On 2010-07-14 Hendra . wrote:
I need a mail server with a catch-all address but limit the recipient
pattern to -keyw...@example.com, and forward it to an existing
local account.
The -keyw...@example.com is an auto-generated address by another
application so these addresses will not be
On 14/07/10 06:11, Hendra . wrote:
Hi All,
I'm new to postfix as well as to this mailing list, so I apologize in
advance for any blunder ;)
Need some expert advice on what I'm trying to achieve but encountered
a major roadblock so far.
I need a mail server with a catch-all address but
Hi,
how can I tell why the following mail has been rejected:
Jul 14 08:48:58 zarafa-xen postfix/smtpd[26113]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from ns.gbc.net[212.97.96.201]: 554 5.7.1 ns.gbc.net[212.97.96.201]:
Client host rejected: Access denied; from=joerg.hal...@flaig-hommel.de
to=m.b...@otec.de
* Joern Bredereck j...@bw-networx.net:
Hi,
how can I tell why the following mail has been rejected:
Jul 14 08:48:58 zarafa-xen postfix/smtpd[26113]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from ns.gbc.net[212.97.96.201]: 554 5.7.1 ns.gbc.net[212.97.96.201]:
Client host rejected: Access denied;
Disregard my posting... I found the IP in one of the tables Sorry
for bothering you!
Jörn
Am 14.07.10 10:06, schrieb Joern Bredereck:
Hi,
how can I tell why the following mail has been rejected:
Jul 14 08:48:58 zarafa-xen postfix/smtpd[26113]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from
Joern Bredereck put forth on 7/14/2010 3:06 AM:
Hi,
how can I tell why the following mail has been rejected:
Jul 14 08:48:58 zarafa-xen postfix/smtpd[26113]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from ns.gbc.net[212.97.96.201]: 554 5.7.1 ns.gbc.net[212.97.96.201]:
Client host rejected: Access denied;
Am 14.07.10 10:45, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
Do you have more than one access table/type? I have 7 access tables,
including hash, CIDR, regexp, and PCRE. I add comments to my regexp and PCRE
tables to make matching REJECTs in the mail log to a given filter possible.
Without such comments
Joern Bredereck put forth on 7/14/2010 3:50 AM:
Am 14.07.10 10:45, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
Do you have more than one access table/type? I have 7 access tables,
including hash, CIDR, regexp, and PCRE. I add comments to my regexp and PCRE
tables to make matching REJECTs in the mail log to a
Am 14.07.10 10:59, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
Anyway, the important thing to remember is that others may see the text, so
make sure it's polite.
Yes, agreed. Well... at least depending on...
On the flip side, if the table entry is for a chronic
pain in the butt professional snowshoe spammer,
Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org writes:
It might be helpful if you shared the logs of mail entering postfix
when you run your test command.
As basic as possible:
$ cat test.msg
To: jo...@sppn.nl
test message
$ /usr/sbin/sendmail -v -t test.msg
While figuring this out I ran
On 7/14/2010 3:59 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Joern Bredereck put forth on 7/14/2010 3:50 AM:
Am 14.07.10 10:45, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
Do you have more than one access table/type? I have 7 access tables,
including hash, CIDR, regexp, and PCRE. I add comments to my regexp and PCRE
tables to
On 7/14/2010 5:01 AM, Johan Vromans wrote:
Noel Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org writes:
It might be helpful if you shared the logs of mail entering postfix
when you run your test command.
As basic as possible:
$ cat test.msg
To: jo...@sppn.nl
test message
$ /usr/sbin/sendmail -v
Magnus Bäck mag...@dsek.lth.se writes:
On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 at 09:11 CEST,
Dieter Kluenter die...@dkluenter.de wrote:
I have added a private restriction class to main.cf
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/distribution_lists.cf,
Il 14/07/2010 04:57, Sahil Tandon ha scritto:
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 04:50:11 +0200, Amedeo Rinaldo wrote:
..[CUT]..
Is there a simple way to get the reverse hostname back ?
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#check_reverse_client_hostname_access
..so simple :) Thank you Sahil ..
But..
Postfix prior version 2.3 allowed this using regexp transport_maps:
/^(.*)@(.*)$/smtp:[${2}.smtp.transport.company.com]
I'm looking for this result in postfix version 2.3+:
u...@domain1.comsmtp:[domain1.com.smtp.transport.company.com]
--
Thanks.
On 7/14/2010 10:21 AM, Amedeo Rinaldo wrote:
Il 14/07/2010 04:57, Sahil Tandon ha scritto:
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 04:50:11 +0200, Amedeo Rinaldo wrote:
..[CUT]..
Is there a simple way to get the reverse hostname back ?
On 7/14/2010 11:11 AM, Dusan Obradovic wrote:
Postfix prior version 2.3 allowed this using regexp
transport_maps:
/^(.*)@(.*)$/ smtp:[${2}.smtp.transport.company.com]
I'm looking for this result in postfix version 2.3+:
u...@domain1.com mailto:u...@domain1.com
Hello!
I've just upgraded a working setup from postfix 2.5.5 to 2.6.6 on a
Gentoo box. Since then, when postfix/local tries to do user name
expansion (as far as I learned from the backtrace), it segfaults:
8--
#0 0x11286469 in vstring_strcpy
On 07/14/2010 01:27 AM, Thomas Arnett wrote:
On Jul 13, 2010, at 7:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
What are the symptoms of the problem?
postfix/pipe[22169]: 5991748: to=u...@example.com, relay=dovecot, delay=1.9,
delays=1.8/0.05/0/0.03, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (Command died with
I think I have a configuration issue, but it looks like a strange one
on this end. Before going line by line, I thought I would throw this out
to the list.
I am attempting to set up postfix (send only) with TLS support. TLS was
compiled in and postfix does run, it does send mail in the clear.
* Theodore Durst tdu...@durstmedia.com:
I think I have a configuration issue, but it looks like a strange one
on this end. Before going line by line, I thought I would throw this out
to the list.
I am attempting to set up postfix (send only) with TLS support. TLS was
compiled in and
* Theodore Durst tdu...@durstmedia.com wrote:
Any hints?
When I started I found this quite useful:
http://souptonuts.sourceforge.net/postfix_tutorial.html
--
left blank, right bald
pgpQO8XkJLp9C.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:09:37 +0200
markus reichelt m...@mareichelt.com articulated:
When I started I found this quite useful:
http://souptonuts.sourceforge.net/postfix_tutorial.html
The tutorial, while useful, is nevertheless dated.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
On 07/14/2010 08:09 PM, markus reichelt wrote:
* Theodore Dursttdu...@durstmedia.com wrote:
Any hints?
When I started I found this quite useful:
http://souptonuts.sourceforge.net/postfix_tutorial.html
Please stick to the actual documentation, to avoid misunderstandings :
On 7/14/2010 1:02 PM, Theodore Durst wrote:
I think I have a configuration issue, but it looks like a strange one
on this end. Before going line by line, I thought I would throw this out
to the list.
I am attempting to set up postfix (send only) with TLS support. TLS was
compiled in and
mx1# postfwd -V
postfwd2 0.21 (Net::DNS 0.65, Net::Server 0.97, Sys::Syslog 0.27, Perl 5.008009
on freebsd)
mx1# postfwd --showconfig -f /usr/local/etc/postfwd.conf | egrep SNDR
Rule 4: id-SNDR_RATE_LIMIT; action-rate($$sender/10/60/450 4.7.1
SNDR_RATE_LIMIT); client_address-==;(.*)
then I
On 7/14/2010 2:26 PM, Len Conrad wrote:
mx1# postfwd -V
postfwd2 0.21 (Net::DNS 0.65, Net::Server 0.97, Sys::Syslog 0.27, Perl 5.008009
on freebsd)
mx1# postfwd --showconfig -f /usr/local/etc/postfwd.conf | egrep SNDR
Rule 4: id-SNDR_RATE_LIMIT; action-rate($$sender/10/60/450 4.7.1
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 07:56:36PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
postfix/pipe[15018]: A481A3B: to=u...@example.com, relay=dovecot,
delay=0.32, delays=0.26/0.02/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (Command
died with signal 7: /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver)
postfix/pipe[15173]: A481A3B:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:49:11PM -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#virtual_mailbox_domains
So what if a given domain is, instead, going to have addresses
forwarded back out to some other mail server?
If without rewriting, that's a relay domain. If addresses
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 17:08, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:49:11PM -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#virtual_mailbox_domains
So what if a given domain is, instead, going to have addresses
forwarded back
On 07/14/2010 10:29 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 07:56:36PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
postfix/pipe[15018]: A481A3B: to=u...@example.com, relay=dovecot,
delay=0.32, delays=0.26/0.02/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (Command
died with signal 7:
On 07/14/2010 10:29 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 07:56:36PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
postfix/pipe[15018]: A481A3B: to=u...@example.com, relay=dovecot,
delay=0.32, delays=0.26/0.02/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (Command
died with signal 7:
Phil Howard:
Every address in these domains will be rewritten to some other address
(not all with the same domain) and sent on their way. Some of them
will be rewritten to addresses that do fall into other classes for
some kind of local delivery (right now, in virtual mailbox).
You give
On 7/14/2010 5:09 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
Every address in these domains will be rewritten to some other address
(not all with the same domain) and sent on their way. Some of them
will be rewritten to addresses that do fall into other classes for
some kind of local delivery (right now, in
34 matches
Mail list logo
