.
In
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Joey
Sent: Wednesday, 17 December 2008 12:06 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: RE: helo being rejected
-Original Message-
From:
Victor Duchovni escribió:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:45:19PM -0700, Jes?s Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
We need to log the error detail from the SSL library to see what the
library is unhappy about. This sure looks like an SSL library bug,
compiler bug or hardware issue. The kernel is no
M?rcio Luciano Donada wrote:
I am using the sender_bcc_maps, but would like to know if there is the
possibility of doing the audit in e-mail sent from the field for only
domain xyz
Can you re-state your question more clearly? Perhaps use an example.
Also read:
Jesús Manuel Loaiza Vidal escribió:
Jesús Manuel Loaiza Vidal escribió:
Victor Duchovni escribió:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:45:19PM -0700, Jes?s Manuel Loaiza Vidal
wrote:
We need to log the error detail from the SSL library to see what the
library is unhappy about. This sure looks like
jweinbergerhj wrote:
I know it's a simple question...but doea any know if this:
content_filter=hash:/path/to/table (or mysql:/path/to/filters.cf)
will work?
No. From postconf(5):
content_filter (default: empty)
The name of a mail delivery transport that filters mail after it is
I use postfix 2.3 to accept mails and deliver to a cyrus server via
lmtp (unix )
IF I have a large mailq to local delivery via lmtp , how can I
prioritize the delivery of a particular mail
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 09:46:21AM +0530, ram wrote:
I use postfix 2.3 to accept mails and deliver to a cyrus server via
lmtp (unix )
IF I have a large mailq to local delivery via lmtp , how can I
prioritize the delivery of a particular mail
You can't prioritize a particular message unless
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 05:14:33AM +0100, Jack Raats wrote:
From my logfile
Out: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Sender address
[obviouslya...@mypricepilot.com] blocked using bogusmx.rfc-ignorant.org;
Domain has demonstrably bogus MX records
Is this error (demonstrably) made by
Hi all,
I have a wiered problem with alias lists in Postfix
We use aliases for our internal mailing lists (departmnents for instance).
We use an OpenLDAP for the Userbase. Normally everything is ok.
But if one recipient out of this list is over Quota Postfix
keeps the message in the mailq not
39 matches
Mail list logo
