On 30 Apr 2015, at 08:25, Birta Levente blevi.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29/04/2015 20:56, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:53:00PM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
I see many SSL_connect error for different domains which mail service hosted
at microsoft:
Apr 28 10:32:12 srv1
On 30/04/2015 09:36, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
On 30 Apr 2015, at 08:25, Birta Levente blevi.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29/04/2015 20:56, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:53:00PM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
I see many SSL_connect error for different domains which mail
service
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 09:25:48AM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
Perhaps some sort of middle-box is interfering with TLS on your
end. Also, what version of OpenSSL are you using?
Well your end can be anywhere between you and the Microsoft email
hosting mail servers.
I make a test on another
On 30 Apr 2015, at 08:46, Birta Levente blevi.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Looked at the mailing list archive I resolved with smtp_tls_policy_maps =
hash:/etc/postfix/tls_policy:
tls_policy:
irs.ro may protocols=TLSv1 ciphers=medium exclude=3DES:MD5
Instead of forcing TLSv1 (I would
On 30/04/2015 09:58, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 09:25:48AM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
Perhaps some sort of middle-box is interfering with TLS on your
end. Also, what version of OpenSSL are you using?
Well your end can be anywhere between you and the Microsoft email
On 29/04/2015 20:56, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:53:00PM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
I see many SSL_connect error for different domains which mail service hosted
at microsoft:
Apr 28 10:32:12 srv1 postfix/smtp[18296]: SSL_connect error to
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:09:36AM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
OK, I found the problem:
I had configured the smtp_tls_CAfile. Removing everything works fine.
Was the file malformed? I have a hard time imagining any non-empty
set of well-formed certs in that file causing the problem you
On 30/04/2015 10:17, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:09:36AM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
OK, I found the problem:
I had configured the smtp_tls_CAfile. Removing everything works fine.
Was the file malformed? I have a hard time imagining any non-empty
set of well-formed
Hello,
I'm using local transport and system user with maildir. But when I sent mail in
the log I see the following error
Apr 30 08:01:15 jira-srv01 postfix/local[20496]: warning: perhaps you need to
create the maildirs in advance
Apr 30 08:01:15 jira-srv01 postfix/smtpd[20530]: disconnect
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:12:33 +0300
Алексей Доморадов alex_...@mail.ru wrote:
But it's very uncomfortable to create maildir for each
user manually. Are there any workaround?
set home_mailbox to Maildir/, and create Maildir/{cur,new,tmp}
at directory /etc/skel/, so on next adduser/useradd it
Hi...
Thanks for your answer, but I need this only for a few accounts...
I thing use procmail or .forward rules...
Or other idea...
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-forward-mail-to-other-server-but-leaving-a-copy-tp76521p76569.html
Sent
@Nicolás
Fixed. Working. well 99%. The problem was actually stupidly simple. On my part
as usual.
station.master@quantum-radio SHOULD be station.manager@quantum-radio…. trust me
to pick the one bad one to test with.
So now the original syntax for the query works.
query = SELECT 1 FROM
On Wed, April 29, 2015 22:26, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
The fact that the same name fails HELO checks (which don't use the
default suffixes) is not unexpected.
Actually, my suspicion was that this was a case of cause and effect.
The reject due to the host name lookup failure was the result of
Postscreen is successfully blocking a lot of spam for us. Our DNSBL
settings are doing a great job, however I'm having one false
positive. One of our customers does a bit of business with a Chinese
firm. Their rep from this firm is using the nefarious 163.com as their
service provider. Of
On 4/30/2015 8:59 AM, Rod K wrote:
Postscreen is successfully blocking a lot of spam for us. Our DNSBL
settings are doing a great job, however I'm having one false
positive. One of our customers does a bit of business with a
Chinese firm. Their rep from this firm is using the nefarious
On 4/30/2015 10:15 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/30/2015 8:59 AM, Rod K wrote:
Postscreen is successfully blocking a lot of spam for us. Our DNSBL
settings are doing a great job, however I'm having one false
positive. One of our customers does a bit of business with a
Chinese firm. Their rep
On 4/30/2015 9:27 AM, Rod K wrote:
On 4/30/2015 10:15 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/30/2015 8:59 AM, Rod K wrote:
Postscreen is successfully blocking a lot of spam for us. Our DNSBL
settings are doing a great job, however I'm having one false
positive. One of our customers does a bit of
Further on this. Doing the forward and reverse lookups reveals this:
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;133.201.62.95.in-addr.arpa.IN PTR
;; ANSWER SECTION:
133.201.62.95.in-addr.arpa. 106382 IN PTR
static-133-201-62-95.ipcom.comunitel.net.
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
62.95.in-addr.arpa.
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:12:33 +0300
Алексей Доморадов alex_...@mail.ru wrote:
But it's very uncomfortable to create maildir for each
user manually. Are there any workaround?
set home_mailbox to Maildir/, and create Maildir/{cur,new,tmp}
at directory /etc/skel/, so on next adduser/useradd it
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:29:29AM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
On 30/04/2015 10:17, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:09:36AM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
OK, I found the problem:
I had configured the smtp_tls_CAfile. Removing everything works fine.
Was the file malformed?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 08:28:21PM -0700, Tom Johnson wrote:
That aside, even with the wrong MX host, I still get successful
connections. Perhaps you're behind some sort of firewall that
proxies TLS and disconnects when it does not like the peer certificate:
$ posttls-finger -c
On Apr 230, 2015, at 2:41:53 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
And I've tried this, thinking that it could be an issue with the selected
ciphers, \
but it makes no difference:
smtp_tls_exclude_ciphers = 3DES DES
The symptom with broken 3DES with Microsoft systems is not a
handshake
On 04/30/2015 08:24 PM, Terry Barnum wrote:
I've been using pflogsumm but it's old and doesn't know about
postscreen. I'd like to see how many connections are being refused by
postscreen. What do you like? logwatch? awstats? other?
http://logreporters.sourceforge.net/
I believe logwatch now
I've been using pflogsumm but it's old and doesn't know about postscreen. I'd
like to see how many connections are being refused by postscreen. What do you
like? logwatch? awstats? other?
Thanks,
-Terry
Terry Barnum
digital OutPost
http://www.dop.com
On Thu, April 30, 2015 11:14, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Separately, various restrictions like reject_unknown_helo_hostname
and reject_unknown_sender_domain, ... use explicit DNS lookups
that do disable the search list.
Nothing to see here, the DNS queries are not unexpected.
I follow that.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:23:18AM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
Separately, various restrictions like reject_unknown_helo_hostname
and reject_unknown_sender_domain, ... use explicit DNS lookups
that do disable the search list.
Nothing to see here, the DNS queries are not unexpected.
Четверг, 30 апреля 2015, 21:53 +07:00 от Koko Wijatmoko k...@wijatmoko.name:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:53:30 +0300
Алексей Доморадов alex_...@mail.ru wrote:
If I correctly understood - path specified in the
home_mailbox would be relative to a user's home
directory. So with home_mailbox =
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 09:26:11AM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
The fact that the same name fails HELO checks (which don't use the
default suffixes) is not unexpected.
Actually, my suspicion was that this was a case of cause and effect.
Your instinct is wrong, and further effort in
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:14:08 +0300
Алексей Доморадов alex_...@mail.ru wrote:
Are we reading the same man page? :) I don't see any
notes about adduser.local in man useradd on CentOS 6
do your home work first, try it... if not work then upgrade your
adduser package rpm from centos 7 or latest
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:14:08 +0300
Алексей Доморадов alex_...@mail.ru wrote:
Are we reading the same man page? :) I don't see any
notes about adduser.local in man useradd on CentOS 6
do your home work first, try it... if not work then upgrade your
adduser package rpm from centos 7 or latest
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:53:30 +0300
Алексей Доморадов alex_...@mail.ru wrote:
If I correctly understood - path specified in the
home_mailbox would be relative to a user's home
directory. So with home_mailbox = Maildir/ all new
emails would be stored in the /home/webmaster/Maildir/
new. And
On Thu, April 30, 2015 11:28, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
There is no trailing dot. Postfix gets a name from getnameinfo()
which it passes for forward checking to getaddrinfo(). Whether
the C-library is doing any DNS under the covers is up to the C-
library. The name returned by getnameinfo()
30.04.2015 14:21, Koko Wijatmoko wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:12:33 +0300
Алексей Доморадов alex_...@mail.ru wrote:
But it's very uncomfortable to create maildir for each
user manually. Are there any workaround?
Postfix do create missing Maildirs by default,
there's no need to do extra
33 matches
Mail list logo