Today I received a ticket for altering the way my Postfix server
handles mail and I don't understand it. The ticket / request is pasted
below:
**
According to RFC 4409 client mail submission to an email server is
supposed to use port 587.
Server to
* Carlos Mennens carlosw...@gmail.com:
Today I received a ticket for altering the way my Postfix server
handles mail and I don't understand it. The ticket / request is pasted
below:
**
According to RFC 4409 client mail submission to an email
587 is AUTHENTICATED submission and should be
preferred since more and more providers blocking
spam-bots by clsoing outgoing port 25 for homeusers
submission inet n - n - 50 smtpd -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes -o
smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
he is NOT requesting to
On 8/18/2011 8:53 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
Today I received a ticket for altering the way my Postfix server
handles mail and I don't understand it. The ticket / request is pasted
below:
**
According to RFC 4409 client mail submission to an email
* Carlos Mennens carlosw...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Matt Hayes domin...@slackadelic.com wrote:
Carlos,
This is a direct quote from a bot running in #postfix on freenode:
Port 587 is submission, for user submission of mail, NOT suitable for mail
exchange. See the
On 8/18/2011 9:13 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Matt Hayesdomin...@slackadelic.com wrote:
Carlos,
This is a direct quote from a bot running in #postfix on freenode:
Port 587 is submission, for user submission of mail, NOT suitable for mail
exchange. See the
Am 18.08.2011 15:23, schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
On 2011-08-18 14:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
587 is AUTHENTICATED submission
Says who ?
have you ever seen submission as open-relay?
if yes - where and why does nonone shutdown this machine?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2011-08-18 15:27, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.08.2011 15:23, schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
On 2011-08-18 14:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
587 is AUTHENTICATED submission
Says who ?
have you ever seen submission as open-relay?
if yes - where and why does nonone shutdown this machine?
Submission
Am Donnerstag, 18. August 2011, 15:23:28 schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
On 2011-08-18 14:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
587 is AUTHENTICATED submission
Says who ?
Port 587 is AUTHORIZED submission, NOT AUTHENTICATED.
A limitation to a local network ist also a kind of authorization.
On 2011-08-18 17:39, Thomas Berger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 18. August 2011, 15:23:28 schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
On 2011-08-18 14:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
587 is AUTHENTICATED submission
Says who ?
Port 587 is AUTHORIZED submission, NOT AUTHENTICATED.
Um, no.
RFC 4409, section 4.3 states that
On 8/18/2011 11:39 AM, Thomas Berger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 18. August 2011, 15:23:28 schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
On 2011-08-18 14:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
587 is AUTHENTICATED submission
Says who ?
Port 587 is AUTHORIZED submission, NOT AUTHENTICATED.
A limitation to a local network ist also
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jeroen Geilman
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 9:03 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Request For Port 587
This is now a Draft standard, meaning you'd better
On 2011-08-18 Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 2011-08-18 14:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
587 is AUTHENTICATED submission
Says who ?
Chapter 4.3 of RFC 4409, unless I'm misunderstanding something.
Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning.
Le 18/08/2011 14:53, Carlos Mennens a écrit :
Today I received a ticket for altering the way my Postfix server
handles mail and I don't understand it. The ticket / request is pasted
below:
**
According to RFC 4409 client mail submission to an
Le 18/08/2011 01:31, Steve Fatula a écrit :
- Original Message -
From: Steve Fatula compconsult...@yahoo.com
To: Postfix Users postfix-users@postfix.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 6:18 PM
Subject: Remove header on reinjection
Sounded easy (and probably is), but, don't
Le 15/08/2011 17:29, Drizzt a écrit :
Hi,
I have a setup whereby we check for spoofing. That is, anyone using an
envelope from in our domain is blocked. In a similar fashion we stop our
own hosts from spoofing others.
For reference:
- external spoofing:
check_sender_access: mysql
16 matches
Mail list logo