Now this is the problem of all invites, especially those invites that
scrape my addressbook and invite everyone.
Should not all invites carry some header or any other identification ,
that list management software can automatically detect and /dev/null the
mails
Thanks
Ram
Ram put forth on 7/15/2010 1:29 AM:
Now this is the problem of all invites, especially those invites that
scrape my addressbook and invite everyone.
Should not all invites carry some header or any other identification ,
that list management software can automatically detect and /dev/null
Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 17:47:21, John A. a écrit :
Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 14:12:22, John A. a écrit :
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:42:42 +0200
John A. j...@edatis.com articulated:
I tried to use transport as following:
transport_maps = local.cf remote.cf
- local.cf
Hi,
Can I automagically attach a different disclaimer for each domain?
if so, how? Are there different options?
Adri
--
Adrian P. van Bloois
Postbus 2575 email: adr...@accu.uu.nl
3500 GN Utrecht voice: +31-(0)-30-68-94649
The Netherlands
* Adrian P. van Bloois adr...@accu.uu.nl:
Hi,
Can I automagically attach a different disclaimer for each domain?
if so, how? Are there different options?
Which program is appending the single disclaimer now?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité -
Hi to all!
I've a environmetn with two postfix server, with relaying scope.
If I send an email without domain:
220 *
helo test
250 relay2.A.com
mail from:test
250 2.1.0 Ok
it will arrive with the domain suffix A appended.
I want to send an email without
* Stefano Villa st...@pobox.com:
Hi to all!
I've a environmetn with two postfix server, with relaying scope.
If I send an email without domain:
220 *
helo test
250 relay2.A.com
mail from:test
250 2.1.0 Ok
it will arrive with the domain suffix
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 18:38, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Phil Howard:
Every address in these domains will be rewritten to some other address
(not all with the same domain) and sent on their way. Some of them
will be rewritten to addresses that do fall into other classes for
* Stefan Foerster cite+postfix-us...@incertum.net:
While I agree that it is totally obvious that table are re-read as
soon as a new proxymap(8) process is spawned, on a resonably busy
system, this won't happen too often. So getting a definitive answer on
that one would still be helpful.
Has
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Stefan Foerster cite+postfix-us...@incertum.net:
While I agree that it is totally obvious that table are re-read as
soon as a new proxymap(8) process is spawned, on a resonably busy
system, this won't happen too often. So getting a definitive answer on
that one would
Phil Howard:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 18:38, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Phil Howard:
Every address in these domains will be rewritten to some other address
(not all with the same domain) and sent on their way. ?Some of them
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:53, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Phil Howard:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 18:38, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Phil Howard:
Every address in these domains will be rewritten to some other
Phil Howard:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:53, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Phil Howard:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 18:38, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Phil Howard:
Every address in these domains will be rewritten
As most of you guys know. I use mailscanner. I would like
recomendations of what else to use. I prefer a all in one package like
what mailscanner does. It also utilizes clamav and spamassion. The
problem is most of the information I find on the net is outdated or
for projects that stops.
In http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html this text ...
A null client is a machine that can only send mail. It receives no
mail from the network, and it does not deliver any mail locally. A
null client typically uses POP, IMAP or NFS for mailbox access.
... is confusing (the
Phil Howard:
This new server only needs to send mail.
Then is is a null MAIL client.
Wietse
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 14:17, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 06:38:17PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Phil Howard:
Every address in these domains will be rewritten to some other address
(not all with the same domain) and sent on their way.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:31:36PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Also, only use proxymap for IPC based tables (ldap, mysql, pgsql, tcp, ...),
do not use proxymap for indexed files, cidr tables, pcre/regexp tables,
It depends on what the trade-offs are. I know of one user with
very
Use greylisting, eg postgrey and set it up to work before amavisd-new
or mailscanner.
2010/7/15 Josh Cason joc...@mychoice.cc
As most of you guys know. I use mailscanner. I would like recomendations of
what else to use. I prefer a all in one package like what mailscanner does.
It also
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:37:48 +0200
Von: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix
* Josh Cason joc...@mychoice.cc:
As most of you guys know. I use mailscanner. I would
Or sqlgrey, a fork of postgrey.
http://sqlgrey.sourceforge.net/
On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
Use greylisting, eg postgrey and set it up to work before amavisd-new
or mailscanner.
2010/7/15 Josh Cason joc...@mychoice.cc
As most of you guys know. I use mailscanner. I would
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:45:10PM -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
This is all documented Phil, please read more carefully, and if not sure
what something means, test your understanding in a test configuration that
does not handle live mail traffic.
Fortunately I have that test machine, now.
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:03:17 -0700
Von: Bradley Giesbrecht bradley.giesbre...@gmail.com
An: postfix-users postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix
Or sqlgrey, a fork of postgrey.
http://sqlgrey.sourceforge.net/
Or
Victor Duchovni:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:31:36PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Also, only use proxymap for IPC based tables (ldap, mysql, pgsql, tcp,
...),
do not use proxymap for indexed files, cidr tables, pcre/regexp tables,
It depends on what the trade-offs are. I
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:37:02PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
One might suggest that CIDR is not a good fit for this even if stored
just once, an IPC based server that walks trees rather than lists
would be far more suitable...
I agree that the Postfix CIDR implementation achieves
On 07/15/2010 12:29 PM, Steve wrote:
Or GROSS (the only greylisting application that I know working with a bloom
filter (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom_filter)).
http://code.google.com/p/gross/
Thanks for the link, what I see there is very interesting - I'll check
this out...
Joe
Hi,
does anyone know something about this error with postfix and amavis?
Jul 13 17:57:25 e200 amavis[27308]: (27308-05) Passed CLEAN, [209.132.180.67]
[213.165.64.20] linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org -
li...@imt-systems.com,mstev...@imt-systems.com, Message-ID:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 15:19, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:45:10PM -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
This is all documented Phil, please read more carefully, and if not sure
what something means, test your understanding in a test configuration
Morten P.D. Stevens:
Hi,
does anyone know something about this error with postfix and amavis?
Jul 13 17:57:25 e200 amavis[27308]: (27308-05) Passed CLEAN, [209.132.180.67]
[213.165.64.20] linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org -
li...@imt-systems.com,mstev...@imt-systems.com, Message-ID:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:02:52PM +0200, Steve wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:37:48 +0200
Von: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix
* Josh Cason
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:46 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: TROUBLE in process_request: Error writing a SMTP response
to the socket
What the
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 04:44:00PM -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
You are working too hard if you are trying to optimize mailbox
domains to alias domains when there are not yet any mailboxes.
I *know* certain domains will never have mailboxes.
You can make these virtual alias domains, but if
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:54:22 +0300
Von: Henrik K h...@hege.li
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:02:52PM +0200, Steve wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 15
Morten P.D. Stevens:
What the previous logfile record from process amavis[27308]?
Wietse
This one:
Jul 13 17:48:34 e200 amavis[27308]: (27308-04) Passed CLEAN, [168.100.1.7]
[80.101.24.220] owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org -
li...@imt-systems.com,mstev...@imt-systems.com,
Hello,
I'm using two instances of postfix and lately I've been getting a lot of
deferred email, any suggestions how to stop accepting email that can't be
delivered. I do have local recipients table, server should not accept email
that can't be deliver. Please help!
host# perl check_outmail
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Morten Stevens
IMT-Systems GmbH
Helfmann-Park 10
65760 Eschborn
Tel: +49(0)6196 95 48 10
Mobil: +49(0)179 66 38 401
E-Mail: mstev...@imt-systems.com
Internet: http://www.imt-systems.com
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Eschborn am Taunus
Eingetragen im Handelsregister
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 11:30 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: TROUBLE in process_request: Error writing a SMTP response
to the socket
Morten P.D.
Jeroen Geilman jeroen at adaptr.nl writes:
I completely agree that non-delivery to a (presumably dependable) MDA
should never error out, but I thought a soft solution would be better
than choosing the more extreme route (of altering working code).
I believe the code is not working as
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:10:32PM +, Thomas Arnett wrote:
Jeroen Geilman jeroen at adaptr.nl writes:
I completely agree that non-delivery to a (presumably dependable) MDA
should never error out, but I thought a soft solution would be better
than choosing the more extreme route (of
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:42:17PM -0700, motty.cruz wrote:
Hello,
I'm using two instances of postfix and lately I've been getting a lot of
deferred email, any suggestions how to stop accepting email that can't be
delivered. I do have local recipients table, server should not accept email
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:16:43PM +0200, Steve wrote:
If you looking for something that is beyond just being better then I
recommend CRM114 or DSPAM or OSBF-Lua. If you insist in having the AV
included in the Anti-Spam tool then use something like DSPAM.
I'd consider those as
Morten P.D. Stevens:
Jul 13 17:57:24 e200 postfix/master[27809]: terminating on signal 15
...
Jul 13 17:57:25 e200 amavis[27308]: (27308-05) (!!)TROUBLE in
process_request: Error writing a SMTP response to the socket: Broken pipe at
(eval 83) line 957, GEN79 line 78.
Well, you terminate the
Victor Duchovni:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:10:32PM +, Thomas Arnett wrote:
Jeroen Geilman jeroen at adaptr.nl writes:
I completely agree that non-delivery to a (presumably dependable) MDA
should never error out, but I thought a soft solution would be better
than choosing the
-Original Message-
From: Wietse Venema [mailto:wie...@porcupine.org]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 1:20 AM
To: Morten P.D. Stevens
Cc: Postfix users
Subject: Re: TROUBLE in process_request: Error writing a SMTP response
to the socket
Morten P.D. Stevens:
Jul 13 17:57:24 e200
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:09:43 +0300
Von: Henrik K h...@hege.li
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:16:43PM +0200, Steve wrote:
If you looking for something that is beyond just
Steve put forth on 7/15/2010 4:16 PM:
* if you feed wrong data to the Anti-Spam filter then the filter will make
errors.
Content (header/body) filters have always been error prone and always will be.
The key to success is if the error rate is acceptable. For users to train
them, they have
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:06:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I will say generically that for an OP who has the time, avoiding content
filters and using SMTP time blocking methods is probably more effective in the
long run and makes more efficient use of network and server resources.
You
47 matches
Mail list logo
