Thank you Wietse this was what i didnt` knew.
B?ny?sz Botond:
I would like to ask? if it`s possible to configure postfix to not
send mails to mime to and cc recipients
Postfix does not send to the To:/Cc: recipients by default. It
will do so only when you execute sendmail -t.
Wietse
http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL138067
The evidence section lists inetnum: 95.218.0.0 - 95.219.255.255, yet
spamhaus listed 93.218.0.0/15 (93 instead of 95)!
93.218.0.0/15 includes large parts of german Deutsche Telekom dialups :|
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung
WTF !
Am 04.05.2012 13:12, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL138067
The evidence section lists inetnum: 95.218.0.0 - 95.219.255.255,
yet
spamhaus listed 93.218.0.0/15 (93 instead of 95)!
93.218.0.0/15 includes large parts of german Deutsche Telekom dialups
:|
1) Should not happen but it did. No one is perfect.
2) I hope you guys don't just blindly trust one RBL provider? Postscreen allows
perfectly to craft weighted BL.
3) Instead of shouting out here has any one reported them their mistake?
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 04
* Steve stev...@gmx.net:
1) Should not happen but it did. No one is perfect.
2) I hope you guys don't just blindly trust one RBL provider? Postscreen
allows perfectly to craft weighted BL.
3) Instead of shouting out here has any one reported them their mistake?
It has been fixed.
--
On 2012-05-04 Steve wrote:
1) Should not happen but it did. No one is perfect.
2) I hope you guys don't just blindly trust one RBL provider?
Postscreen allows perfectly to craft weighted BL.
policyd-weight does weighted checks, too.
Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
Abstractions save us time
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 4 May 2012 14:34:45 +0200
Von: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: A major fuckup on part of spamhaus:
* Steve stev...@gmx.net:
1) Should not happen but it did. No one is perfect.
2)
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 4 May 2012 14:36:44 +0200
Von: Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.net
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: A major fuckup on part of spamhaus:
On 2012-05-04 Steve wrote:
1) Should not happen but it did. No one is perfect.
2) I hope
On 05/03/2012 07:45 AM, Kirill Bychkov wrote:
Hi all,
I need create server with 5 IP addresses (interfaces) and postfix(es).
The role of this server is relay.
If message delivered into my mail server on one ip address, for example,
172.16.35.35, so this message should be sent from same ip:
On 05/03/12 05:14, Rob Sterenborg wrote:
h2a name=credits Credits /a/h2
According to the POSTSCREEN_README, postscreen doesn't do greylisting at
all: postscreen and greylisting are different things. The below is your
patch adapted with a partial copy-paste from the POSTSCREEN_README.
Hi all,
Was wondering if anyone would be willing to share what DNSBL and weights
they are using with Postscreen.
Thanks,
Rod
Hello
I noticed 534 messages like the following on our MX server's log,
since this morning ... I need some clarifications please.
postfix version is 2.10-20120423
May 4 18:00:14 hp9 postfix/qmgr[13147]: BA27314E95DE: skipped, still
being delivered
Thank you
Am 04.05.2012 18:07, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
Hello
I noticed 534 messages like the following on our MX server's log,
since this morning ... I need some clarifications please.
postfix version is 2.10-20120423
May 4 18:00:14 hp9 postfix/qmgr[13147]: BA27314E95DE: skipped, still being
On 05/04/2012 06:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.05.2012 18:07, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
Hello
I noticed 534 messages like the following on our MX server's log,
since this morning ... I need some clarifications please.
postfix version is 2.10-20120423
May 4 18:00:14 hp9 postfix/qmgr[13147]:
Hello,
Instead of including the amavisd activity in the maillog, I want to have a
separate log file. I can't figure out how to get this working though.
For some reason, amavisd isn't writing to the log file that's defined in
/etc/amavisd.conf
If I do a directory listing, the log still shows
I am not sure that this is the right place to ask about NON-postfix
problems.
But, have you checked the log file permissions.
JohnA
On 04/05/2012 12:45 PM, Scott Brown wrote:
Hello,
Instead of including the amavisd activity in the maillog, I want to have a
separate log file. I can't figure
Frank Bonnet:
On 05/04/2012 06:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.05.2012 18:07, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
Hello
I noticed 534 messages like the following on our MX server's log,
since this morning ... I need some clarifications please.
postfix version is 2.10-20120423
May 4
On 2012-05-04 18:45, Scott Brown wrote:
Hello,
Instead of including the amavisd activity in the maillog, I want to have a
separate log file. I can't figure out how to get this working though.
For some reason, amavisd isn't writing to the log file that's defined in
/etc/amavisd.conf
If I do
On May 3, 2012, at 11:23 PM, Bányász Botond wrote:
Thank you Wietse this was what i didnt` knew.
A custom Policy Daemon might be able to achieve what you seek by inspecting the
message's 822 headers, and then rendering a verdict on it.
B?ny?sz Botond:
I would like to ask? if it`s possible
I'm having issues sending email to a public list because connecting to the
MX for the list takes too long. From the postfix log:
May 3 09:50:32 edge01-zcs postfix/qmgr[13714]: 54A1D1BD:
from=qua...@zimbra.com, size=1764, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
May 3 09:50:53 edge01-zcs postfix/smtp[14285]:
On 5/3/2012 6:54 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
...
For many of these systems,
the OS resides on a mirrored pair of local disks which see very
infrequent writes because every filesystem with significant flux is
physically resident across the SAN. Spinning disks draw power. Anything
drawing power
--On Thursday, May 03, 2012 9:57 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
I'm having issues sending email to a public list because connecting to
the MX for the list takes too long. From the postfix log:
This can be ignored, it was because of a firewall rule blocking the new
I've a Linux machine which is used as a final destination for test
emails. Some local inboxes are created, local delivery via Dovecot to IMAP.
I want this machine to never send out any email whatsoever. Never relay.
Accept inbound messages, deliver locally to IMAP - all that is fine. But
no
Florin Andrei:
I've a Linux machine which is used as a final destination for test
emails. Some local inboxes are created, local delivery via Dovecot to IMAP.
I want this machine to never send out any email whatsoever. Never relay.
Accept inbound messages, deliver locally to IMAP - all that
On 4 May 2012, at 17:00, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 5/3/2012 6:54 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
...
For many of these systems,
the OS resides on a mirrored pair of local disks which see very
infrequent writes because every filesystem with significant flux is
physically resident across the SAN. Spinning
I've received a mail having:
From:
=?GB2312?B?tfXBoyy2/rrP0ru19cGjLMj9us/Su7X1waMsy8S6z9K7tfXBoyy3/srOtfXB?=
I wanted to reject such mail with
/^.=\?GB2312\?B\?/
REJECT GB2312 in headers
in header_checks.pcre, but this didn't work. I don't understand because
postmap -q -
Vincent Lefevre:
I've received a mail having:
From:
=?GB2312?B?tfXBoyy2/rrP0ru19cGjLMj9us/Su7X1waMsy8S6z9K7tfXBoyy3/srOtfXB?=
I wanted to reject such mail with
/^.=\?GB2312\?B\?/
REJECT GB2312 in headers
in header_checks.pcre, but this didn't work. I don't understand because
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 10:03:35PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Vincent Lefevre:
I've received a mail having:
From:
=?GB2312?B?tfXBoyy2/rrP0ru19cGjLMj9us/Su7X1waMsy8S6z9K7tfXBoyy3/srOtfXB?=
I wanted to reject such mail with
/^.=\?GB2312\?B\?/ REJECT GB2312 in headers
The OP
Le 04/05/2012 19:42, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Frank Bonnet:
On 05/04/2012 06:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.05.2012 18:07, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
Hello
I noticed 534 messages like the following on our MX server's log,
since this morning ... I need some clarifications please.
postfix
29 matches
Mail list logo
