Re: Convert from basic to virtual

2012-10-22 Thread Noel Jones
On 10/15/2012 6:06 AM, Dominique wrote: Hi list(s), You asked this last week; the answer is still the same. http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/postfix-users@postfix.org/2012-10/msg00283.html -- Noel Jones A few years ago we setup a simple postfix+Cyrus Mail server in the

Re: stat=queue and /var/spool/clientmqueue

2012-10-22 Thread Simone Felici
Il 18/10/2012 17:45, Ralf Hildebrandt ha scritto: * Simone Felici s.fel...@mclink.eu: That's sendmail, not postfix. I know this settings shoud be referred to sendmail and shouldn't have nothing to do with this issue. BTW I'm asking here infos on how manage correctly these mails to

Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: MX vs A records (SOLVED)

2012-10-22 Thread Tom Kinghorn
On 18/10/2012 14:41, Noel Jones wrote: On 10/18/2012 5:04 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote: DO NOT send debug log files unless specifically requested. Normal log files are sufficient. And a friendly reminder that splitting required troubleshooting info up between multiple messages greatly reduces

Re: MX vs A records (SOLVED)

2012-10-22 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.10.2012 15:29, schrieb Tom Kinghorn: On 18/10/2012 14:41, Noel Jones wrote: On 10/18/2012 5:04 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote: DO NOT send debug log files unless specifically requested. Normal log files are sufficient. And a friendly reminder that splitting required troubleshooting

Re: MX vs A records (SOLVED)

2012-10-22 Thread Tom Kinghorn
On 22/10/2012 15:32, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 22.10.2012 15:29, schrieb Tom Kinghorn: On 18/10/2012 14:41, Noel Jones wrote: On 10/18/2012 5:04 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote: DO NOT send debug log files unless specifically requested. Normal log files are sufficient. And a friendly reminder that

Re: MX vs A records (SOLVED)

2012-10-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Tom Kinghorn: it would be nice having at the end of the thread the example config with corrected typo to help others which finding this in the archives! apologies. snip smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_ns_access hash:/etc/postfix/recipient_nameserver_host,

Re: MX vs A records (SOLVED)

2012-10-22 Thread Noel Jones
On 10/22/2012 8:39 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote: On 22/10/2012 15:32, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 22.10.2012 15:29, schrieb Tom Kinghorn: On 18/10/2012 14:41, Noel Jones wrote: On 10/18/2012 5:04 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote: DO NOT send debug log files unless specifically requested. Normal log files are

Re: MX vs A records (SOLVED)

2012-10-22 Thread Tom Kinghorn
On 22/10/2012 15:51, Wietse Venema wrote: Tom Kinghorn: it would be nice having at the end of the thread the example config with corrected typo to help others which finding this in the archives! apologies. snip smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_ns_access

Re: MX vs A records (SOLVED)

2012-10-22 Thread Tom Kinghorn
On 22/10/2012 15:55, Noel Jones wrote: On 10/22/2012 8:39 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote: On 22/10/2012 15:32, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 22.10.2012 15:29, schrieb Tom Kinghorn: On 18/10/2012 14:41, Noel Jones wrote: On 10/18/2012 5:04 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote: DO NOT send debug log files unless

Re: MX vs A records (SOLVED)

2012-10-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Tom Kinghorn: I checked the config and found that the lines did not end with a comma. As soon as I added it, the access rule started working and mails were redirected (i changed REJECT to REDIRECT) What program are you using to edit main.cf? Hi Wietse. This was an inherited system as

Re: MX vs A records (SOLVED)

2012-10-22 Thread Tom Kinghorn
On 22/10/2012 16:09, Wietse Venema wrote: Tom Kinghorn: I suspect there was garbage at the end of lines. Postfix logs warnings in the maillog file when smtpd_xxx_restrictions contains unrecognized content. Wietse Thanks for the response Wietse. Thanks to all who helped. regards Tom

Latest package for RHEL6

2012-10-22 Thread Lima Union
Hi all! does anyone know where I can find the latest postfix release (2.9.x) for RHEL 6 x86_64 from some 'trusted' source? unfortunately Simon Mudd didn't post any package for this platform yet. Thanks in advance. LU

Re: Alert of unusually large queue

2012-10-22 Thread Jan P. Kessler
I'm not sure, if sending an e-mail about a full mailqueue-condition is the best way to go ;-) depends if you have no bulk-mail on your server it will tak enot too long to find a good value to adjust the 50 and as example if i have 500 queued messages i like to look if there is soemthing

Re: Latest package for RHEL6

2012-10-22 Thread Morten Stevens
On 22.10.2012 16:40, Lima Union wrote: Hi all! does anyone know where I can find the latest postfix release (2.9.x) for RHEL 6 x86_64 from some 'trusted' source? unfortunately Simon Mudd didn't post any package for this platform yet. Thanks in advance. LU Hi, I have backported Postfix 2.9.x

Re: Alert of unusually large queue

2012-10-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Jan P. Kessler: As mentioned by other posters you should set up a real monitoring system, that periodically checks your queue or generates an alert (e.g. snmp trap) on the server which does not rely on the mechanism that you are trying to monitor (here smtp). To monitor an SMTP server, try to

Re: Latest package for RHEL6

2012-10-22 Thread Patrick Lists
On 10/22/2012 04:56 PM, Morten Stevens wrote: [snip] I have backported Postfix 2.9.x for my company and I am also package maintainer for Fedora. Here are my latest builds for el6: http://mstevens.fedorapeople.org/el6/postfix/ Would you mind making the SRPM also available? Regards, Patrick

Re: Latest package for RHEL6

2012-10-22 Thread Patrick Lists
On 10/22/2012 05:29 PM, Patrick Lists wrote: On 10/22/2012 04:56 PM, Morten Stevens wrote: [snip] I have backported Postfix 2.9.x for my company and I am also package maintainer for Fedora. Here are my latest builds for el6: http://mstevens.fedorapeople.org/el6/postfix/ Would you mind

Re: Latest package for RHEL6

2012-10-22 Thread Lima Union
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Morten Stevens mstev...@imt-systems.com wrote: On 22.10.2012 16:40, Lima Union wrote: Hi all! does anyone know where I can find the latest postfix release (2.9.x) for RHEL 6 x86_64 from some 'trusted' source? unfortunately Simon Mudd didn't post any package

RE: Alert of unusually large queue

2012-10-22 Thread James Day
-Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jan P. Kessler Sent: 22 October 2012 15:44 To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Alert of unusually large queue I'm not sure, if sending an e-mail about a full

Re: Any best practices for stacking filters?

2012-10-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: wie...@porcupine.org wrote: It's much easier to tell people not to use Milters before a proxy filter... If you use the milter after the proxy server, which is what I'm currently doing, then I result in the following problem: You just confirmed the limitation that I

ESMTP: keys and passwords

2012-10-22 Thread thorsopia
Hello, I'm trying to configure ESMTP using this guide [1]. $ touch smtpd.key $ chmod 600 smtpd.key $ openssl genrsa 4096 smtpd.key $ openssl req -new -key smtpd.key -x509 -days 730 -out smtpd.crt ... If you enter '.', the field will be left blank. - Country Name (2 letter code) [AU]:. State

Re: ESMTP: keys and passwords

2012-10-22 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.10.2012 21:45, schrieb thorso...@lavabit.com: Hello, The above generated a 1024 bit RSA private key. How to create a 4096 bit key? the following is for 2048 bit replace 2048 by whatever you want alter the template for your needs (partly german) this is a script/remplate i am using

Re: Any best practices for stacking filters?

2012-10-22 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, October 22, 2012 3:33 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: One suggestion I can make is to avoid mixing mail streams from outside with mail streams from inside, before your mail is signed. For example, - Use before-queue filters for mail from outside so that you

Re: Any best practices for stacking filters?

2012-10-22 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, October 22, 2012 1:03 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com wrote: Hi Wieste, Wietse even. Sorry. ;) -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Sr. Member of Technical Staff Zimbra, Inc A Division of VMware, Inc. Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and

Re: Any best practices for stacking filters?

2012-10-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: --On Monday, October 22, 2012 3:33 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: One suggestion I can make is to avoid mixing mail streams from outside with mail streams from inside, before your mail is signed. For example, - Use before-queue filters for

Re: Any best practices for stacking filters?

2012-10-22 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, October 22, 2012 4:24 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: My example CAN sign mail with dkim-milter before it hits the Amavis filter. Your example CANNOT sign mail with dkim-milter before it hits the Amavis filter. I believe what you are saying is that I should

Re: Any best practices for stacking filters?

2012-10-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: --On Monday, October 22, 2012 4:24 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: My example CAN sign mail with dkim-milter before it hits the Amavis filter. Your example CANNOT sign mail with dkim-milter before it hits the Amavis filter. I believe what

Re: local_header_rewrite_clients behaving weird

2012-10-22 Thread Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 But as a matter of fact, both test clients are covered by permit_inet_interfaces, the default for local_header_rewrite_cients. Plus, rewrites stopped working without changing Postfix version or config. OK, can it. I got it.

Re: postfix SMTP AUTH

2012-10-22 Thread William Holt
Hi Rob, thanks. I use the reserved adresses because I'm testing the box via local net (my laptop), I have everything setup straight through GoDaddy to my router I just forward the ports when I'm ready. I'll check out the smtpd_sasl_local_domain = $myhostname problem. By the way, do you know of

Re: Any best practices for stacking filters?

2012-10-22 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, October 22, 2012 5:09 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: 1) Use the before-queue filter for mail from outside: external clients - smtpd - Amavis ... 2) Use the after-queue filter for mail from inside: internal clients - smtpd

Re: Any best practices for stacking filters?

2012-10-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: --On Monday, October 22, 2012 5:09 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: 1) Use the before-queue filter for mail from outside: external clients - smtpd - Amavis ... 2) Use the after-queue filter for mail from inside:

Re: Any best practices for stacking filters?

2012-10-22 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, October 22, 2012 6:17 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Quanah Gibson-Mount: --On Monday, October 22, 2012 5:09 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: 1) Use the before-queue filter for mail from outside: external

Re: postfix SMTP AUTH

2012-10-22 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
See below ... * William Holt holt.william.aa...@gmail.com: Hi Rob, thanks. I use the reserved adresses because I'm testing the box via local net (my laptop), I have everything setup straight through GoDaddy to my router I just forward the ports when I'm ready. I'll check out the

Re: postfix SMTP AUTH

2012-10-22 Thread William Holt
P.S. I'm sorry I looked quickly and thought your name was Rob, forgive me Patrick. I'm reading your book, I like it. I also use the postfix web site and debian-wiki/arch-wiki. On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 5:53 PM, William Holt holt.william.aa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rob, thanks. I use the reserved

Re: Any best practices for stacking filters?

2012-10-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: --On Monday, October 22, 2012 6:17 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Quanah Gibson-Mount: --On Monday, October 22, 2012 5:09 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: 1) Use the before-queue filter for mail from outside: