Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:13:25 +0100
> Von: Ansgar Wiechers
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: Re: Spam from the same domain
> On 2010-03-26 Steve wrote:
> > Von: listadecorreo
> >> in the last month I revived a lot of spam from
> >> user_non_ex.
On 2010-03-26 Steve wrote:
> Von: listadecorreo
>> in the last month I revived a lot of spam from
>> user_non_ex...@mydomain to user_ex...@mydomain. can I block all
>> received externals mails from my domain to my domain...
^^^
> Are your users sending mail over your i
* Schwalbe, Oliver :
>
> Hallo Herr Hildebrandt,
>
> Danke für die schnelle Rückantwort.
> uceprotect.net habe ich als erste Maßnahme schon deaktiviert, würde aber ganz
> gerne wieder darauf
> zurückkommen.
> Ich bräuchte aber noch genauere Informationen, wo ich IP ok hinterlegen muß.
> Muß ich
On 2010-03-26 Bob Sauvage wrote:
> I have a postfix server and I want to redirect my mails to another
> server (Spam filter) after the aliase resolution. Because this spam
> filter can only filter 100 adresses.
>
> When the other server has completed its work, it sends this mail to my
> Postfix se
Hello Members,
I would like to know if there is a method so I can have the following
configuration on my MTA:
The user foobar can receive attached jpeg files, but cannot send
attached jpegs. I need this because some employees must receive some
files in a specific extension, but cannot send
Oops, I forgot to mention the problem: All mail goes to the catch-all
address, so even mail destined for m...@domain.com.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Da-Huntha wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've recently set-up a backup server and chose postfix to handle the mail.
> It's running on Debian 5
Hello everyone,
I've recently set-up a backup server and chose postfix to handle the mail.
It's running on Debian 5 Kernel 2.6.26-2-686
While I got postfix running it won't handle my catch-all alias settings
correctly.
Here's my basic set-up:
# /etc/mailname
domain.com
# /etc/postfix/virtual
m.
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:54:43 +0100
> Von: listadecorreo
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: Spam from the same domain
>
> Hello
>
> in the last month I revived a lot of spam from user_non_ex...@mydomain
> to user_ex...@mydomain. can I bloc
On Mar 26, 2010, at 17:14, Mark Goodge wrote:
> On 26/03/2010 20:54, listadecorreo wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> in the last month I revived a lot of spam from user_non_ex...@mydomain
>> to user_ex...@mydomain. can I block all received externals mails
>> from my domain to my domain...
>
> It's ve
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 04:54:00PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Don't pass non-ASCII user names to your LDAP table.
>
> Hmm. If the Postfix LDAP driver handles only non-ASCII query keys
> then we should have a smarter response from the mail system.
Agreed. By the time I read your message, I h
On 26/03/2010 20:54, listadecorreo wrote:
Hello
in the last month I revived a lot of spam from user_non_ex...@mydomain
to user_ex...@mydomain. can I block all received externals mails
from my domain to my domain...
It's very easy to block mails from fake_u...@domain to real_u...@domain.
Hello
in the last month I revived a lot of spam from user_non_ex...@mydomain
to user_ex...@mydomain. can I block all received externals mails
from my domain to my domain...
I use postfix with amavis (spamassassin/clamav)
thanks in advance
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 06:28:50PM +0100, Matias Surdi wrote:
>
> > The problem is that I'm receiving mails to non existent accounts, or ,
> > with an accented (non ascii) character and instead of rejecting the
> > mail postfix is replying the client with a 451 error, here is th
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 06:28:50PM +0100, Matias Surdi wrote:
> The problem is that I'm receiving mails to non existent accounts, or ,
> with an accented (non ascii) character and instead of rejecting the
> mail postfix is replying the client with a 451 error, here is the
> session transcript, wit
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:31:50AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Friday, March 26, 2010 6:28 PM +0100 Matias Surdi
> wrote:
>
>
>> Additionaly, on the postfix log I can see:
>>
>> Mar 26 15:44:17 calipso postfix/smtpd[27237]: warning:
>> dict_ldap_lookup: Search error 34: Invalid DN s
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:52:55PM +0100, Dick Visser wrote:
> > Having noticed the many pitfalls of parsing X.509 certs, and written
> > careful code to parse them (and avoided Postfix being linked to
> > vulnerabilities later found in most certificate parsers), I am reluctant
> > to ask Postfix
--On Friday, March 26, 2010 6:28 PM +0100 Matias Surdi
wrote:
Additionaly, on the postfix log I can see:
Mar 26 15:44:17 calipso postfix/smtpd[27237]: warning:
dict_ldap_lookup: Search error 34: Invalid DN syntax
Looks like dict_ldap_lookup is failing to properly encode the data before
qu
Hi,
I'm running postfix with a ldap vmailbox database for incomming mails.
The problem is that I'm receiving mails to non existent accounts, or ,
with an accented (non ascii) character and instead of rejecting the
mail postfix is replying the client with a 451 error, here is the
session transcrip
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:13:05 -0600
Josh Cason wrote:
> So when I type grep the original message. In this case as
> listed above. It list the server ip number as comming in with some
> outside e-mail address we don't have.
If it's coming from the server IP or localhost, you've most likely
got
Hi people !
I have a postfix server and I want to redirect my mails to another server (Spam
filter) after the aliase resolution. Because this spam filter can only filter
100 adresses.
When the other server has completed its work, it sends this mail to my Postfix
server (on another SMTP process
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 01:13:36PM +, me wrote:
> I'm reading the docs but somehow can not get the hang of a config,
> for a local domain(canonical/mydestination) that recipients list would be
> looked up in ldap
http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/DATAB
> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 02:00:10 -0300
> From: Julio Cesar Covolato
> To: Jim Seymour , owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Pflogsumm Version 1.1.3 Released
>
> Hi Jim!
>
> Any improviment to suport the reinjection from amavisd?
Nope. If I had, it would've been mentioned in the Cha
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:13:36 +, me articulated:
> just signed up and have a novice kind of question, sorry :)
>
> I'm reading the docs but somehow can not get the hang of a config,
> for a local domain(canonical/mydestination) that recipients list
> would be looked up
> in ldap
>
> postmap
Hallo Herr Hildebrandt,
Danke für die schnelle Rückantwort.
uceprotect.net habe ich als erste Maßnahme schon deaktiviert, würde aber ganz
gerne wieder darauf
zurückkommen.
Ich bräuchte aber noch genauere Informationen, wo ich IP ok hinterlegen muß.
Muß ich dafür eine eigene Datei anlegen und dar
El vie, 26-03-2010 a las 12:06 +0100, Wietse Venema escribió:
> Marcos Lorenzo de Santiago:
> > I had configured default_destination_recipient_limit to 1500 and I
> > couldn't send an email destined to 1100 recipients. It was when I
> > modified this two options when I got it working:
> >
> > smt
just signed up and have a novice kind of question, sorry :)
I'm reading the docs but somehow can not get the hang of a config,
for a local domain(canonical/mydestination) that recipients list would
be looked up
in ldap
postmap queries my ldap, returns no errors, but
cannot get whole thing(post
Please don't top-post replies. Also note, I set Reply-To: to keep
discussions on list. I do not want a CC:.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 06:03:47AM +0530, Chaminda Indrajith wrote:
> ~user/.forward+spam would be a good solution for me since my
> users are system users.
>
> Could you give me an example
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:22:55AM +, Jamie Griffin wrote:
> I'm going to re-read about smtpd_*_restrictions to better understand what
> i've done because from what you've said I could improve my configuration but
> can i ask quickly, do you mean I can move all of the smtpd restrictions i'm
Stephens, Kurt:
> I'd like to have all local postfix deliveries to go directly into
> a TCP or UDS (named pipe) socket, that will eventually end up raw
> in database table for subsequent triage.
It's easy enough to take one of the pipe(8) examples in master.cf,
run a netcat-like command, and set m
On Fri, March 26, 2010 9:51 am, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 08:26:33AM +1100, Voytek Eymont wrote:
>
>> so, if I was to create a mail user 'voytek+spam' in the database,
>> '+spam' mail would end up in voytek+spam mail user maildir ?
> The user for virtual(8) must be the full addre
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:22:55AM +, Jamie Griffin wrote:
> I'm going to re-read about smtpd_*_restrictions to better
> understand what i've done because from what you've said I
> could improve my configuration
"Improve" is a value judgment. I think it's fair to say that
management is easie
On 23/03/2010 16:41, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> Having noticed the many pitfalls of parsing X.509 certs, and written
> careful code to parse them (and avoided Postfix being linked to
> vulnerabilities later found in most certificate parsers), I am reluctant
> to ask Postfix users to write robust X.5
Marcos Lorenzo de Santiago:
> I had configured default_destination_recipient_limit to 1500 and I
> couldn't send an email destined to 1100 recipients. It was when I
> modified this two options when I got it working:
>
> smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit
> smtpd_recipient_limit
>
> I rtfm but I just
I had configured default_destination_recipient_limit to 1500 and I
couldn't send an email destined to 1100 recipients. It was when I
modified this two options when I got it working:
smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit
smtpd_recipient_limit
I rtfm but I just can't see why it wasn't working, because
de
On 2010-03-26 05:32, Stephens, Kurt wrote:
I'd like to have all local postfix deliveries to
go directly into a TCP or UDS (named pipe) socket,
I wrote a small hack for this a few years back, and it has been in
production for a few of our customers ever since. (I believe it's fairly
portable a
35 matches
Mail list logo
