On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 08:52:27AM +0200, bharathan kailath wrote:
> the following is my main.cf
> ===
> relay_recipient_maps =hash:/etc/postfix/relay_recipients
> mime_header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/mime_header_checks
> disable_dns_lookups = no
> mailbox_command =
> mailbox_tra
After adding the lines
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/restricted_senders
smtpd_restriction_classes = local_only
local_only =
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/local_domains, reject
to the file /etc/postfix/main.cf: the ser
the following is my main.cf
===
relay_recipient_maps =hash:/etc/postfix/relay_recipients
mime_header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/mime_header_checks
disable_dns_lookups = no
mailbox_command =
mailbox_transport =
strict_8bitmime = no
disable_mime_output_conversion = no
smtpd_sender_res
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:08:11PM -0600, Matt Rude wrote:
> > You need to enable hosts file lookup:
> >
> > smtp_host_lookup = dns, hosts
> >
> > Wietse
>
> Wouldn't it be:
>
> smtp_host_lookup = dns, native
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_host_lookup
Yes.
--
V
I was reading this subject and I was wondering, if you thought about what
would happen if you compile a list of misspelled domains and denied
them instantly and the user mint to send it to one of those domains. I'm
saying this because what you may think is misspelled domain maybe a real
domain that
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Ed W wrote:
> The problem is that so many scammers seem to buy these mis-spellings and
> hold them with no MX record set and so the poor user who mistypes
> effectively see's their message sit in the postfix queue for 5 days (or
> whatever your timeout is set to) and then 5 da
Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Martin Spinassi wrote:
Is there something to read a specific mail using the id that appears at
posqueue -p? What do you use for that task?
Martín
I use
postcat -q QUEUEID | less
http://www.postfix.
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Cory Coager:
>> Noel Jones said the following on 01/22/2009 03:20 PM:
Is there another way of adding multiple addresses for transport of a
domain? Round robin DNS would work I guess but not as good as a
failover. If one of the addresses in the DNS is down t
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> Martin Spinassi wrote:
>>
>> Is there something to read a specific mail using the id that appears at
>> posqueue -p? What do you use for that task?
>>
>> Martín
>
> I use
> postcat -q QUEUEID | less
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postcat.1.html
>
>
Thanks for helping me with this - you're right!
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Mike Pogue:
>> You're right, the ip set on smtp_bind_address was wrong. Updated this
>> and restarted postfix.
>>
>> Got an error related to clamsmptpd, that tries to connect to x.x.x.x10
>> in
Martin Spinassi wrote:
Hi list!
I've been using postfix since a few weeks. I always used qmail before
for mail servers, and I'm really impressed by postfix but there is
something that I really miss...
I use to use "qmHandle -m'MAIL_ID'" to see some mails that looks strange
or not normal, but ca
Hi list!
I've been using postfix since a few weeks. I always used qmail before
for mail servers, and I'm really impressed by postfix but there is
something that I really miss...
I use to use "qmHandle -m'MAIL_ID'" to see some mails that looks strange
or not normal, but can't figure out if there i
Cory Coager:
> Noel Jones said the following on 01/22/2009 03:20 PM:
> >> Is there another way of adding multiple addresses for transport of a
> >> domain? Round robin DNS would work I guess but not as good as a
> >> failover. If one of the addresses in the DNS is down the transport
> >> is go
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:20:33PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
>> Is there another way of adding multiple addresses for transport of a
>> domain? Round robin DNS would work I guess but not as good as a failover.
>> If one of the addresses in the DNS is down the transport is going to get
>> delay
Noel Jones said the following on 01/22/2009 03:20 PM:
Is there another way of adding multiple addresses for transport of a
domain? Round robin DNS would work I guess but not as good as a
failover. If one of the addresses in the DNS is down the transport
is going to get delayed for that MX and
Cory Coager wrote:
Victor Duchovni said the following on 01/22/2009 12:31 PM:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:26:54PM -0500, Cory Coager wrote:
What is the syntax for specifying multiple addresses in transport for smtp?
Something like:
example.com smtp:[gateway1.example.com] smtp:[gatewa
Victor Duchovni said the following on 01/22/2009 12:31 PM:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:26:54PM -0500, Cory Coager wrote:
What is the syntax for specifying multiple addresses in transport for smtp?
Something like:
example.com smtp:[gateway1.example.com] smtp:[gateway2.example.com]
Cory Coager:
> What is the syntax for specifying multiple addresses in transport for
> smtp? Something like:
>
> example.com smtp:[gateway1.example.com] smtp:[gateway2.example.com]
The syntax is fully documented in the transport(5) manual page.
You can safely conclude that functionality d
Mike Pogue:
> You're right, the ip set on smtp_bind_address was wrong. Updated this
> and restarted postfix.
>
> Got an error related to clamsmptpd, that tries to connect to x.x.x.x10
> instead of localhost (127.0.0.1)
> ~~~
> www clamsmtpd: 102C71: SERVER: couldn't connect to: x.x.x.10:10026:
> T
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:26:54PM -0500, Cory Coager wrote:
> What is the syntax for specifying multiple addresses in transport for smtp?
> Something like:
>
> example.com smtp:[gateway1.example.com] smtp:[gateway2.example.com]
No, there is no multi-nexthop syntax in the transport table.
What is the syntax for specifying multiple addresses in transport for
smtp? Something like:
example.com smtp:[gateway1.example.com] smtp:[gateway2.example.com]
The information contained in this communication is in
> Let's assume that you specify:
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> default_transport = smtp
> relay_transport = smtp
> smtp_destination_rate_delay = 120s
>
> With this, Postfix inserts 120s between deliveries over the smtp
> transport. There will not be two messages back to back.
>
> In othe
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:57:30PM +0100, Schilling, Timo wrote:
> Hello to everybody,
>
> while we use the option "reject_unknown_helo_hostname" we noticed, that
> single hostnames will be rejected without contacting the dns-servers.
> After some debugging of the source code we got to this line:
Thomas Ackermann:
> Wietse Venema schrieb:
> > That is a bug in your operating system.
> >
>
> That made me test all of them :)
...
> Solaris 8 and 9:
> AIX (AIX 3 5 00C9FC9A4C00):
> Linux (SuSE 9.3 and SuSE 10.3):
...
> Which OS is not buggy then?!?
SunOS 3 (hey I said 21 years ago :-), may
Ed W:
> Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Jacky Chan :
> >
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> Can I create custom mail queue in /var/spool/postfix to hold the mails for
> >> specific detinsation and schedule to deliver one by one for period of time,
> >> let's say 2 mins.
> >>
> >
> > That's not needed.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:46:09AM +0530, ram wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 12:56 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> > ram wrote:
> That was just an example. In real life I dont have the exact same key
> but I have matches in both
Don't put matches in both files.
> > Search order is documented in t
Thomas Ackermann wrote:
> Wietse Venema schrieb:
>> That is a bug in your operating system.
>>
>
> That made me test all of them :)
> I used several runs of "ping" against the hostname after including it
> with two entries into /etc/hosts
> Cannot use "getaddrinfo" ...
getaddrinfo is a test pro
On Jan 22, 2009, at 10:28 AM, bharathan kailath wrote:
hi
how can i take some measures to stop this so called Nigerian 419
spam ;i've got two postfix relays with amavisd; but still i get some
emails like Nigerian 419 spam
help appreciated
smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, c
hi
how can i take some measures to stop this so called Nigerian 419 spam ;i've
got two postfix relays with amavisd; but still i get some emails like
Nigerian 419 spam
help appreciated**
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:28:07 +0200
> Von: bharathan kailath
> An: postfix users list
> Betreff: Nigerian 419 spam
> hi
> how can i take some measures to stop this so called Nigerian 419 spam
> ;i've
> got two postfix relays with amavisd; but still i ge
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Eddy Beliveau :
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> We are using Postfix 2.5.4 with success. Thanks ;-)
>>
>> My question is:
>>
>> We have many students who send emails to mispelled domains, as:
>> hotmmail.com, hotmial.com, hotmail.cm ...
>>
>> I know that I can try to find all individ
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Jacky Chan :
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Can I create custom mail queue in /var/spool/postfix to hold the mails for
>> specific detinsation and schedule to deliver one by one for period of time,
>> let's say 2 mins.
>>
>
> That's not needed. Create a custom transport fo
Wietse Venema schrieb:
That is a bug in your operating system.
That made me test all of them :)
I used several runs of "ping" against the hostname after including it
with two entries into /etc/hosts
Cannot use "getaddrinfo" ...
Solaris 8 and 9:
Only uses the first IP in /etc/hosts (with "
On Jan 21, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:04:07PM -0500, jeff donovan wrote:
On Jan 21, 2009, at 12:13 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:41:00AM -0500, jeff donovan wrote:
I read the performance tuning http://www.postfix.org/TUNING
* Eddy Beliveau :
> Hi!
>
> We are using Postfix 2.5.4 with success. Thanks ;-)
>
> My question is:
>
> We have many students who send emails to mispelled domains, as:
> hotmmail.com, hotmial.com, hotmail.cm ...
>
> I know that I can try to find all individual combinations
> and write them in some
Eddy Beliveau schrieb:
I know that I can try to find all individual combinations
and write them in some reject file to be used in check_recipient_access
Is there some way to define a rule based on phonetic
or another solution which detect mispelled words ?
I would recommend against that idea :
Thomas Ackermann:
> I can map the mail-relays hostname only to one IP with /etc/hosts and
> therefor, any redundancy is lost.
That is a bug in your operating system.
As a workaround, use smtp_fallback_relay.
I have used multiple IP addresses per name in /etc/hosts for as
long as I can remember,
Hi!
We are using Postfix 2.5.4 with success. Thanks ;-)
My question is:
We have many students who send emails to mispelled domains, as:
hotmmail.com, hotmial.com, hotmail.cm ...
I know that I can try to find all individual combinations
and write them in some reject file to be used in check_re
Mike Pogue:
> fatal: parameter inet_interfaces: no local interface found for x.x.x.10
Postfix cannot bind to the interface address because that address
has not been configured on the machine in question.
You can specify only IP addresses that show up with "ifconfig -a".
Postfix does NOT implemen
Maybe i should better explain the reasons behind this question:
We have some domains, where the mail-relay is mapped to several
IP-Adresses (and servers) over an DNS entry.
That is, we have ONE mailrelay that can be configured as relayhost.
So far, so good.
BUT, we also have systems without D
Hello,
normally, you can say "relayhost = domain" and postfix searches the MX
record for that domain in DNS to get the list of relayhosts.
For domains where no MX record is configured into the DNS, i would need
to use more than one relayhost ...
Is that possible?
The configuration seems not
Hi!
I have this server with 4 IPs, from x.x.x.10 to from x.x.x.14.
My main domain, example.com is bind to x.x.x.10 address (x.x.x.10 has
a PTR record too)
For some reason postfix (smtp server) is picking up the last IP
x.x.x.14 for outgoing mail instead of x.x.x.10. This is a problem
because I w
On 1/22/2009, ram (r...@netcore.co.in) wrote:
> I have a got a stupid problem. We have some customers saying they
> can't and don't want to reconfigure their mail servers even if
> Planet-X hits Earth and that would help to avoid it :) And their MTAs
> always responds with:
If they are that brain
Gábor Lénárt wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:38:28PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
[...]
Also sounds as if you don't have a valid recipient list for these
customers. Not OK. Your queue is likely filled with lots of
undeliverable mail to unknown recipients, and undeliverable bounces to
bogus sen
ram wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 18:36 +0100, Gábor Lénárt wrote:
Hei,
I have a got a stupid problem. We have some customers saying they can't and
don't want to reconfigure their mail servers even if Planet-X hits Earth and
that would help to avoid it :) And their MTAs always responds with:
45
Hello to everybody,
while we use the option "reject_unknown_helo_hostname" we noticed, that
single hostnames will be rejected without contacting the dns-servers.
After some debugging of the source code we got to this line:
226 _res.options &= ~saved_options;
where the flag "RES_DEFNAMES" will be
- Original Message
> From: Norm Mackey
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 4:12:21 AM
> Subject: example.com problem?
>
> I had been under the impression that I should tell users to use the
> domain "example.com" (or example.org) as default settings in s
Jacky Chan:
> If slow_destination_rate_delay = 5s and slow_destination_concurrency_limit =
> 2, and with slow_destination_recipient_limit > 1, how does
> slow_destination_rate_delay and slow_destination_concurrency_limit affect
> each other if there are 10 mails send to the same doamin?
xxx_rate_d
Norm Mackey:
> The situation reached the point where the mail queue could not even
> be listed completely with postqueue without postqueue failing, and
What was the failure? I suppose that after $daemon_timeout seconds
(1800s default) the daemon that lists the queue is terminated for
safety reas
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 18:36 +0100, Gábor Lénárt wrote:
> Hei,
>
> I have a got a stupid problem. We have some customers saying they can't and
> don't want to reconfigure their mail servers even if Planet-X hits Earth and
> that would help to avoid it :) And their MTAs always responds with:
>
> 45
Geert Hendrickx yazmış:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:08:52AM +0200, Tolga wrote:
http://www.google.com/search?q=self+signed+certificate
I have been reading
https://help.ubuntu.com/8.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html and I applied
some parts and skipped some (as I don't have SASL anywhere
Tolga ha scritto:
http://www.google.com/search?q=self+signed+certificate
I have been reading
https://help.ubuntu.com/8.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html and I applied
some parts and skipped some (as I don't have SASL anywhere mentioned
in main.cf), and I restarted postfix but I still get the war
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:08:52AM +0200, Tolga wrote:
>> http://www.google.com/search?q=self+signed+certificate
> I have been reading
> https://help.ubuntu.com/8.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html and I applied
> some parts and skipped some (as I don't have SASL anywhere mentioned in
> main.cf), and I
Orijinal Mesaj
Konu: Re: Mail certificate
Tarih: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:08:52 +0200
Kimden: Tolga
Kime: Nick Warr
CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
Tercihler: <49781c25.9000...@ozses.net> <497828de.5030...@mobilia.it>
Nick Warr yazmış:
Tolga ha scritto:
He
Nick Warr yazmış:
Tolga ha scritto:
Hello,
It seems I (not knowingly) created a certificate for use, and now it
expired. How do I renew it? Below is my postconf -n, if it helps:
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
config_dire
Tolga ha scritto:
Hello,
It seems I (not knowingly) created a certificate for use, and now it
expired. How do I renew it? Below is my postconf -n, if it helps:
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
config_directory = /etc/postfix
56 matches
Mail list logo
