Le 07/06/2011 01:13, Wietse Venema a écrit :
St?phane MERLE:
Postfix installs its own sendmail command, to avoid breaking PHP
etc. This was a smarter move than having to re-educate people.
yes, I must agree on that ! (that's just confusing because the
/usr/sbin/sendmail is not a script but a
* Rich Wales ri...@richw.org:
If I enable postscreen and specify my choice of blocklists and whitelists
in postscreen_dnsbl_sites, am I correct in assuming that I might as well
remove any reject_rbl_client and permit_dnswl_client clauses from my
smtpd_*_restrictions, since they will now be
* Rich Wales ri...@richw.org:
value from a given list. (I won't go into the details, they would be
off-topic here, but it's nice to have this capability.)
It will probably start a flamewar, but I personally am interested in
your particular weights on the different RBLs
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
It sounds to me like you are saying that...
lookup result := special action |
(other action [,])* [special action]
No, I wrote:
One line NOT starting with REJECT or PREPEND etc., containing OTHER
ACTIONS (note plural) than REJECT or PREPEND etc.
Therefore: result =
Rich Wales:
Note that postscreen caches the results of successful tests,
so that it does not repeat every test for every connection.
This is controlled by the postscreen_mumble_ttl parameters.
Some caching may also be done by my DNS server too, right? This would,
of course, be
St?phane MERLE:
problem is not even coming from him ... it's just that I never had this
kind of thing (mail in the mailq but nothing in qshape on active or
deferred).
Mailq reports mail in all Postfix queues: MAILDROP, INCOMING, ACTIVE
DEFERRED, and HOLD. You were using qshape for ACTIVE
Wietse Venema:
Wietse Venema:
Michael Way:
it would be?:
if !/[[::]]user1\.home@work\.com$/
/./ user1\.home@work\.com Don't use \ in the replacement text!
endif
Looks like you want to replace all senders in outbound email by your own
email address. In that case it is
It seems my smtpd exchange server is still unhappy even with this last
solution. I'm getting:
550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender (in
reply to end of DATA command))
This follows your suggestion to put this in /etc/postfix/sender_canonical:
/./ user1.h...@work.com
Sorry I didn't read your e-mail before hitting the send button.
You are correct about it going into a loop, and the only way to
stop it is to remove the rules in main.cf and then postfix reload.
I'm wondering why you call it unsafe? Is this because it will
fill up your log files if you don't
Hi list,
Reading the archives I saw that there is a nice regexp with dynamic
hostnames available here: www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.regexp
Unfortunately this file seems to be unavailable at the moment for some
reason.
Do you guys happen to know from where this file (latest) version can be
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:46:57PM -0400, Michael Way wrote:
I have a setup where I use postfix to connect to my work smtpd
exchange server via TLS encryption and normal login authentication.
This smtpd server also requires that the From address in the
email header is from the same user
I can send emails via this system just fine using mutt or
whatever command line mail I like, BUT I also use fetchmail to
get email from our IMAP server. I then use a .forward file to
keep a local copy AND send a copy to gmail as a backup.
Ugly and complex, but, oh well.
Until they moved
Hi,
Le 07/06/2011 13:08, Wietse Venema a écrit :
St?phane MERLE:
problem is not even coming from him ... it's just that I never had this
kind of thing (mail in the mailq but nothing in qshape on active or
deferred).
Mailq reports mail in all Postfix queues: MAILDROP, INCOMING, ACTIVE
DEFERRED,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:38:44AM -0400, Michael Way wrote:
So why not just take MSexChange out of the picture? Set up direct
authentication to gmail. SASL_README.html#client_sasl just as you
did, setting it up to authenticate to MSexChange.
Have your .forward invoke sendmail(1) with
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 07:03:34AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Note the following difference.
postscreen caches that the client IS NOT listed in DNSBL.
It doesn't cache clients that are listed.
DNS servers cache that the client IS listed in DNSBL.
They don't cache non-existent DNSBL
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:40:18PM -0400, Islam, Towhid wrote:
virtual_alias_maps =
proxy:mysql:$config/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf,hash:/etc/postfix/vmailbox
Translated: look at the mysql first, then look at the vmailbox (db) table.
Except, this does not appear to work. In the old SuSE
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Бак Микаел mikael@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi list,
Reading the archives I saw that there is a nice regexp with dynamic
hostnames available here: www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.regexp
Unfortunately this file seems to be unavailable at the moment for some
reason.
Hello,
We have a postfix server which does forwarding messages to virtual domains.
B459E38562! 118003 Tue Jun 7 10:21:49
profs-cpsc-l-boun...@mailman.ucalgary.ca
us...@ucalgary.ca
us...@ucalgary.ca
On 06/07/2011 10:42 PM, Kai Wang wrote:
Hello,
We have a postfix server which does forwarding messages to virtual domains.
B459E38562! 118003 Tue Jun 7 10:21:49
profs-cpsc-l-boun...@mailman.ucalgary.ca
us...@ucalgary.ca
* Kai Wang kw...@ucalgary.ca:
Hello,
We have a postfix server which does forwarding messages to virtual domains.
B459E38562! 118003 Tue Jun 7 10:21:49
profs-cpsc-l-boun...@mailman.ucalgary.ca
us...@ucalgary.ca
In message 3qpvhy2tqszh...@spike.porcupine.org, Wietse wrote:
It sounds to me like you are saying that...
lookup result := special action |
(other action [,])* [special action]
No, I wrote:
One line NOT starting with REJECT or PREPEND etc., containing OTHER
ACTIONS
Things a beginning to become clearer to me, bit by bit. Please bear with as I
not an expert or well versed in postfix.
Yes, vmailbox contains a set of address (to address) mappings. They are
actually a combination of virtual mailbox locations as well as email addresses
of users where the
How would I specify all IPv6 addresses starting with 2001:638:700:1005
in a regexp table?
Regards,
wolfgang
Wolfgang Zeikat:
How would I specify all IPv6 addresses starting with 2001:638:700:1005
in a regexp table?
/^2001:638:700:1005:/, assuming a /64 or smaller subnet.
But I wonder why CIDR tables would not be a better solution.
Wietse
In an older episode, on 2011-06-08 01:21, Wietse Venema wrote:
/^2001:638:700:1005:/, assuming a /64 or smaller subnet.
Thank you, Wietse.
I have realized that I actually need to match all IPv6 addresses
starting with
2001:638:700:, but
/^2001:638:700:/
works fine, too.
Best regards,
Hello
Does anyone is running postfix in FreeBSD jails environement
with success on a production server ? I'm thinking of it
and would be interrested by any successful experience.
Thank you.
26 matches
Mail list logo
